i shot those with my 135 f/2l.

however, a 70-200 f/2.8l would be a better choice i think because unfortunately the 135 makes it very hard to frame the car for some corners.

hmm..I was just wondering if my 17-85IS would be better than the 70-210...but I guess not then...

sloppy photoshop

http://1-2-3-direct.com/forum_stuff/prelude.jpg

I've seen better from you DaFonz :). Nice post processing. There's an electrical pole growing from it though.

Like I said.. sloppy :)

http://1-2-3-direct.com/forum_stuff/prelude_org.jpg

The original

lol! it looks like it had been pasted on :p where are those food pix!

Where's your bimmer dafonz?

da fonz, I would maybe crop that shot a little, and definitely cut out those ugly garbage bins ;)

Wow, what a difference between the original and the photoshopped one. I really like it :)

Oh, how do you sign your pictures like that? I always wanted to know.

I have a tablet so it makes it a fair bit easier to sign stuff. I signed it and then made up a custom brush taht I just add to teh photos.

Bah.. who needs a bimmer when you have a bike. *vroom vroom* :D

did another little photoshoot tonight with my buddies wrx. I've realized that I need some wireless flashes, and damn I love SLR's haha. WAY better than the S3IS I was using before :p

Comments?

http://img157.imageshack.us/img157/1...192copyyp3.jpg

http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/722...241copytf8.jpg

http://img157.imageshack.us/img157/9...305copypt6.jpg

http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/726...539copydy7.jpg

Someone's having a little too much fun with his 10mm lens :)

Nice shots! Really like the second one. Third one would be better without the light pole sticking through the windshield. Lighting balance on the last one is superb.

very nice colin :)

first three are great. the colors and angles are fun and interesting to look at. great job on the exposure. a suggestion would be to keep the same style of border for all those three images. this helps bring it together as a set.

ps-The second image is a tad too dark. its the same light and same car, try to match the color of the car in each shot.

the last shot stinks. background appears sharper then the car. theres all these funny shapes and aside from the car taking up the dead center of the image, my eye has no direction. my eye keeps bouncing to those poles, cause of their unique shape. oh, and the shadow of the tripod/camera is also smelly.

this is all imo.

haha, well I've gotta try it out! haha :p
Interesting...I appreciate the comments.

Ah... Nice. That makes sense :) Thanks!

I agree with [azn angel] on the last photo. Well, mainly meaning the tripod maybe should've been photoshopped out of the pic.

Besides that little detail :D I like all of them.

Good job!

3rd picture is really nice and pleasing. Angle is good, colours are fantastic and exposure is bang on. The poles need to be removed to make it perfect

how about something like this then?

http://img111.imageshack.us/img111/9...540copysb0.jpg

Edit: Tripod shadow removed

^ i still see the tripod ;)

i think the main problem is that the building is so ...interesting... putting a car in there doesn't help.

I sort of like the building. But I understand what Dennis means when he says it takes away from the car.

these are raw images right off the camera.
I didn't have access to PS when I uploaded them. Regardless, I can see so many flaws in the originals that I know what to do next time we get together for pics. Probably as soon as the next sunny day.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...7/IMGP0735.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...7/IMGP0737.jpg

http://www.northwestnissans.com/boar...3&d=1174371287

http://www.northwestnissans.com/boar...1&d=1174373508

"You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page."

Stupid Nissan snobs.

ah well

hypa, what rims are on your car? It's hot, especially when it's wingless.