^ yes.

^ wurd.

^ ok. thanks

heh, again, havn't posted for awhile! I think I'll just throw a bunch of my recent stuff in one post this time...

http://www.snapriot.com/index.php?ca...s/RPIJettaGolf
http://static.flickr.com/84/255243441_75229a140a_o.jpg

http://www.snapriot.com/index.php?ca...slavCorradoVR6
http://static.flickr.com/109/255252822_056228af14_o.jpg

http://www.snapriot.com/index.php?ca...avenworthdrive
http://static.flickr.com/80/260923991_ed6011e49f_o.jpg

http://www.snapriot.com/index.php?ca...rYamahaR6shoot
http://www.snapriot.com/gallery/CarS...TyloR6SR11.jpg

http://www.snapriot.com/index.php?ca...9SIRPhotoshoot
http://static.flickr.com/103/271353718_25c481edda_o.jpg

http://www.snapriot.com/index.php?ca...ormandFunction
http://static.flickr.com/81/276720614_51d2fe4694_o.jpg

and one from a bunch of pics that aren't up yet.
http://static.flickr.com/90/280183339_f8a3535ed8_o.jpg

wow nice setting,

where was the 855 empty building?

Not allowed to discuss that, and yes, I am seriously not allowed.

I know where that is....how in the world did you get in???

so he broke in.

:D

Trespassing...

CCC

41. (1) Every one who is in peaceable possession of a dwelling-house or real property, and every one lawfully assisting him or acting under his authority, is justified in using force to prevent any person from trespassing on the dwelling-house or real property, or to remove a trespasser therefrom, if he uses no more force than is necessary.

Something to think about.

The crime I believe, if convicted is a summary conviction.

Nice pictures though.

^^ A counter attack to this would be

"Sorry officer I got lost, how do you get out?"

lol, I wasn't trespassing, but you guys think what you want...

Actully, it's not hard to get in there on foot. I know someone who did a photo essay on 'entropy' there, and was not stopped by anyone. Taking a car in there without any connections would be difficult at best...

You don't have to be an officer to do that according to what it says there, lol.

whoah! a civic! that's a first

http://static.flickr.com/109/291904994_b9395c80a4_o.jpg

my buddy's e30 at an impromptu shot

Damnit I was gonna say that's a 318is until I saw you put that in the pic itself :(. Clean 318is!

In regards to exterior, what's the difference b/w the 318is and 325is for E30s?

Headlights, foglights, and chrome window trim for the 325/is.

been a lurker to this thread

some very nice pics here


anyways

heres my first one taken with buddys d70

comments welcome

http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c304/hurrior/cut.jpg

as it should be readily obvious to you, the first and foremost issue with the photo is the exposure. It is quite a bit over exposed. I think you used the flash which would explain how brightly lit the front of the car is versus say the hood, and this is the proper technique. However, I would say this photo should've been exposed less. The bottom line is if you only want to expose for one thing, it should be your subject. If you are with a tripod, you can do multiple exposures to expose properly the background and car seperately so that you can combine them through Photoshop.

Composition is alright. If you were dead set on that much background, I'd have moved the car closer to you in such a way that it maintained a similar angle (though a bit more side and less front would be good). Ideally it would encompass the right 2/3 width wise.

Good try and keep shooting!

I think what you said is correct.


But for this try he did a very good job... better than
90% of other new photographer where their night
shots are often VERY underexposed.

Quite impressive...the trick is to do it in one shot.

http://img399.imageshack.us/img399/9352/mg4468el4.jpg

After the Rain