Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... | | |
07-18-2008, 02:19 AM
|
#301 | Trollollolloing RS sine 2005
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 7,093
Thanked 2,471 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 473 Times in 132 Posts
|
i'm new to photography, and had picked up a XTi kit... i've been looking and been reading into reviews on what lens to buy... so far i'm pretty much set on these...
EF 50mm f/1.4
EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS
EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS
and i might pick up a used 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS just for the heck of it so i can walk arnd and not worry about damaging the other pricier lens...
any inputs?
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane I had some girl come into the busser station the other day trying to make out with every staff member and then pull down her pants and asked for someone to stick a dick in her (at least she shaved). | Quote:
Originally Posted by 1exotic Vtec doesn't kick in on Reverse. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma its like.. oh yeah oh yeah.. ohhhh yeah... OOoooOohh... why's it suddenly feel a bit better... ohhhh yeahh... ohhh...oh..fuck... it probably ripped. | |
| |
07-27-2008, 10:55 AM
|
#302 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 173
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Nikon 50mm f/1.4 vs f/1.8.
What are the main differences between the 1.4 and 1.8 besides price and speed? I heard that the 1.8 was slightly sharper but I'm not totally sold on that. Any answers would be appreciated, thanks.
|
| |
07-30-2008, 06:06 PM
|
#303 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
|
Have you checked Photozone?
50mm 1.8 http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikko...w--test-report
Optics: 6 elements in 5 groups
Diaphragm: Seven straight blades. Stops down to f/22
50mm 1.4 http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikko...ab-test-report
Optics: 7 seven elements in 6 groups
Diaphragm: 7 straight blades stopping down to f/16
Image quality is pretty close, looks like 1.8 has a little better center sharpness while the 1.4 has a little better sharpness at the borders. But still very close. You get a little better build quality with the 1.4.
I bought the 1.8 cuz it was cheaper. I figured I'd be using my Sigma30mm1.4 more often than my 50mm anyways.
|
| |
08-01-2008, 06:55 AM
|
#304 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 173
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
^^
Thanks for the answer, I ended up going with the 1.8 too because of the price. |
| |
08-17-2008, 08:53 PM
|
#305 | OWNER/C.F.O./MONEYMAN
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,486
Thanked 2,253 Times in 626 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
ok, its been months now and ive finally decided, its time for me to get an additional lens. the beginner 18-55 is great, but i want to explore looking at wide angles.
thoughts and opinions on this one?
Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM
i tried it out at the store, looks like a very clear and clean lens and straight out very versitile lens.
still a very very very beginner so tell me ur thoughts.
|
| |
08-17-2008, 09:26 PM
|
#306 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
sg! i just got that lens yesterday and tested it against the canon 10-22. it seemed to be on par for sharpness and quality so far and the perspectives you can have with it are pretty cool and for sure would make awesome photos. wide angle ftw
between canon and sigma ( i dunno if u have canon or nikon), the quality and sharpness was very close. i figured that for such a small diff in clarity, it didnt really merit me spending another 250-300 bucks extra.
quite happy with the sigma 10-20.
|
| |
08-17-2008, 09:50 PM
|
#307 | OWNER/C.F.O./MONEYMAN
Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,486
Thanked 2,253 Times in 626 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
i have a nikon w/ the standard lens kit 18-55mm
was looking and researching for a wide angle lens. this was one of the ones that i was looking at. Quote:
Originally Posted by moky sg! i just got that lens yesterday and tested it against the canon 10-22. it seemed to be on par for sharpness and quality so far and the perspectives you can have with it are pretty cool and for sure would make awesome photos. wide angle ftw
between canon and sigma ( i dunno if u have canon or nikon), the quality and sharpness was very close. i figured that for such a small diff in clarity, it didnt really merit me spending another 250-300 bucks extra.
quite happy with the sigma 10-20. | |
| |
08-17-2008, 10:06 PM
|
#308 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
you can always check pbase.com for sample shots of that lens or look here for comparison shots too: http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests
pretty complete i think |
| |
08-20-2008, 09:40 PM
|
#309 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
|
I'm assuming you have a Nikon D40/40X/60 since you have the 18-55 kit. You're pretty much limited to the Nikkor 12-24 F4 and the Sigma 10-20 since they're the only ones that will AF. The Sigma10-20 is great for the price and that 2mm really does make a difference on the wide end. I would highly recommend that. Just be aware with the Sigma problems and make sure you have a good copy.
|
| |
09-05-2008, 08:59 PM
|
#310 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
|
For the Nikon users, I'm trying to decide which lens to get, the 17-35 F2.8 FX or the 17-55 F2.8 DX lens. I have a D200 and realistically don't see myself getting a FX camera, however, you never know. In 5 years time, perhaps all consumer level DSLR's are full frame, and the DX lens would be bunk.
At this point, everyone is persuading me not to buy DX lenses any more, however, the reviews say the 17-55 is sharper, has better bokeh and the focal range is a bit more useful, though I could get by with the 17-35 and a 50 prime. Opinions?
Last edited by IMASA; 09-05-2008 at 09:01 PM.
|
| |
09-09-2008, 05:03 PM
|
#311 | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Van City
Posts: 137
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'm assuming that if your looking at those lenses, cost doesn't matter that much so I'd go 17-55 right away. Convenience factor plays a big role and you don't have to bring out your prime everytime you want to shoot a 50mm distance.
|
| |
09-10-2008, 09:14 PM
|
#312 | 2010 RS Top Food Critic Winner
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,410
Thanked 694 Times in 233 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 16 Posts
|
so.
wide as possible
sigma 10-20 f4-5.6
or
slightly less and more fixed
tokina 11-16 f2.8
mm....
|
| |
09-16-2008, 10:23 AM
|
#313 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,330
Thanked 2,976 Times in 1,275 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 25 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by kwazy so.
wide as possible
sigma 10-20 f4-5.6
or
slightly less and more fixed
tokina 11-16 f2.8
mm.... | Buy the Toke. It's a truly awesome lens, and the f2.8 is great for lower-light shots. If you get a wide angle I think you'll be going wider rather than longer. I wish I had the $$ for it...
The thing is built like a tank, too.
EDIT: Yes, I've used it before. Really, really nice.
Last edited by roastpuff; 09-16-2008 at 10:23 AM.
|
| |
09-16-2008, 01:42 PM
|
#314 | 2010 RS Top Food Critic Winner
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,410
Thanked 694 Times in 233 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 16 Posts
|
hmmm now where am i gonna find one new...or even used. :/
|
| |
09-18-2008, 03:13 AM
|
#315 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by kwazy hmmm now where am i gonna find one new...or even used. :/ | Broadway Camera carries the Tokina.
|
| |
09-18-2008, 05:45 PM
|
#316 | 2010 RS Top Food Critic Winner
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,410
Thanked 694 Times in 233 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 16 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by IMASA Broadway Camera carries the Tokina. |
Got a little toy from Taiwan. |
| |
09-18-2008, 05:48 PM
|
#317 | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
|
Hahaha...did you have someone bring it over? Did you pay less than local retail at least?
|
| |
09-18-2008, 05:54 PM
|
#318 | 2010 RS Top Food Critic Winner
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,410
Thanked 694 Times in 233 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 16 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin Hahaha...did you have someone bring it over? Did you pay less than local retail at least? | Yup, got it for just under 600$ CDN converted.. it's going for about 630 + tax etc local, but BC Camera is out of stock/backordered.
Last edited by K-Dub; 09-18-2008 at 05:58 PM.
|
| |
09-18-2008, 06:04 PM
|
#319 | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
|
Then my deal was pretty smokin'. |
| |
09-18-2008, 06:08 PM
|
#320 | 2010 RS Top Food Critic Winner
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,410
Thanked 694 Times in 233 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 16 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin Then my deal was pretty smokin'. | I know. What store, and why was yours like a whole 100$ cheaper?!
|
| |
09-18-2008, 06:11 PM
|
#321 | ...in the world.
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
|
From Japan. Retail was $590. I paid like $520 since I didn't pay the Japanese taxes...nor did I report it and have to pay Canadian doodies.
|
| |
09-20-2008, 06:05 PM
|
#322 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: YVR
Posts: 4,518
Thanked 1,275 Times in 434 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 24 Posts
|
Anyone know of a cheaper place to get a Sigma 10-20mm Nikon Mount? The cheapest I've seen it as at sigma4less and its about $500 with shipping. If I do end up ordering at sigma4less will i get raped by customs?
|
| |
09-21-2008, 03:46 PM
|
#323 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
|
I have a Sigma10-20 already and I use it a LOT. Is it worth getting the Tokina 11-16? The 2.8 is nice, but not that important for me and everyone says it's SHARP!! The 9 apperature blades should yield nicer bokeh and sunstars, which I find look terrible w/ the 10-20.
Last edited by IMASA; 09-21-2008 at 04:17 PM.
|
| |
10-08-2008, 12:31 AM
|
#324 | Media Officer / MOD
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 28,077
Thanked 5,752 Times in 1,725 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 63 Posts
|
Any Nikon fans who will suggest a $500 or less lens that can take some sharp crisp pics?
|
| |
10-08-2008, 03:26 AM
|
#325 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by aznboi128 Any Nikon fans who will suggest a $500 or less lens that can take some sharp crisp pics? | Nikon 50mm 1.8/1.4
Nikon 85mm 1.8
Tamron 17-50 F2.8
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:33 PM. |