Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
11-18-2008, 11:40 AM
|
#351 | | I subscribe to the Revscene NWS thread(s)
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,654
Thanked 331 Times in 242 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 6 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by [HuCk DuCk]  All kit lenses aren't great. But personally I'd say just shoot with the kit lens for a while, then you'll discover what you need rangewise, rather than buying a lens off the bat and finding out you went in the other direction. it'll also save the bank if you find dSLR isn't for you | True. You do have a good point. I guess if I were to pick the 17-85 route, I would either get the kit with 17-85 or buy a body and probably a used lens.
I was just curious to see if the 17-85 lens is even worth the extra money to start with (I see used ones going for about $300-$350).
| 
|  | |
11-19-2008, 04:55 PM
|
#352 | | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,152
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Failed 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
if you plan on the 17-85, don't buy the kit, just buy body only, cuz if you get the 17-85, the 18-55 will be useless
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by Car Chick
Other than that, sorry.. we all suck - there are no GOOD photographers here. We just like cameras. kthanksbye. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Fei-Ji haha i can taste the cum in my mouth | Quote:
Originally Posted by halogodv2 Personally speaking i would have cum inside her and then eat that pussy till she cums some more and then fucked her more | | |
| | |
11-19-2008, 05:02 PM
|
#353 | | I subscribe to the Revscene NWS thread(s)
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,654
Thanked 331 Times in 242 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 6 Posts
|
Yep - I'm getting just the body only. Someone pointed me to another interesting lens today though that I'm looking into - a Tamron 17-50 f/2.8. Supposedly a pretty sharp lens and appears to be frequently compared to the 17-85 in a lot of reviews. No IS and less reach, but supposedly better optics than a Canon 17-85. Researching now to see how it stacks up against the kit 18-55 and the 17-85.
| |
| | |
11-19-2008, 05:20 PM
|
#354 | | (╯°□°）╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,097
Thanked 11,223 Times in 2,294 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
|
here is the best unbiased review of the following and compared
Canon 18-55mm f3.5-5.6
Canon 17-5mm f4-5.6
Canon 17-55mm f2.8
Tamron 17-50mm f2.8
Sigma 18-50mm f2.8
| |
| | |
11-20-2008, 01:02 AM
|
#355 | | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,152
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Failed 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
huh? where's the review? or what are u talking about?
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by Car Chick
Other than that, sorry.. we all suck - there are no GOOD photographers here. We just like cameras. kthanksbye. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Fei-Ji haha i can taste the cum in my mouth | Quote:
Originally Posted by halogodv2 Personally speaking i would have cum inside her and then eat that pussy till she cums some more and then fucked her more | | |
| | |
11-20-2008, 04:25 AM
|
#356 | | (╯°□°）╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,097
Thanked 11,223 Times in 2,294 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
| | |
| | |
11-20-2008, 12:38 PM
|
#357 | | I subscribe to the Revscene NWS thread(s)
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,654
Thanked 331 Times in 242 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 6 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by darthchilli | I did see that review when I was researching the Tamron. It seemed like a pretty technical review and was way over my head so I scrolled down to the conclusion. I can't help to think that the reviewer may have been a bit of a Canon fanboi though...
I'm still undecided about whether to get the Tamron though. I can't find any used ones locally (I saw one on CL, but I didn't get a response from the seller) and I'm hesitant to buy one online just because of the quality issues I occasionally hear about in some people's reviews. Since a lot of the pictures I take are going to be indoors, and I'd prefer not to use the flash if possible, I still have my eye set on the Tamron. The Canon 17-55 f2.8 is way out of my price range.
| |
| | |
11-20-2008, 02:31 PM
|
#358 | | (╯°□°）╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,097
Thanked 11,223 Times in 2,294 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
|
theres not much out there for the tamron becuz its still a very sharp lens!
| |
| | |
11-20-2008, 02:58 PM
|
#359 | | I subscribe to the Revscene NWS thread(s)
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,654
Thanked 331 Times in 242 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 6 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by darthchilli theres not much out there for the tamron becuz its still a very sharp lens! | Yeah, no doubt. All the used ones I've seen are about $420 and up. Lens and Shutter have it at $499.
I guess I'm going to have to get something soon...right now I've got just a body and no lens. 
darthchilli - you still thinking about the tamron? If you want we can go in together and buy two and see if they'll cut us a bit of a deal...either that, or I can pick buy your 17-85 to hold me over for the time being.  | |
| | |
11-20-2008, 06:50 PM
|
#360 | | (╯°□°）╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,097
Thanked 11,223 Times in 2,294 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
|
the canon 17-55 has close to no flaws
which from reading many different reviews, it says the same hting
canons saturation and colors from their lens will of course be better than 3rd party in most cases
just that the 17-55mm has a price that rapes ur wallet being an EFS lens and not a L lens
u can buy the 24-70L for 100 more
and both are sharp as hel
| |
| | |
12-02-2008, 03:52 PM
|
#361 | | Media Officer / MOD
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 28,077
Thanked 5,752 Times in 1,725 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 63 Posts
|
where do you guys buy your lenses from? was checking out sigma4less.com w/ the current currency exchange its the same as broadway camera....
| |
| | |
12-02-2008, 04:23 PM
|
#362 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
|
If it's a Sigma lens, you might as well buy in Canada if the price is similar. At least you'll get the 10 year warranty.
| |
| | |
12-02-2008, 06:19 PM
|
#363 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
12-11-2008, 01:04 AM
|
#364 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 905
Thanked 41 Times in 20 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The following site is the best site every made for Canadian photography junkies...I ran across it on redflagdeals...not sure if its been posted...but check it.. www.photoprice.ca
I was able to use that site to price match and what not and i saved quite a good chunk of change on my Camera and Lens purchase today...pretty happy about it...
Best part about it is tax savings...learn to buy out of province...and not only do you get a cheaper price (since there are more options/places to buy from) but you only pay 5% tax as opposed to 12% :0)
The site is super easy to maneuver...so check it out and have fun!
BTW: I am in no way affiliated with this site....I just love it...Broadway camera couldnt even come close to what I got my gear for - the absolute best price they could do was still over $100 difference...
Last edited by JLC; 12-11-2008 at 01:05 AM.
| |
| | |
12-11-2008, 06:06 AM
|
#365 | | (╯°□°）╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,097
Thanked 11,223 Times in 2,294 Posts
Failed 1,143 Times in 311 Posts
|
different companies different structures
you are..a smart shopper
anyways..yea..i use that site too...but i always end up buying second hand...haha
| |
| | |
12-11-2008, 09:06 AM
|
#366 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever | Article link didn't work - just kicked straight to the lensrentals homepage.
But WTF... I didn't know the iPhone had an EF-mount! 
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | | |
| | |
12-30-2008, 11:16 PM
|
#367 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 5,988
Thanked 1,380 Times in 479 Posts
Failed 51 Times in 26 Posts
|
not sure if anyone asked yet but whats a good wide angle lens??
i got a big family and everytime we take a family picture its really hard to get everyone to fit into the picture since i dont ahve enough room to move the camera back anymore
i just got the xsi
Last edited by lilaznviper; 12-30-2008 at 11:20 PM.
| |
| | |
12-31-2008, 01:04 AM
|
#368 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
|
How much are you willing to spend? Canon's 10-22mm is really nice (buddy of mine has one, I'm jealous). Most third-party lensmakers (Tamron, Tokina, Sigma, etc.) have something similar. I've heard good things about Sigma's.
Or for about $30-$40 you can get an adapter off eBay that screws on the front of your lens like a filter and gives you ridiculously wide angles... expect image quality to be worth about $30-$40, too, but if it's for family portraits that are just going on Facebook or into 4x6 prints, you'd probably never notice the difference.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | | |
| | |
12-31-2008, 11:38 AM
|
#369 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 5,988
Thanked 1,380 Times in 479 Posts
Failed 51 Times in 26 Posts
|
probably gunna be blown up picture that will hang somewhere haha
willing to spend around 200-300ish dollars
| |
| | |
12-31-2008, 12:13 PM
|
#370 | | I subscribe to the Revscene NWS thread(s)
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,654
Thanked 331 Times in 242 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 6 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lilaznviper not sure if anyone asked yet but whats a good wide angle lens??
i got a big family and everytime we take a family picture its really hard to get everyone to fit into the picture since i dont ahve enough room to move the camera back anymore
i just got the xsi | What lens are you using right now? Just so we have an idea of how wide you want to go. A 10-22 is about $800 which is way up there.
Last edited by syee; 12-31-2008 at 12:15 PM.
| |
| | |
12-31-2008, 12:19 PM
|
#371 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
I'd recommend the Tokina 11-16 f2.8, but it costs around $700.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
12-31-2008, 12:43 PM
|
#372 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 5,988
Thanked 1,380 Times in 479 Posts
Failed 51 Times in 26 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by syee What lens are you using right now? Just so we have an idea of how wide you want to go. A 10-22 is about $800 which is way up there. | currently have the 18-55mm lens that came with the camera only Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever I'd recommend the Tokina 11-16 f2.8, but it costs around $700. | dont have a lot of money to spend
| |
| | |
01-01-2009, 02:14 AM
|
#373 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
|
Well, I guess you better enjoy that 18-55 then. Good camera gear is going to be $$$. Save up, you might be able to find a Sigma 10-20 for under $500.
| |
| | |
01-10-2009, 12:13 AM
|
#374 | | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,978
Thanked 185 Times in 129 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 5 Posts
|
Been thinking about the Sigma 17-70 for my Pentax K10D for a while now. Looked at some sample photos over on pbase ( http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/17_70_28_45_dc_macro) and have been quite impressed by the clarity and sharpness of the images.
After reading the lensrentals article on Sigma failure rates, I am now skeptical about this lens. Has anyone here had any experience with this lens and what might be a suitable alternative?
Thanks!
| |
| | |
01-10-2009, 11:23 PM
|
#375 | | Captain Happy Bubble is my Homeboy
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 312
Thanked 268 Times in 43 Posts
Failed 46 Times in 15 Posts
|
oops wrong thread :P
Last edited by po.chac.co; 01-11-2009 at 02:30 AM.
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:07 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
![[HuCk DuCk]'s Avatar](images/avatars/Looney_Tunes_-_Tweety.gif)
