Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
02-20-2009, 08:07 AM
|
#401 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
^^ Can't simulate a UV or IR cut filter either.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| 
|  | |
02-20-2009, 08:18 AM
|
#402 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
|
^True that.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira  Does anyone know how many to a signature? | ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | | |
| | |
02-20-2009, 08:26 AM
|
#403 | | I subscribe to the Revscene NWS thread(s)
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,654
Thanked 331 Times in 242 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 6 Posts
|
So sticking with a UV and Circular Polarizer (as most people will have one or the other or both), when is the ideal time to use them? I've always taken off any filters I've had when shooting into something bright like the sun or a light source. Polarizers I've used when shooting landscapes with lots of sky or water to get the nice deep blue of the sky and remove reflections off water.
Any other rules of thumb or recommendations on when to use these various filters?
| |
| | |
02-26-2009, 10:52 PM
|
#404 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 5,988
Thanked 1,380 Times in 479 Posts
Failed 51 Times in 26 Posts
|
^ i would also liketo know that
i got myself on a hand of couple filters from my friend
6pt star, polarized, UV, fluorescent
| |
| | |
02-27-2009, 04:39 PM
|
#405 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 5,988
Thanked 1,380 Times in 479 Posts
Failed 51 Times in 26 Posts
|
sweet i just got the 55-250mm IS and 50mm f1.8 lens for $440 brand new
| |
| | |
03-18-2009, 09:21 PM
|
#406 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Any advice on the following?
Tokina AF 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro DX
Tamron 17-50 F2.8
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC AF
will be used on a 350D
Last edited by ddr; 04-14-2009 at 11:26 PM.
| |
| | |
03-31-2009, 03:59 PM
|
#407 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,038
Thanked 166 Times in 40 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 7 Posts
|
So I'm getting a D300 body for sure...
Not sure if I want to spend the extra money for the 24-70 or go with the cheaper solution of 17-55mm.
I probably should add more info... I do a lot of event coverage and managed to get away with a 24-70 on my XTi for about a year. I have since sold that combo and I'm trying to figure out if it's worth spending the extra $400 to get the extra reach, but lose the wide angle.
Not sure if the 17-55 will make my life easier, but that's why I'm asking for your tips =P
Last edited by w00tgasm; 03-31-2009 at 05:10 PM.
| |
| | |
03-31-2009, 09:58 PM
|
#408 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
The 24-70 is a bit of a waste on a crop body, IMHO as you're wasting the wide part of the lens. The 17-55 is better if you want the wide. They're both really sharp lenses though. If you're happy with what you were achieving with the 24-70 on the XTi, then get the 24-70 by all means. You can use it on any future FF bodies too.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
04-01-2009, 08:37 AM
|
#409 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Cayman Islands
Posts: 2,945
Thanked 93 Times in 29 Posts
Failed 12 Times in 5 Posts
|
Anybody know where i can get my hands on a Nikon 35mm F1.8G in vancouver? Please PM me if you do! thanx 
__________________ LClock 1.62b pinkbaby(aka pinkbuggy): (_\._) :p
| |
| | |
04-02-2009, 10:25 PM
|
#410 | | NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 45
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSlowSS Anybody know where i can get my hands on a Nikon 35mm F1.8G in vancouver? Please PM me if you do! thanx | Went by London Drugs and they said only Langley and Maple Ridge had stock. Kerrisdale Cameras was completely sold out.
| |
| | |
04-03-2009, 01:02 PM
|
#411 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Cayman Islands
Posts: 2,945
Thanked 93 Times in 29 Posts
Failed 12 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Newtown Went by London Drugs and they said only Langley and Maple Ridge had stock. Kerrisdale Cameras was completely sold out. | sweet, thank you!
__________________ LClock 1.62b pinkbaby(aka pinkbuggy): (_\._) :p
| |
| | |
04-03-2009, 07:22 PM
|
#412 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,038
Thanked 166 Times in 40 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 7 Posts
|
Since I got used to the 24-70 on my XTi, I decided to go with it for my D300...
SuperSlowSS, did you end up finding the 35mm?
| |
| | |
04-03-2009, 11:36 PM
|
#413 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Cayman Islands
Posts: 2,945
Thanked 93 Times in 29 Posts
Failed 12 Times in 5 Posts
|
Yeap went to london drugs in langley and got it.  They have a lot of cool lens that are hard to get in vancouver.
Now the question... keep the 50mm f1.4g or not. haha
__________________ LClock 1.62b pinkbaby(aka pinkbuggy): (_\._) :p
| |
| | |
04-04-2009, 12:05 AM
|
#414 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,038
Thanked 166 Times in 40 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 7 Posts
|
Haha.
How much did you get the 50mm for?
If it wasn't long ago, just return it.
| |
| | |
04-04-2009, 04:48 AM
|
#415 | | NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 45
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSlowSS Yeap went to london drugs in langley and got it. They have a lot of cool lens that are hard to get in vancouver.
Now the question... keep the 50mm f1.4g or not. haha | How many did they have in stock? My laziness has prevented me from driving all the way out there but I can't seem to find the lens anywhere nearby.
| |
| | |
04-04-2009, 08:31 AM
|
#416 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Cayman Islands
Posts: 2,945
Thanked 93 Times in 29 Posts
Failed 12 Times in 5 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by -Paolo- Haha.
How much did you get the 50mm for?
If it wasn't long ago, just return it. | I got it at regular price. Trying to decide if I really want 50mm focal length on DX format. And if F1.4 is really worth it.. hahah Quote:
Originally Posted by Newtown How many did they have in stock? My laziness has prevented me from driving all the way out there but I can't seem to find the lens anywhere nearby. | oh zero now. Local camera stores will be getting more very soon. Just that I need to test this lens out before going on a trip.
__________________ LClock 1.62b pinkbaby(aka pinkbuggy): (_\._) :p
| |
| | |
04-09-2009, 08:56 PM
|
#417 | This title intentionally left blank MOD
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Above Sea Level
Posts: 8,549
Thanked 484 Times in 211 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 14 Posts
|
So, I'm looking for a budget zoom/macro lens to try out, and I've heard the Canon 70-300mm sucks, as does the 55-200/55-250 that Canon offers in the entry level.
Any thoughts/experience with the Sigma APO DG 70-300mm? http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc..._6_APO_DG.html
__________________
Classifieds Head Moderator
Automotive Service Technician
I don't have an anger problem. I have an idiot problem. | |
| | |
04-09-2009, 09:35 PM
|
#418 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,267
Thanked 2,930 Times in 1,249 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 25 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Alatar So, I'm looking for a budget zoom/macro lens to try out, and I've heard the Canon 70-300mm sucks, as does the 55-200/55-250 that Canon offers in the entry level.
Any thoughts/experience with the Sigma APO DG 70-300mm? http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc..._6_APO_DG.html | They suck in comparison to the L lenses, yeah, but they're better than the Sigma... spec for spec, Canon OEM lenses will always beat Sigmas in IQ.
The 70-300IS is actually quite good for the price, and the focal length + IS make it quite versatile outdoors. The AF isn't bad, either. IQ is pretty good, actually. Better than the 55-250, which is OK.
The 70-200 F4L actually isn't all that expensive on the used market. If you can cough up $600-650 that's the telephoto lens I would buy.
EDIT: Do some comparison searches online between the Sigma and the Canon lenses.
| |
| | |
04-09-2009, 10:01 PM
|
#419 | This title intentionally left blank MOD
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Above Sea Level
Posts: 8,549
Thanked 484 Times in 211 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 14 Posts
|
To be fair, I said entry level, not L lens. I'm hoping to cheap out a bit, and get something to see how zoom fairs, first, before stepping up to an f2.8L/f4L Canon 70-200mm. The comparable lenses I was referring to would be your $200-300 Canon lenses in the same price range.
The research I've done online seems to indicate that this particular Sigma lens outperforms what Canon offers in this price range. Hopefully someone's had some experience with said lenses to be able to give an accurate or first hand account on their use of said glass.
__________________
Classifieds Head Moderator
Automotive Service Technician
I don't have an anger problem. I have an idiot problem. | |
| | |
04-09-2009, 10:05 PM
|
#420 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 5,988
Thanked 1,380 Times in 479 Posts
Failed 51 Times in 26 Posts
|
i got the 55-250mm IS canon lens
to me it shoots pretty nice pictures but for about 300 bucks its a nice cheap lens
| |
| | |
04-10-2009, 01:34 AM
|
#421 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,038
Thanked 166 Times in 40 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 7 Posts
|
I personally like the 55-250 IS if you're sticking with a crop body and are on a budget.
They're starting to find their way back into stock as well =)
| |
| | |
04-10-2009, 09:08 AM
|
#422 | | I subscribe to the Revscene NWS thread(s)
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,654
Thanked 331 Times in 242 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 6 Posts
|
I've got a 55-250 as well and I like it.
The 70-300IS is probably double the price of the 55-250 though. I guess it comes down to how much you want to spend.
| |
| | |
04-11-2009, 04:17 PM
|
#423 | | Okanagan Mod Team
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Oliver
Posts: 1,343
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I think you meant to type 75-300 ($300) which does suck compared to the canon 70-300 IS which is a very good lens for the price tag of $700. I own both the 70-300 IS and the 70-200 2.8L IS and I like them both but actually find that the 70-300 has a wider sweet spot, and is alot easier to use due to the huge weight difference. All the reviews I've seen on the 70-300 IS are very favorable and I have to agree.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DA_TEG
cars dont just fall off the road into the air. | 92 240sx - 11.583 @ 120.72 mph - Ashcroft
05 Scion xB
| |
| | |
04-14-2009, 12:15 PM
|
#424 | This title intentionally left blank MOD
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Above Sea Level
Posts: 8,549
Thanked 484 Times in 211 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 14 Posts
|
Everyday walkaround, same general price...
Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5 DC Macro
or
Tamron 17-50 f2.8
Hoping to pick one up this week, possibly even later today.
__________________
Classifieds Head Moderator
Automotive Service Technician
I don't have an anger problem. I have an idiot problem. | |
| | |
04-14-2009, 12:19 PM
|
#425 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,283
Thanked 1,275 Times in 303 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
Tamron, hands down
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:04 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
