Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... | | |
06-01-2006, 12:31 PM
|
#26 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
it is
so you really have to see if it's worth it for you to get certain lenses.
you can always start out with a 70-300 lens that shouldn't cost more than 400 bucks or if you want a cheaper 70-200 f2.8 lens you can always checkout Sigma's version, as it is very good for the price as well.
and buy used, you'll save a ton of money that way.
__________________
Nikonian
|
| |
06-01-2006, 01:02 PM
|
#27 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: vancouver
Posts: 4,779
Thanked 129 Times in 31 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by DARKSUN I say go for a 18-200, its the perfect all-in -one
Wide for party shots and it has enough reach for 90% of the shots needed. You can geta deal on the New Tamron XR DiII LD (won the new Tipa 2005 award) or get a Canon version.
IS is great to have as well, but if your steady, you can get away with having no IS under 200 | 18-200? there's no good lense for the canons with this range, not even the Tamron
infact there's none that is good at this range
even the 18-200 VR from nikkor is overrated. distortion, bad bokeh, and a slow zoom. It happens to be not that sharp as well.
|
| |
06-01-2006, 01:05 PM
|
#28 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Go used. Both of my lenses are 2nd hand and the condition has been great while saving me $ as well.
|
| |
06-01-2006, 02:01 PM
|
#29 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Rikaro 18-200? there's no good lense for the canons with this range, not even the Tamron
infact there's none that is good at this range
even the 18-200 VR from nikkor is overrated. distortion, bad bokeh, and a slow zoom. It happens to be not that sharp as well. |
the distortion is no worse than any other super-zooms. at 18mm it's quite bad but so is everything else out there.
bokeh... find me a consumer zoom lens that has good bokeh, please. it's not just the 18-200 VR.
slow zoom... again, find me a super zoom that is faster than this. at 200mm , f5.6 is acutally pretty good. With VR you get a couple more stops for handholdability.
Sharpness, the copy I tried was good, about the same as the 18-70 ,and that says a lot about it because the 18-70 is pretty good for a cheap zoom lens.
If you compare any of these lense with the pro ones (any Canon L lens or any Nikon ED lens) then sure it's not as good, but it also doesn't cost 1500 or 2000 bucks.
At $899 (it was $799 when announced but stupid Nikon jacked up the price), find me a lens that goes from 18 to 200, with VR and AF-S, and produces similar image quality.
The closest is the 17-85 IS and that thing is nowhere near as good as nikon's 18-200.
Overrated? Only beucase of the huge demand.
__________________
Nikonian
Last edited by Bonjour43MA; 06-01-2006 at 02:09 PM.
|
| |
06-01-2006, 03:53 PM
|
#30 | RS Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Iran
Posts: 1,493
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hmmm....to combine these lens threads all into one or not.....that's the question....
~S
|
| |
06-01-2006, 04:15 PM
|
#31 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
We do consolidate a lot of threads around here, I dont think it'd hurt to have "The Lens Thread"
|
| |
06-01-2006, 04:50 PM
|
#32 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Go for it.
|
| |
06-01-2006, 10:04 PM
|
#33 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
where can You find used?
|
| |
06-01-2006, 10:46 PM
|
#34 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
| www.camerabuysell.com www.craigslist.org www.bccamera.com (buy/sell forum)
and if you don't mind buying things sight-unseen: www.fredmiranda.com (probably the biggest inventory of used camera stuff but most are in the US) www.keh.com
lots and lots of used stuff out there.
__________________
Nikonian
|
| |
06-02-2006, 02:13 AM
|
#35 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by MajinHurricane where can You find used? | Kerrsdale Cameras
Leo's
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
06-04-2006, 01:09 PM
|
#36 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
I checked the richmond location for kerrisdale... they were pretty rude to me when I asked.
Wheres leos?
|
| |
06-04-2006, 02:25 PM
|
#37 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
You need to go to the main store in Kerrisdale or check their website.
Leo's is on Granville st between Nelson & Helmcken.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
06-04-2006, 03:14 PM
|
#38 | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 1,539
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
|
Is there much of a difference between the Tamron and Sigma 18-200's?
I'm in the same situation, I want to get a better array of lenses for my 20d.
I was thinking of the 28-135mm IS, and the 10-22mm. I probably do a lot more wide angle than zoom, but I'd like to have the capability... so maybe a 10-22 and 18-200?
|
| |
06-04-2006, 03:49 PM
|
#39 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
06-04-2006, 08:52 PM
|
#40 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
I'm actually thinking about saving my bones and buying the 70-200 f/2.8L
Those things look sick.
|
| |
06-04-2006, 09:22 PM
|
#41 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by MajinHurricane I'm actually thinking about saving my bones and buying the 70-200 f/2.8L
Those things look sick. | Why not get a 600 f/4, they look even more sick.
|
| |
06-04-2006, 09:28 PM
|
#42 | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by MajinHurricane I'm actually thinking about saving my bones and buying the 70-200 f/2.8L
Those things look sick. | Hey I got 1200mm L4 in storage.. Trade you your first born for it!
|
| |
06-04-2006, 09:28 PM
|
#43 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
You know what, I should correct myself. If you want a cool looking lens you need to get a Nikon 200-400 f/4 VR. Nevermind that it doesn't fit your camera, it looks MEGA SICC though.
|
| |
06-04-2006, 09:50 PM
|
#44 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
oh, you mean this thing? nah it's not sick at all
it's GROSS
__________________
Nikonian
|
| |
06-04-2006, 10:30 PM
|
#45 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
|
You need an X-ray lens that will see through women's clothing!
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
06-04-2006, 10:33 PM
|
#46 | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Soundy You need an X-ray lens that will see through women's clothing! | I like the way he's thinking!
|
| |
06-05-2006, 01:36 AM
|
#47 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Soundy You need an X-ray lens that will see through women's clothing! | All you need is a very slightly modified SONY digicam with the Nightshot feature.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
06-05-2006, 01:43 AM
|
#48 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
sick as in image quality and performance :P
Last edited by Meowjin; 06-05-2006 at 12:29 PM.
|
| |
06-05-2006, 02:45 AM
|
#49 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
^?
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
06-05-2006, 12:43 PM
|
#50 | My hair is on fire!
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: bc
Posts: 2,083
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| canon 28-135 IS? or 17-85 is??
IM not too familiar with the IS system. How dependable are they for low light indoor use?
Ive read both of these lenses reviews and got mixed results. I cant afford L lenses so these 2 are within my budget range.
Anyone use these lenses before? can you tell me how the quality of the pictures are? Pros and cons of these lenses? Any rec. for other lenses?
Rite now i got a 28mm and a 50mm prime lenses. Both are very good for indoor use, im just getting lazy switiching em all the time when im taking party shots. so i need to replace em with one of the suggested lenses.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:50 AM. |