REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-01-2006, 12:31 PM   #26
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Bonjour43MA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
it is

so you really have to see if it's worth it for you to get certain lenses.

you can always start out with a 70-300 lens that shouldn't cost more than 400 bucks or if you want a cheaper 70-200 f2.8 lens you can always checkout Sigma's version, as it is very good for the price as well.

and buy used, you'll save a ton of money that way.
Advertisement
__________________
Nikonian
Bonjour43MA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2006, 01:02 PM   #27
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Rikaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: vancouver
Posts: 4,779
Thanked 129 Times in 31 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by DARKSUN
I say go for a 18-200, its the perfect all-in -one

Wide for party shots and it has enough reach for 90% of the shots needed. You can geta deal on the New Tamron XR DiII LD (won the new Tipa 2005 award) or get a Canon version.

IS is great to have as well, but if your steady, you can get away with having no IS under 200
18-200? there's no good lense for the canons with this range, not even the Tamron
infact there's none that is good at this range
even the 18-200 VR from nikkor is overrated. distortion, bad bokeh, and a slow zoom. It happens to be not that sharp as well.
Rikaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2006, 01:05 PM   #28
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
dub.dub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Go used. Both of my lenses are 2nd hand and the condition has been great while saving me $ as well.
dub.dub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2006, 02:01 PM   #29
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Bonjour43MA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Rikaro
18-200? there's no good lense for the canons with this range, not even the Tamron
infact there's none that is good at this range
even the 18-200 VR from nikkor is overrated. distortion, bad bokeh, and a slow zoom. It happens to be not that sharp as well.

the distortion is no worse than any other super-zooms. at 18mm it's quite bad but so is everything else out there.

bokeh... find me a consumer zoom lens that has good bokeh, please. it's not just the 18-200 VR.

slow zoom... again, find me a super zoom that is faster than this. at 200mm , f5.6 is acutally pretty good. With VR you get a couple more stops for handholdability.

Sharpness, the copy I tried was good, about the same as the 18-70 ,and that says a lot about it because the 18-70 is pretty good for a cheap zoom lens.

If you compare any of these lense with the pro ones (any Canon L lens or any Nikon ED lens) then sure it's not as good, but it also doesn't cost 1500 or 2000 bucks.

At $899 (it was $799 when announced but stupid Nikon jacked up the price), find me a lens that goes from 18 to 200, with VR and AF-S, and produces similar image quality.

The closest is the 17-85 IS and that thing is nowhere near as good as nikon's 18-200.

Overrated? Only beucase of the huge demand.
__________________
Nikonian

Last edited by Bonjour43MA; 06-01-2006 at 02:09 PM.
Bonjour43MA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2006, 03:53 PM   #30
Doc
RS Veteran
 
Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Iran
Posts: 1,493
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hmmm....to combine these lens threads all into one or not.....that's the question....



~S
Doc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2006, 04:15 PM   #31
Banned (ABWS)
 
Jomo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
We do consolidate a lot of threads around here, I dont think it'd hurt to have "The Lens Thread"
Jomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2006, 04:50 PM   #32
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
dub.dub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Go for it.
dub.dub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2006, 10:04 PM   #33
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
where can You find used?
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2006, 10:46 PM   #34
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Bonjour43MA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
www.camerabuysell.com
www.craigslist.org
www.bccamera.com (buy/sell forum)

and if you don't mind buying things sight-unseen:

www.fredmiranda.com (probably the biggest inventory of used camera stuff but most are in the US)

www.keh.com

lots and lots of used stuff out there.
__________________
Nikonian
Bonjour43MA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 02:13 AM   #35
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by MajinHurricane
where can You find used?
Kerrsdale Cameras
Leo's
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2006, 01:09 PM   #36
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
I checked the richmond location for kerrisdale... they were pretty rude to me when I asked.

Wheres leos?
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2006, 02:25 PM   #37
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
You need to go to the main store in Kerrisdale or check their website.

Leo's is on Granville st between Nelson & Helmcken.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2006, 03:14 PM   #38
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
MegaHurtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 1,539
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
Is there much of a difference between the Tamron and Sigma 18-200's?

I'm in the same situation, I want to get a better array of lenses for my 20d.

I was thinking of the 28-135mm IS, and the 10-22mm. I probably do a lot more wide angle than zoom, but I'd like to have the capability... so maybe a 10-22 and 18-200?
__________________
My feedback (25-0-0)
MegaHurtz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2006, 03:49 PM   #39
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Read the user reviews at http://www.photographyreview.com/
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2006, 08:52 PM   #40
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
I'm actually thinking about saving my bones and buying the 70-200 f/2.8L

Those things look sick.
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2006, 09:22 PM   #41
Banned (ABWS)
 
Jomo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by MajinHurricane
I'm actually thinking about saving my bones and buying the 70-200 f/2.8L

Those things look sick.
Why not get a 600 f/4, they look even more sick.
Jomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2006, 09:28 PM   #42
Blood tests positive for LOL mod
 
Mananetwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by MajinHurricane
I'm actually thinking about saving my bones and buying the 70-200 f/2.8L

Those things look sick.
Hey I got 1200mm L4 in storage.. Trade you your first born for it!
__________________
Tomasz Wagner | Mananetwork Photography
Portfolio | Le Fan? | Twitter | Flickr | Tumblr | 500px | Contact me


artofstance
Buy/Sell Rating
Proud member of G.R.A.P.E -- Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts
Mananetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2006, 09:28 PM   #43
Banned (ABWS)
 
Jomo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
You know what, I should correct myself. If you want a cool looking lens you need to get a Nikon 200-400 f/4 VR. Nevermind that it doesn't fit your camera, it looks MEGA SICC though.
Jomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2006, 09:50 PM   #44
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Bonjour43MA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
oh, you mean this thing? nah it's not sick at all

it's GROSS

__________________
Nikonian
Bonjour43MA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2006, 10:30 PM   #45
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Soundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
You need an X-ray lens that will see through women's clothing!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira View Post
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta View Post
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
Soundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2006, 10:33 PM   #46
Blood tests positive for LOL mod
 
Mananetwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Soundy
You need an X-ray lens that will see through women's clothing!
I like the way he's thinking!
__________________
Tomasz Wagner | Mananetwork Photography
Portfolio | Le Fan? | Twitter | Flickr | Tumblr | 500px | Contact me


artofstance
Buy/Sell Rating
Proud member of G.R.A.P.E -- Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts
Mananetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 01:36 AM   #47
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Soundy
You need an X-ray lens that will see through women's clothing!
All you need is a very slightly modified SONY digicam with the Nightshot feature.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 01:43 AM   #48
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
sick as in image quality and performance :P

Last edited by Meowjin; 06-05-2006 at 12:29 PM.
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 02:45 AM   #49
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
^?
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 12:43 PM   #50
My hair is on fire!
 
supra123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: bc
Posts: 2,083
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
canon 28-135 IS? or 17-85 is??

IM not too familiar with the IS system. How dependable are they for low light indoor use?

Ive read both of these lenses reviews and got mixed results. I cant afford L lenses so these 2 are within my budget range.

Anyone use these lenses before? can you tell me how the quality of the pictures are? Pros and cons of these lenses? Any rec. for other lenses?

Rite now i got a 28mm and a 50mm prime lenses. Both are very good for indoor use, im just getting lazy switiching em all the time when im taking party shots. so i need to replace em with one of the suggested lenses.
supra123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net