Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
08-11-2009, 11:23 AM
|
#476 | | YOU CANT CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: FL400
Posts: 5,866
Thanked 3,092 Times in 1,038 Posts
Failed 553 Times in 157 Posts
|
I'm just a very new guy in the field of Photography - just got my first DSLR back in December.
Currently using a Canon XS/1000D
Because of my love of shooting aircraft, I want a good telephoto lens, but also inexpensive.
I am looking to throw around max 500-600 dollars on it - are there any in this price range that I can consider?
__________________
Where the hell am I
| 
|  | |
08-11-2009, 03:00 PM
|
#477 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,330
Thanked 2,976 Times in 1,275 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 25 Posts
|
I would probably recommend the Canon 70-300IS - decent quality, pretty long reach and IS for shooting hand-held.
Here's one for 650: http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/va...316974924.html
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter  Damn, not only is yours veiny AF, yours is thick AF too. Yours is twice as thick as mine.. That looks like a 2" or maybe even 3"? | | |
| | |
08-11-2009, 05:06 PM
|
#478 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
EF-S 55-250mm IS? About $375.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
08-11-2009, 06:06 PM
|
#479 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,833
Thanked 6,596 Times in 1,169 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 23 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by !SG gotta agree with that, i love the 10-20 wideangle, but i can understand, for someone more professional, they would hate this lens. its af, and thus 1/2 the time it is hard to get it to focus right.
after playing with it for a good year now, i must say i almost never use it at its fullest wide angle. the picture is just too distorted. | I love my Sigma 10-20mm too. From what Senna has said though, I probably won't buy another Sigma lens. I do find my 2 Sigma lenses are a bit soft.
| |
| | |
08-11-2009, 08:14 PM
|
#480 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 5,988
Thanked 1,380 Times in 479 Posts
Failed 51 Times in 26 Posts
|
i got the 55-250mm IS lens and its awesome
good quality plus its an awesome lens to have for landscape pictures just like any other zoom lens and at the price its at its worth it
| |
| | |
08-12-2009, 08:31 AM
|
#481 | | I am grateful grapefruit
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Matsuda I love my Sigma 10-20mm too. From what Senna has said though, I probably won't buy another Sigma lens. I do find my 2 Sigma lenses are a bit soft. | i have this lens and it works great. it's not tack sharp, but you can't compare it to the canon one that is something like 1.7 times the price or something.
and the reason why you would get a super wide angle is for the crazy perspective, not to fill the picture with everything you can see.
| |
| | |
08-24-2009, 01:12 AM
|
#482 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
i have the 55-250IS. i'd have to say i was impressed by such a budget lens.
now i'm thinking about the 70-300 IS USM and the 70-200 f4L. how do they compare? reach is definitely swaying me and reviews deem the former as a 'hidden L lens'. but u guys keep tempting me with ur 'L' talk
| |
| | |
08-24-2009, 01:27 AM
|
#483 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
The 'L' will be sharper and have higher contrast for sure, and is built to a higher standard. The 70-300 isn't a bad lens by any means though. Test them out at Leo's, they have a good selection of Canon lenses in stock.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
08-24-2009, 02:50 PM
|
#484 | | I am grateful grapefruit
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
|
just wanted to chime in that the 70-300's focus rotates... so it won't work well with circular polorizers... while 70-200 f4L doesn't....
| |
| | |
08-24-2009, 03:13 PM
|
#485 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Richmond
Posts: 72
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever The casual user doesn't know what a high quality lens is capable of. Of course, budget constraints play a role, and Sigma does have some unusual focal lengths, but most amateurs have never experienced the sharpness or high contrast of a high end lens. | Senna, what do you think of Tamron Lenses overall??
I own a Tamron 17-50 F2.8 and I feel that it's really a great value lens, sharpness is pretty good as well overall.
| |
| | |
08-24-2009, 06:05 PM
|
#486 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
The Tamron 17-50 f2.8 and the 90mm f2.8 macro are really nice lenses, as is the new 70-200mm f2.8.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
08-24-2009, 06:48 PM
|
#487 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
so hard to pick, the three zooms mentioned above are all around the same price range
| |
| | |
08-24-2009, 10:54 PM
|
#488 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonone so hard to pick, the three zooms mentioned above are all around the same price range | Have you looked at the 70-300 DO lens? It's not much more than the 70-200 f4 IS.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
08-25-2009, 06:58 PM
|
#489 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,330
Thanked 2,976 Times in 1,275 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 25 Posts
|
I'd rather get the L rather than the DO, though. Just because the DO's aperture range isn't all that great and it's such an odd duck.
The F4IS is a killer lens in terms of image quality.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter Damn, not only is yours veiny AF, yours is thick AF too. Yours is twice as thick as mine.. That looks like a 2" or maybe even 3"? | | |
| | |
08-26-2009, 12:18 AM
|
#490 | | I am grateful grapefruit
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
|
after carrying around my lenses all day, that DO is looking mighty light and compact right now.....
| |
| | |
08-26-2009, 09:09 AM
|
#491 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by gars after carrying around my lenses all day, that DO is looking mighty light and compact right now..... | Seriously consider the 70-200 F4 L (with our w/o IS). I have the non-IS and it's not a very heavy lens at all to carry around. my friends are usually surprised how light it is and it's MUCH lighter than the F2.8 version (that thing is 3.5lbs i think?). I only find it gets heavy when i'm gripping my cam (50D) with the 70-200, and also my 580 EX II speedlight attached...
IQ is amazing on the F4, especially in the day time or outdoors. Colors just pop out.
The crappy thing is, once you have tasted what an L lens offers, it's tough to go back.... 
__________________
Toda Powered
| |
| | |
08-26-2009, 09:24 AM
|
#492 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
It's not tough to go back. It won't even occur to you to use a non-L lens. 
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
08-26-2009, 10:44 AM
|
#493 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever It's not tough to go back. It won't even occur to you to use a non-L lens. | that's the problem...all i look at are L lenses now...
i don't even want to look at the EF-S lenses since Full Frame would be nice down the road...LOL!!!
damn this money-pit called digital slr photography...
__________________
Toda Powered
| |
| | |
08-26-2009, 11:09 AM
|
#494 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
My photography professor's favourite saying was: "If you want to make a small fortune in photography, start with a large one."
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
08-26-2009, 03:16 PM
|
#495 | | I am grateful grapefruit
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mashimaro Seriously consider the 70-200 F4 L (with our w/o IS). I have the non-IS and it's not a very heavy lens at all to carry around. my friends are usually surprised how light it is and it's MUCH lighter than the F2.8 version (that thing is 3.5lbs i think?). I only find it gets heavy when i'm gripping my cam (50D) with the 70-200, and also my 580 EX II speedlight attached...
IQ is amazing on the F4, especially in the day time or outdoors. Colors just pop out.
The crappy thing is, once you have tasted what an L lens offers, it's tough to go back.... | ya, i'm still lost as to what to get.... honestly, after spending a day out with my kit (it's not even that big), i have a 40D, with a Sigma 10-20, 18-50 f2.8, and a recently re-aquired 50mm f1.8, my shoulder hurts... i can't imagine getting another lens in my collection and carrying it around the whole day.
| |
| | |
08-27-2009, 08:49 PM
|
#496 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,330
Thanked 2,976 Times in 1,275 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 25 Posts
|
Get a good backpack-style bag with a nice contoured back support pad. It really helps.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter Damn, not only is yours veiny AF, yours is thick AF too. Yours is twice as thick as mine.. That looks like a 2" or maybe even 3"? | | |
| | |
08-28-2009, 04:44 PM
|
#497 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
|
Yes, I used to carry everything in a shoulder bag, crumpler 6 million dollar, but ever since I switched to a backpack, it made carrying my gear much easier.
| |
| | |
08-29-2009, 12:12 AM
|
#498 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 5,988
Thanked 1,380 Times in 479 Posts
Failed 51 Times in 26 Posts
|
can someone recommend me a decent marco lens?
and possible to get for less than 600
| |
| | |
08-29-2009, 06:31 AM
|
#499 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,330
Thanked 2,976 Times in 1,275 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 25 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lilaznviper can someone recommend me a decent marco lens?
and possible to get for less than 600 | Yes, Canon 100mm f2.8 USM Macro. Awesome macro lens, and great for potraits too! Should be able to get for ~$600, check around on craigs!
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter Damn, not only is yours veiny AF, yours is thick AF too. Yours is twice as thick as mine.. That looks like a 2" or maybe even 3"? | | |
| | |
08-29-2009, 10:07 AM
|
#500 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
|
For a good macro lens look at the Tamron 90mm macro. Much less than $600 and its great!
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's | |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:36 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
