Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
09-05-2009, 07:39 PM
|
#526 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lilaznviper  i'm looking at lens and shutter for the tarmon 90mm and can;t find it on their website
anyone know anywhere else i mite be able to get it locally?
any input one the Tokina AT-X AF 100 f/2.8 Macro? | Surprised it's not listed on L&S' website, but they have it in the store. I was at the West Broadway location 2 weeks ago and it was there.
| 
|  | |
09-05-2009, 08:15 PM
|
#527 | | 2010 RS Top Food Critic Winner
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,410
Thanked 694 Times in 233 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 16 Posts
|
tamron for the f2.8. if you're staying 1.6x
canon if you want to go to full frame in the future, it'll be your investment.
| |
| | |
09-05-2009, 10:00 PM
|
#528 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
|
I borrowed the Tamron 90mm macro, and it works on my full frame. Its great... but loud... and it hunts when i was walking around in the evening at the night market.
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's | |
| | |
09-05-2009, 11:11 PM
|
#529 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
|
Yes the Tamron 90's focusing is super slow and is a bit noisey, however it's quite sharp and pretty nice bokeh for the price. I just used it today for some portraits and was quite impressed. The poor man's Nikkor 105mm F2.8 AF-S micro lens.
| |
| | |
09-05-2009, 11:15 PM
|
#530 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
|
I feel the same way about this lens, its very very very good at what it does.
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's | |
| | |
09-06-2009, 07:02 AM
|
#531 | | Banned (BBM)
Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: 416/604
Posts: 100
Thanked 10 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
if i got a 50mm f/1.4 prime lens, would it be able to take indoor pictures? what are the chances i might still be able to require a flash?
ie. dinner photo, as dim enough that maybe just candle style lighting.
| |
| | |
09-06-2009, 09:27 AM
|
#532 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by lol internet. if i got a 50mm f/1.4 prime lens, would it be able to take indoor pictures? what are the chances i might still be able to require a flash?
ie. dinner photo, as dim enough that maybe just candle style lighting. | If you use a high ISO setting (depending on camera body) you should be ok, but if your camera is a crop body, 50mm may be too long. With candle light, your subjects will still need to be relatively still.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
09-06-2009, 11:46 AM
|
#533 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever If you use a high ISO setting (depending on camera body) you should be ok, but if your camera is a crop body, 50mm may be too long. With candle light, your subjects will still need to be relatively still. | ditto.
I'd get a 30 or 35mm lens for indoor shots using a non-fullframe body.
__________________
Nikonian
| |
| | |
09-06-2009, 03:42 PM
|
#534 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
Just get the 24mm f1.4. Problem solved! 
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
09-07-2009, 10:23 PM
|
#535 | | フルコンボ
Join Date: May 2004 Location: YVR
Posts: 5,213
Thanked 3,985 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 8 Posts
|
Looking for a ultrawide,
Looking at these two options:
Tokina AF 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro DX
or
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Edit:
K ignore me, i went with the tokina. haha
Last edited by RCubed; 09-08-2009 at 04:38 PM.
| |
| | |
09-11-2009, 10:18 PM
|
#536 | | Got MOD?
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 7,918
Thanked 519 Times in 444 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
Any opinions regarding the Canon 80-200 F2.8 L? It's an oldie with no USM but 2.8 and an L droool.. Wonder if I should move into this from my 70-200 F4 L?
| |
| | |
09-11-2009, 10:36 PM
|
#537 | | 2010 RS Top Food Critic Winner
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,410
Thanked 694 Times in 233 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 16 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by RCubed Looking for a ultrawide,
Looking at these two options:
Tokina AF 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro DX
or
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Edit:
K ignore me, i went with the tokina. haha | yay tokina.
| |
| | |
09-11-2009, 11:59 PM
|
#538 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,242
Thanked 2,915 Times in 1,236 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 25 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever Just get the 24mm f1.4. Problem solved! | Great lens, the 24L! Get the Sigma 30mm f1.4 if you are crop body and have less $$. And go with a local retailer so you can pick a lens that doesn't have focus issues.  Quote:
Originally Posted by !MiKrofT Any opinions regarding the Canon 80-200 F2.8 L? It's an oldie with no USM but 2.8 and an L droool.. Wonder if I should move into this from my 70-200 F4 L? | I have one, and I love it! The color, contrast sharpness and bokeh doesn't lose to the 70-200 f2.8IS that my friend has, and the black is cool IMO. I would even say that color might be a little bit better. AF speed is pretty fast though it's not USM-fast. If you have a 70-200 f4L though I'm not sure if I'd want to move to this one. F4 and F2.8 isn't that huge of a difference, IMO, unless it's like indoors with no flash and desperately dark, in which you'd rather have IS anyways. http://www.flickr.com/photos/diondit...7619158977831/
This set was shot with the 80-200L during an ultimate game. No sharpening added in post, just a few WB/color tweaks if even that. Body was 5D2... the AI Servo ain't bad! 
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter Damn, not only is yours veiny AF, yours is thick AF too. Yours is twice as thick as mine.. That looks like a 2" or maybe even 3"? | | |
| | |
09-12-2009, 06:54 AM
|
#539 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,283
Thanked 1,275 Times in 303 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
Just a note, the 80-200 is no longer serviced by Canon. If something goes wrong, your stuck looking for third party repairs. great lens for the money, but its a gamble.
| |
| | |
09-12-2009, 02:26 PM
|
#540 | | Got MOD?
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 7,918
Thanked 519 Times in 444 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
Yeah the servicing was what worried me the most since my F4 L is almost new. Guess I'll stick with what I got  | |
| | |
09-12-2009, 08:49 PM
|
#541 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,242
Thanked 2,915 Times in 1,236 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 25 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 77civic1200 Just a note, the 80-200 is no longer serviced by Canon. If something goes wrong, your stuck looking for third party repairs. great lens for the money, but its a gamble. | Yah, I know. I'll take it when it happens. 
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter Damn, not only is yours veiny AF, yours is thick AF too. Yours is twice as thick as mine.. That looks like a 2" or maybe even 3"? | | |
| | |
10-01-2009, 08:08 AM
|
#542 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
So i took the plunge and purchased a new Canon 24-70 F2.8 L yesterday...
my wallet is hurting a bit, but i'm blown away by how good the image quality is with this lens!!!! 
__________________
Toda Powered
| |
| | |
10-01-2009, 08:32 AM
|
#543 | | Okanagan Mod Team
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Oliver
Posts: 1,343
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I love my 24-70mm, congrats. That and my 70-200 2.8 IS are the only lenses that leave my bag anymore.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DA_TEG
cars dont just fall off the road into the air. | 92 240sx - 11.583 @ 120.72 mph - Ashcroft
05 Scion xB
| |
| | |
10-01-2009, 08:37 AM
|
#544 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Slo40 I love my 24-70mm, congrats. That and my 70-200 2.8 IS are the only lenses that leave my bag anymore. | Yah dood, i love the lens! i've also got a 70-200 F4 and the pics out of both lenses are just amazing!
i was deciding between the 17-55 F2.8 IS (yup, i'm on a APS-C body), the 24-105 F4 L IS, or the 24-70...i'm glad i went with the 24-70 over those 2 lenses.
it would be nice if the 24-70 came with an IS version, but i'm sure they're working on it and it'll probably be a $2K lens at that point.
now it's time to look for a wider angle to fill the lower gap
__________________
Toda Powered
| |
| | |
10-01-2009, 08:41 AM
|
#545 | | Okanagan Mod Team
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Oliver
Posts: 1,343
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I find I don't really need IS on the 24-70 since it is a fast and mostly wide lens.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DA_TEG
cars dont just fall off the road into the air. | 92 240sx - 11.583 @ 120.72 mph - Ashcroft
05 Scion xB
| |
| | |
10-01-2009, 08:44 AM
|
#546 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
That is true and that was also another selling point for me to go with the F2.8
i'm guessing you must be on a FF body? i like the 24 as a walk around, but i find it a bit narrow for landscape shots (compared to my 17-85mm kit lens of course).
perhaps it's time to save up for the 16-35mm? or perhaps i should just go with the 10-22mm EF-S....
__________________
Toda Powered
| |
| | |
10-01-2009, 08:48 AM
|
#547 | | Okanagan Mod Team
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Oliver
Posts: 1,343
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Not FF yet, still on the 40D, but I'd love to get a 5D soon tho. I was thinking about he 10-22mm myself, but I wanted more distortion than it gives so I've pretty much decided on the 15mm 2.8 fisheye.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by DA_TEG
cars dont just fall off the road into the air. | 92 240sx - 11.583 @ 120.72 mph - Ashcroft
05 Scion xB
| |
| | |
10-01-2009, 09:04 AM
|
#548 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
the fisheye's are alway interesting to shoot with!
i just don't like the cost of the 10-22 EF-S...reviews seem kinda so so as well on that lens...guess i'll just use my kit lens in the meantime for wider shots.
__________________
Toda Powered
| |
| | |
10-01-2009, 11:41 AM
|
#549 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mashimaro So i took the plunge and purchased a new Canon 24-70 F2.8 L yesterday...
my wallet is hurting a bit, but i'm blown away by how good the image quality is with this lens!!!! | If you're impressed with the canon version, don't try the Sony Zeiss & Nikon 24-70 f2.8 lenses - you'll be disappointed.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
10-01-2009, 11:42 AM
|
#550 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mashimaro the fisheye's are alway interesting to shoot with!
i just don't like the cost of the 10-22 EF-S...reviews seem kinda so so as well on that lens...guess i'll just use my kit lens in the meantime for wider shots. | Tokina 11-16 beats every other APS-C wide angle zoom. Period.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:05 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
