Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
10-01-2009, 12:44 PM
|
#551 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever  If you're impressed with the canon version, don't try the Sony Zeiss & Nikon 24-70 f2.8 lenses - you'll be disappointed. | So the brick i just bought is 'lacking' compared to the Ziess and Nikor? 
and i've seen great reviews on that Tokina UWA for the APS-C's...looks like a great third party lens.
__________________
Toda Powered
| 
|  | |
10-01-2009, 12:55 PM
|
#552 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mashimaro So the brick i just bought is 'lacking' compared to the Ziess and Nikor?
and i've seen great reviews on that Tokina UWA for the APS-C's...looks like a great third party lens. | Yeah, the canon is the oldest design. It's fine on a 5DmkII, but due to the pixel density of the 50D or 7D, you'll notice that it could be better on the latter two bodies. It's a bit less sharp than the Nikon, and flares a bit more. The Sony is the sharpest of the three, but to me, it seems as if Zeiss sacrificed some bokeh quality for ultimate sharpness. I did a test shot with the Zeiss on a A900 body, and it is absolutely amazing, but the bokeh isn't as smooth & creamy as the canon & Nikon. The Nikon is probably the best balanced one, but there are rumours of a new Canon 24-70 IS, which should be much better.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Last edited by Senna4ever; 10-01-2009 at 01:03 PM.
| |
| | |
10-01-2009, 01:38 PM
|
#553 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Yup, just read up on those 2 lenses...they look pretty damn good!
but geez, the cost of the Nikkor is up there at $2G's USD. ouch!
i'm thinking of going with a full frame body in the future, hence why i purchased the 24-70 in the meantime over the 17-55 EFS lens. 
seems like a lot of people are happy with the Canon so i feel it's a safe bet. however, an IS version is probably going to hit the markets in the near future i'm thinking as well, but that should bring the price up quite a bit as well (add another 400bux?).
What do you think of Leica lenses? their image quality looks great from the sample pics i've seen so far.
__________________
Toda Powered
| |
| | |
10-01-2009, 10:33 PM
|
#554 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mashimaro Yup, just read up on those 2 lenses...they look pretty damn good!
but geez, the cost of the Nikkor is up there at $2G's USD. ouch!
i'm thinking of going with a full frame body in the future, hence why i purchased the 24-70 in the meantime over the 17-55 EFS lens.
seems like a lot of people are happy with the Canon so i feel it's a safe bet. however, an IS version is probably going to hit the markets in the near future i'm thinking as well, but that should bring the price up quite a bit as well (add another 400bux?).
What do you think of Leica lenses? their image quality looks great from the sample pics i've seen so far. | Leica and Zeiss lenses are on an entirely different level from Canon/Nikon/non-Zeiss Sony. Contrast, colour, sharpness, resolution & detail rendition are miles ahead. There's a reason why my Leica 35mm f1.4 cost $4500 vs. the Canon 35mm f1.4, which only costs $1500.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
10-07-2009, 11:00 PM
|
#555 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,113
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
|
wondering if i should change my tamron 17-50mm to the nikon 17-55mm
havent played with the nikon but the photos ppl put out with it seem to have better colours / contrast? sharpess is the same
| |
| | |
10-07-2009, 11:06 PM
|
#556 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
The Nikon has more contrast and should be sharper.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
10-10-2009, 11:47 PM
|
#557 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: richmond Lah!
Posts: 5,459
Thanked 474 Times in 224 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 36 Posts
|
I need some input for my next walk-around lens, other then the 18-55 kit lens that i have.
I'm thinking of a 17-85, what do you all think?
| |
| | |
10-13-2009, 06:45 AM
|
#558 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
|
My 40D came with the EF-S 17-85 IS USM, and I like it! :thumbup: For something packaged as a kit lens, it's pretty clean, and a good complement to my older EF 75-300 - nice to have a little overlap rather than a 20mm gap (I had the 18-55 with my 300D).
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | | |
| | |
10-21-2009, 04:57 AM
|
#559 | | 2010 RS Top Food Critic Winner
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,410
Thanked 694 Times in 233 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 16 Posts
|
Sigma 105mm f2.8 EX Macro
Any one have experience with it?
| |
| | |
10-21-2009, 08:55 AM
|
#560 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by LC21 I need some input for my next walk-around lens, other then the 18-55 kit lens that i have.
I'm thinking of a 17-85, what do you all think? | i had a 17-85 and sold it about a month ago.
you'll find that it's very soft from the 17-50 range. they're not too bad in the used market (price wise, as i find the BNIB prices to be rediculous).
focal range is great for a walk around lens though.
__________________
Toda Powered
| |
| | |
10-21-2009, 05:04 PM
|
#561 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Dub Sigma 105mm f2.8 EX Macro
Any one have experience with it? | It's okay, nowhere near as good as the Nikon 105 VR or Canon 100 IS.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
10-21-2009, 05:05 PM
|
#562 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
Tamron has just announced a 17-50mm f2.8 IS/VR, shipping immediately.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
10-22-2009, 08:51 AM
|
#563 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
^interesting...i wonder how it is, compared to the Canon 17-55 F2.8 IS?
__________________
Toda Powered
| |
| | |
10-22-2009, 11:26 PM
|
#564 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,113
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
|
i played with the tamron in japan a few weeks ago. quite impressed but it's weakest point is at 17mm in terms of corner sharpness. then again, it's best bang for the buck
| |
| | |
10-22-2009, 11:28 PM
|
#565 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mashimaro ^interesting...i wonder how it is, compared to the Canon 17-55 F2.8 IS? | Not sure, but the new Canon 15-85mm is insane sharp.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
10-23-2009, 01:57 AM
|
#566 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: richmond Lah!
Posts: 5,459
Thanked 474 Times in 224 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 36 Posts
|
what's a decent budget walk around lens for canon? any suggestions? shooting a xsi.
| |
| | |
10-23-2009, 02:00 AM
|
#567 | | フルコンボ
Join Date: May 2004 Location: YVR
Posts: 5,214
Thanked 3,998 Times in 596 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 8 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by LC21 what's a decent budget walk around lens for canon? any suggestions? shooting a xsi. | Tamron 17-50mm
| |
| | |
10-23-2009, 08:52 AM
|
#568 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever Not sure, but the new Canon 15-85mm is insane sharp. | true, i've seen some pretty nice sample pics on POTN as well...but the cost is the only downside IMO.
__________________
Toda Powered
| |
| | |
11-22-2009, 10:43 PM
|
#569 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
got a 17-55. love it.
Last edited by ddr; 12-10-2009 at 06:06 PM.
| |
| | |
11-29-2009, 06:31 PM
|
#570 | | Revscene.net has a homepage?!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,231
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
Failed 39 Times in 1 Post
|
17-55 2.8is or 17-40 L for my rebel xt? feel like finally upgrading the kit lens...
| |
| | |
11-29-2009, 06:32 PM
|
#571 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
17-55 for the extra stop of light.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
11-29-2009, 09:33 PM
|
#572 | | Revscene.net has a homepage?!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,231
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
Failed 39 Times in 1 Post
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever 17-55 for the extra stop of light. | is there a big difference in the sharpness of the two lens?
| |
| | |
12-05-2009, 06:31 PM
|
#573 | | Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 244
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Body: Canon Rebel T1i
Current lens: EF-S 18-55mm IS Kit lens
For sure I want to get the Canon EF 50mm f1.8 II
But now, here is my dilemma! I'm stuck between a few lenses. I don't want to be spending over $900 after taxes. So here are my options (if there is something better, please recommend it)
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS + Canon EF 28mm f2.8
OR
Canon EF 70-200mm f4L USM
OR even this one...
Sigma 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM I'm really leaning towards this lens though | |
| | |
12-05-2009, 07:10 PM
|
#574 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by //RacingSpirit>> is there a big difference in the sharpness of the two lens? | The 17-40 is sharper IIRC by a little bit. Quote:
Originally Posted by vietfx Body: Canon Rebel T1i
Current lens: EF-S 18-55mm IS Kit lens
For sure I want to get the Canon EF 50mm f1.8 II
But now, here is my dilemma! I'm stuck between a few lenses. I don't want to be spending over $900 after taxes. So here are my options (if there is something better, please recommend it)
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f4-5.6 IS + Canon EF 28mm f2.8
OR
Canon EF 70-200mm f4L USM
OR even this one...
Sigma 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM I'm really leaning towards this lens though | I'd personally get the 70-200 f4, but it all comes down to what your needs are.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
12-05-2009, 07:12 PM
|
#575 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
|
Vietfx, i ran into the same dilemma when i was new to photography as well. I wanted more reach then what my kit lens gave me. Even tho it was a fine first lens. If i was you i'd pick up a used 50mm 1.8 and get the 70-200 f4. It might seem like alot more money, but its a worth while investment. There is one for sale in the classifieds here on revscene, and its a decent price too. Those other two lenses won't give you, what the 70-200 F4 will. As well if you pick up the L, if you wanted you could basically sell it for the same price that you got it for. Its a good choice.
In my personal experiance, super zooms like all the 18-200's are convient but not that great. I always like to think, a lens that less is alot more then a lens that does alot.
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's | |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
