REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-05-2009, 07:47 PM   #576
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
If you do get a 18-200, forget the Sigma and go with the Canon version. You'll find that with the high pixel density of the T1i, some lenses will be out resolved by the sensor, and you'll notice a particular lens' shortcomings are greatly magnified compared to say an 8MP DSLR. Get the sharpest lenses you can afford.

I've had so many customers complain after buying a 5D mkII that the camera is not producing sharp photos, because the lenses they used on a 5D were tack sharp, but the images look soft on a 5D mkII. For example, an older 28-135mm EF lens is great on a 5D, but on a 5D mkII, it's not very good at all, as the 5d mkII has a higher resolving power than what the 28-135 lens can produce.
Advertisement
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 08:41 PM   #577
Media Officer / MOD
 
!Aznboi128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 28,077
Thanked 5,752 Times in 1,725 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 63 Posts
Hey guys,

Thinking of picking up a tokina 11-16. Anyone got one? Thoughts? Thanks. gonna to match it with my d80 and d300
Posted via RS Mobile
!Aznboi128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 09:00 PM   #578
:inoutugh:
 
TOS'd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ඞ
Posts: 9,982
Thanked 5,849 Times in 1,842 Posts
Failed 970 Times in 279 Posts
So, im pretty new to photography still. Ive had my d80 w/ 18-200mm for about 2 years now? But for the most part it has been a paper weight. What kind of lens should I get, Im looking for something that can be a good for close up and like "regular" distance photos? I dunno what to call it exactly but im basically a noob looking for something to spark some interest in photography and put my camera to use. Im not looking for somehting with a crazy zoom though, since i dont see myself doing much zooming in great distances for a shot. Thanks.
TOS'd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 10:20 PM   #579
Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
 
vietfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 244
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever View Post
If you do get a 18-200, forget the Sigma and go with the Canon version. You'll find that with the high pixel density of the T1i, some lenses will be out resolved by the sensor, and you'll notice a particular lens' shortcomings are greatly magnified compared to say an 8MP DSLR. Get the sharpest lenses you can afford.

I've had so many customers complain after buying a 5D mkII that the camera is not producing sharp photos, because the lenses they used on a 5D were tack sharp, but the images look soft on a 5D mkII. For example, an older 28-135mm EF lens is great on a 5D, but on a 5D mkII, it's not very good at all, as the 5d mkII has a higher resolving power than what the 28-135 lens can produce.
How are you able to tell the Canon is better than the Sigma? For future reference.
vietfx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 10:41 PM   #580
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Boostslut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by vietfx View Post
How are you able to tell the Canon is better than the Sigma? For future reference.
The Canon is faster because its 5.6 at 200mm and the Sigma is 6.3

If you want reviews on both of these lenses, go here:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/
Its a real good one!
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's
Boostslut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2009, 11:58 PM   #581
Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
 
vietfx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 244
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the quick reply.. Damn I overlooked that! haha

I'm now thinking about the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f3.5-4.5 USM, after watching this. But one step at a time.. I don't want to get ahead of myself.
http://www.vimeo.com/5252275

Last edited by vietfx; 12-06-2009 at 01:04 AM.
vietfx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 09:40 PM   #582
Revscene.net has a homepage?!
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,231
Thanked 28 Times in 12 Posts
Failed 39 Times in 1 Post
Pretty much leaning towards the 17-40L lens (may go ff in future).....is $839.99 at Broadway Camera a good price? Or should I buy it online?
//RacingSpirit>> is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 09:47 PM   #583
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Boostslut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
http://www.photoprice.ca/product/00031

Check out your prices for the lens here. You can always buy in Canada and save on taxes if you get it shipped in from out of BC.

I love my 17-40 on full frame, but not so much on a crop.
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's
Boostslut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2009, 10:24 AM   #584
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
ColinK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 3,928
Thanked 119 Times in 37 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
^ cool link!
__________________
Your friendly neighbourhood realtor! :)

www.ColinPhoto.ca
ColinK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2009, 05:15 PM   #585
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Mashimaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,706
Thanked 458 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by vietfx View Post
Thanks for the quick reply.. Damn I overlooked that! haha

I'm now thinking about the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f3.5-4.5 USM, after watching this. But one step at a time.. I don't want to get ahead of myself.
http://www.vimeo.com/5252275
I've got the Canon 10-22 and i also picked up a B+W slim CPL as well. it's a great lens but i'm still trying to get used to it as it's VERY wide at the 10mm range.

i might be selling it in the next few months though if you're interested.

so far, it's a great lens IMO.
__________________
Toda Powered
Mashimaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 10:39 PM   #586
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Boostslut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
I'm looking into a Canon 500mmL. I have a chance to pick a 600mmL for $800 more than the 500mmL. Which one would you choose? I know the obvious weight, and size difference, and of course focal length. IQ, sharpness, focusing speed. Which one would you pick? And yeah i'd have a tripod and wimberley head. Opinions? I need to choose in the next two days or so.
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's
Boostslut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 10:48 PM   #587
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
My opinion is that the 500mm is the best compromise of weight and focal length. If you're just going to shoot wildlife, then maybe consider the 600mm, but in most cases for me, 500 is just fine...the 600mm is very heavy....BIF's will be much more difficult compared to the 400mm f5.6 even with the Wimberly. Since I like going to the Abbotsford Airshow, I found that the 500mm was almost too long even on a full frame 1Ds mkIII. I would have preferred a 400mm there.

You have to consider your support system too. The 600mm is going to require a heavy duty tripod & head, so be prepared to spend $1000+. No cheaping out on a Benro or Giottos!
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2009, 10:51 PM   #588
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Boostslut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
400mm on full-frame was perfect at the airshow! And yeah, i'll most likely go for the 500L, because of the weight issue, and i can always get a 1.4 for it to get some extra reach if i think i need it, on a cropper.
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's
Boostslut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 03:25 PM   #589
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
ColinK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 3,928
Thanked 119 Times in 37 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
I know someone locally who is selling their canon 50mm f1.4 with a uv and cp filter along with the lens hood for $450.

I have the canon 50mm f1.8 right now and am semi satisfied with it. Biggest thing I dont like about it is that it doesn't always focus accurately.

Can someone talk me into the f1.4 for the extra money? Or is it not worth it?
__________________
Your friendly neighbourhood realtor! :)

www.ColinPhoto.ca
ColinK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2009, 03:29 PM   #590
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Totally worth it...much better build quality, and the DoF fall off is amazing, at least on a FF body. If you don't buy it, 10,000 puppies will die via spontaneous combustion.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 12:21 AM   #591
HELP ME PLS!!!
 
lilaznviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 5,988
Thanked 1,380 Times in 479 Posts
Failed 51 Times in 26 Posts
alright so finally i have the money to get a macro lens
now im deciding which one i should get since broadway camera has the canon 100mm for 689.99 or should i go for the tamron 90mm
lilaznviper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 01:12 AM   #592
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
They're both good. Broadway Camera includes the instant rebate in their pricing...be careful, as they may not be the cheapest overall.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 05:59 AM   #593
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Boostslut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
Go for the Tamron 90mm, its ugly but such a sweet lens! Pretty cheap too! The Canon 100mm macro, everyone knows how awesome it is.
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's
Boostslut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 12:48 PM   #594
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
The Tamron is very nice, actually. I know that some pros use it for their commercial work. If you save up a bit more, you can get the new Canon 100mm IS macro, too.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 01:21 PM   #595
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boostslut View Post
http://www.photoprice.ca/product/00031

Check out your prices for the lens here. You can always buy in Canada and save on taxes if you get it shipped in from out of BC.

I love my 17-40 on full frame, but not so much on a crop.
Hey i have the same lens!
Definitely when you crop doesn't look very clear nemore, Although I use a 40D so lower res then the newer cameras I guess.

Thinking of getting a really high aperture lens, nething else thats a good deal besides the 50mm 1.8?
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 02:08 PM   #596
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
ColinK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 3,928
Thanked 119 Times in 37 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
^ not for that kind of money.

I might be selling mine soon tho. I'm thinking of getting the canon or sigma 50mm 1.4.

I'm located in Kelowna, but could ship it to you...
__________________
Your friendly neighbourhood realtor! :)

www.ColinPhoto.ca
ColinK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2009, 02:39 PM   #597
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Boostslut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
I had a really nice canon 85 1.8 but i sold it yesterday for $340 with a filter, and a hood n stuff.

Go Tamron macro!
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's
Boostslut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2009, 10:09 AM   #598
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColinK View Post
^ not for that kind of money.

I might be selling mine soon tho. I'm thinking of getting the canon or sigma 50mm 1.4.

I'm located in Kelowna, but could ship it to you...
How much are the sigma 50mms?
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2009, 01:27 PM   #599
HELP ME PLS!!!
 
lilaznviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 5,988
Thanked 1,380 Times in 479 Posts
Failed 51 Times in 26 Posts
went to broadway cameras and they sold out of the canon 100mm
lilaznviper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2009, 12:07 PM   #600
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
ColinK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 3,928
Thanked 119 Times in 37 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ilvtofu View Post
How much are the sigma 50mms?
$750
$630 $Cnd from this website: http://www.adencamera.com/prod-overv...359&Category=7
__________________
Your friendly neighbourhood realtor! :)

www.ColinPhoto.ca
ColinK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net