Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
12-25-2009, 01:29 PM
|
#601 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
If, for whatever reason you go the Sigma route, I would suggest not buying on-line. I would go to a store and try out their lenses, as Sigma's QC tolerances are so loose that the lenses vary greatly in image quality. They may back focus, front focus & even have a tilted plane of focus. Yes, the back focus & front focus problems can be compensated for in higher end bodies, but not every DSLR has this feature. Sigma & Tamron are notorious for this.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| 
|  | |
12-25-2009, 01:32 PM
|
#602 | | In RS I Trust
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Mission
Posts: 20,732
Thanked 17,627 Times in 4,328 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
|
The G/F just got a Canon EOS and was looking for good zoom lens. I saw this one bestbuy and was wondering if this would be a perfect starter lens for her? http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/prodde...2&catid=26562#
shes going to use it mainly for nature/Animal(bird) shots.
| |
| | |
12-25-2009, 02:35 PM
|
#603 | | Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 244
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by murd0c  The G/F just got a Canon EOS and was looking for good zoom lens. I saw this one bestbuy and was wondering if this would be a perfect starter lens for her? http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/prodde...2&catid=26562#
shes going to use it mainly for nature/Animal(bird) shots. | I was deciding between that one and the 18-200. I'm glad I bought the 18-200 because it has an awesome range for carrying it around. If you're going to bring one lens for everyday use, it's perfect. http://www.bccamera.com/index.php?ma...oducts_id=3944
Got mine for $669 more than 2 weeks ago! Should have waited and saved myself over $100.
| |
| | |
12-25-2009, 02:41 PM
|
#604 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by murd0c The G/F just got a Canon EOS and was looking for good zoom lens. I saw this one bestbuy and was wondering if this would be a perfect starter lens for her? http://www.bestbuy.ca/catalog/prodde...2&catid=26562#
shes going to use it mainly for nature/Animal(bird) shots. | She may find it a bit lacking in the sharpness and contrast department, depending how picky she is. It's not bad, but it's not great. Depending on your or her budget, the 70-300mm f4-f5.6 IS USM is a much better lens.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Last edited by Senna4ever; 12-25-2009 at 02:48 PM.
| |
| | |
01-10-2010, 07:57 PM
|
#605 | | YOU CANT CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: FL400
Posts: 5,865
Thanked 3,092 Times in 1,038 Posts
Failed 553 Times in 157 Posts
|
not exactly a lens, but I didn't want to start another new thread...
I'm in the market for my first flash - this will generally be used indoors to bounce some extra light off the ceiling etc...
I'm looking at getting a used Canon 420EX speedlite for my Rebel T1i - is this a good choice for my budget? (I'm looking at sub $200 on my measely student wallet)
EDIT: he is willing to let it go for 175
__________________
Where the hell am I
| |
| | |
01-10-2010, 08:08 PM
|
#606 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
go at least 430
or maybe look on strobist and read about the lp210 they advertise
| |
| | |
01-10-2010, 09:33 PM
|
#607 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
I'd go for it. The 420EX isn't a bad flash...should be great for 90% of your usage.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
01-10-2010, 10:31 PM
|
#608 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
|
Agreed, the 420EX is a good flash (I have the same one), but the one thing it's missing that I wish I had was more manual control. It works with the E-TTL flash control through the camera, but there's no way to use it fully manual or manually set the exposure control like on the 430.
Now that said, it WILL be a great starter unit for you, and it will work as a slave with other flashes like the 580, should you upgrade in the future.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | | |
| | |
01-11-2010, 04:24 AM
|
#609 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
isn't manual control important once you feel adventurous enough to go beyond a single flash?
| |
| | |
01-11-2010, 09:32 AM
|
#610 | | YOU CANT CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: FL400
Posts: 5,865
Thanked 3,092 Times in 1,038 Posts
Failed 553 Times in 157 Posts
|
dragonone go to sleep 
Anyways i think i an going for the 420. I took a look at the 430 but the price difference is pretty steep, since 175 is already pushing my boundary. Thank for the input guys! Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
01-17-2010, 10:59 AM
|
#611 | | YOU CANT CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: FL400
Posts: 5,865
Thanked 3,092 Times in 1,038 Posts
Failed 553 Times in 157 Posts
|
Hehe I just got the 420EX, gonna have fun with it once it starts getting a bit nicer out
__________________
Where the hell am I
| |
| | |
01-17-2010, 12:15 PM
|
#612 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
Nice...
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
01-20-2010, 12:10 PM
|
#613 | | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 804
Thanked 330 Times in 32 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Anybody have any thoughts on the 100mm f2.8 macro with IS from Canon? I just purchased it but want to know some thoughts from fellow RS'ers. The optical quality is excellent but the range may not always be useful on a crop camera. Deciding on whether to keep or return at this point.
| |
| | |
02-03-2010, 10:12 AM
|
#614 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Fraserview
Posts: 1,315
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
I have a D3000 with the 18-55mm lens, I'm not looking to put out a lot on a real fish-eye lens. But I'm considering a fisheye lens adapter, I've looked into it a bit and see that the quality won't be as good but it'll do for 90% of the shots I want. Anyways, just wondering if there is a certain fisheye lens adapter that any of you guys recommend. Doesn't have to be from a local source. Any info you guys could give me on these would be helpful. Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
02-10-2010, 03:58 PM
|
#615 | | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
any canon users here that have zeiss lenses on their dslrs as primes?
i thought about the 85mm f/1.4 since it's an attractive aperture/range. i don't see other lenses in this range/aperture combo, save for the vivitar series 1 85mm f/1.4 as well
| |
| | |
02-10-2010, 10:03 PM
|
#616 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
Canon 85mm f1.2?
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
02-10-2010, 10:27 PM
|
#617 | | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
i thought about the canon 85/1.2, but something about the zeiss just attracts me to it even if it is fully MF
| |
| | |
02-10-2010, 10:34 PM
|
#618 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
I'd pick the Zeiss, too.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
02-11-2010, 10:22 PM
|
#619 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
|
Found on CL
Nikon 50mm 1.8D Prime Lens $120
Is this any good?
I'm a canon guy and know absolutely nothing about nikon lenses, it's a gift for a good friend of mine who wanted a prime lens, uses a D90, brand doesn't matter
| |
| | |
02-11-2010, 10:40 PM
|
#620 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
You're giving a used lens as a gift???
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
02-12-2010, 06:46 AM
|
#621 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
|
^I'd take a used lens as a gift... better than NO lens, especially if I'm not paying for it!
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | | |
| | |
02-12-2010, 04:54 PM
|
#622 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
|
For $120 used, you're better off buying new for $140, especially if it's a gift. At least they get 5 year warranty. I wouldn't pay more than $100 for a used 1.8.
| |
| | |
02-13-2010, 12:43 AM
|
#623 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever You're giving a used lens as a gift??? | Actually more interested to find out whether this lens is any good LOL
and any other primes that are good not just the nikon 50mm
Last edited by ilvtofu; 02-13-2010 at 12:49 AM.
| |
| | |
02-13-2010, 01:02 PM
|
#624 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ilvtofu Actually more interested to find out whether this lens is any good LOL
and any other primes that are good not just the nikon 50mm | If they are a DX user, try the 35mm 1.8, that's less than $300. Else the 50mm 1.8 is hard to beat, provided that their Nikon camera has a built in focusing motor.
Another lens note: Just got myself an used twin ring Nikkor 80-200 F2.8 AF-D. Looking for a teleconverter. I've read the Tamron/Kenko 1.4x, 1.7x are the best that will work with this lens and still provide full functionallity. Anyone have experience w/ the 1.7x? Does it scarfice too much IQ or would it be as good as the 1.4x?
| |
| | |
02-14-2010, 03:20 PM
|
#625 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,906
Thanked 438 Times in 240 Posts
Failed 20 Times in 15 Posts
|
Hey guys, I'm a newbie here with a D40. I'm looking to buy a decent all around lens and I'm wondering what do you guys think about the Nikon 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 G ED-IF AF-S VR DX Version II? http://www.bccamera.com/index.php?ma...ptokjve9vcge63
I was also looking into the Sigma 18-200mm f3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM but after reading some reviews online and in this thread that might not be the best route to go. The Sigma looks to be similar in specs but it's cheaper than the Nikon so I know we're obviously not comparing apples to apples here.
I've tried playing around with the Nikon 18-200 lens when my cousin let me borrow it. Due to the weight (or lack of), the D40 it tends to be a little heavy towards the lens side. Other than that I just wanted other opinions about it and whether or not I should look elsewhere.
Upgrading my body will also be something I want to do in the future so if there's a better choice out there I'll save up and buy the lens and body together later on and just make the best of the gear I have now. Thanks.
Last edited by mickz; 02-14-2010 at 03:31 PM.
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:07 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
