Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... | | |
06-05-2006, 12:57 PM
|
#51 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
very. My s2 is actually could shot 1/60th with the focus being a little soft or if the subjects were sitting still sharp.
|
| |
06-05-2006, 01:10 PM
|
#52 | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
|
Lets start off by saying 17-85IS can only be used on the rebel or 20D, while the 28-135IS is for all EOS cameras.
Alot of people use the 28-135IS, but they don't like it on a 1.6x crop camera. So Canon decided to release the 17-85IS which is the smaller brother of the 28-135IS
ex. 17-85 x 1.6 = 28-135IS
Same lenses. It just depends if you want more wide, or more telephoto
|
| |
06-05-2006, 01:53 PM
|
#53 | My hair is on fire!
Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: bc
Posts: 2,083
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
thx mananetwork. i have the rebel. i dont mind the wideness of teh 28 cuz i only use it to take party pictures so i could careless.
i guess in terms of resale value its easier to sell the 28-135 if i decide to.
Now how is the quality on these things? i heard its soft, but some say sharp. can anyone tell me this from exp?
|
| |
06-05-2006, 02:06 PM
|
#54 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
My friend's got a 17-85 and I swear to god he got one of the BEST copies evermade... at 70mm his lens is just as sharp as some L lenses, I kid you not.
It really depends on sample variation and what "copy" you happend to get... if it's good, then it's REALLY good.
Go buy from a store and try out 2 or 3 copies, and get the one that seems to be the sharpest at the focal range that you'll be using the most.
__________________
Nikonian
|
| |
06-05-2006, 02:44 PM
|
#55 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: N49°12~W123°07~
Posts: 4,001
Thanked 51 Times in 21 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The 28-135 would be a very good walk-around lens. If you got it I think it would rarely leave your camera.
Do IS lenses let you pan?
__________________
check out BCaquaria for all your aquarium needs
also visit the Ham Radio Forums for discussion on radio communication
|
| |
06-06-2006, 10:56 PM
|
#56 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
yes, I believe you have to turn off the is or set it to tripod mode or something.
|
| |
06-06-2006, 11:25 PM
|
#57 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Acuracura The 28-135 would be a very good walk-around lens. If you got it I think it would rarely leave your camera.
Do IS lenses let you pan? | Many of them have a mode that'll only stabilize one axis so that the other can blur. I haven't done much panning myself so I can't really verify if it works in full IS mode, but you can always turn IS off if you find it undesirable for the shot you're taking.
|
| |
06-06-2006, 11:29 PM
|
#58 | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Acuracura The 28-135 would be a very good walk-around lens. If you got it I think it would rarely leave your camera.
Do IS lenses let you pan? | the basic IS ones no, but the more advanced ones IS2 will
|
| |
06-07-2006, 12:11 AM
|
#59 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
what lenses have IS2?
|
| |
06-07-2006, 12:12 AM
|
#60 | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by dub.dub what lenses have IS2? | 24-105 IS *I THINK*, 70-200 2.8 IS, 300 IS, 100-400 IS, + the rest of the expensive lenses
|
| |
06-07-2006, 01:52 AM
|
#61 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
oh... hmm.. is it a switch or just a feature within the IS? |
| |
06-07-2006, 08:38 AM
|
#62 | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 1,539
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
|
70-200 F4L or 70-300 F4-5.6 IS?
I'm sure everybody will say the L lens, and call me a noob, but what is better about the L series vs the non-L?
Depending on where you look, the prices aren't too far apart.
|
| |
06-07-2006, 04:20 PM
|
#63 | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: May 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,134
Thanked 14 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
...
Last edited by ridetrials; 01-11-2015 at 12:03 PM.
|
| |
06-07-2006, 04:23 PM
|
#64 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Bonjourma listed your basic options if you want wide.
And to answer your question: 14mm is pretty close to as wide as you can go and be rectilinear. The 6mm Senna mentioned is a circular fisheye, which means it doesn't fill a frame.
|
| |
06-07-2006, 09:38 PM
|
#65 | NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: vancouver
Posts: 42
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Sigma 18-200
|
| |
06-07-2006, 10:17 PM
|
#66 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
I probably going to buy in the next year
70-200 f/2.8L 1200 can with ship
50 mm f/1.8 (cheap glass with such sharp results) 100 dollars used
An Is lens... i think the 24-105 is (or somethign liek that) goes for around 600
|
| |
06-07-2006, 10:24 PM
|
#67 | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by MajinHurricane I probably going to buy in the next year
70-200 f/2.8L 1200 can with ship
50 mm f/1.8 (cheap glass with such sharp results) 100 dollars used
An Is lens... i think the 24-105 is (or somethign liek that) goes for around 600 | he's asking about advice on what lenses are good to buy, not what your getting and how cheep you can get it for |
| |
06-07-2006, 10:26 PM
|
#68 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Mananetwork he's asking about advice on what lenses are good to buy, not what your getting and how cheep you can get it for | Actually those are probably 3 good lenses anyone should buy with a canon system, so why you gotta be a troll?
|
| |
06-07-2006, 10:31 PM
|
#69 | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by MajinHurricane Actually those are probably 3 good lenses anyone should buy with a canon system, so why you gotta be a troll? | 24-105
No idea how your gonna get that for 600bones
|
| |
06-07-2006, 10:58 PM
|
#70 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
| |
| |
06-07-2006, 11:23 PM
|
#71 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by MajinHurricane Actually those are probably 3 good lenses anyone should buy with a canon system, so why you gotta be a troll? | Do you have any firsthand experience with any of the aforementioned lenses that you're giving purchase advice on?
|
| |
06-07-2006, 11:30 PM
|
#72 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Jomo Do you have any firsthand experience with any of the aforementioned lenses that you're giving purchase advice on? | sorry no, its advice that other photographers have given me.
|
| |
06-10-2006, 12:24 AM
|
#73 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: richmond
Posts: 595
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i reallly think either buy the 70-200mm f4 or the IS
the f2.8 is so heavy...it'd be hard to use without IS
saying this because i used an IS two weeks ago shooting a music concert
the pics are so damn sharp
i was at about 30 feet (?) away...take shots at 200mm f2.8
and u can still see single hairs on the pictures.
everyone needs a 70-200mm f2.8 IS!!!
well, if u can't buy it, at least rent it for $35!!!
|
| |
06-10-2006, 02:54 AM
|
#74 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
its 500 dollars more american though :/
|
| |
06-10-2006, 03:11 AM
|
#75 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
I have a 70mm~210mm f2.8, but I get a lot of CA on my 7D. Super sharp on film, though.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:04 PM. |