REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-05-2006, 12:57 PM   #51
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
very. My s2 is actually could shot 1/60th with the focus being a little soft or if the subjects were sitting still sharp.
Advertisement
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 01:10 PM   #52
Blood tests positive for LOL mod
 
Mananetwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
Lets start off by saying 17-85IS can only be used on the rebel or 20D, while the 28-135IS is for all EOS cameras.
Alot of people use the 28-135IS, but they don't like it on a 1.6x crop camera. So Canon decided to release the 17-85IS which is the smaller brother of the 28-135IS
ex. 17-85 x 1.6 = 28-135IS

Same lenses. It just depends if you want more wide, or more telephoto
__________________
Tomasz Wagner | Mananetwork Photography
Portfolio | Le Fan? | Twitter | Flickr | Tumblr | 500px | Contact me


artofstance
Buy/Sell Rating
Proud member of G.R.A.P.E -- Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts
Mananetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 01:53 PM   #53
My hair is on fire!
 
supra123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: bc
Posts: 2,083
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
thx mananetwork. i have the rebel. i dont mind the wideness of teh 28 cuz i only use it to take party pictures so i could careless.
i guess in terms of resale value its easier to sell the 28-135 if i decide to.

Now how is the quality on these things? i heard its soft, but some say sharp. can anyone tell me this from exp?
supra123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 02:06 PM   #54
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Bonjour43MA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
My friend's got a 17-85 and I swear to god he got one of the BEST copies evermade... at 70mm his lens is just as sharp as some L lenses, I kid you not.

It really depends on sample variation and what "copy" you happend to get... if it's good, then it's REALLY good.

Go buy from a store and try out 2 or 3 copies, and get the one that seems to be the sharpest at the focal range that you'll be using the most.
__________________
Nikonian
Bonjour43MA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2006, 02:44 PM   #55
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Acuracura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: N49°12~W123°07~
Posts: 4,001
Thanked 51 Times in 21 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
The 28-135 would be a very good walk-around lens. If you got it I think it would rarely leave your camera.

Do IS lenses let you pan?
__________________
check out BCaquaria for all your aquarium needs
also visit the Ham Radio Forums for discussion on radio communication
Acuracura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 10:56 PM   #56
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
yes, I believe you have to turn off the is or set it to tripod mode or something.
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 11:25 PM   #57
Banned (ABWS)
 
Jomo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Acuracura
The 28-135 would be a very good walk-around lens. If you got it I think it would rarely leave your camera.

Do IS lenses let you pan?
Many of them have a mode that'll only stabilize one axis so that the other can blur. I haven't done much panning myself so I can't really verify if it works in full IS mode, but you can always turn IS off if you find it undesirable for the shot you're taking.
Jomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 11:29 PM   #58
Blood tests positive for LOL mod
 
Mananetwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Acuracura
The 28-135 would be a very good walk-around lens. If you got it I think it would rarely leave your camera.

Do IS lenses let you pan?
the basic IS ones no, but the more advanced ones IS2 will
__________________
Tomasz Wagner | Mananetwork Photography
Portfolio | Le Fan? | Twitter | Flickr | Tumblr | 500px | Contact me


artofstance
Buy/Sell Rating
Proud member of G.R.A.P.E -- Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts
Mananetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 12:11 AM   #59
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
dub.dub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
what lenses have IS2?
dub.dub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 12:12 AM   #60
Blood tests positive for LOL mod
 
Mananetwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by dub.dub
what lenses have IS2?
24-105 IS *I THINK*, 70-200 2.8 IS, 300 IS, 100-400 IS, + the rest of the expensive lenses
__________________
Tomasz Wagner | Mananetwork Photography
Portfolio | Le Fan? | Twitter | Flickr | Tumblr | 500px | Contact me


artofstance
Buy/Sell Rating
Proud member of G.R.A.P.E -- Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts
Mananetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 01:52 AM   #61
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
dub.dub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
oh... hmm.. is it a switch or just a feature within the IS?
dub.dub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 08:38 AM   #62
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
MegaHurtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 1,539
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
70-200 F4L or 70-300 F4-5.6 IS?

I'm sure everybody will say the L lens, and call me a noob, but what is better about the L series vs the non-L?

Depending on where you look, the prices aren't too far apart.
__________________
My feedback (25-0-0)
MegaHurtz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 04:20 PM   #63
I bringith the lowerballerith
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,134
Thanked 14 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
...

Last edited by ridetrials; 01-11-2015 at 12:03 PM.
ridetrials is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 04:23 PM   #64
Banned (ABWS)
 
Jomo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bonjourma listed your basic options if you want wide.

And to answer your question: 14mm is pretty close to as wide as you can go and be rectilinear. The 6mm Senna mentioned is a circular fisheye, which means it doesn't fill a frame.
Jomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 09:38 PM   #65
NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: vancouver
Posts: 42
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sigma 18-200
notic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 10:17 PM   #66
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
I probably going to buy in the next year

70-200 f/2.8L 1200 can with ship
50 mm f/1.8 (cheap glass with such sharp results) 100 dollars used
An Is lens... i think the 24-105 is (or somethign liek that) goes for around 600
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 10:24 PM   #67
Blood tests positive for LOL mod
 
Mananetwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by MajinHurricane
I probably going to buy in the next year

70-200 f/2.8L 1200 can with ship
50 mm f/1.8 (cheap glass with such sharp results) 100 dollars used
An Is lens... i think the 24-105 is (or somethign liek that) goes for around 600
he's asking about advice on what lenses are good to buy, not what your getting and how cheep you can get it for
__________________
Tomasz Wagner | Mananetwork Photography
Portfolio | Le Fan? | Twitter | Flickr | Tumblr | 500px | Contact me


artofstance
Buy/Sell Rating
Proud member of G.R.A.P.E -- Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts
Mananetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 10:26 PM   #68
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Mananetwork
he's asking about advice on what lenses are good to buy, not what your getting and how cheep you can get it for
Actually those are probably 3 good lenses anyone should buy with a canon system, so why you gotta be a troll?
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 10:31 PM   #69
Blood tests positive for LOL mod
 
Mananetwork's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by MajinHurricane
Actually those are probably 3 good lenses anyone should buy with a canon system, so why you gotta be a troll?
24-105

No idea how your gonna get that for 600bones
__________________
Tomasz Wagner | Mananetwork Photography
Portfolio | Le Fan? | Twitter | Flickr | Tumblr | 500px | Contact me


artofstance
Buy/Sell Rating
Proud member of G.R.A.P.E -- Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts
Mananetwork is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 10:58 PM   #70
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
i think i ment this...

I think

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...goryNavigation
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 11:23 PM   #71
Banned (ABWS)
 
Jomo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by MajinHurricane
Actually those are probably 3 good lenses anyone should buy with a canon system, so why you gotta be a troll?
Do you have any firsthand experience with any of the aforementioned lenses that you're giving purchase advice on?
Jomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2006, 11:30 PM   #72
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Jomo
Do you have any firsthand experience with any of the aforementioned lenses that you're giving purchase advice on?
sorry no, its advice that other photographers have given me.
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2006, 12:24 AM   #73
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: richmond
Posts: 595
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
i reallly think either buy the 70-200mm f4 or the IS


the f2.8 is so heavy...it'd be hard to use without IS

saying this because i used an IS two weeks ago shooting a music concert

the pics are so damn sharp



i was at about 30 feet (?) away...take shots at 200mm f2.8

and u can still see single hairs on the pictures.

everyone needs a 70-200mm f2.8 IS!!!



well, if u can't buy it, at least rent it for $35!!!
laurencepak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2006, 02:54 AM   #74
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
its 500 dollars more american though :/
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2006, 03:11 AM   #75
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
I have a 70mm~210mm f2.8, but I get a lot of CA on my 7D. Super sharp on film, though.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net