REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-11-2011, 11:51 PM   #1001
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by m3thods View Post
looking for a place that rents out a tokina 11-16 (Canon) before I drop cash for one. Senna does Beau stock them for rent? If not does anyone know where else I could rent one locally?
No, we don't rent 3rd party lenses - too much trouble when it comes to quality control & servicing.
Advertisement
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2011, 02:20 PM   #1002
Get Money, Get Paid
 
Volvoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Richmond
Posts: 2,285
Thanked 1,264 Times in 262 Posts
Failed 55 Times in 19 Posts
I currently have a Nikon D90 and I would like to purchase a wide angle zoom lens. These are the lowest Canadian prices i've found for the lenses.

Nikkor AF-S Zoom DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - $734.99CDN

Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DI II Zoom Lens for Nikon - $460CDN

Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM for Nikon - $584.99CDN

Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon - $699CDN

Is the Nikkor worth that much more than the Tamron and the Sigma?

Last edited by Volvoman; 01-12-2011 at 02:33 PM.
Volvoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 02:30 AM   #1003
My homepage has been set to RS
 
gilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 2,187
Thanked 1,815 Times in 341 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 29 Posts
^ also have the same question as him.
__________________
FEEDBACK


2018 Golf R MK7.5 (Daily)
2001 S2000 (Weekend Warrior)
1991 Merc 300 TE-24 AMG Estate - Sold
2005 STi - Sold
1987 AE86 GTS - Sold
1986 AE86 GTS - Sold
gilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 02:50 AM   #1004
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Volvoman View Post
I currently have a Nikon D90 and I would like to purchase a wide angle zoom lens. These are the lowest Canadian prices i've found for the lenses.

Nikkor AF-S Zoom DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - $734.99CDN

Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DI II Zoom Lens for Nikon - $460CDN

Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM for Nikon - $584.99CDN

Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon - $699CDN

Is the Nikkor worth that much more than the Tamron and the Sigma?
The Tokina is probably the sharpest of the bunch, but depending on your final image size, you may not notice. Is it worth more? That depends - if the Tokina/Sigma/Tamron fails and you have to get it serviced, you may not see your lens for a few months, and you'll have to pay for shipping out to Ontario. Typically, Nikon's servicing is quite fast (around 2 - 3 weeks for non-NPS) as long as the repair is not difficult. Nikon also has a service centre in Richmond so you can take it there yourself and actually talk to a person face to face.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 12:11 PM   #1005
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
N.V.M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: right here
Posts: 4,995
Thanked 4,789 Times in 835 Posts
Failed 884 Times in 162 Posts
new used lens for me tomorrow!

*please don't flake*
__________________
now what?
N.V.M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2011, 06:20 PM   #1006
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Nikon 17-55mm f2.8.. anyone here own it? Issues? Worth the money?
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2011, 08:12 PM   #1007
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo View Post
Nikon 17-55mm f2.8.. anyone here own it? Issues? Worth the money?
If you're going to stick with DX cameras for the foreseeable future, I think it great. It's a sharp lens - think of it like it's the 24-70mm f2.8 for DX.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 01-17-2011, 05:28 PM   #1008
RS controls my life!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 743
Thanked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Failed 7 Times in 1 Post
I am looking for a good all around lense for my XSi.
I am looking at one of these three lenses:
- 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
- 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
- 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

I already have the 18-55mm (kit lense) and 75-300mm (which i might sell).

The 75-300mm is kind of useless for me, because it doesn't have IS and i don't always have my tripod with me, although i kind of like the very narrow DOF.

The 18-55mm is very convenient, but it just doesn't zoom far enough for some of the stuff i do.
Bath Tussue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2011, 06:59 PM   #1009
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
^^^ How about the Canon 18-200? Or the Tamron 18-270 VC lens? I've heard it's not bad.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2011, 07:41 PM   #1010
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bath Tussue View Post
I am looking for a good all around lense for my XSi.
I am looking at one of these three lenses:
- 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
- 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
- 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

I already have the 18-55mm (kit lense) and 75-300mm (which i might sell).

The 75-300mm is kind of useless for me, because it doesn't have IS and i don't always have my tripod with me, although i kind of like the very narrow DOF.

The 18-55mm is very convenient, but it just doesn't zoom far enough for some of the stuff i do.
Just read the review for the 18-135 by slrgear, seems like a decent quality lens for the price. But the 18-200 doesn't have much more distortion when you consider the additional amount of range. They are both solid lenses IMO but the 18-200 is significantly more on the used market which I wouldn't recommend getting unless you have to use a dslr. I'd rather save the money and get a entry level L lens for a bit more. I've read that the 17-85 isn't all that great also especially the abberation

I still own the 55-250 which is a very sharp lens but the 55 on a crop sensor is quite a long focal length which means you'll have to bring an extra lens along.

Anyways I have both the 18-200 and 55-250 on me right now PM me if you're interested. If you're coming to the photowalk I can bring both these lenses for you to try out!

EDIT: forgot to mention my everyday lens the sigma 17-70 F2.8-4.0 OS HSM Macro. Relatively affordable and versatile enough. 20 cm ish minimum focusing distance. Costed the equivalent of about $400CAD in hk locally you can probably find a similar one used for that price.
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback

Last edited by ilvtofu; 01-18-2011 at 12:31 AM.
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2011, 05:12 PM   #1011
RS controls my life!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 743
Thanked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Failed 7 Times in 1 Post
i am not sure if i can go to the photo walk yet
i will know by the day before
i will sign up once i know my schedule
Bath Tussue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 08:23 AM   #1012
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
Nvm, went to broadway camera to look at it, hated it
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback

Last edited by ilvtofu; 01-19-2011 at 05:21 PM.
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2011, 01:53 PM   #1013
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
IMASA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo View Post
Nikon 17-55mm f2.8.. anyone here own it? Issues? Worth the money?
I have a love/hate relationship with my 17-55.

Love: The heavy duty build quality, fast, quite and consistant AF, 9 apperature blades, the big ass hood, and I got it new for a pretty good price.

Hate: The bulk - it sucks when you want to travel light. I tend not to bring it for vacations due to the weight/size and the fear of theft if I leave it in a rental car/locker. But the bulk is also what makes it so solid and feels good in your hands.

DX - I was trying to decide between the 17-55 vs the 24-70. It was about an $800 price difference back when I was buying. I kinda regret not getting the 24-70 now since I want to find an excuse to switch to FX.

The lens is kind old. You can find ppl trying to sell theirs for $800-1000 on the used sites.
IMASA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 09:37 PM   #1014
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
^ I just picked up the 17-55mm. There is 'clicking' noise when put on AF-C and the autofocus is hunting around... hard to describe. Otherwise the autofocus is pretty quick and quiet.

What does your copy sound like?
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2011, 01:51 PM   #1015
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
IMASA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
I think yours is normal. Mine does make some clicking/clacking sound as it hunts around for focus, usually when it hits the limts, but overall, it is pretty quiet.
IMASA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 11:31 PM   #1016
'
 
insomniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,664
Thanked 6,557 Times in 1,111 Posts
Failed 797 Times in 212 Posts
should i trade my 80-200mm for a 17-55m?

just got a d90 today. not looking to spend alot..
what lens should i get? i need something thats practical..
maybe 18-55mm? what do you guys suggest?
and i also need a wideangle lens but im on a tight budget

thanks in advance.
__________________
Buy & Sell Feedback (53-0-0)
insomniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 11:30 AM   #1017
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
IMASA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,461
Thanked 1,276 Times in 308 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 12 Posts
Buy a prime and practise. I'd recommend the 35mm 1.8 if you're on a budget.
IMASA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2011, 12:27 PM   #1018
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Why do you 'need' a wide angle? If you're on a budget, the 18-55mm does great. The 17-55mm is just luxury.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2011, 10:36 PM   #1019
I am grateful grapefruit
 
gars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
I'm thinking of buying a new prime - namely the Canon 85mm F1.8, or the 100mm F2.

I was looking online, the difference between the two is only about $100. Any recommendations on one or the other?
gars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 12:13 AM   #1020
Trollollolloing RS sine 2005
 
TOPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 7,093
Thanked 2,471 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 473 Times in 132 Posts
the 85 1.8 has a lot of purple fringing. i was thinking of getting it until i read up on it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane View Post
I had some girl come into the busser station the other day trying to make out with every staff member and then pull down her pants and asked for someone to stick a dick in her (at least she shaved).
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1exotic View Post
Vtec doesn't kick in on Reverse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma View Post
its like.. oh yeah oh yeah.. ohhhh yeah... OOoooOohh... why's it suddenly feel a bit better... ohhhh yeahh... ohhh...oh..fuck... it probably ripped.
TOPEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 02:57 PM   #1021
ddr
Snapping away
 
ddr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
hey senna, what's the nikon-EOS adapter you used the other day? any particular brand that's of better build quality and AF confirmation?
__________________
flickr
ddr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 05:51 PM   #1022
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddr View Post
hey senna, what's the nikon-EOS adapter you used the other day? any particular brand that's of better build quality and AF confirmation?
I use the Novoflex brand - it's one of the best made out there, but it costs $300. We're currently looking into becoming a Cinevate dealer, and they seem to have a very high quality adapter at a much lower price.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 02-07-2011, 11:13 PM   #1023
I LIKE JDM!!
 
european's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Lower Mainland
Posts: 8,008
Thanked 2,175 Times in 715 Posts
Failed 13 Times in 3 Posts
Pro's and cons between Nikon 400mm f2.8 and 500mm f4??
From what I know so far. I'm leaning towards 500mm f4. Weighs less, longer reach, fast, accurate, a bit cheaper as well. I heard you don't need a great tripod for it but I doubt that and won't use a crap tripod if I get the super lens. But I'm no expert on any of this.
__________________
When life hands you lemons, you clone those lemons and make.. super lemons! - Principal Cinnamon J. Scudworth

YouTube
Instagram
flickr
Twitter
Portfolio
european is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 11:53 PM   #1024
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
You're thinking of buying a 400 or 500 now? Haha...

I would go for the 500mm f4...it's a good compromise between focal length & weight. I can handhold the 500mm pretty much all day, the 400mm is so heavy it's much more difficult.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 12:16 AM   #1025
I am grateful grapefruit
 
gars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOPEC View Post
the 85 1.8 has a lot of purple fringing. i was thinking of getting it until i read up on it.
really? I've read otherwise in most of the reviews... is purple fringing different from CA?
gars is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net