Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
02-16-2011, 08:59 PM
|
#1051 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 604778  Looking to get a new fixed lens. Thinking of getting th Nikon 35mm F/1.8.
But I hear that apparently the Tokina 35mm F/2.8 is sharper then the Nikon one.
Feedback and info please? | http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...ssage=35040212 | 
|  | |
02-17-2011, 07:48 AM
|
#1052 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 604778 Looking to get a new fixed lens. Thinking of getting th Nikon 35mm F/1.8.
But I hear that apparently the Tokina 35mm F/2.8 is sharper then the Nikon one.
Feedback and info please? | I had both. Just sold both. I think I enjoyed the Tokina more. Maybe it was just the copies, but I found the Tokina to be sharper. Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
02-18-2011, 12:46 AM
|
#1053 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
What's the difference between these two lens? (Same lens, different packaging)  | |
| | |
02-18-2011, 01:58 AM
|
#1054 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
The packaging was updated.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
02-18-2011, 09:58 AM
|
#1055 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
My question should have been "Is there a difference between these two lenses. " obviously the packaging got updated but do the lenses update too? Like a v1.01? Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
02-18-2011, 12:17 PM
|
#1056 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,148
Thanked 1,053 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
there wasn't any news regarding a refresh, so my guess is that they're the same lens.
| |
| | |
02-18-2011, 12:36 PM
|
#1057 | | I LIKE JDM!!
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Lower Mainland
Posts: 8,008
Thanked 2,175 Times in 715 Posts
Failed 13 Times in 3 Posts
|
I'm looking at Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X for my Nikon D90. 599 shipped. Yay or nay? Or is there something better?
| |
| | |
02-18-2011, 01:03 PM
|
#1058 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo My question should have been "Is there a difference between these two lenses. " obviously the packaging got updated but do the lenses update too? Like a v1.01? Posted via RS Mobile | No change in the lenses themselves... At least none that they've made public. Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
02-18-2011, 02:44 PM
|
#1059 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by european I'm looking at Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X for my Nikon D90. 599 shipped. Yay or nay? Or is there something better? | I just got the lens and LOVE it. Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
02-25-2011, 07:09 AM
|
#1060 | | Captain Happy Bubble is my Homeboy
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Richmond
Posts: 308
Thanked 100 Times in 29 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
Strongly suggest the tokina 116
It's definitely a yay to me~ Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
02-26-2011, 06:45 PM
|
#1061 | | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: right here
Posts: 4,973
Thanked 4,783 Times in 830 Posts
Failed 884 Times in 162 Posts
|
so what exactly happens when you put a lens designed for a smaller sensor on a full framed camera? will the image appear with a darkened frame? or blurred out edges?
__________________
now what?
| |
| | |
02-26-2011, 06:46 PM
|
#1062 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,566
Thanked 383 Times in 155 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 54 Posts
|
^ It will vary from model to model, and depends which apt you're shooting at.
| |
| | |
02-27-2011, 09:38 PM
|
#1063 | | I am grateful grapefruit
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by N.V.M. so what exactly happens when you put a lens designed for a smaller sensor on a full framed camera? will the image appear with a darkened frame? or blurred out edges? | Ya, it depends on the lens. Usually - it's just very very strong vignetting.
The A900 actually detects that you have an crop-frame lens on and will automatically only use a crop frame sized portion of the sensor. Only thing is when you look through the viewfinder - there's a box that shows where the crop frame picture is being cut off, making it hard to frame pictures properly.
| |
| | |
03-06-2011, 05:40 PM
|
#1064 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
Nikon 35mm f1.4
How the heck does this lens cost $1,800 and the 35mm f1.8 cost $200? I know the 35mm is DX, but it this lens really worth the money? It seems impossible to justifly the cost..
| |
| | |
03-06-2011, 05:42 PM
|
#1065 | | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: right here
Posts: 4,973
Thanked 4,783 Times in 830 Posts
Failed 884 Times in 162 Posts
|
look at the Canon 50mm 1.4 and 1.2. crazy.
__________________
now what?
| |
| | |
03-06-2011, 08:10 PM
|
#1066 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo Nikon 35mm f1.4
How the heck does this lens cost $1,800 and the 35mm f1.8 cost $200? I know the 35mm is DX, but it this lens really worth the money? It seems impossible to justifly the cost.. | If you use it in a professional setting like weddings & portraiture, then yes, it's worth its weight in gold.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
03-16-2011, 08:39 AM
|
#1067 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,741
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Looking to upgrade from my 18-55mm f3.6-5.6 IS lens for my Canon XSi. Looking for the best value walkaround lens:
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II VC LD
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di
Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS
Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM
Some discontinued Canon lens:
Canon EF 28-70mm f3.5-4.5
Canon EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 USM
| |
| | |
03-16-2011, 09:26 AM
|
#1068 | | Da Vinci's real masterpiece: The Mona Diesel
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,797
Thanked 563 Times in 247 Posts
Failed 15 Times in 15 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by djm Looking to upgrade from my 18-55mm f3.6-5.6 IS lens for my Canon XSi. Looking for the best value walkaround lens:
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II VC LD
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di
Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS
Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM
Some discontinued Canon lens:
Canon EF 28-70mm f3.5-4.5
Canon EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 USM | Wow was gonna ask this exact same question... more specifically how does the Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM perform as a semi-decent walk around lens?
| |
| | |
03-16-2011, 04:26 PM
|
#1069 | | Got MOD?
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 7,918
Thanked 519 Times in 444 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
I'm using the Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 VC as my default lens.
The 17-85 is a pretty average lens. I wouldn't get this one personally.
| |
| | |
03-16-2011, 04:59 PM
|
#1070 | | '
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,664
Thanked 6,557 Times in 1,111 Posts
Failed 797 Times in 212 Posts
|
hey guys, im quite a noob at photography
picked up my first camera this year..
so right now i want a zoom lens that zooms farther
right now i have a 80-200 and 300mm. both are 2.8
im on a tight budget. should i just get one of those zoom multipliers or what are they called?
or i want something more compact. quality isnt important because the pictures will just be of events. i had a hella hard time with the 80-200 this morning for 4 hours haha
| |
| | |
03-16-2011, 05:50 PM
|
#1071 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 2,187
Thanked 1,815 Times in 341 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 29 Posts
|
^you have a 300mm and you need to zoom farther? what are you shooting? the moon?
__________________ FEEDBACK 2018 Golf R MK7.5 (Daily) 2001 S2000 (Weekend Warrior) 1991 Merc 300 TE-24 AMG Estate - Sold 2005 STi - Sold 1987 AE86 GTS - Sold 1986 AE86 GTS - Sold | |
| | |
03-16-2011, 09:30 PM
|
#1072 | | Got MOD?
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 7,918
Thanked 519 Times in 444 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
I'd recommend a teleconverter if you need more zoom.
| |
| | |
03-16-2011, 10:40 PM
|
#1073 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
get a 500mm mirror lens
| |
| | |
03-16-2011, 11:03 PM
|
#1074 | | '
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,664
Thanked 6,557 Times in 1,111 Posts
Failed 797 Times in 212 Posts
|
^how much are those and which one do you recommend getting?
im thinking about getting a 18-200 so i dont have to carry my 35-70 and 80-200 around all the time lol
everyone tells me i shouldnt do it because of "bad quality" but i really dont mind at this point because of the inconvenience. im only taking pictures of casual events, assemblies, parades, etc. will be working with not alot of space lol. basically i need
1) a daily "get shit done" lens (wider and greater range than the 35-70. 35-70 is pretty good sometimes but really sucks to work with. its loud, af is way slower than manual focusing and sometimes it doesnt even work. im getting a sigma 17-70 this weekend but like i said i need something thats all around so 18-200? willing to spend 300-400 on this one.)
2) a lens that can zoom even farther but quality doesnt matter as long as i can get peoples facial expressions
@!MiKrofT yeah haha those are what i was talking about. which one do you recommend?
tia you guys
| |
| | |
03-16-2011, 11:10 PM
|
#1075 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
|
@737! If you just need a lens for PW events 300mm is more than enough. I went through the whole year with just my 55-250 and took literally thousands of pics, but since you want a kit lens so badly give the tamron 18-270 a shot. Don't expect much out of image quality especially at the longer end Quote:
Originally Posted by 737! ^how much are those and which one do you recommend getting?
im thinking about getting a 18-200 so i dont have to carry my 35-70 and 80-200 around all the time lol
everyone tells me i shouldnt do it because of "bad quality" but i really dont mind at this point because of the inconvenience. im only taking pictures of casual events, assemblies, parades, etc. will be working with not alot of space lol. basically i need
1) a daily "get shit done" lens (wider and greater range than the 35-70. 35-70 is pretty good sometimes but really sucks to work with. its loud, af is way slower than manual focusing and sometimes it doesnt even work. im getting a sigma 17-70 this weekend but like i said i need something thats all around so 18-200? willing to spend 300-400 on this one.)
tia you guys | EDIT: Sounds like you should just sell your dslr if image quality means nothing to you, take that money and get a handycam or something with 400x zoom etc... 18-200 has pretty slow AF in my experience
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:33 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
