Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
04-01-2011, 12:14 AM
|
#1101 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
what should i look for when purchasing a 2nd hand flash. the seller it's been used 3 times. who knows. grabbing another 430exII.
| 
|  | |
04-19-2011, 03:49 PM
|
#1102 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: 604
Posts: 957
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
Hey guys i have a nikon d60 i have the 18-55 lens i wanted to get some input on thats another
Type of lens i could get thanks will mainly be using for street photos Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
04-19-2011, 07:31 PM
|
#1103 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
Ditch the 18-55 and get the 17-55mm f2.8 if you can. That might be a good start...and then get some wide prime lenses.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
04-19-2011, 08:06 PM
|
#1104 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Canada
Posts: 1,566
Thanked 383 Times in 155 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 54 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinoy_Crx  Hey guys i have a nikon d60 i have the 18-55 lens i wanted to get some input on thats another
Type of lens i could get thanks will mainly be using for street photos Posted via RS Mobile | There's a billion of lens out there. You're gonna have to provide us a least a bare budget you want to work at....
| |
| | |
04-30-2011, 03:20 PM
|
#1105 | | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: right here
Posts: 4,955
Thanked 4,764 Times in 826 Posts
Failed 883 Times in 161 Posts
|
couple shiny new lenses..... 
Sigma 150mm Macro, and the Canon EF 70-300 L IS 
__________________
now what?
| 
| | |
05-01-2011, 12:15 PM
|
#1106 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,148
Thanked 1,053 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
^beautiful. I hear nothing but great things about the Sigma 150. And the 70-300L, well that's already becoming a great addition to the L family.
| |
| | |
05-01-2011, 02:49 PM
|
#1107 | | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: right here
Posts: 4,955
Thanked 4,764 Times in 826 Posts
Failed 883 Times in 161 Posts
|
couple of macros from today( from Reifel) :  
__________________
now what?
| |
| | |
05-01-2011, 03:18 PM
|
#1108 | | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,580
Thanked 2,169 Times in 249 Posts
Failed 404 Times in 66 Posts
|
anybody have any thoughts on the tamron 18-270 mm with the new pzd?
i need a all around lens for traveling
i heard that it's a bit soft at full zoom, but can be corrected a bit by stopping at f/8
| |
| | |
05-02-2011, 09:49 PM
|
#1109 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
^ How often do you need 270mm?
A good all around lens is a 18-55mm. Haha.
| |
| | |
05-02-2011, 11:40 PM
|
#1110 | | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,580
Thanked 2,169 Times in 249 Posts
Failed 404 Times in 66 Posts
|
^i'll be needing it quite often, i already got some advice from a few photographer friends, i'll be getting it soon
especially for this year and next
i'll be going to Vegas, Africa, India, Dubai, Hong Kong, Beijing, Taiwan, Shanghai, and various random places, when ever i go to India, Dubai, Africa i go on desert safari's and wild life safari's, not to mention zoo's, aquariums, lots of scenic opportunities
im pretty sure the farthest i would usually zoom is to 200mm, but there will definitely be times where a 270mm zoom would come in handy
18 - 55mm is definitely not my idea of a good all around lens, and the 55-250 i herd is not worth it, way to soft especially on the edges
eventually, when i get more of a steady income, i'll be upgrading to better quality lenses
| |
| | |
05-03-2011, 02:30 AM
|
#1111 | | Work hard, Play Hard - Wiz
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,415
Thanked 2,011 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 365 Times in 46 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by bigzz786786 anybody have any thoughts on the tamron 18-270 mm with the new pzd?
i need a all around lens for traveling
i heard that it's a bit soft at full zoom, but can be corrected a bit by stopping at f/8 | I'm also planning on getting that lens.
| |
| | |
05-08-2011, 11:14 PM
|
#1112 | | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: YVR
Posts: 4,518
Thanked 1,275 Times in 434 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 24 Posts
|
hmm sigma 10-20mm or should I continue on my quest to saving up for a 70-200mm 2.8?
I currently have:
50mm 1.4
85mm 1.8
17-50mm 2.8
I would really love a telephoto and I have my eyes on the 70-200mm VRI. Would there be a different alternative or should I just keep saving? I wouldn't mind getting a wide angle lens either like the 10-20mm
| |
| | |
05-09-2011, 08:58 PM
|
#1113 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever Ditch the 18-55 and get the 17-55mm f2.8 if you can. That might be a good start...and then get some wide prime lenses. | that's bad advice since he has a D60... 17-55mm much too front heavy.
| |
| | |
05-09-2011, 10:14 PM
|
#1114 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
what if you added a battery grip?
i'm not sure if that's bad advice ... b/c of ergonomics
| |
| | |
05-09-2011, 10:32 PM
|
#1115 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo that's bad advice since he has a D60... 17-55mm much too front heavy. | Not really...it's not that heavy - the 14-24 is front heavy. The D60 isn't super light like a D40, and the 17-55 is the top DX zoom for Nikon.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
05-09-2011, 10:48 PM
|
#1116 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
^D60 is almost the same weight at the D40, maybe 20g more.
17-55mm seems overkill for the D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D3100.. probably better matched to D90/D7000/D300s IMO.
With a D60, must as well stick with a 18-55mm kit lens. There's not too much wrong with it.
Anohter problem is that the 17-55mm is $1400. That seems way overkill for an older entry level body, with pretty much the same zoom range, but MUCH heavier lens and larger.
I would think an investment in the $200 35mm f1.8 would do more for photography, esp if he wants do street photos.
Or, if he really insists on a fast zoom, Sigma 16-50 f2.8 is a good choice and save $600 in the process. It's lighter too.
However, my vote is the 16-85mm. I used it all the time for the D40, and I really liked it, esp the VR function, since the D40 had bad higher ISO performance.
| |
| | |
05-09-2011, 11:05 PM
|
#1117 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
I think it's better to have a good lens on a cheaper body than vice versa. If budget allows, I'd say go for it. I don't consider it heavy personally.
I would never even consider a Sigma - what if it fails for some reason? You're going to wait 3-4 months to get it back from servicing.
Nikon 16-85....forgot about that one...I keep forgetting about the various DX lenses Nikon has since we don't stock them.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
05-10-2011, 02:42 AM
|
#1118 | | Work hard, Play Hard - Wiz
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,415
Thanked 2,011 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 365 Times in 46 Posts
|
I need a new wide angle lens pretty bad. I've been using the Nikon 18-55mm kit lens for sometime now.
I was thinking of the new Tamron 18-270mm PZD version and the Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 lens.
I've heard good reviews for both lenses... still not to sure which one to go for.
| |
| | |
05-10-2011, 02:49 AM
|
#1119 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
How about the aforementioned Nikon 16-85?
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
05-10-2011, 10:37 AM
|
#1120 | | Work hard, Play Hard - Wiz
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,415
Thanked 2,011 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 365 Times in 46 Posts
|
^havent heard much about it.
Ill look into it. Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
05-10-2011, 01:25 PM
|
#1121 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
what exactly do you mean by 'good'? good value? good performance? the sigma 17-50 >> 18-50 from what i've read.
| |
| | |
05-10-2011, 02:13 PM
|
#1122 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 2,187
Thanked 1,815 Times in 341 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 29 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 604778 I need a new wide angle lens pretty bad. I've been using the Nikon 18-55mm kit lens for sometime now.
I was thinking of the new Tamron 18-270mm PZD version and the Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 lens.
I've heard good reviews for both lenses... still not to sure which one to go for. | nikon 10-24mm
__________________ FEEDBACK 2018 Golf R MK7.5 (Daily) 2001 S2000 (Weekend Warrior) 1991 Merc 300 TE-24 AMG Estate - Sold 2005 STi - Sold 1987 AE86 GTS - Sold 1986 AE86 GTS - Sold | |
| | |
05-10-2011, 08:21 PM
|
#1123 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
^ That's not a particularly good Wide Angle lens imo.
1. It's expensive
2. It's soft just about everywhere
3. The build quality is inferior to the older Nikon 12-24mm.
If you need wide angle, in my opinion, the Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 is king.
| |
| | |
05-11-2011, 03:41 PM
|
#1124 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,148
Thanked 1,053 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 13 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ddr what exactly do you mean by 'good'? good value? good performance? the sigma 17-50 >> 18-50 from what i've read. | the truth, but at more than 50% more cost, it's pretty hefty cost difference. I personally have the 18-50 and am very happy with it, but would definitely jump to the 17-50 for the OS and HSM.
| |
| | |
05-12-2011, 06:25 PM
|
#1125 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,156
Thanked 1,345 Times in 589 Posts
Failed 149 Times in 56 Posts
|
Looking at the 80-200 F2.8D ED Lens. I've seen a couple ranging from $700-$900 on CL. Anyone have experience or suggestions on this len? Any common issues I should include in my considerations?
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:53 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
