REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-14-2011, 02:49 PM   #1126
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
N.V.M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: right here
Posts: 4,973
Thanked 4,783 Times in 830 Posts
Failed 884 Times in 162 Posts
just to articulate another recent event over the phone with Kerrisdale cameras, i will never shop there if its the last friggin camera store on the planet.

seems like an easy question, will you price match this certain item which is cheaper at Broadway or Lens&Shutter?

answer, yes, no, maybe. come on down, we'll let you know. we do, most of the time, but am not sure. jebus.
Advertisement
__________________
now what?

Last edited by N.V.M.; 05-14-2011 at 05:57 PM.
N.V.M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2011, 03:44 PM   #1127
Work hard, Play Hard - Wiz
 
604778's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,415
Thanked 2,011 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 365 Times in 46 Posts
I feel like the new Tamron would do. The 18-270mm PZD version. Would it be good for traveling?
Posted via RS Mobile
604778 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2011, 09:51 PM   #1128
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,580
Thanked 2,169 Times in 249 Posts
Failed 404 Times in 66 Posts
^ I ended up getting the new tamron 18-270, I love it, it definitely is lighter and more compact, and a great all around walking/traveling lens
Posted via RS Mobile
bigzz786786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 01:41 AM   #1129
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Anyone got the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 OS?
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 08:35 AM   #1130
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Matsuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,829
Thanked 6,590 Times in 1,166 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 23 Posts
^ I have the 18-50 f2.8 HSM lol
__________________
artofstance
artofstance on facebook
artofstance on Instagram
artofstance on twitter
Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts
--------------------------------------------
2018 Volkswagen Golf R
1999 Mazda Miata *sold*
2005 Mazda 3 *sold*
2002 Volvo S40 *RIP*
1989 Volvo 740 *RIP*
Matsuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 10:56 AM   #1131
I am grateful grapefruit
 
gars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
^ I have the 18-50 f2.8 non-HSM hehehe
__________________
Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts
gars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 11:59 AM   #1132
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,580
Thanked 2,169 Times in 249 Posts
Failed 404 Times in 66 Posts
couple pics i took with the tamron 18-270 pzd, with a rebel xsi, no post processing

18mm


270mm (for the rest)






bigzz786786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 03:27 PM   #1133
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matsuda View Post
^ I have the 18-50 f2.8 HSM lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by gars View Post
^ I have the 18-50 f2.8 non-HSM hehehe
Yea, there's not a whole lot of literature on the 17-50mm, the stuff that I have come across say's that it's sharper than the Nikon 17-55m f2.8 and Canon 17-5mm f2.8.

It also have OS, (VR or IS etc)which the Nikon doesn't have. It's also 1/2 the price. LOL.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 05:02 PM   #1134
I am grateful grapefruit
 
gars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo View Post
Yea, there's not a whole lot of literature on the 17-50mm, the stuff that I have come across say's that it's sharper than the Nikon 17-55m f2.8 and Canon 17-5mm f2.8.

It also have OS, (VR or IS etc)which the Nikon doesn't have. It's also 1/2 the price. LOL.
Ya, i've been reading up on reviews about it as well - thought long and hard about upgrading.

but 2 things bug me - the rotating front element - which sucks if you use a CPL - as well as the non-USM equivalent (which isn't that big a deal I guess)

but that's why it's probably cheaper.
__________________
Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts
gars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 07:54 PM   #1135
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
^ the front element doesn't rotate, just the focus ring:



I have the Nikon 17-55mm right now.. I wonder if I should have got the Sigma instead. Seems to be a winner, and according to DxOmark, sharper than the Nikon... I've been finding that I can't hand hold anything slower than 1/50s. I miss VR/IS/OS.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 08:11 PM   #1136
I am grateful grapefruit
 
gars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo View Post
^ the front element doesn't rotate, just the focus ring:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F14IX...eature=related


I have the Nikon 17-55mm right now.. I wonder if I should have got the Sigma instead. Seems to be a winner, and according to DxOmark, sharper than the Nikon... I've been finding that I can't hand hold anything slower than 1/50s. I miss VR/IS/OS.
oops, misread the article.

seems like a good choice for Nikon!
__________________
Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts
gars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2011, 11:58 AM   #1137
Ready to be Man handled by RS!
 
TeriyakiSawce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 77
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 2 Posts
What would you buy D90 with 18-105 or 18-55 & 55-200? Thanks.
Posted via RS Mobile
TeriyakiSawce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2011, 02:43 PM   #1138
F**K YOUR HEAD
 
ilvtofu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeriyakiSawce View Post
What would you buy D90 with 18-105 or 18-55 & 55-200? Thanks.
Posted via RS Mobile
I think it's preference, IIRC the 18-55 has better quality than the 18-105 which can get pretty distorted. however the 18-105 is a pretty practical lens for focal range and that might suit your needs better. You can usually get away with just taking the 18-105 out with you.

The 55-200 is a pretty sharp lens for the price too,
__________________
Miata
Fiesta
Feedback
ilvtofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2011, 03:39 PM   #1139
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeriyakiSawce View Post
What would you buy D90 with 18-105 or 18-55 & 55-200? Thanks.
Posted via RS Mobile
Switching lens is a pain.

if you can live w/ 18-105 just do that. How many shots will you actually make from the 100-200mm range? My guess is not too many.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2011, 08:41 PM   #1140
フルコンボ
 
RCubed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YVR
Posts: 5,214
Thanked 3,998 Times in 596 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 8 Posts
Looking for a walkaround prime for nikon. Budget <$600.
Suggestions?
I was thinking a the 35mm 1.8 or 24 2.8
RCubed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2011, 10:33 PM   #1141
ddr
Snapping away
 
ddr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
sigma 30mm f/1.4, if you can stomach sigma's warranty.
__________________
flickr
ddr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2011, 12:48 AM   #1142
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCubed View Post
Looking for a walkaround prime for nikon. Budget <$600.
Suggestions?
I was thinking a the 35mm 1.8 or 24 2.8
Not much choice... 35mm f1.8 is the way to go. Best bang for buck.

What's wrong with the 50mm f1.8 or f1.4? Decent choice too.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2011, 09:52 AM   #1143
I am grateful grapefruit
 
gars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
I think the 50mm is a little long as a "walkaround" prime.

I'm jealous that Nikon has the 35 1.8....
__________________
Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts
gars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2011, 11:32 AM   #1144
Work hard, Play Hard - Wiz
 
604778's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,415
Thanked 2,011 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 365 Times in 46 Posts
After seeing the reviews on you youtube of the Sigma 17-50mm OS. Kinda condering it now. But the Tamron 18-270mm PZD is still on my mind also.. I could use that extra zoom..

Hard to decide
Posted via RS Mobile
604778 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2011, 03:47 PM   #1145
ddr
Snapping away
 
ddr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
i think the aperture, OS effectiveness, and sharpness are just incomparable. huge difference. if you can't tell the difference then by all means, go with the 18-270. most users will tell you to get a separate zoom for the occasional shot if you think you will need it.
__________________
flickr
ddr is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 05-26-2011, 05:07 PM   #1146
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
N.V.M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: right here
Posts: 4,973
Thanked 4,783 Times in 830 Posts
Failed 884 Times in 162 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gars View Post
I think the 50mm is a little long as a "walkaround" prime.

it is. i did a couple walks with just my 50mm, i kept kicking myself on a lot of missed shots if i had something shorter.
__________________
now what?
N.V.M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2011, 10:49 PM   #1147
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Thoughts on Zeiss Planar and Distagon lens? Any way of testing these lenses also?
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 12:19 AM   #1148
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
"Planar" & " Distagon" are types of lens designs. Which Planar & Distagon lenses do you want to try? I know Leo's has the new Zeiss lenses for Canon & Nikon and Genesis Matrix just received a full set of CP lenses.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 12:42 AM   #1149
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Well I was rather interested in the 35mm f1.4 Distagon or perhaps the older version too. I'm just curious about the feel and using these lens.. how much approx to rent them?
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 02:12 AM   #1150
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
^^^ Google?
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net