You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Photography LabTHIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...
I currently have a kit 18-105. I've been more interested in street photo and portrait shots. I've been debating over the
35mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, or Tamron 17-50 2.8. What do you guys think? Thanks.
^ i've had a sigma 17-70 before and it was pretty good for the price. the f2.8 is actually only from 17-20mm then it goes up, but for what it costs vs (back then) canon's 17-85 f4-5.6, i was pretty pleased. had a sharp copy too some people don't like the "warm glow" it provided though but i was always particular to the warmth.
i have the sigma 17-70 haha. it was the first lens i bought after i got my first camera earlier this year. im just wondering what would be a nice upgrade for around the same price range.
mine isnt every sharp shooting people but its sharp when shooting objects. the pictures it takes are kinda soft. im just asking for a price check because i think i got ripped off. i bought it for $400 and i see some for cheaper but with os hsm but not in the best condition. but i got mine mint with everything in the box. right now im trying to figure a price to sell it for.
@moky, i love the warm glow too! i like to increase the temperature when editing on top of the glow haha
yeah I have the HSM OS and it's a pretty good walkaround lens, I stopped using my 17-40 L because of the OS helps loads at night without a tripod. It's very sharp, maybe you should just upgrade to it
Im looking for a little more reach from my 70-200.
Anyone know anything about the Kenko MC4 1.4x Teleconverters?
Reviews are a hit and miss with this thing. Some people say its as good as the Nikon TC-14E, and others say its shit.
What do you think of the Canon EF 35-105mm Zoom Lens f/4.5-5.6 for $30 dollars.
Basic use, just bored of my kit lens from my t2i.
The only thing is that the electronic is disabled ? Getting it on ebay, and this is what the seller is saying.
" The electronics for this lens have been disconnected and the aperture set on full. "
So this pretty much means manual focus ? anything else i should know about it ?
Spoiler!
Heres the full summarized description .
The glass in this 35 - 105mm lens rivals the high quality and excellent optics of the L-series lenses for quality. This is a beautiful, beautiful lens with absolutely gorgeous glass. HOWEVER: The electronics in this lens malfunctioned and when I opened it, the ribbon was broken across several circuit. I have removed the contacts and the ribbon just under the mount, opened the aperture wide, and have been using it with great success on Manual Focus using the aperture priority (AV) setting on my 300D. The glass and body are still excellent, the photos are still excellent, and the manual focus and zoom still work well.
I'm still looking for a new prime and I'm not sure which one I should get. I'm either thinking the 35mm 1.8D or the 24mm 2.8D.
I was leaning towards the 24mm since it's a wider prime and would be interesting to play with one. I currently have a 50mm 1.4D and a 85mm 1.8D as my primes.
Also, anyone have any experience with the Nikon 24-70mm 2.8? Thinking of upgrading from my 17-50mm 2.8 to one of them.
Has anyone used the MP-E 65? It seems like a really neat lens
Any suggestions for macro lenses, flowers, bugs, small objects etc.?
I had one for about a year, until i sold it for bigger things. It's a great lens, but you NEED a MR-14EX, or the MR-24 or whatever its called to make it happen. It's the hardest most frustrating lens you will ever use, but the results that you get out of it are amazing if you know how to use it. If it's your first macro lens, get a Canon 100mm macro, the Sigma 105mm Macro, or even the Tamron 90mm Macro. They are all good first macro lenses.
Fuck I'm drunk. Had to rewrite this about 5 times to make it make sense.
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's
what kind of ultra wide angel are out there for canon full frame?
i currently know there are:
Canon 17-40
Canon 16-35
Sigma 12-24
what other options r out there?
im looking for a UWA that is good quality and a decent price, so the 16-35 is out of the question
TIA
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane
I had some girl come into the busser station the other day trying to make out with every staff member and then pull down her pants and asked for someone to stick a dick in her (at least she shaved).
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1exotic
Vtec doesn't kick in on Reverse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma
its like.. oh yeah oh yeah.. ohhhh yeah... OOoooOohh... why's it suddenly feel a bit better... ohhhh yeahh... ohhh...oh..fuck... it probably ripped.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
some people don't like the "warm glow" it provided though but i was always particular to the warmth.
