Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... | | |
08-04-2011, 01:26 AM
|
#1201 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
If you have a sharp copy of the 50mm, why not keep it? I think it's a sweet lens on a FF body.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
08-08-2011, 01:19 PM
|
#1202 | '
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,664
Thanked 6,557 Times in 1,111 Posts
Failed 797 Times in 212 Posts
|
Hey guys, Sorta in a dilemma.
Looking to buy a new lens soon but I cant decide which one.
I currently have a 50mm f1.4g, 35-70mm f2.8 and a 16mm f2.8 fisheye.
I need a wider lens because 35 isn't wide enough. I can only afford to get one lens right now. Should I get a tokina 16-50 f2.8 lens or should I get a tokina 12-24 f4 or a tokina 11-16 f2.8? Im thinking of selling the 1.4g to get a 35mm + 12-24. Or is getting the 16-50 the best choice because I dont have an all arounder? I know most of you shoot primes but I shoot events quite a bit so switching lens is quite inconvenient for me. Will shooting people with a 12-24 stretch their faces? Let me know, thanks in advance! Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
08-08-2011, 05:48 PM
|
#1203 | フルコンボ
Join Date: May 2004 Location: YVR
Posts: 5,214
Thanked 3,998 Times in 596 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 8 Posts
|
Get a 24-70. Im picking up one in the near near future |
| |
08-08-2011, 07:41 PM
|
#1204 | '
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,664
Thanked 6,557 Times in 1,111 Posts
Failed 797 Times in 212 Posts
|
out of my budget i wish i was balling like you i can get a 12-24 + 17-50 for the price of that lolol
|
| |
08-08-2011, 09:49 PM
|
#1205 | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,038
Thanked 166 Times in 40 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 7 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever If you have a sharp copy of the 50mm, why not keep it? I think it's a sweet lens on a FF body. | Because I borrowed it from my store.
I can buy it from the EPP for much less |
| |
08-08-2011, 11:43 PM
|
#1206 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
Do you work at a camera store?
EPP?
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
08-09-2011, 12:02 AM
|
#1207 | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,038
Thanked 166 Times in 40 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 7 Posts
|
Employee purchase price
|
| |
08-09-2011, 01:14 AM
|
#1208 | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,580
Thanked 2,169 Times in 249 Posts
Failed 404 Times in 66 Posts
|
im soon to be purchasing a 60d, and currently i have a kit lens 18-55 is, and i have a tamron 18-270 pzd vc
im thinking im going to need something sharper, so im wondering if a 15-85mm is, and a 70-200 f/4L is a good combo to keep me pleased for some time
any advice?
btw, im not made of loads of money, so best bang for the buck is what im after
also i take more into all around photography, scenic (landscape and urban), wild life, portrait, and sports (mostly wanting to try rolling shots)
|
| |
08-09-2011, 01:22 AM
|
#1209 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
I think that's a great kit to have. My sharpness obsessed co-worker has those lenses, but with the 7D body. Later on, you can add a wide aperture prime to your kit.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
08-10-2011, 10:43 AM
|
#1210 | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
Anyone got the Nikon 70-300mm VR? Like it? Hate it? Compared to the 55-300mm VR?
|
| |
08-13-2011, 06:26 PM
|
#1211 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
For anyone with a micro 4/3 camera, I just tested the new Leica 25mm f1.4 and it is incredibly sharp! Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
08-30-2011, 01:33 AM
|
#1212 | SardaukarMod
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Salusa Secundus
Posts: 11,306
Thanked 485 Times in 198 Posts
Failed 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
looking to pick up a new lens for my d80. wide angle, specifically for an upcoming trip to Europe.
new: Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f3.5-4.5 Di II - $550ish?
or used: Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM BNIB New Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM lens for nikon - this guy's asking for $500
or Tokina AT-X Pro SD 12-24mm F4 (IF) DX II?
Last edited by seakrait; 08-30-2011 at 02:39 AM.
|
| |
08-30-2011, 01:36 AM
|
#1213 | '
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,664
Thanked 6,557 Times in 1,111 Posts
Failed 797 Times in 212 Posts
|
I've seen used 10-20 sigmas for $400. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
08-30-2011, 02:37 AM
|
#1214 | SardaukarMod
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Salusa Secundus
Posts: 11,306
Thanked 485 Times in 198 Posts
Failed 15 Times in 13 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 737! I've seen used 10-20 sigmas for $400. Posted via RS Mobile | links? |
| |
08-30-2011, 10:05 PM
|
#1215 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,157
Thanked 1,346 Times in 589 Posts
Failed 149 Times in 56 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by seakrait links? | I'd sell you my Nikon 18-35mm if you are interested. I barely use it.
|
| |
08-31-2011, 02:46 PM
|
#1216 | Da Vinci's real masterpiece: The Mona Diesel
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,797
Thanked 563 Times in 247 Posts
Failed 15 Times in 15 Posts
|
Any one have the Canon EF 28mm 2.8 lens? Since i have a cropped sensor I was thinking of using this as my walk around prime. Any thoughts? http://www.memoryexpress.com/Product...7%28ME%29.aspx |
| |
08-31-2011, 05:56 PM
|
#1217 | 2010 RS Top Food Critic Winner
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,410
Thanked 694 Times in 233 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 16 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jsunu | I would suggest the Sigma 24 1.8 instead as a walkaround lens.
Since I got it, it hasn't been taken off my 7D and I love it. FM Reviews - Sigma 24mm f1.8 EX DG Aspherical Macro Flickr: Sigma24f1.8
It's a strange lens, big but light, wide but also works as a macro, and it's super fast at f1.8.
|
| |
09-01-2011, 02:29 AM
|
#1218 | Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,411
Thanked 217 Times in 71 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 39 Posts
|
Canon 70-200 f4L non-IS and IS version, is it a big difference? i was thinking about the 70-200mm but would IS really be that important?
|
| |
09-01-2011, 09:53 AM
|
#1219 | I am grateful grapefruit
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
|
the 70-200 F4L - the IS version is actually sharper - but the IS itself actually makes a big difference if you're going to be shooting handheld. Not everyone has a steady hand that can shoot 200mm without IS - even during daytime.
But the price difference is quite high. on the used market - the non-IS version goes for about $600, while the IS version is about $1100. So it really depends on how much you want to spend. You can buy a used non-IS version first and see how you feel about it, and sell it later on if you want to upgrade.
The IS version is also weather sealed - which might mean it would last a little longer in the elements.
__________________ Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts |
| |
09-01-2011, 10:07 PM
|
#1220 | SardaukarMod
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Salusa Secundus
Posts: 11,306
Thanked 485 Times in 198 Posts
Failed 15 Times in 13 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Euro7r I'd sell you my Nikon 18-35mm if you are interested. I barely use it. | hrmmm.. i was hoping to pick up something wider than that. but that being said, how much are you askin'? |
| |
09-01-2011, 10:46 PM
|
#1221 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,157
Thanked 1,346 Times in 589 Posts
Failed 149 Times in 56 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by seakrait hrmmm.. i was hoping to pick up something wider than that. but that being said, how much are you askin'? | Asking for $350. Pm-ed you.
|
| |
09-10-2011, 06:02 PM
|
#1222 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: right here
Posts: 4,973
Thanked 4,783 Times in 830 Posts
Failed 884 Times in 162 Posts
|
not a lens, but it goes on one!
trying it out now, hopefully it'll do what my gray card does, but so much easier.
__________________
now what?
|
| |
09-10-2011, 10:30 PM
|
#1223 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
^^^^ doesn't that give you a white balance? A grey card is more for getting the proper exposure.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
09-11-2011, 04:29 AM
|
#1224 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: right here
Posts: 4,973
Thanked 4,783 Times in 830 Posts
Failed 884 Times in 162 Posts
| Quote:
By using a grey card, the camera can be set to a true white balance, resulting in a more accurate recording of all the colours.The older photographic grey cards are not suitable because they are not neutral enough. They were used for judging exposure rather than judging a white balance and colour neutrality.
| About a Grey Card
now, i didn't know that about the card being used for exposure, i've always solely used it for white balancing. but i tend to get lazy and go through the process, forgetting to take it with me, etc.
__________________
now what?
Last edited by N.V.M.; 09-11-2011 at 04:44 AM.
|
| |
09-12-2011, 05:52 PM
|
#1225 | SardaukarMod
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Salusa Secundus
Posts: 11,306
Thanked 485 Times in 198 Posts
Failed 15 Times in 13 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by seakrait looking to pick up a new lens for my d80. wide angle, specifically for an upcoming trip to Europe.
new: Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f3.5-4.5 Di II - $550ish?
or used: Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM BNIB New Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM lens for nikon - this guy's asking for $500 (new $600)
or Tokina AT-X Pro SD 12-24mm F4 (IF) DX II (new 660)? | still undecided. anyone have an opinion?
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:47 AM. |