Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
09-29-2011, 07:59 PM
|
#1226 | | Kick' In' Duh' Bass
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,619
Thanked 1,692 Times in 405 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 65 Posts
|
Does anyone have experience with the Sigma 17-70 OS? Been thinking of either that or the Canon 15-85, from what i hear both very similar.. Except the Canon is double the price lol.
__________________ Flickr The DC5 Member's Journal > 2005 Acura TSX ASPEC < > 2003 Acura RSX-S < > 1994 Acura Intergra LS < > 1994 Honda Civic SI < > 1991 Acura Integra GS < ( RIP ) | 
|  | |
09-29-2011, 09:06 PM
|
#1227 | | resident Oil Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
|
^ Sigma 17-50mm OS is better than the 17-70mm, try it out!
| |
| | |
09-29-2011, 10:36 PM
|
#1228 | | Kick' In' Duh' Bass
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,619
Thanked 1,692 Times in 405 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 65 Posts
|
True its a constant 2.8 but i need more of an upgrade in focal length for a more general purpose lens. The more research i do it seems that the Canon 15-85 is far more superior in sharpness. Time to save up...
__________________ Flickr The DC5 Member's Journal > 2005 Acura TSX ASPEC < > 2003 Acura RSX-S < > 1994 Acura Intergra LS < > 1994 Honda Civic SI < > 1991 Acura Integra GS < ( RIP ) | |
| | |
09-30-2011, 09:55 AM
|
#1229 | | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Richmond
Posts: 4,458
Thanked 47 Times in 16 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Fro those interested, Memory Express currently has Canon 17-85mm IS USM F4-5.6 for sale at $350.00 Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM at Memory Express Computers | |
| | |
09-30-2011, 02:01 PM
|
#1230 | | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,580
Thanked 2,169 Times in 249 Posts
Failed 404 Times in 66 Posts
|
hey guys, quick update, i got my 60d and canon 70-200 f4L IS! so happy right now!
t first i was gonna get the 15-85 is, but now im thinking about the 17-40 f4L, what are your thoughts? which is sharper?
also planning on a 50mm 1.4
| |
| | |
09-30-2011, 04:22 PM
|
#1231 | | Returner of Lost Phones and Turtles
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,117
Thanked 3,997 Times in 963 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 69 Posts
|
Im looking for a telephoto zoom lens, any suggestions? Camera is a T2i
| |
| | |
09-30-2011, 10:10 PM
|
#1232 | | Snapping away
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by LP670-4 SV  Im looking for a telephoto zoom lens, any suggestions? Camera is a T2i | depends on your budget. 55-250, 70-300 is usm, any of the canon 70-200
| |
| | |
10-01-2011, 11:48 PM
|
#1233 | | Returner of Lost Phones and Turtles
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,117
Thanked 3,997 Times in 963 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 69 Posts
|
Best for the price is what I'm looking for haha gonna keep my eye out for one Posted via RS Mobile | |
| | |
10-02-2011, 01:03 AM
|
#1234 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
The new 70-300L is amazing, if you have the budget for it.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
10-03-2011, 12:25 PM
|
#1235 | | Rider
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Surrey
Posts: 3,269
Thanked 2,081 Times in 532 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 100 Posts
|
looking for suggestions for a digital camera (canon) for no more than 300$ all in need it asap
TIA
| |
| | |
10-03-2011, 05:01 PM
|
#1236 | This title intentionally left blank MOD
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Above Sea Level
Posts: 8,549
Thanked 484 Times in 211 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 14 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by gdoh looking for suggestions for a digital camera (canon) for no more than 300$ all in need it asap
TIA | You want this thread.
__________________
Classifieds Head Moderator
Automotive Service Technician
I don't have an anger problem. I have an idiot problem. | |
| | |
10-06-2011, 09:17 PM
|
#1237 | | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Montreal
Posts: 590
Thanked 324 Times in 144 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Looking for a versatile travel lens for my D90...thinking about the 16-85VR. Any thoughts for or against it? Tests look pretty good.
__________________
"Happiness lies in the joy of achievement and the thrill of creative effort"
| |
| | |
10-06-2011, 09:23 PM
|
#1238 | | Kick' In' Duh' Bass
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,619
Thanked 1,692 Times in 405 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 65 Posts
|
^ i was actually just looking into this lens as well for a D7000 but from what i read and the guy told me from BC its very similar to the 18-105 VR. Differences are not very significant and ur pretty much paying for the 16mm..
__________________ Flickr The DC5 Member's Journal > 2005 Acura TSX ASPEC < > 2003 Acura RSX-S < > 1994 Acura Intergra LS < > 1994 Honda Civic SI < > 1991 Acura Integra GS < ( RIP ) | |
| | |
10-06-2011, 10:02 PM
|
#1239 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
The 18-105VR is decent too.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
10-06-2011, 11:43 PM
|
#1240 | | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Montreal
Posts: 590
Thanked 324 Times in 144 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by -EuroRSN- ^ i was actually just looking into this lens as well for a D7000 but from what i read and the guy told me from BC its very similar to the 18-105 VR. Differences are not very significant and ur pretty much paying for the 16mm.. | Interesting...I've used a 18-105 before and the images, at least on that copy weren't that sharp. The reviews on the 16-85 give great ratings on sharpness (corners were a bit darker, but it's a zoom lens for the consumer level, so I can live with that). I'll have to visit BC and try it out tomorrow. What about that Sigma 17-50? Perhaps it's a bit too heavy for a travel lens?
__________________
"Happiness lies in the joy of achievement and the thrill of creative effort"
Last edited by AWDTurboLuvr; 10-06-2011 at 11:59 PM.
| |
| | |
10-08-2011, 12:56 PM
|
#1241 | | Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,411
Thanked 217 Times in 71 Posts
Failed 98 Times in 39 Posts
|
consider purchasing the canon 24-70mm f2.8 L lens as a walk-around lens, but it does not come with IS, also considering the canon 24-105mm f4 with IS.... i really love to 2 extra stops, but is it worth not having IS? i've read some ppl whom bought the 2.8 complain about it not being sharp, maybe due to their shaky hands? What are your outputs guys?
| |
| | |
10-08-2011, 04:40 PM
|
#1242 | | '
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,664
Thanked 6,557 Times in 1,111 Posts
Failed 797 Times in 212 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by AWDTurboLuvr Interesting...I've used a 18-105 before and the images, at least on that copy weren't that sharp. The reviews on the 16-85 give great ratings on sharpness (corners were a bit darker, but it's a zoom lens for the consumer level, so I can live with that). I'll have to visit BC and try it out tomorrow. What about that Sigma 17-50? Perhaps it's a bit too heavy for a travel lens? | Focusing samples Nikon 16-85 vs 18-200 vs Sigma 18-50 f2.8: Nikon SLR Lens Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review
i think i would go with the 17-50. it has fixed 2.8 too. it shouldnt be too heavy, i had a 17-70 a while back and it was pretty light
| |
| | |
10-08-2011, 06:17 PM
|
#1243 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by -EuroRSN- Does anyone have experience with the Sigma 17-70 OS? Been thinking of either that or the Canon 15-85, from what i hear both very similar.. Except the Canon is double the price lol. | I have the sigma 17-70 F2.8-4.0 OS HSM Macro on my 7D. I'm pretty happy with it and it's an incredibly easy lens to use. The minimum focus distance makes it really practical for stuff like food photography. IMO it's a pretty sharp lens and with the OS on I've taken portraits at speeds as slow as 1/5 without any problems. There is a big difference between the 2.8-4.0 and the 2.8-4.5 though, dont be fooled!
| |
| | |
10-08-2011, 07:45 PM
|
#1244 | | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: right here
Posts: 4,995
Thanked 4,789 Times in 835 Posts
Failed 884 Times in 162 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ilvtofu There is a big difference between the 2.8-4.0 and the 2.8-4.5 though, dont be fooled! |
the 2.8-4.5 is about 1/2 the price, he should be safe. There's a Canon version of this lens, just called a 2.8(17-70mm OS), and its even way more than the 2-8-4.0
__________________
now what?
| |
| | |
10-09-2011, 01:26 AM
|
#1245 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Shead consider purchasing the canon 24-70mm f2.8 L lens as a walk-around lens, but it does not come with IS, also considering the canon 24-105mm f4 with IS.... i really love to 2 extra stops, but is it worth not having IS? i've read some ppl whom bought the 2.8 complain about it not being sharp, maybe due to their shaky hands? What are your outputs guys? | The 24-70 has one extra stop over the 24-105. I think the 24-105 is a good walkaround/travel lens, but I wouldn't use it professionally - I find the f4 aperture too limiting. Both lenses are a bit soft, but they will output sharp 16x20 prints, maybe 20x24 as long as you have optimum focus & exposure. I think for most people, the 24-105 is a better choice, but if you do a lot of people shots indoors, the f2.8 aperture of the 24-70 might come in handy, as the IS does not compensate for subject movement. The 24-70 is a bit of a pig, as it's big & heavy.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
10-09-2011, 01:31 AM
|
#1246 | | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,580
Thanked 2,169 Times in 249 Posts
Failed 404 Times in 66 Posts
|
does anybody have any experience with the 17-40 f4L?
im wanting to purchase a good sharp walk around lens lens but still be reasonable in price
i already have a 70-200 f4L IS, so i need something for the shorter range
any other suggestions? right now i have a 60d but i plan to eventually move to FF
| |
| | |
10-22-2011, 10:22 PM
|
#1247 | | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 787
Thanked 433 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 32 Times in 11 Posts
|
Looking for a beginner-intermediate wide-angle lens for T3i, thx!
Canon EF 28mm f2.8?
Last edited by xeryusx; 10-22-2011 at 10:36 PM.
| |
| | |
10-23-2011, 02:17 AM
|
#1248 | | Kick' In' Duh' Bass
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,619
Thanked 1,692 Times in 405 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 65 Posts
|
^ well the cheapest and best is the sigma 10-22mm. You still gonna spend near $600 or less if u find used. Or you can also go for a general purpose 15-85 USM but thats like $1000 and cost more then the T3i it self... Fuck why are lenses so damn expensive Time to save up
__________________ Flickr The DC5 Member's Journal > 2005 Acura TSX ASPEC < > 2003 Acura RSX-S < > 1994 Acura Intergra LS < > 1994 Honda Civic SI < > 1991 Acura Integra GS < ( RIP ) | |
| | |
10-23-2011, 11:43 AM
|
#1249 | | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 524
Thanked 130 Times in 50 Posts
Failed 10 Times in 3 Posts
|
Edit: Oops. Wrong thread haha  | |
| | |
10-26-2011, 04:04 PM
|
#1250 | | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Richcity
Posts: 1,295
Thanked 1,179 Times in 229 Posts
Failed 198 Times in 55 Posts
|
How much can i get for selling my lens that came with my d5100?
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:08 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
