Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... | | |
08-05-2013, 09:51 PM
|
#1501 | My AFC gave me an ABS CEL code of LOL while at WOT!
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,515
Thanked 1,431 Times in 486 Posts
Failed 243 Times in 94 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by AndM Looking for a solid 52mm circular polarizer for a good price. Anyone have Hoya's 52mm circular polarizer? Any recommendations?
Cheers. | I have the Hoya one. Got it from a friend that works at futureshop. Was half off with staff discount. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
08-05-2013, 10:12 PM
|
#1502 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: PENIS
Posts: 4,287
Thanked 4,155 Times in 1,302 Posts
Failed 297 Times in 125 Posts
|
I have a hoya 55 super quality cpl
I also have a tiffen 52 polarizer for sale
just get it on ebay + step down rings
__________________ There's a phallic symbol infront of my car Quote:
MG1: in fact, a new term needs to make its way into the American dictionary. Trump............ he's such a "Trump" = ultimate insult. Like, "yray, you're such a trump."
| bcrdukes yray fucked bcrdukes up the nose
dapperfied yraisis
dapperfied yray so waisis
FastAnna you literally talk out your ass
FastAnna i really cant
FastAnna yray i cant stand you
Last edited by yray; 08-05-2013 at 10:51 PM.
|
| |
08-31-2013, 11:56 AM
|
#1503 | MoD
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: a rainy city
Posts: 3,486
Thanked 1,805 Times in 227 Posts
Failed 124 Times in 20 Posts
|
I just finally upgraded from my kit lens. I was told to get a UV filter; not for the filtering properties, but more so for protection. Do you guys agree? I was thinking the Hoya Alpha UV MC filter or the Hoya Pro 1.
Last edited by k2_alpha; 08-31-2013 at 12:01 PM.
|
| |
08-31-2013, 12:35 PM
|
#1504 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
I generally don't use filters, as they can cause increased flaring and ghosting especially at night. It's not a bad idea to use a filter for protection, but I rarely do. I have a B+W MRC UV filter for my 24-105mm f4L as it's my walk around lens, but I don't have any filters for my 24-70L or 70-200L which are the lenses I use when shooting paid gigs.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
09-22-2013, 08:12 AM
|
#1505 | NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 45
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 1 Post
|
Hi experts, any experience with the EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Portrait lens. I will mainly use it for street style fashion shoots.
I currently use the EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM kit lens. It's actually not too bad. Considering I shoot on a tripod so I can use longer exposure to compensate for the narrower f-stop. But it does limit me when I want to capture motion.
I also have the EF 50mm f/1.8 II that I can borrow from time to time too.
Are the 40mm and 50mm lens much different on a cropped body? Any input on image quality? Response time to autofocus and such?
Also, do I need the 40mm considering my kit lens and the 50mm?
I read their stats, but nothing compares to actual experience.
Thanks in advance for all your input. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2013, 11:59 AM
|
#1506 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,148
Thanked 1,053 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
So I'm in the process of offloading my beloved 70-200 2.8 IS II in a trade.
What I'm getting back in return are:
135L (so stoked!)
70-200 f/4L (non-IS)
$500 cash
This is going to be added to an existing 6D, 17-40L, and Sigma 50 1.4.
My question to you all is what to do with the $500. Yes I can keep it, but I was set on filling that gap between 50 and 135 with an 85 1.8. But recently it got me thinking that the difference (to me, at least) between 50->85 or 85->135 isn't that huge. I have a 580EXII, so I don't feel like upgrading to 2 flashes.
Putting it towards a 35L/Sigma 35 also crossed my mind, but I'd rather not add more cash on top for a lens I'm not sure I'd use much.
I don't use my tele very often (and never indoors, always outside in daylight), so I thought I didn't need IS. From what I read, the difference between the IQ of the two f/4 versions is marginal, so I'm thinking just save the cash for something else.
Any thoughts?
|
| |
10-09-2013, 10:04 PM
|
#1507 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,745
Thanked 691 Times in 275 Posts
Failed 155 Times in 43 Posts
|
whats a good lens for taking large group car pics.
my stock lens are the 18-55 and its hard to take large group car pics. difficult to fit all the cars into shoot and I have to be very far away to take the pic to make it fit.
|
| |
10-09-2013, 10:20 PM
|
#1508 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
|
Tokina 11-16 F2.8 is pretty awesome. Or Canon 10-22mm lens. $$$ but its wide! Assuming your using a crop sensor camera.
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's |
| |
10-10-2013, 09:52 AM
|
#1509 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,745
Thanked 691 Times in 275 Posts
Failed 155 Times in 43 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Boostslut Tokina 11-16 F2.8 is pretty awesome. Or Canon 10-22mm lens. $$$ but its wide! Assuming your using a crop sensor camera. | im pretty newbie, havent really had the time to get into photography. I have the t5i. I just take pics on auto mode LOL and then I edit them on my computer with lightroom
Last edited by Recon604; 10-10-2013 at 04:43 PM.
|
| |
10-10-2013, 05:22 PM
|
#1510 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,148
Thanked 1,053 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
There was a recent price drop on the 10-22 to about $799. I've seen 2-3 ads on CL selling for 600-650. I haven't seen a used 11-16 in a while. Don't really need the 2.8 if you're shooting cars. Big thing the Canon has going for it is the flare resistance. It's miles ahead the Tokina.
|
| |
10-11-2013, 06:12 PM
|
#1511 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,745
Thanked 691 Times in 275 Posts
Failed 155 Times in 43 Posts
| |
| |
10-11-2013, 08:52 PM
|
#1512 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,745
Thanked 691 Times in 275 Posts
Failed 155 Times in 43 Posts
|
i just price matched the lenses at Broadway Cameras. I got a B+W UV filter too but I noticed they scammed me.
They sold me this one @ $149.99 but it actually costs $89.99 B+W UVa Haze 010 77mm Filter - Broadway Camera
the one i found out that also costs $149 was the slim one B+W UV Haze 010 77mm Slim Filter - Broadway Camera
The price sticker on the filter even says $149.99
So I guess the flip the prices on the filter since I told them I was a newbie... fckin choked
|
| |
10-12-2013, 07:47 AM
|
#1513 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,283
Thanked 1,275 Times in 303 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
So go back and get your money? just make sure you don't actually have a slim filter first
They may have been trying to sell you the slim because of the wide angle lens though
|
| |
10-12-2013, 12:35 PM
|
#1514 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: The Fruit Loops
Posts: 3,625
Thanked 7,509 Times in 2,035 Posts
Failed 173 Times in 83 Posts
|
I was always under the impression that the slim is better on a wide angle due to potential corner darkness.
At least this is what I've read on photography boards. I have the slm CP filter on my Tokina 11-16mm and it's been phenomenal. I use the same filter with step ring on my 50mm without issue. So something to keep in mind is to spend more on a large diameter filter and use it with rings to cover your smaller lenses.
|
| |
10-12-2013, 05:08 PM
|
#1515 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,745
Thanked 691 Times in 275 Posts
Failed 155 Times in 43 Posts
|
slim filter requires you to buy a new lens cap. the canon one doesnt fit tight on the slim
i returned it got one on ebay 50% of what it costs at bcc
|
| |
01-03-2014, 10:56 AM
|
#1516 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Van
Posts: 3,130
Thanked 38 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I just picked up a Sony Nex 3n with 15-60 lens. Any suggestions that you guys can give to a noobie looking for a better lens? Mostly for travel pics. Something budget would be great.... i was thinking of grabbing a used Sigma 30mm f/2.8. Any thoughts?
|
| |
01-03-2014, 02:07 PM
|
#1517 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,148
Thanked 1,053 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
It really depends what you're shooting. By itself the zoom should suffice for travel. The 30 would be a great walk around lens for going around towns as it would be close to a "50mm lens"
Given you called yourself a newbie, I'll go ahead and explain it: The sensor in your NEX is a bit smaller than a "full frame" sensor. So 30mm isn't really 30mm. It's actually closer to 45mm (30mm x 1.5 "crop factor", so it would be a 30mm field of view that's being cropped). That's why sometimes you'll hear APS-C-sensors (like your NEX) as "crop sensors". Just keep that in mind when you buy lenses from here on out.
If you're shooting landscapes though, it wouldn't really be wide enough unless you shot panoramas.
So yeah, it's a great lens, but without knowing what you shoot we can't really make suggestions for you.
Edit: Keep in mind that there are adapters from NEX to whatever lens mounts you want, so lens selection is abundant and possibly cheap as lint. That said, the lenses would usually be manual focus. So if that's not your thing, just ignore that part.
|
| |
01-03-2014, 02:37 PM
|
#1518 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Van
Posts: 3,130
Thanked 38 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I would mostly be taking pictures of touristy things when i go to Mexico next week - like the ruins, beaches, people, etc.
Would the 19mm be better for landscapes/outdoors?
*total newbie* lol Quote:
Originally Posted by m3thods It really depends what you're shooting. By itself the zoom should suffice for travel. The 30 would be a great walk around lens for going around towns as it would be close to a "50mm lens"
Given you called yourself a newbie, I'll go ahead and explain it: The sensor in your NEX is a bit smaller than a "full frame" sensor. So 30mm isn't really 30mm. It's actually closer to 45mm (30mm x 1.5 "crop factor", so it would be a 30mm field of view that's being cropped). That's why sometimes you'll hear APS-C-sensors (like your NEX) as "crop sensors". Just keep that in mind when you buy lenses from here on out.
If you're shooting landscapes though, it wouldn't really be wide enough unless you shot panoramas.
So yeah, it's a great lens, but without knowing what you shoot we can't really make suggestions for you.
Edit: Keep in mind that there are adapters from NEX to whatever lens mounts you want, so lens selection is abundant and possibly cheap as lint. That said, the lenses would usually be manual focus. So if that's not your thing, just ignore that part. | |
| |
01-03-2014, 04:47 PM
|
#1519 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,148
Thanked 1,053 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 13 Posts
|
If it's a mixture of things, I'd probably just stick with the zoom. I'm not too familiar with the NEX series so I can't comment on low-light/ISO performance and whether your particular model has a built-in flash. With that said, the variable aperture on your zoom lens will reduce your ability to take lower-light photographs (with/without flash if you have it) but it won't remove your ability to do so.
Play around with the kit lens here before you leave. If there's a focal length that you find that you're using, then use that to determine what your next lens should be.
To answer your question- yes wider is generally better when taking pictures of grand vistas or other types of landscapes. That said, it's not the best when taking pictures of people (close up, due to the distortion it produces). This is why I say stick with your zoom lens since it has the focal lengths you need for your vacation based on the info given.
|
| |
01-12-2014, 02:09 AM
|
#1520 | Got MOD?
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 7,918
Thanked 519 Times in 444 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
So looking for a new walkaround lens. Tamron basically gave me the middle finger for warranty on my 17-50 F2.8 VC so I'm looking for a replacement. Probably sell the bad one cheap since it still works but just experiencing friction on the wider end during zooming and focusing. Suggestions? Canon 7D body.
|
| |
01-12-2014, 02:34 AM
|
#1521 | Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,928
Thanked 6,672 Times in 2,686 Posts
Failed 254 Times in 140 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by !MiKrofT So looking for a new walkaround lens. Tamron basically gave me the middle finger for warranty on my 17-50 F2.8 VC so I'm looking for a replacement. Probably sell the bad one cheap since it still works but just experiencing friction on the wider end during zooming and focusing. Suggestions? Canon 7D body. | Depends on how "walkaround" a lens you want, and how much you are looking to spend.
Considering that you have a 7D, I think the best match is really the Canon 15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS. Yes, it has a smaller and variable aperture, and yes, the long end might still seem a little short. But AF is fast, and IQ is superb -- the glass and optics are L-quality even though the construction and materials aren't.
Another option that I like is actually the 18-55 IS non-STM kit lens. You won't find another zoom lens more portable than this (perfect for walkaround), and if you can stop the aperture down a bit, IQ can still be quite decent. Best of all, you can find this lens for dirt cheap.
|
| |
01-12-2014, 04:46 AM
|
#1522 | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Y
Posts: 1,604
Thanked 1,399 Times in 396 Posts
Failed 147 Times in 59 Posts
|
Thoughts on the Nikon 60mm 2.8G vs. 85mm 1.8G on a DX frame?
|
| |
01-12-2014, 11:03 AM
|
#1523 | Got MOD?
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 7,918
Thanked 519 Times in 444 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum Depends on how "walkaround" a lens you want, and how much you are looking to spend.
Considering that you have a 7D, I think the best match is really the Canon 15-85 f/3.5-5.6 IS. Yes, it has a smaller and variable aperture, and yes, the long end might still seem a little short. But AF is fast, and IQ is superb -- the glass and optics are L-quality even though the construction and materials aren't.
Another option that I like is actually the 18-55 IS non-STM kit lens. You won't find another zoom lens more portable than this (perfect for walkaround), and if you can stop the aperture down a bit, IQ can still be quite decent. Best of all, you can find this lens for dirt cheap. | Hmm. 15-85 might work. I've been looking at Canon 17-55 f2.8 is USM or maybe even an 24-70 f2.8 L. There's also the sigma 18-35 f1.8 but the range is a little short and no IS.
|
| |
01-12-2014, 05:56 PM
|
#1524 | Orgasm Donor & Alatar owned my ass twice!
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Paradise, BC
Posts: 6,928
Thanked 6,672 Times in 2,686 Posts
Failed 254 Times in 140 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by !MiKrofT Hmm. 15-85 might work. I've been looking at Canon 17-55 f2.8 is USM or maybe even an 24-70 f2.8 L. There's also the sigma 18-35 f1.8 but the range is a little short and no IS. | I am not a fan of the Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS. IQ-wise, it is impeccable -- no question about that. But the lens is too bulky, both in terms of size and weight, and 55mm on a crop body is a bit short. Also, watch out of dust problems in the early copies of the lens.
For me at least, 24mm is not wide enough on a crop body. Also, be mindful that the lens does not have IS. If neither issues are important to you, by all means, it's a very good lens.
|
| |
01-12-2014, 11:32 PM
|
#1525 | Got MOD?
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 7,918
Thanked 519 Times in 444 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 4 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Traum I am not a fan of the Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS. IQ-wise, it is impeccable -- no question about that. But the lens is too bulky, both in terms of size and weight, and 55mm on a crop body is a bit short. Also, watch out of dust problems in the early copies of the lens.
For me at least, 24mm is not wide enough on a crop body. Also, be mindful that the lens does not have IS. If neither issues are important to you, by all means, it's a very good lens. | Yeah I heard about the dust. I'm buying it brand new so hopefully won't encounter that problem. I've decided on the 17-55. Not too worried about the size and weight. Its just a bit heavier than my tamron. I also have 11-16 and 70-200 so I've got an OK range.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:18 AM. |