Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... |
 | | 
05-19-2006, 10:58 AM
|
#1 | | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 1,539
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
| Recommend me a couple good lenses
As most in here probably know, I recently picked up a brand new 20d. Right now, I'm only shooting with the kit lens. What are some good lenses that I should be saving up for? I still haven't figured what would make a good selection of lenses, so please, offer your advice.
| 
|  | |
05-19-2006, 11:40 AM
|
#2 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
shoot with the kit lens for bit longer, keep an eye on which focal lengths you use the most, then you look for lenses in that focal range that suits your style.
always hitting the 18mm side? you might want to try a wide angle lens
55mm? maybe something that goes to 70 or 80mm.
mostly below 55mm but above 18mm? find an "upgrade" to your kit lens.
I think that may be the best way to pick a good lens without too much confusion and wasted time/money.
The most COMMON setup I know is something wide (17-40, 18-55... etc) and something long (70-200, 85...etc). I think those 2 will cover pretty much everything you'll ever need.
cheers
__________________
Nikonian
| |
| | |
05-19-2006, 12:43 PM
|
#3 | | SFICC-03*
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: richmond
Posts: 8,379
Thanked 2,858 Times in 1,148 Posts
Failed 152 Times in 75 Posts
|
17-85 IS pretty common for a walkaround lens
| 
| | |
05-19-2006, 01:54 PM
|
#4 | | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 487
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
|
24-70
24-105
__________________
2004 PWP TSX
| |
| | |
05-19-2006, 02:17 PM
|
#5 | | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Pochacho
24-70
24-105 | It depends on how much you wanan spend becuase both those lenses are $$$.
Tamron 28-75 F2.8 is a good lens to look at. Only 500bucks
Last edited by Mananetwork; 05-19-2006 at 02:20 PM.
| |
| | |
05-19-2006, 02:22 PM
|
#6 | | Old School RS
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Port Moody
Posts: 4,596
Thanked 4,042 Times in 1,232 Posts
Failed 129 Times in 79 Posts
|
kit lens is 18 at its widest... if i wanted a wide angle, wouldnt buying a 17 or 16 or something not be enough of a difference to merit it?
__________________
I'm old now - boring street cars and sweet race cars. | |
| | |
05-19-2006, 03:01 PM
|
#7 | | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: White Rock
Posts: 809
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I was thinking the same thing, wouldn't you have to go down to like 14mm to really see a difference?
__________________
"Who's General Failure, and why's he reading my disc?" - Unknown My Flickr Gallery | |
| | |
05-19-2006, 03:08 PM
|
#8 | | Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 230
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Everyone needs a EF 50mm 1.8 @ 100 bucks you can't go wrong
Tamron 28-75 F2.8 around 400
Canon 70-200 F4L around 800
Pretty much covers all focal ranagers unless u want to get into the ultra wide angle
Best bangs for the buck.. Both are super sharp and excellent qualuty lens..
| |
| | |
05-19-2006, 05:53 PM
|
#9 | | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 1,539
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
|
^^ I was thinking about getting that lens, where can I get one locally? I'll pick one up tomorrow 
I was thinking something with a good zoom too, what are opinions on this one? http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/pro...0009174&catid=
Are there any good alternatives to the EF-S 10-22mm? I saw some of Domani's shots with that lens and they were amazing. I think I would make great use of a wide angle like that.
| |
| | |
05-19-2006, 06:02 PM
|
#10 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
if you want to go wide
Sigma 12-24
Tokina 12-24
Canon 10-20
Sigma 10-20
x1.6 for your focal length and that's about right for wideangle stuff.
is 14mm the widest lens ever? In 35mm/Full Frame format, I mean.
__________________
Nikonian
| |
| | |
05-20-2006, 03:13 AM
|
#11 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
Doesn't Nikon have a 6mm?
A 35mm f1.7ish lens would approximate a 50mm lens on a 1.5x camera.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300. 
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
05-21-2006, 08:53 PM
|
#12 | | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: richmond
Posts: 595
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Voigtlander has a 12mm rectilinear lens
Nikon's 6mm is just a fisheye, which is something else.
apparently there is a big different between a 12mm and a 14mm lens. http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...ltrawide.shtml | |
| | |
05-21-2006, 09:20 PM
|
#13 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
^^^ great article! I want an Xpan so badly...
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
05-21-2006, 10:15 PM
|
#14 | | Old School RS
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Port Moody
Posts: 4,596
Thanked 4,042 Times in 1,232 Posts
Failed 129 Times in 79 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Bonjour43MA
Canon 10-20 | Do you mean the 10-22?
Does anybody besides Jackson use this lens here?
I've been looking for a really good wide angle to shoot with and this seems to be the one to buy...
__________________
I'm old now - boring street cars and sweet race cars. | |
| | |
05-22-2006, 12:17 AM
|
#15 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
yeah I think I meant 10-22 
__________________
Nikonian
Last edited by Bonjour43MA; 05-22-2006 at 12:59 AM.
| |
| | |
05-31-2006, 11:56 PM
|
#16 | | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
| What lenses to buy?
Now that I have a 20d... I need some more lenses to go with it
I'm planning to buy a 50 mm f/1.8
but I need a decent zoom lens... And I have no idea what to buy.
Also for a good price.
| |
| | |
06-01-2006, 12:41 AM
|
#17 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
if you don't know what you need to buy, then go with one of those all-in-ones and shoot for awhile.
THEN you'll know exactly what to buy.
I'd say get the 17-85 IS for now and shoot with that for a bit, then take a look at how you use the focal range and go from there.
The 50mm is a good lens and it's cheap but I think you'll soon find that it's too long for indoor people shots. It's good for low-light stuff, though.
Hmm... didn't we have a similar thread like this already? lol
__________________
Nikonian
| |
| | |
06-01-2006, 12:59 AM
|
#18 | | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
An 18-200mm would be an excellent choice, IMHO.
What are you going to use the 50mm f1.8 for? If you're going to be shooting portraits or indoor portraits it is a great choice because with the 1.5x crop factor it becomes a 75mm equivalent lens. Other than that, I don't see the use for one. I have two 50mm lenses - one is a f1.7 and the other is a f3.5 macro - and I find I never use the f1.7 even though it is probably the sharpest lens I own.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
| |
| | |
06-01-2006, 01:25 AM
|
#19 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Stalking in BC
Posts: 3,701
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I say go for a 18-200, its the perfect all-in -one
Wide for party shots and it has enough reach for 90% of the shots needed. You can geta deal on the New Tamron XR DiII LD (won the new Tipa 2005 award) or get a Canon version.
IS is great to have as well, but if your steady, you can get away with having no IS under 200
__________________
"I live my life, one Quarter pounder at a time...for those 400 calories or more...I am FREE."
604 Twist-and-Go Warrior My Ratings!!!! | |
| | |
06-01-2006, 06:31 AM
|
#20 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Use the kit lens, it's not as bad as people make it out to be. Why do you need more lenses, just because your one lens is lonely? Shoot with what you have, learn what you need.
| |
| | |
06-01-2006, 10:26 AM
|
#21 | | Ready to be Man handled by RS!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 87
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I agree....
| |
| | |
06-01-2006, 10:41 AM
|
#22 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
oh I thought you only had the body.
if you have the kit lens then heck yeah, just keep it and use it for a bit longer until you know what focal lengths you like to use more often, then you pick something in that range.
__________________
Nikonian
| |
| | |
06-01-2006, 11:53 AM
|
#23 | | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
Oh I need a zoom lens for sports.
| |
| | |
06-01-2006, 12:17 PM
|
#24 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
70-200 f4L is popular but you won't be able to shoot indoors with it.
anything indoors without strobes require at least a f2.8 lens and they're pricey.
so... it depneds on your budget i guess
__________________
Nikonian
| |
| | |
06-01-2006, 12:20 PM
|
#25 | | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
bleh! This is an expensive hobby.
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:56 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
