Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... | | |
07-16-2006, 12:32 AM
|
#276 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Five10: i do not see any saturation effect... |
| |
07-16-2006, 01:51 AM
|
#277 | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
|
Happy Birthday Mike!
|
| |
07-16-2006, 04:54 AM
|
#278 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
Nice moon tonight...
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
07-16-2006, 04:58 AM
|
#279 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: White Rock
Posts: 809
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
What lens do you use for that?
__________________
"Who's General Failure, and why's he reading my disc?" - Unknown My Flickr Gallery |
| |
07-16-2006, 05:09 AM
|
#280 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
Sigma 170mm~500mm APO.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
07-16-2006, 07:06 AM
|
#281 | I am Hook'd on RS
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: BC
Posts: 97
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by dub.dub Five10: i do not see any saturation effect... | Oh... then never mind
The first and last pic have been desaturated a bit..
|
| |
07-16-2006, 11:14 AM
|
#282 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by baldy Got an early bday present today! A lensbaby 2.0! | I want one, too!
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
07-16-2006, 11:56 AM
|
#283 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by ramir | i would use a little burn tool to make the light in the background a little less intense.
|
| |
07-16-2006, 01:51 PM
|
#284 | Revscene.net has a homepage?!
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,253
Thanked 99 Times in 38 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
A shot from yesterday
|
| |
07-16-2006, 07:20 PM
|
#285 | Guest |
^nice composition, the background ppl are a little too over exposed for me. But if you want to be super artsy, you can say that the dark cloud is over the panhandler compared to everyone else.
Nice pic.
PS. i'm Bildo, i'm using my gf's account
Last edited by mkoh; 07-16-2006 at 07:21 PM.
|
| |
07-17-2006, 04:20 AM
|
#286 | SFICC-03*
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: richmond
Posts: 8,400
Thanked 2,872 Times in 1,155 Posts
Failed 153 Times in 76 Posts
|
Last edited by unit; 07-17-2006 at 04:20 AM.
|
| |
07-17-2006, 09:24 AM
|
#287 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
dealer's got an Ace! |
| |
07-17-2006, 04:56 PM
|
#288 | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,142
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Long time no post for me...
In anycase, enjoy. More new photographs can be found at www.justin.threesixtyphoto.com |
| |
07-17-2006, 05:31 PM
|
#289 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
|
was it for a clothign line?
|
| |
07-17-2006, 05:55 PM
|
#290 | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,142
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by MajinHurricane was it for a clothign line? | It was a Fashion show.
|
| |
07-17-2006, 06:10 PM
|
#291 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The contrast on the 1st one seems a bit too much as sleeve is pitch black (with a very light tint of gray for a few folds). Then again it could be from my LCD.
I like #2 but from a lower perspective, my eyes look from down to up and I always see their legs first.
|
| |
07-17-2006, 07:53 PM
|
#292 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,968
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Their legs look kinda terrifying if you ask me. You've gotta smooth 'em out or something, because the current texture/noise on their legs makes them look full of cellulite.
|
| |
07-17-2006, 07:57 PM
|
#293 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
There was a dragon flying across the sky in Abbottsford yesterday.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
07-17-2006, 08:13 PM
|
#294 | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,142
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Jomo Their legs look kinda terrifying if you ask me. You've gotta smooth 'em out or something, because the current texture/noise on their legs makes them look full of cellulite. | It doesn't show up on print.
One thing I've learned is that our monitors are WAY more sensitive to things than what actually arises on print.
In any case, the comments are always welcomed and appreciated!
|
| |
07-17-2006, 08:14 PM
|
#295 | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,142
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by dub.dub The contrast on the 1st one seems a bit too much as sleeve is pitch black (with a very light tint of gray for a few folds). Then again it could be from my LCD.
I like #2 but from a lower perspective, my eyes look from down to up and I always see their legs first. | ERR... it's definitely your LCD.
|
| |
07-17-2006, 08:42 PM
|
#296 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: White Rock
Posts: 809
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by dub.dub The contrast on the 1st one seems a bit too much as sleeve is pitch black | This reminded me of an epiphany I had recently.
I remember reading a thread from before I became a regular, entitled "Photography is ART!!!" started by Salar. I read through it and found some pretty valid points, however heated the thread became. I, and probably everybody else here, totally agree that art is subjective, but I'm going to expain something that occured to me using another example.
I'm sure we can all agree that music is art, right? But if you have one Chopin's nocturnes, or Beethoven's symphonies, you don't want to hear it played like a machine; all the notes perfect length, all volume levels perect as compared to the average volume of the whole piece. Why? Because it has no character nor humanity. The best musicians vary their time (Can anyone say Frank Sinatra?) and their volume thereby portraying a different emotion.
I now believe that the same goes for photography. Ever look at some of Justin's wedding shots? NONE of them are 'properly' exposed, that would be too AVERAGE and wouldn't evoke any emotion or interest - only from the people that were there, and maybe the odd person those few explained it to. Most of the time he's got the whites blown out, or in darker shots he's got the blacks underexposed creating a different emotion. Making us see differently than we're used to makes things interesting and artistic.
/rant
That being said, I like the first shot more, the second one scares me :S
__________________
"Who's General Failure, and why's he reading my disc?" - Unknown My Flickr Gallery |
| |
07-17-2006, 08:57 PM
|
#297 | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,142
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Gopher This reminded me of an epiphany I had recently.
I remember reading a thread from before I became a regular, entitled "Photography is ART!!!" started by Salar. I read through it and found some pretty valid points, however heated the thread became. I, and probably everybody else here, totally agree that art is subjective, but I'm going to expain something that occured to me using another example.
I'm sure we can all agree that music is art, right? But if you have one Chopin's nocturnes, or Beethoven's symphonies, you don't want to hear it played like a machine; all the notes perfect length, all volume levels perect as compared to the average volume of the whole piece. Why? Because it has no character nor humanity. The best musicians vary their time (Can anyone say Frank Sinatra?) and their volume thereby portraying a different emotion.
I now believe that the same goes for photography. Ever look at some of Justin's wedding shots? NONE of them are 'properly' exposed, that would be too AVERAGE and wouldn't evoke any emotion or interest - only from the people that were there, and maybe the odd person those few explained it to. Most of the time he's got the whites blown out, or in darker shots he's got the blacks underexposed creating a different emotion. Making us see differently than we're used to makes things interesting and artistic.
/rant
That being said, I like the first shot more, the second one scares me :S | hehe... although you've made good points and you understand my use of blown highlights and contrast for photographs, almost all of my photos come out of my camera 100% properly exposed. I use a lightmeter for the most part.
My mentor once told me that to make photographs stand out, post processing must occur. Lenses, film and sensors etc. only record the information. You must record all the information accurately in order to post process them to their full potential. Some don't like my taste in post processing, much like I don't prefer the tastes of others. I do however have great respects to individuals who know how to post process well.
As a rule of thumb in my business, I provide the original 'properly' exposed photographs to my clients along with post processed versions for them to choose from. Here however, I post the photos or the versions of photos that I find striking or strong. Some may not be your cups of tea and I understand that. I also do appreciate all comments on the work that I post. I take the thoughts posted and use them to find new ways of delivering an emotion or thought.
Your rant is a valid rant Gopher and I think to help this forum, members need to critique each other on objective components as much as objective components. When I posted critiques from my lighting workshop I critique fairly objectively and suggest changes in regards to subjective matters.
Anywhoo... more pictures and comments!!! |
| |
07-17-2006, 09:00 PM
|
#298 | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,142
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Senna4ever There was a dragon flying across the sky in Abbottsford yesterday. | Intriguing cloud formation Jason. My thoughts on this photo is that you may have crop the photo in a little tight. I say this because if you go from a 4x6 to a 5x7, you would miss a chunk off one end. However for web viewing it works fine.
I love clouds. They're so interesting to look at.
|
| |
07-17-2006, 09:09 PM
|
#299 | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
|
I got this fantastic cloud arrangement coming back from Calgary.. I just need to make myself dinner, then sit down to edit my shit
|
| |
07-17-2006, 09:25 PM
|
#300 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
| www.derekpearson.com
he does the best job at the weird exposures of weddings.
Last edited by Meowjin; 07-17-2006 at 11:39 PM.
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:47 AM. |