Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... | | |
07-20-2006, 02:36 AM
|
#326 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
A little menage a trois on the roof of my car
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
07-20-2006, 09:11 AM
|
#327 | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 108
Thanked 43 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
2 from over the last 2 weeks: |
| |
07-20-2006, 10:01 AM
|
#328 | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
|
I run by that area all the time^^
|
| |
07-20-2006, 06:43 PM
|
#329 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: YVR
Posts: 2,104
Thanked 659 Times in 78 Posts
Failed 26 Times in 9 Posts
|
I don't I posted this one yet.. |
| |
07-20-2006, 07:27 PM
|
#330 | SFICC-03*
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: richmond
Posts: 8,431
Thanked 2,905 Times in 1,169 Posts
Failed 153 Times in 76 Posts
|
hehe im following you around jas
i think the shrubs in the foreground work for this picture, but i also cant help but to think that without them, the picture would be much more 'background worthy'
|
| |
07-20-2006, 07:27 PM
|
#331 | SFICC-03*
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: richmond
Posts: 8,431
Thanked 2,905 Times in 1,169 Posts
Failed 153 Times in 76 Posts
| |
| |
07-20-2006, 09:14 PM
|
#332 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: White Rock
Posts: 809
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by unit03 hehe im following you around jas
i think the shrubs in the foreground work for this picture, but i also cant help but to think that without them, the picture would be much more 'background worthy' | I disagree. Personally, I'm a huge fan of natural framing, and I feel that having those bushes in picture help to place you in the frame looking out onto the water. I think that's a great shot.
ps, I'm not trying to dismiss your critique Unit03 even if it sounds that way.
__________________
"Who's General Failure, and why's he reading my disc?" - Unknown My Flickr Gallery |
| |
07-20-2006, 09:45 PM
|
#333 | SFICC-03*
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: richmond
Posts: 8,431
Thanked 2,905 Times in 1,169 Posts
Failed 153 Times in 76 Posts
|
not at all, its just a matter of preference
|
| |
07-20-2006, 09:53 PM
|
#334 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: YVR
Posts: 2,104
Thanked 659 Times in 78 Posts
Failed 26 Times in 9 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by unit03 hehe im following you around jas
i think the shrubs in the foreground work for this picture, but i also cant help but to think that without them, the picture would be much more 'background worthy' | sup Chris,
I actually took first picture w/o bushes in the foreground,
after reviewing them thru LCD, I thought it would look better with them..
so I waited till some cars drove by (it was very dark out, side of the road), so I can have enough light shined at them.
|
| |
07-20-2006, 10:49 PM
|
#335 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
__________________
Nikonian
Last edited by Bonjour43MA; 07-20-2006 at 10:50 PM.
|
| |
07-20-2006, 11:06 PM
|
#336 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
not a wedding pro
but how's #2 with a soft touch on it rather than some grain?
|
| |
07-20-2006, 11:06 PM
|
#337 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
oh and i like #1
the pathway leads my eyes |
| |
07-20-2006, 11:22 PM
|
#338 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
Yeah I was just trying something different, should probably keep it consistent eh.
*edit* yeah it looks better with the same effect. sweet.
__________________
Nikonian
Last edited by Bonjour43MA; 07-20-2006 at 11:48 PM.
|
| |
07-21-2006, 12:05 AM
|
#339 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
I would have lved to have shot that wedding in IR.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
07-21-2006, 12:10 AM
|
#340 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
would've been fun for sure, too bad I'm not a big IR fan, though... althought I think some IR landscape stuff's pretty amazing.
__________________
Nikonian
|
| |
07-21-2006, 12:14 AM
|
#341 | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: 604
Posts: 1,120
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
well done! i'm very impressed with the tonal range on that d50 as well. your soft focus effect is a nice touch. agreed with dub on #1, very well composed
|
| |
07-21-2006, 12:28 AM
|
#342 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
^^^ you know what's weird.
on my LCD screen it showed more blown highlights than when I opend them in Photoshop, suffice to say that I was VERY happy to see that not all the whites on the dress were blown... phew.
kinda weird how it's not the same on the camera and with the software.. anyone one knows why?
__________________
Nikonian
|
| |
07-21-2006, 12:32 AM
|
#343 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 3,123
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
monitor calibration?
|
| |
07-21-2006, 12:34 AM
|
#344 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
The camera LCD should never be trusted.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
07-21-2006, 12:46 AM
|
#345 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
even if the "highlight" feature is turned on? u know, the blinking lights showing which areas have blown highlights?
or should I just use the histogram to judge proper exposure? I heard that's not accurate either.
__________________
Nikonian
|
| |
07-21-2006, 05:49 AM
|
#346 | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: mars
Posts: 1,041
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
| |
| |
07-21-2006, 08:11 AM
|
#347 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: White Rock
Posts: 809
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Bonjour, I love the glowing effect you have going on in those images, but I think you lost something in your greyscale conversion. If you use the a channel mixer adjustment layer set to monochrome and play around with that, just tone down the greens a little bit. Keep the contrast for the bride and groom. I think that little adjustment would make a world of difference.
__________________
"Who's General Failure, and why's he reading my disc?" - Unknown My Flickr Gallery |
| |
07-21-2006, 09:38 AM
|
#348 | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,142
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Photo 1: I like the composition of the photograph. Although from the photo it looks like the point of focus is on the grassy area in the middle of the path. My personal preference would have been to shoot with the grass in the immediate foreground in focus, or the bride and groom in focus. Good control over highlights and shadows. On a very sunny day this is the hardest thing to manage.
Photo 2: This is a very classic photograph in the wedding world. Good shadow and highlight retention. Did you shoot this in JPG or RAW?
Photo 3: I like the dreamy look myself so this to me is an excellent photograph. I would expect most of the dress to be blown out and the details to be present in the shadows. This is what seems to be the case.
I think the photographs are excellent. Good work!
|
| |
07-21-2006, 09:43 AM
|
#349 | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,142
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote: Originally posted by Bonjour43MA even if the "highlight" feature is turned on? u know, the blinking lights showing which areas have blown highlights?
or should I just use the histogram to judge proper exposure? I heard that's not accurate either. | If you understand how to read the histogram it is pretty bang on. I personally use a light meter for the most part, but I do look at the histogram to ensure what I expected shows up.
For instance:
If you think of the histogram as a black and white data scale, you would expect that in the photos you took there would be an abundance of data in the very left and the very right. This would be the tuxedo, dress, decorations and extremely bright highlights in the area. Data in the middle section would also be fairly high because of the grass creating data in a neutral gray zone. So I would expect to see a histogram with data way past the white zone, some data in the white to light gray, a fair bit of data in the mid gray, and some data in the black.
Don't make the mistake of thinking you always have to have an abundance of data in the white area. If nothing is white in your photo, you won't have data there.
|
| |
07-21-2006, 11:00 AM
|
#350 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
|
Excellent info, guys, thanks a lot. Really appreciate it.
Yes I'll probably have to play around with some other methods of black and white conversion... I think the diffuse glow effect somehow decreased the contrast of the photos.
Thanks Justin for the advice, it was my first wedding so I kinda limped along while trying to correct some mistakes on the spot - it was fun though! I'll try to get a bit more "creative" once I feel comfortable with the technical side of things... for now it's more about getting it right with exposure and lighting control. Note to self: get a reflector. lol
and yes I shot everything in RAW simply cuz I wanted some room for mistakes and for corrections later on in PP, just in case.
__________________
Nikonian
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:08 AM. |