| |
Quote:
Created this piece after I took a power nap in the midst of reading, after 4 months of holidays, i'm struggling to get back into gear http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/9642/studyingyd7.jpg I recently found this little hobby, Munny dolls. You buy the blank and design it to your desire. This one's my friend's http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/2058/munnyuf1.jpg and lastly, my friend's kid sister http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/7905/sarahcf5.jpg |
GFUNK: #1 Photo. LOL. Studying after 1 beer, 2 beer, 3 beer, and 4 hahaha. The concept bored me until I realized that lol. #3 photo. I think if the body was in focus too, it would make for a better photo. As it is, it almost looks a little awkward. Nice photos ! |
GFunk, I actually like how here body is not totally in focus, but maybe if it was a bit less shallow it wouldn't seem as if her head was floating. |
Quote:
|
Photomatrix Pro |
|
768seconds http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1157/...04556c21_o.jpg 30seconds http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1179/...b7b6a16b_o.jpg I might go back one night and do another with a CPL on try to see what an hour or two looks like |
^^^Where did you take those star ones? I don't think you need a CPL or ND. Just set it on BULB + low ISO. |
Testing out my new Panasonic Lumix LX2. :) This thing is amazing. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...s/P1000001.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...s/P1000002.jpg |
Yeah, don't think CPL would really make a difference with the star shots, other than to act as an ND. I'd love to know where that is, too - the bottom one is incredible. |
The CPL would just prolong the shutter drag so I can keep it open longer. I need to cut out more light if I want to do an hour or two |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
so....what's a cpl? |
Quote:
|
WTF?? I've shot WAY longer than that with way lighter settings... example: http://www2.moltenimage.com/photos/p..._moonscape.jpg DateTime - 2005:07:23 01:38:04 ExposureTime - 508 seconds FNumber - 5.00 ISOSpeedRatings - 100 FocalLength - 18 mm Okay, that's not longer, that's only about 8-1/2 minutes, but unless it's really smoggy or something, the sky won't get much brighter than that, and the stars won't bloom because they're always moving across the frame. |
That picture is nice. soft looking. whats with the 2 red dots though?(middle of left tree, sky on the right side) edit>: found a 3rd one in middle/right side of the field. |
Quote:
Quote:
wow. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Seriously, what's CPL? And ND? :confused: |
ND i'm pretty sure is a neutral density filter (a filter that darkens everything a little, similar to a GND - Graduated Neutral Density Filter, except this is all the way through). Senna, I really like that shot!! :) |
ND = neutral density, reduces all colors by a specified amount. GND = graduated neutral density, darker on one side, lighter on the other, even transition from one to the other. CPL = circular polarizer. Like a regular polarizer except the lightwaves are given an extra 'twist' to allow proper operation of auto-exposure and auto-focus. |
Quote:
|
This is approx. 3.2 hours, f/8 at ISO200. Unfortunately my 300D has a lot of noise at that exposure time, although part of that may be from the battery running down while I left it out overnight... http://www2.moltenimage.com/photos/stars1.jpg Make - Canon Model - Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL DateTime - 2007:08:11 04:36:23 ExposureTime - 11522 seconds FNumber - 8.00 ISOSpeedRatings - 200 ExposureBiasValue - 0.00 FocalLength - 18 mm ExposureMode - Manual White Balance - Auto |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:20 AM. | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net