Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another... | | |
12-15-2009, 10:34 PM
|
#8626 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mananetwork HDR mean multiple images captured within a single image. It's used in film and games to simulate dramatic light changes from shadows to highlights.
In photography the artists likes to fit all those images into one still image, while in film/game production a shader drives the HDR image by gradually change exposures on the fly | Not necessarily. HDR in the photographic sense is exactly that. High dynamic range. I don't see a high dynamic range in those photos...the black points are too high, not enough details in the shadows. I would consider them as extended dynamic range.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
12-15-2009, 10:41 PM
|
#8627 | Blood tests positive for LOL mod
Join Date: May 2002 Location: World
Posts: 12,999
Thanked 1,263 Times in 325 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 18 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever Not necessarily. HDR in the photographic sense is exactly that. High dynamic range. I don't see a high dynamic range in those photos...the black points are too high, not enough details in the shadows. I would consider them as extended dynamic range. | My photos would be considered extended dynamic range. I use all the raw information to squeeze out as much info from the image as possible.
When I can see everything from the darkest to brightest details in a frame, I consider that HDR. I don't think you can get anymore detail out from shadows which haven't even been grazed by some light source
|
| |
12-15-2009, 10:59 PM
|
#8628 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 568
Thanked 58 Times in 15 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
here some random shieeetz, just playing around with the tamron 90mm haha |
| |
12-15-2009, 11:22 PM
|
#8629 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Mananetwork When I can see everything from the darkest to brightest details in a frame, I consider that HDR. I don't think you can get anymore detail out from shadows which haven't even been grazed by some light source | Sure you can, you just need to expose for it...that's exactly the reason why I don't consider them HDR...I would have liked to have seen a little more detail. Maybe there is, and the small image size doesn't do it justice. There is no detail in the dark side of the buildings. Of course, I'm not saying that you have to have detail in all shadow areas, as sometimes it can't be helped. Anne Marie Comte, a Vancouver professional photographer does amazing night-time HDR, but she combines up to 30 different exposures to achieve the smallest detail.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
12-16-2009, 01:24 AM
|
#8630 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,561
Thanked 888 Times in 350 Posts
Failed 356 Times in 87 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever Not necessarily. HDR in the photographic sense is exactly that. High dynamic range. I don't see a high dynamic range in those photos...the black points are too high, not enough details in the shadows. I would consider them as extended dynamic range. | Both those night images are HDR. It is just that the bottom one of tokyo is filled with lights so you dont see as much darkness, but if you want to nit pick, the shadow part of the tree in the toyko image is pitch black as well. Just because an image is HDR doesnt mean EVERY dark shadow bit has to be filled with light... if that was the case then there wouldnt be an image, everything would be grey, and have a damn flat image. Again, just because the tone map is different in every image doesn't mean the image isn't HDR.
Good HDR looks natural, you can barely tell it is HDR. It doesnt mean every shadow has to be filled with light or every bright hotspot has to be darkened. It just means the multiple exposures are combined perfectly to make and image look as closely to how your eyes see it as possible. If you look directly at the sun you are still going to see a white circle, and if you look into an unlit alley at night you are still goin to see pitch black in the shadow behind a dumpster.
Anne Comte does not do "amazing" HDR. Her hdr images are the typical over tone mapped process. It looks unrealistic, just looks 'cool' for that specific look. I got the same results the 1st hour I messed around with photomatix and 3 jpeg exposures. You dont need 30 exposures to do HDR. I've tested, as well as the web's craziest HDR enthusiasts and professionals that 7 exposures (2stops difference raw format) is all you EVER EVER need for a night time HDR. That is even over kill for raw, the info is all there with 5 exposures. If you DO decide to do 30 exposures for a night shot, you'll even notice 1/2 of the images are useless as when you go to +10 stops (asuming the median exposure is 'proper' exposure) the darkest areas will not show any detail anyway since it will be filled with haze from a nearby light area, it's uselss for getting details out of.
edit: ok for example:
this is the median "proper" exposed image in a 5 exposure, 2stops difference, raw file set for a night time HDR i did of the london financial district.
This is an HDR image of the set properly tonemapped (imo). It looks natural, not overly exaggerated and brings back good detail in the shadow and highlight areas of the scene like how my eyes saw. Shadows adjusted slightly darker cuz i liked it
This is the EXACT same 5 exposure set from the SAME HDR file just tonemapped differently to give that crazy "HDR look" (slightly to the extreme side). It looks cool but it looks fake, unatural, and flat. However you get every single detail from the brightest blown out highlights to the darkest of shadows. Looks like shit IMO.
but both of these are HDR, just tone mapped completely different.
__________________ yolo
Last edited by J____; 12-16-2009 at 02:17 AM.
|
| |
12-16-2009, 02:05 AM
|
#8631 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by J____ Both those night images are HDR. It is just that the bottom one of tokyo is filled with lights so you dont see as much darkness, but if you want to nit pick, the shadow part of the tree in the toyko image is pitch black as well. Just because an image is HDR doesnt mean EVERY dark shadow bit has to be filled with light... if that was the case then there wouldnt be an image, everything would be grey, and have a damn flat image. Again, just because the tone map is different in every image doesn't mean the image isn't HDR.
Good HDR looks natural, you can barely tell it is HDR. It doesnt mean every shadow has to be filled with light or every bright hotspot has to be darkened. It just means the multiple exposures are combined perfectly to make and image look as closely to how your eyes see it as possible. If you look directly at the sun you are still going to see a white circle, and if you look into an unlit alley at night you are still goin to see pitch black in the shadow behind a dumpster.
Anne Comte does not do "amazing" HDR. Her hdr images are the typical over tone mapped process. It looks unrealistic, just looks 'cool' for that specific look. I got the same results the 1st hour I messed around with photomatix and 3 jpeg exposures. You dont need 30 exposures to do HDR. I've tested, as well as the web's craziest HDR enthusiasts and professionals that 7 exposures (2stops difference raw format) is all you EVER EVER need for a night time HDR. That is even over kill for raw, the info is all there with 5 exposures. If you DO decide to do 30 exposures for a night shot, you'll even notice 1/2 of the images are useless as when you go to +10 stops (asuming the median exposure is 'proper' exposure) the darkest areas will not show any detail anyway since it will be filled with haze from a nearby light area, it's uselss for getting details out of. | Then we agree to disagree. Anyways, I'm tired of arguing. Next person to post, please post a photo!
Do you even know Anne-Marie? Obviously you don't because you called her Anne.
*edit* I just checked Anne-Marie's website, and she has her old over the top photos on there. Jackson, she does much better work now. Just check her prints at various local gallery shows.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Last edited by Senna4ever; 12-16-2009 at 02:20 AM.
|
| |
12-16-2009, 02:20 AM
|
#8632 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Shanghai
Posts: 3,561
Thanked 888 Times in 350 Posts
Failed 356 Times in 87 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever Then we agree to disagree. Anyways, I'm tired of arguing. Next person to post, please post a photo!
Do you even know Anne-Marie? Obviously you don't because you called her Anne.
*edit* I just checked Anne-Marie's website, and she has her old over the top photos on there. Jackson, she does much better work now. Just check her prints at various local gallery shows. | i dont knw of her personally but i've seen her work.
edit: i'll have to check out her gallery stuff when i get a chance. I'll take ur word for it now.
i call every anne-marie anne =P
__________________ yolo |
| |
12-16-2009, 02:26 AM
|
#8633 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
I'd forgotten how over the top she used to be. Yes, I don't like that kind of HDR...I like the HDR that you did in England, or Dan Burkholder's current work.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
12-16-2009, 06:15 AM
|
#8634 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever Not necessarily. HDR in the photographic sense is exactly that. High dynamic range. I don't see a high dynamic range in those photos...the black points are too high, not enough details in the shadows. I would consider them as extended dynamic range. | Next question then is, "how high is high"? Can you quantify that in dB? Or even bits? Where do you split the hair between "extended" and "high"?
I remember a few years ago, when I was participating in a certain photo-critique site, there was quite a debate raging over HDR - same kinda stuff, ranging between "what IS HDR" and "does all HDR look like shit?". I finally decided to give my input, by announcing that HDR was "played out" and introducing a new art form:
Fortunately, most people got the humor in it. Some played along, commenting on my overprocessing... or admiring the lack of processing... even starting a discussion on different grey levels. But of course, there were those with NO sense of humor as well... wish I could remember some of the inanities they came up with...
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | .. Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | |
| |
12-16-2009, 12:51 PM
|
#8635 | VLS Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
|
That looks exacly like my photo of Vancouver in the fog!
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
|
| |
12-16-2009, 09:58 PM
|
#8636 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,944
Thanked 13,521 Times in 1,745 Posts
Failed 2,239 Times in 545 Posts
|
some epic clouds from today.
__________________ PHOTOGRAPHY / FLICKR |
| |
12-16-2009, 10:39 PM
|
#8637 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Kelowna
Posts: 3,928
Thanked 119 Times in 37 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
kewl! |
| |
12-16-2009, 11:02 PM
|
#8638 | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,829
Thanked 6,590 Times in 1,166 Posts
Failed 68 Times in 23 Posts
|
yeah the clouds were awesome this evening, here's my contribution
my shots came out pretty grainy though and I was at ISO 200, any ideas?
|
| |
12-16-2009, 11:36 PM
|
#8639 | フルコンボ
Join Date: May 2004 Location: YVR
Posts: 5,214
Thanked 3,998 Times in 596 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 8 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 1exotic some epic clouds from today. | that is sweeeet
|
| |
12-17-2009, 12:09 AM
|
#8640 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Richmond
Posts: 4,335
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
That last HDR of Shibuya in Tokyo is awesome. The night shots of U of A are great too . And I agree withe J__ and Mana's definition of HDR. If you picture Rcub's shot in one exposure, he wouldn't have gotten those details in the dark or bright areas.
|
| |
12-17-2009, 12:10 AM
|
#8641 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,944
Thanked 13,521 Times in 1,745 Posts
Failed 2,239 Times in 545 Posts
|
the clouds were really low so everything bellow was yellow in the streets, looked pretty cool in person while it lasted.
__________________ PHOTOGRAPHY / FLICKR |
| |
12-17-2009, 01:41 AM
|
#8642 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,185
Thanked 1,379 Times in 578 Posts
Failed 96 Times in 53 Posts
|
^ wat the black thing on the top left corner?
it was smaller on the last pic u posted but like double the size on ^
|
| |
12-17-2009, 11:51 AM
|
#8643 | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,944
Thanked 13,521 Times in 1,745 Posts
Failed 2,239 Times in 545 Posts
|
that's the roof beside the balcony.
__________________ PHOTOGRAPHY / FLICKR |
| |
12-17-2009, 10:19 PM
|
#8644 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Vancouvr Island
Posts: 2,294
Thanked 36 Times in 20 Posts
Failed 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Hey guys
If you guys really want to get into it, you can discuss single versus multi image HDRs, and whats real and not…I remember there is quite a debate on that
My opinion, I dislike the overcooked tone mapping, looks to cartoonish for my liking.
I havent had any time to shoot lately, but I have a job lined up for a commercial shoot for a gym..nothing high key, but itll be fun to unholster the cam again
|
| |
12-17-2009, 10:48 PM
|
#8645 | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: vancouver
Posts: 135
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 32 Times in 4 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by N.gen here some random shieeetz, just playing around with the tamron 90mm haha |
im creeped out by the grren thing with the orange mask lol
__________________
96 integra stolen
04 rsx Sold
08 lancer
|
| |
12-18-2009, 12:13 AM
|
#8646 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,185
Thanked 1,379 Times in 578 Posts
Failed 96 Times in 53 Posts
|
where did you get the joker figure? i want
|
| |
12-19-2009, 05:30 PM
|
#8647 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: May 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 566
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Here are a couple of recents: |
| |
12-19-2009, 07:27 PM
|
#8648 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
here are three from my california trip, the rest are still on the camera:
1. taken at memorial point, south lake tahoe, nevada during sunset 2 weeks ago
2. also taken at lake tahoe, early morning light
3. taken sunset at 17 mile drive along pebble beach, carmel, nor-cal. the cypress stands alone on the ocean, away from the rest of the cypress trees, est age is 250 years old
more pics to come when i am back in vanc!
|
| |
12-19-2009, 07:28 PM
|
#8649 | フルコンボ
Join Date: May 2004 Location: YVR
Posts: 5,214
Thanked 3,998 Times in 596 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 8 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by moky here are three from my california trip, the rest are still on the camera:
1. taken at memorial point, south lake tahoe, nevada during sunset 2 weeks ago
2. also taken at lake tahoe, early morning light
3. taken sunset at 17 mile drive along pebble beach, carmel, nor-cal. the cypress stands alone on the ocean, away from the rest of the cypress trees, est age is 250 years old
more pics to come when i am back in vanc! | wow great shots! i love the first 2
|
| |
12-19-2009, 07:38 PM
|
#8650 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 1,072
Thanked 357 Times in 126 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
thanks RCUBED
are we allowed to post more than 3 a day?
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:17 PM. |