You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Photography LabTHIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...
sorry to quote pics but what kind of exposure are we talking about with a shot like this during the day?
i was trying a bunch of different things up on the sunshine coast this past weekend and anything that i assumed would give the effect of the water like this became too washed out with too much light?
__________________
Dank memes cant melt steel beams
You need a really small aperture to get the shutter speeds slow enough to create that kind of blurring. In daylight, you may need a neutral density filter to reduce a good chunk of the light coming into your camera to allow you to get to these slow shutter speeds.
__________________ I'm old now - boring street cars and sweet race cars.
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,667
Thanked 10,387 Times in 3,913 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
you can try using your sunglasses if you dont have an nd filter handy although the lenses may be too small for your camera (works great for my cellphone even though its got a built in nd filter)
sorry to quote pics but what kind of exposure are we talking about with a shot like this during the day?
i was trying a bunch of different things up on the sunshine coast this past weekend and anything that i assumed would give the effect of the water like this became too washed out with too much light?
For the ones posted/quoted, the exposure I had was f/16, ISO 160 (my lowest ISO is 200 before it goes to the Low ISO settings). I was also using a 7-stop ND filter to get 1.6 seconds and 2.5 seconds.
It also wasn't the best time of day as the sun was pretty high (3-4PM I think?). The waterfall itself is still a bit overexposed and there are quite a lot of shadow areas.
you can try using your sunglasses if you dont have an nd filter handy although the lenses may be too small for your camera (works great for my cellphone even though its got a built in nd filter)
I used my sunglasses this weekend at Lynn Canyon.
iso100, 35mm, f16, Maui Jim sunglasses, at least they were polarized lol. You can see the curve on the bottom corners from the sunglasses
Recently came back from a road trip through the Canadian Rockies. Amazing scenery!
Quote:
Originally Posted by RecklessNS
Quote:
Originally Posted by freesole
These are fucking beautiful.
freesole, that's some next level animal shot right there. Love the context and the subject isolation. Usually not a fan of the blurry foreground but that bokeh and noise are so pretty, like film grain. Great stuff. Which telephoto?
Or did you just ninja up to that deer? When I got a shot of a deer, that bastard just stared right at me and that didn't make for a particularly interesting shot.
That deer picture is one of the best I've ever seen, no lie! MAD PROPZ!!! Please do share the story of that shot, and how you got it? Looks almost like a wide'ish angle shot, maybe 24-35mm or something? Remote setup? FUCKING AMAZING WORK!
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's