REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-31-2010, 04:12 PM   #1551
This title intentionally left blank MOD
 
Alatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Above Sea Level
Posts: 8,549
Thanked 484 Times in 211 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 14 Posts
Essentially, what it boils down to is the higher res/movie mode capabilities. I've heard some good things about the T2i, and I've already played around with my brother's T1i, so I guess the next step is physically seeing/holding the T2i.
Advertisement
__________________
Classifieds Head Moderator
Automotive Service Technician

I don't have an anger problem. I have an idiot problem.
Alatar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2010, 05:54 PM   #1552
How I Mod your mother
 
!Yaminashi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Crayon Box
Posts: 13,688
Thanked 977 Times in 477 Posts
Failed 18 Times in 11 Posts
Any thoughts on the Canon G11?
__________________
Quote:
[19-07, 16:52] bloodmack: EB did u change my avatar and title?
Quote:
[19-07, 16:54] El Bastardo: bm i have no idea what you're talking about because i don't speak gorilla
!Yaminashi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 04:24 AM   #1553
2010 RS Top Food Critic Winner
 
K-Dub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,410
Thanked 694 Times in 233 Posts
Failed 102 Times in 16 Posts
Does anyone have staff discount? Looking for a 7D.

I'm looking at you Senna or niforpix.
K-Dub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 12:42 AM   #1554
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-Dub View Post
Does anyone have staff discount? Looking for a 7D.

I'm looking at you Senna or niforpix.
Hehehe... Sorry, it only applies to myself or immediate family. There is a $150 rebate on the 7D now though.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 03:16 AM   #1555
Cool beans bro
 
JordanLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,795
Thanked 1,054 Times in 231 Posts
Failed 34 Times in 21 Posts
Currently have an XSi and JUST got a smokin deal on a 17-40L I then traded the 17-40L for a 24-105 F4L IS and i wanna maximize the awesome.I wanna upgrade my body to a 7D or MAYBE a 5DMKII if the price is right but dont know if I should keep the 24-105 or trade it for a 17-5 2.8 IS. What scares me is the IS issue on the 17-55 how it gives out...
JordanLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 07:54 AM   #1556
This title intentionally left blank MOD
 
Alatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Above Sea Level
Posts: 8,549
Thanked 484 Times in 211 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JordanLee View Post
Currently have an XSi and JUST got a smokin deal on a 17-40L I then traded the 17-40L for a 24-105 F4L IS and i wanna maximize the awesome.I wanna upgrade my body to a 7D or MAYBE a 5DMKII if the price is right but dont know if I should keep the 24-105 or trade it for a 17-5 2.8 IS. What scares me is the IS issue on the 17-55 how it gives out...
Won't be able to use the 17-55 EF-S IS on the 5DMKII as it's a FF camera. EF lenses only. If you got the 7D, then yes, you'd be able to use the 17-55.
__________________
Classifieds Head Moderator
Automotive Service Technician

I don't have an anger problem. I have an idiot problem.
Alatar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 04:35 PM   #1557
Need my Daily Fix of RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: burnaby
Posts: 289
Thanked 344 Times in 74 Posts
Failed 111 Times in 18 Posts
Can any recommend any good slr camera for a beginner who's just getting into photography?
ray666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2010, 01:26 AM   #1558
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Boostslut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,734
Thanked 1,128 Times in 339 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 28 Posts
Canon XSI, T2i or T1i, or Nikon you can't beat the D90 for a beginners camera.
__________________
2017 Jeep Wrangler JKU
Canon 5D MKIV w/ a bunch of L's
Boostslut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2010, 07:36 PM   #1559
Need my Daily Fix of RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: burnaby
Posts: 289
Thanked 344 Times in 74 Posts
Failed 111 Times in 18 Posts
Oh. For the people who are interested, bestbuy is having a sale on Canon t1i until the 10th. $780 for the camera and kit lens and a rebel accesory kit. The kit comes with a bag, extra battery, and a uv filter. I think it worth $120 for the kit itself? What do you guys think of the deal?
Posted via RS Mobile
ray666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2010, 08:43 PM   #1560
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ray666 View Post
Can any recommend any good slr camera for a beginner who's just getting into photography?
The older Nikon D40/D40x/D60. It's so simple there's nothing to do but to go out and compose nice photos, rather than mess around with mundane settings like D-Lighting etc, AEB, etc.

Step 1 is to build the composition skills and I really think the D40 is good for that. It teaches you how to compose and how to control the fundamentals, like shutter speed, aperture, white balance, exposure compensation, and most importantly, composition... it's also cheap on Craigslist.

Read books too.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2010, 12:11 AM   #1561
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,189
Thanked 1,699 Times in 446 Posts
Failed 148 Times in 52 Posts
Hey guys. I'm planning on springing my first DSLR in a couple weeks after I get my next paycheque. I'm leaning toward the Nikon D5000.

I know the basics of shooting (ISO, shutter speed, white balance, aperture size, basic compo e.g. framing, etc) by being around my amateur photographer dad, but I've never put the knowledge into practice. Thus, I think that an lower-end entry level camera like a D40 may be too feature-less for me as I think I can get better fairly quickly.

Considering my position, is there anything that would make you buy a D3000 or D60 over a D5000?
woob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2010, 12:42 AM   #1562
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
My feeling is that you'd probably outgrow the D3000 quite quickly.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-13-2010, 01:25 AM   #1563
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by woob View Post
Hey guys. I'm planning on springing my first DSLR in a couple weeks after I get my next paycheque. I'm leaning toward the Nikon D5000.

I know the basics of shooting (ISO, shutter speed, white balance, aperture size, basic compo e.g. framing, etc) by being around my amateur photographer dad, but I've never put the knowledge into practice. Thus, I think that an lower-end entry level camera like a D40 may be too feature-less for me as I think I can get better fairly quickly.

Considering my position, is there anything that would make you buy a D3000 or D60 over a D5000?
D5000 is a far nicer camera. More features and allows you to grow into it. The D3000 is dated, and the GUIDE mode is just plain stupid.

I like the tilt screen of the D5000.

The only advantage of a D60 is that' you can find used ones on CL for quite cheap. Since you know the basics, have you considered the D90?
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-13-2010, 02:50 AM   #1564
RS controls my life!
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 774
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 2 Posts
I think I'm going with Canon. The reason being is because the lenses are cheaper than canon.
GomGom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2010, 01:20 PM   #1565
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,189
Thanked 1,699 Times in 446 Posts
Failed 148 Times in 52 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo View Post
D5000 is a far nicer camera. More features and allows you to grow into it. The D3000 is dated, and the GUIDE mode is just plain stupid.

I like the tilt screen of the D5000.

The only advantage of a D60 is that' you can find used ones on CL for quite cheap. Since you know the basics, have you considered the D90?
I have, in fact, considered the D90, but it costs $450 more (kit) than the D5000. My budget isn't fixed, but what justifies the price difference?

Last edited by woob; 06-13-2010 at 01:25 PM.
woob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2010, 07:00 PM   #1566
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by woob View Post
I have, in fact, considered the D90, but it costs $450 more (kit) than the D5000. My budget isn't fixed, but what justifies the price difference?
They have the same sensor, so image quality (assuming the lens is the same) should be about the same.

There's a few key differences.

1. D90 can drive Non AF-S lens (that is, lenses that can't autofocus by themselves). If you plan on buying some primes, the D90 route can actually save you some money. AF-S primes are expensive!

2. Higher Res LCD monitor

3. Top LCD information (Wish my D40 camera had this)

4. Superior Kit Lens (If you are going the kit lens route. 18-55mm vs 18-105mm)

5. More Sturdy.

6. Dedicated ISO, WB, Quality and Info buttons <- All invaluable for bypassing menu navigation.


Downsides: Price, bigger size, heavier and lack of swivel LCD. If you just plan on taking a few pics here and there I think the D5000 is a fabulous camera for that. If you are more on the enthusiast side the D90 may be all the camera you'd ever need for a long time.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2010, 12:59 PM   #1567
Rs has made me the man i am today!
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,189
Thanked 1,699 Times in 446 Posts
Failed 148 Times in 52 Posts
So I looked it up, and consulted with my dad, and he lives with manual lenses, so I figure I can too. Also, I don't think I'll be sticking to DX in a few years so the AF-S argument is moot.

And as much as I'd love the top LED, IMO the rest of those reasons don't justify the price jump. I'm going with the D5000 in a few weeks.

Thanks for your help guys.
woob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2010, 11:17 PM   #1568
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Have fun w/ the camera. Yes, DX is the suck, although acceptable. I wish I had the funds to switch to FF!
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 12:17 AM   #1569
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Bonjour43MA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
DX doesn't suck. In fact, the crop sensor and the magnification factor makes it awesome for sports and bird photography; a 300mm/2.8 lens with 2x TC becomes 900mm/5.6 vs just 600mm/5.6 on FX; your typical 70-200mm/2.8 zoom becomes 140-300mm/2.8. All for a FRACTION of the price if you needed FX equivalent lenses.
__________________
Nikonian
Bonjour43MA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 12:37 AM   #1570
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
^

Agreed. Maybe 'suck' was the wrong word. I really dig the much larger viewfinder of FF and the low light capabilities. But yes, DX is win for the situations you listed.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 12:52 AM   #1571
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Bonjour43MA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,764
Thanked 281 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 25 Posts
Yeah there's definitely markets for both format, and I can see DX sticking around for many more years to come. In fact, I would even consider going back to DX if the noise performance can be close to what the current FX bodies can offer... FX is great overall but it gets really expensive when you try to get longer lenses... even with TCs you just don't get that "free" reach you get with DX.

I think it would be awesome if the D700 replacement will be around 16~18mp (I personally have no need for more than 12mp but the higher the more you can crop), and have a crop mode of at least 8mp - now THAT would be the perfect camera cuz then you can use either mode as you see fit.
__________________
Nikonian
Bonjour43MA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 04:59 AM   #1572
Cool beans bro
 
JordanLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,795
Thanked 1,054 Times in 231 Posts
Failed 34 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alatar View Post
Won't be able to use the 17-55 EF-S IS on the 5DMKII as it's a FF camera. EF lenses only. If you got the 7D, then yes, you'd be able to use the 17-55.
Ahh I worded it wrong. I meant I don't know if I should go for the 7D + 17-55 2.8IS route or save up for a 5D2 and keep my 24-105. In both cases I'd sell my XSi now along with the Tamron 17-50.
JordanLee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 06:43 PM   #1573
d1
I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
 
d1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,599
Thanked 492 Times in 125 Posts
Failed 104 Times in 21 Posts
Looking for some recommendations: It's a gift for my sister and she knows jack about cameras.

Looking for:
- Point n shoot
- easy to use, reliable
- HD video capability
- under $300
d1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2010, 10:22 PM   #1574
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by d1 View Post
Looking for some recommendations: It's a gift for my sister and she knows jack about cameras.

Looking for:
- Point n shoot
- easy to use, reliable
- HD video capability
- under $300
Canon SD940
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 12:30 AM   #1575
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
SSM_DC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,956
Thanked 1,322 Times in 549 Posts
Failed 28 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo View Post
Canon SD940
+1 on this recommendation.
SSM_DC5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net