REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2013, 04:21 PM   #2276
I AM
 
Groot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,466
Thanked 1,329 Times in 294 Posts
Failed 149 Times in 42 Posts
So im looking to get a T3i or T4i. futureshop has the T3i with 18-200mm for $699 Canon EOS Rebel T3i 18MP DSLR With 18-200mm IS Stabilized Lens Kit : Cameras - Future Shop
and broadway camera has the T4i kit for $679
Canon EOS Rebel T4i w/EF-S 18-55 IS II Kit - Broadway Camera

is there really any difference between the T3i and T4i besides the touchscreen?
Advertisement
Groot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 03:16 PM   #2277
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,723
Thanked 1,570 Times in 574 Posts
Failed 58 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushy View Post
So im looking to get a T3i or T4i. futureshop has the T3i with 18-200mm for $699 Canon EOS Rebel T3i 18MP DSLR With 18-200mm IS Stabilized Lens Kit : Cameras - Future Shop
and broadway camera has the T4i kit for $679
Canon EOS Rebel T4i w/EF-S 18-55 IS II Kit - Broadway Camera

is there really any difference between the T3i and T4i besides the touchscreen?
Another big difference is that the T4i has usable phase detection autofocus (quick autofocus that doesn't take 10 seconds to lock!) during video ONLY if you use STM lenses - This is very important for casual users looking to shoot video with their DSLRS.

The 18-200 is definitely a very useful travel lense : If you were to get the T4i, you'd probably have to get a 55-250 if you wanted to shoot objects that are far away
AstulzerRZD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 03:21 PM   #2278
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,723
Thanked 1,570 Times in 574 Posts
Failed 58 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rich80 View Post
Hi Everyone,

I need some advice. I have always used P&S cameras however I would like to begin using a DSLR. I have never used one before but would like to begin doing some more hobby based photography. How is the Canon 2ti? I can pick it up brand new for about $390 plus tax? Any recommendations if that is a good DSLR for my needs (Beginner) and at that price point. Thanks
The T2i is definitely a good starting point. Although it's sensor definitely isn't the best performer in low light when compared to some of the newer DSLRs, it's video capabilities more than make up for it.

If I were you, I would probably buy a 35mm f/2 or a 28mm f/1.8. These two lenses are prime lenses (meaning no zoom). This will force you to walk around and improve your composition. As well, they also let lots of light into the camera, meaning that you can take pictures in darker situations without a tripod that will be sharp (and less noisy)
AstulzerRZD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 03:28 PM   #2279
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstulzerRZD View Post
Another big difference is that the T4i has usable phase detection autofocus (quick autofocus that doesn't take 10 seconds to lock!) during video ONLY if you use STM lenses - This is very important for casual users looking to shoot video with their DSLRS.

The 18-200 is definitely a very useful travel lense : If you were to get the T4i, you'd probably have to get a 55-250 if you wanted to shoot objects that are far away
Just remember only the 18-135mm kit lens has STM. The only other lens with STM is the 40mm f2.8 pancake.

The 18-135mm isn't too bad of a lens, actually.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2013, 03:34 PM   #2280
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,723
Thanked 1,570 Times in 574 Posts
Failed 58 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Araaadi View Post
Hey guys, looking for a beginners camera for myself, I am pretty good with technology and I learn quickly. At first it was between the NEX 5R or the Nikon D3200 for me, but a friend said that the d5200 is comming out soon and will a lot better than the d3200.

What do you guys recommend?
To start off, I'll explain why I disagree with some of your friends' choices.

While the NEX5r is definitely a very useful package that can produce great images, I find that some of the manual controls that are IMPORTANT for beginners to experiment with are rather hard to access. As well, Sony's lense line-up isn't very great either.

The D5200 and D3200 both share the same brilliant 24MP sensor and have a useful guide mode that can help teach you how to use some of the custom functions. However, they lack aperture adjustment during live view that is oh so crucial to shooting video! However. Both the D5xxx and D3xxx range lack an autofocus motor, meaning that buying lenses is more expensive, and preventing you from using cheaper, old (but just as good!) nikon lenses!

If you're going to buy a camera to start out on, I would recommend either a T2i/T3i or a D7000.

The T2i and T3i shoot brilliant video and are dirt cheap nowadays (Brand new for less than 500 if you know where to look). Did I mention that the lenses you have are always more important that your camera body? They shoot much more robust looking video than the entry level Nikon bodies. As well, you can splurge for the T4i ( and an STM lense) if you want set and forget video; but I do believe that learning how to shoot video properly is important in the 21st century!

The D7000 is bound to get replaced soon, meaning price drops! As I mentioned earlier, the D5xxx and D3xxx are limited to certain more expensive Nikon lenses (AF-S) because they lack an in body AF motor. If you got the same set of starter lenses [I'd recommend 35 f/1.8, 80-200 or 85, random wide angle] the D7000 might actually be cheaper in the long run as you can buy older equivalents (AF-D lenses). Also, the most crucial part is that the D7000 makes it a LOT easier to access Manual Controls, which are all a part of learning photography. The 39 point autofocus makes the camera much more versatile, allowing you to shoot sports.

Last edited by AstulzerRZD; 01-27-2013 at 03:53 PM. Reason: More detail added
AstulzerRZD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 02:48 PM   #2281
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Crowtservo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 622
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Failed 14 Times in 7 Posts
Hey guys!

I'm looking to get my first DSLR camera in the next couple months and was looking for recommendations. The main reason I want to get one is I'm going to Asia for a while this summer and I'd like to have more than just my phone camera to take some decent pictures. I don't mind carrying around a bigger camera but I also don't want to spend a ton of money. I'm also planning to eventually get into using it more and taking up photography as a hobby, but right now the main concern and is decent vacation shots.

Based on this thread and elsewhere, it seems the Canon T2i/T3i/T4i and the Nikon D3100/3200/5200/7000 are the common entry-level DSLRs. Specifically, the T2i and the D3100 seem to be great "bang for the buck" models. I'm hoping to keep the cost for a new unit (with basic lens) below 500-600 if possible.

As for lens, many units come with a lens and I'm not sure what to look for for my purposes. Obviously vacation shots will be generally landscape but I assume some amount of zoom would be necessary, right? Many of the options I've seen come with 18-55 and/or 55-200 but I've also seen 18-105 lenses. I've done my best to figure out what all the number and acronyms mean generally but I still have no idea what to pick for different circumstances.

Lastly, I was going to try to save some money by buying one used. Is there anything to be particularly concerned about when buying used? Many people post the shutter count, is this a big concern?

Thanks so much!

EDIT 1: A friend also suggested I get a mirrorless or micro four thirds camera since they are easier to carry around. Would a newbie like me even notice the difference in quality?

EDIT 2: It seems the D3100 with 18-55 VR lens might be the sweet spot at just under $500 after tax. Can anyone convince me that the D3200 is worth an extra $150 for a beginner?

Last edited by Crowtservo; 02-06-2013 at 10:22 PM.
Crowtservo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 09:17 PM   #2282
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstulzerRZD View Post
The D5200 and D3200 both share the same brilliant 24MP sensor and have a useful guide mode that can help teach you how to use some of the custom functions. However, they lack aperture adjustment during live view that is oh so crucial to shooting video! However. Both the D5xxx and D3xxx range lack an autofocus motor, meaning that buying lenses is more expensive, and preventing you from using cheaper, old (but just as good!) nikon lenses!
The D3200 (sensor made by Sony) & D5200 (sensor made by Toshiba) do not share the same sensor, and the older Nikon lenses do not perform as well optically as the newer lenses due to the super high resolution and pixel density. They are generally sharp in the centre but get soft out towards the edges.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2013, 07:54 PM   #2283
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
Nismo200SX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Surrey
Posts: 989
Thanked 28 Times in 19 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowtservo View Post
Hey guys!

I'm looking to get my first DSLR camera in the next couple months and was looking for recommendations. The main reason I want to get one is I'm going to Asia for a while this summer and I'd like to have more than just my phone camera to take some decent pictures. I don't mind carrying around a bigger camera but I also don't want to spend a ton of money. I'm also planning to eventually get into using it more and taking up photography as a hobby, but right now the main concern and is decent vacation shots.

Based on this thread and elsewhere, it seems the Canon T2i/T3i/T4i and the Nikon D3100/3200/5200/7000 are the common entry-level DSLRs. Specifically, the T2i and the D3100 seem to be great "bang for the buck" models. I'm hoping to keep the cost for a new unit (with basic lens) below 500-600 if possible.

As for lens, many units come with a lens and I'm not sure what to look for for my purposes. Obviously vacation shots will be generally landscape but I assume some amount of zoom would be necessary, right? Many of the options I've seen come with 18-55 and/or 55-200 but I've also seen 18-105 lenses. I've done my best to figure out what all the number and acronyms mean generally but I still have no idea what to pick for different circumstances.

Lastly, I was going to try to save some money by buying one used. Is there anything to be particularly concerned about when buying used? Many people post the shutter count, is this a big concern?

Thanks so much!

EDIT 1: A friend also suggested I get a mirrorless or micro four thirds camera since they are easier to carry around. Would a newbie like me even notice the difference in quality?

EDIT 2: It seems the D3100 with 18-55 VR lens might be the sweet spot at just under $500 after tax. Can anyone convince me that the D3200 is worth an extra $150 for a beginner?
depending on what your shooting the D3200 could really be worth it if you want to use the WiFi adapter. being able to crop is nice too. The sensor improvements may or may not be worth it to you. But you could also get the D5100 for about the same price too.
__________________
CoLoRs Member #26
For Good or For Awesome?
Nismo200SX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2013, 09:29 PM   #2284
Say! Say! Say!
 
Razor Ramon HG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 15,442
Thanked 3,336 Times in 1,465 Posts
Failed 240 Times in 64 Posts
Hey Crow, I was in the same spot as you a few months ago. I ended up buying a used Nikon D80 and a 18-55mm lens for about $250 CAD. I've been really impressed with the quality of shots considering the camera was from 2006, and the low price that I paid for it.

Since you're travelling and on a budget, I think the D80 would fit your needs perfectly.

For example - Nikon D80 + Nikkor 18-135lens

The numbers basically mean focal length of the lens, aka. how far the lens can zoom in/more narrow of a focus. 18-55mm is a standard kit lens, and is great for starting out. The image below is probably the easiest way to explain it visually.

__________________
Quote:
Owner of Vansterdam's 420th thanks. OH YEAUHHH.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 89blkcivic View Post
Did I tell you guys black is my favourite colour? My Ridgeline is black. My Honda Fit is black. Wish my dick was black........ LOL.
Razor Ramon HG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2013, 05:27 PM   #2285
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
Nismo200SX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Surrey
Posts: 989
Thanked 28 Times in 19 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 3 Posts
Okay It's time to upgrade from my aging D90. I could use some input from the working pro's here.

So far I've considered the following options. I Primarily shoot interiors for real estate but have also been shooting some commercial projects. So far from the examples I've seen in regards to dynamic range and shadow recovery the D800 and D600 are hard to beat.
Also Looking at breaking into video as well for my interior projects. My Nex7 is nice but building a rig around it is a bit of a pain and Sony likes to cripple their own products (ie. no tethering.)

Nikon D800 Test

$$$ - D800 w 16-35 F4 VR

$$ - D600 w 16-35 F4 VR
$$ - D7100 70-200 2.8 VR + Atomos Ninja 2

My only issue with the D600 and D7100 is that locking button on the mode dial. I found the handling of the d800 to be much better.

Any input would be nice. I've been looking researching this for a few weeks now and still have not completely nailed my decision.
__________________
CoLoRs Member #26
For Good or For Awesome?
Nismo200SX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2013, 06:09 PM   #2286
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
What lenses do you currently have? If you don't have too much invested in Nikkor lenses, perhaps a switch to a Canon 6D or 5DmkIII may serve you better professionally. For stills, the Nikons will outperform the Canons (but not by much), but if video is going to be a big part of what you plan to do, then the Canons will run rings around the Nikons. The Nikons are frustrating when shooting video, however, the D7100 is better, but still not as good as the Canons.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2013, 06:59 PM   #2287
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
Nismo200SX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Surrey
Posts: 989
Thanked 28 Times in 19 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 3 Posts
I've got 2 UWA Nikkor 12-24 f4 and Tokina 11-16 DX lenses, 50m 1.8, 24-70 2.8 tokina.
__________________
CoLoRs Member #26
For Good or For Awesome?
Nismo200SX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 12:59 PM   #2288
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
sonick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Revscene
Posts: 9,636
Thanked 7,688 Times in 2,580 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 126 Posts
Anybody recommend an DSLR I can find used that has decent video recording? Nothing super fancy, but would like an external mic input.

For reference I use a Sony SLT-A33 at work for video and the quality is fine for me.

Budget around $400 +/- $75? Prefer Nikon as I have a lens already but not a huge deal as I only have one lens.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyxx View Post
Sonick is a genius. I won't go into detail what's so great about his post. But it's damn good!
2010 Toyota Rav4 Limited V6 - Wifey's Daily Driver
2009 BMW 128i - Daily Driver
2007 Toyota Rav4 Sport V6 - Sold
1999 Mazda Miata - Sold
2003 Mazda Protege5 - Sold
1987 BMW 325is - Sold
1990 Mazda Miata - Sold

100% Buy and Sell Feedback
sonick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 09:09 PM   #2289
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
Nismo200SX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Surrey
Posts: 989
Thanked 28 Times in 19 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 3 Posts
In the around $400 range the D5100 is hard to beat if you must have nikon for video. Or if you want more then look at the D5200 which is better in every way. Especially in the moiré and aliasing department for video.
__________________
CoLoRs Member #26
For Good or For Awesome?
Nismo200SX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2013, 10:58 AM   #2290
MOD
 
Gh0stRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: VANCOUVER
Posts: 26,849
Thanked 7,553 Times in 1,957 Posts
Failed 153 Times in 85 Posts
looking for a point and shoot

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 or Canon PowerShot SX260 HS ???
__________________
M0D3RAT0R

Gh0stRider's Buy & Sell Feedback


Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieH View Post
whole time i thought gh0strider was white lol

Gh0stRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2013, 05:02 PM   #2291
Proud to be called a RS Regular!
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 139
Thanked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
I'm looking for a waterproof rugged camera for an upcoming vacation to the philippines.

I've been looking and research a few cameras and I've narrowed it down to the following:
- Panasonic Lumix TS4
- Olympus Digital Camera TG-820
- Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20
- Nikon COOLPIX AW100

I'm leaning towards the Nikon. Any experts out there who can chime in? Or maybe recommend something that's under 300?
kingdrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2013, 06:07 PM   #2292
PM me for my nudes
 
smoothie.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 3,931
Thanked 3,777 Times in 1,003 Posts
Failed 267 Times in 76 Posts
so I've been told by people to go for nikon without a reason other than "I like mine" or "they're better"

I've wanted one since the T2i days, and as I watch the progression of the T line, I'm thinking, whats the point of being outdated yearly?

Im at a crossroads between the Canon 60D and SL1.

Canon 60D + 18-200mm is $999 right now, and correct me if I'm wrong, but will have higher image quality than the SL1.

SL1 is sub 800, but lighter, newer processor, smaller.

School me on comparable Nikon's to look at please?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonturbo View Post
Too bad it isn't about flipping cars to lose money, I'm really good at that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkunkWorks View Post
This wouldn't happen if you didn't drive a peasant car like an Audi...
Quote:
[14-05, 14:59] FastAnna You tiny bra wearing, gigantic son of a bitch
[15-05, 10:35] FastAnna Yeah I was dreaming of those big titties in that tiny bra
Quote:
Originally Posted by westopher View Post
I'd probably blow someone for that 911
smoothie. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2013, 01:41 AM   #2293
ddr
Snapping away
 
ddr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,920
Thanked 97 Times in 84 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
not a fan of super zooms but here's a similar Nikon kit: Nikon D7000 with 18-105 VR Kit - Canada and Cross-Border Price Comparison - photoprice.ca
__________________
flickr
ddr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2013, 02:04 AM   #2294
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
yray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: PENIS
Posts: 4,316
Thanked 4,178 Times in 1,315 Posts
Failed 297 Times in 125 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by smoothie. View Post
so I've been told by people to go for nikon without a reason other than "I like mine" or "they're better"


School me on comparable Nikon's to look at please?
Canon and Nikon consumer lines are practically the same. You got some fanboy people you've been talking to.

What are you going to use the camera for? Hobby or just to shoot pics of milfs and cats when on vacation??
__________________
There's a phallic symbol infront of my car

Quote:
MG1: in fact, a new term needs to make its way into the American dictionary. Trump............ he's such a "Trump" = ultimate insult. Like, "yray, you're such a trump."
bcrdukes yray fucked bcrdukes up the nose

dapperfied yraisis
dapperfied yray so waisis

FastAnna you literally talk out your ass
FastAnna i really cant
FastAnna yray i cant stand you
yray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2013, 08:10 AM   #2295
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
If you're going to be shooting a lot of video, then get a Canon. The Canons are still superior to Nikons for video, but for stills, the Nikons potentially are better in terms of resolution & dynamic range. That 25MP APS-C sensor in the Nikons are useless without a lens that can do the sensor justice.

That new Canon 18-135mm kit lens for the T4i & T5i is actually quite a good lens, and is optimized for video shooting, while the Nikon 18-105mm lens is ok too, but kinda isn't the best for the D3200 or D5200. The Nikon lens also has a plastic lens mount where the Canon 18-135mm is metal.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 09:34 AM   #2296
MOD
 
Gh0stRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: VANCOUVER
Posts: 26,849
Thanked 7,553 Times in 1,957 Posts
Failed 153 Times in 85 Posts
how are sony point and shoots?

leaning towards the wx300.
__________________
M0D3RAT0R

Gh0stRider's Buy & Sell Feedback


Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieH View Post
whole time i thought gh0strider was white lol

Gh0stRider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2013, 01:35 AM   #2297
Throw yo paws in da air!
 
XplicitLuder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: State of Trance
Posts: 5,125
Thanked 2,779 Times in 957 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 61 Posts
anyone recommend any top 3 point and shoot cameras? gf's parents are looking for something thats a lil better then their old sony dslr. i know they want to take it to mexico when we go and are looking for something pretty fancy. anywhere between 400-700$ ? Video recording would be awesome as well
__________________

Proud member of GRAPE Great Revscene Action Photography Enthusiasts


2008 Infiniti M45X - Y50 (Current)
2000 Honda Prelude SH (Sold)
1995 Dodge Spirit (Sold)
1998 Nissan Maxima SE (Sold)
1996 Honda Prelude SR-V (Sold)
XplicitLuder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 09:43 PM   #2298
RS Operative (G)
 
XTC_604_DKNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: East Van
Posts: 7,295
Thanked 80 Times in 29 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
thinking about picking up a x100s
anyone have experience with this that they can chime in on?
any other recommendations?
__________________
2000 SIR | Sold
2001.5 B5S4 | Sold
2005 E46 | Supercharged
2016 Golf R | Stock

my buyer/seller ratings 6-0-0
XTC_604_DKNY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 10:05 AM   #2299
RS Lurker, I don't post!
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey guys,

I'm recently looking to upgrade my camera, I'm still using a t1i lol. Thinking about 5DM2 or 6D cause both are within my budget. Planning to get it with kit 24-105 if possible. However i'm still debating on which one to get. I mean its pretty hard to find 5DM2 now since it's discontinued, but M3 is wayy too exp. :S Any suggestions?

Thanks
Akumaa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2013, 07:08 PM   #2300
NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 44
Thanked 146 Times in 17 Posts
Failed 186 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akumaa View Post
Hey guys,

I'm recently looking to upgrade my camera, I'm still using a t1i lol. Thinking about 5DM2 or 6D cause both are within my budget. Planning to get it with kit 24-105 if possible. However i'm still debating on which one to get. I mean its pretty hard to find 5DM2 now since it's discontinued, but M3 is wayy too exp. :S Any suggestions?

Thanks
Hey Akumaa,

This link will definitely help you out
Canon 6D vs 5D Mark II - Our Analysis

Used 5dmk2 will probably similarly priced as a new 6d... so why not get that extra peace of mind for the 1 year warrantee
bchizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net