Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n | | |
12-18-2008, 02:54 AM
|
#76 | Revscene.net has a homepage?!
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: RICHMOND
Posts: 1,299
Thanked 200 Times in 76 Posts
Failed 56 Times in 20 Posts
|
r8 wud be urbest bet bud
|
| |
12-18-2008, 07:24 AM
|
#77 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: North Shore
Posts: 2,279
Thanked 58 Times in 17 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
If the ZR1 is too much, how about about the new Caddy CTS-V?
|
| |
12-18-2008, 09:02 AM
|
#78 | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 713
Thanked 42 Times in 32 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
ducati 1098
|
| |
12-18-2008, 09:05 AM
|
#79 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 2,107
Thanked 261 Times in 71 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 10 Posts
|
for the money he spends on a GTR you could get a desmodici! only $75,000!
|
| |
12-18-2008, 02:16 PM
|
#80 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 160
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 5 Times in 1 Post
|
Why not a 997 C4S?
|
| |
12-18-2008, 02:47 PM
|
#81 | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,109
Thanked 415 Times in 65 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 3 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by skyxx ^ I like the E39 M5's styling over the E60 M5's. | That's about it. The new M5 is better in every single way.
|
| |
12-18-2008, 04:27 PM
|
#82 | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
|
you said you dont like the GTR because its boring to drive.. ive heard about that and guess it is true.. so why not get a z06? that should be a lot more fun to drive and it has more power then the GTR.. they also look really badass if done up right
|
| |
12-18-2008, 05:10 PM
|
#83 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: vancouver
Posts: 4,779
Thanked 129 Times in 31 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
370z custom VQ 5L Twin Turbo 1000rwhp I know you want it!
|
| |
12-18-2008, 06:46 PM
|
#84 | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 483
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
|
How about a S2000 with Vortech/Comptech SC with beefy rear dif?
should fit your budget nicely with left-over for interrior comfort upgrades.
|
| |
12-18-2008, 07:03 PM
|
#85 | Marcosexual Fan Club, CEO
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: US Bush-country
Posts: 7,741
Thanked 823 Times in 284 Posts
Failed 236 Times in 113 Posts
|
2009 C2S. They aren't bad in the snow, with a set of snowies, since the engine is in the back. And how often does it really snow in Vancouver anyway?
__________________
Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.
|
| |
12-18-2008, 08:17 PM
|
#86 | Proud to be called a RS Regular!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 122
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I have driven the R35 as well and found that the car is too boring. Although the car hold immense speed, it just isn't involving to drive. I literally find that it doesn't take much driver's skill to drive it very fast on the track.
Basically means if I see one on the track and it starts beating everyone else, it is only because of the car. If the same driver move out to another car with no driver aid, that driver will probably get its ass handed to him.
|
| |
12-18-2008, 08:24 PM
|
#87 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bus Stop
Posts: 2,668
Thanked 37 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'm still trying to figure out what's wrong with my Defender/Elise arrangement?
__________________ "We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people." -Gen. Rick Hillier
Through the mud and the blood to the green field beyond. Faugh A'Ballaugh. |
| |
12-18-2008, 08:53 PM
|
#88 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,310
Thanked 580 Times in 230 Posts
Failed 771 Times in 208 Posts
|
Elises are too slow and not worth it to mod plus they have bare interiors , may as well get an atom if your getting an elise.
Last edited by Death2Theft; 12-18-2008 at 08:54 PM.
|
| |
12-18-2008, 09:12 PM
|
#89 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 530 Times in 136 Posts
|
ah but atoms wont keep u dry in the rain
|
| |
12-18-2008, 10:11 PM
|
#90 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bus Stop
Posts: 2,668
Thanked 37 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Death2Theft Elises are too slow and not worth it to mod plus they have bare interiors , may as well get an atom if your getting an elise. | A) Overall speed is not the question here. The OP admits the GTR is plenty fast, but too boring. An Elise is anything but... and also wouldn't be for daily driving anyway.
B) People are too pampered when they drive anyway. I drive my Land Rover every day, and an Elise is luxurious by comparison... and you know what? I don't miss things like a finely padded seat, a headrest, sound deadening, a radio, carpet, A/C, or a decent heater. And beyond all that, Defender interiors are fine; they've got all that stuff, and are plenty comfortable for daily driving, so who cares?
__________________ "We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people." -Gen. Rick Hillier
Through the mud and the blood to the green field beyond. Faugh A'Ballaugh.
Last edited by 1983 Z28; 12-18-2008 at 10:14 PM.
|
| |
12-18-2008, 10:47 PM
|
#91 | Resident Bullshitter
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,209
Thanked 298 Times in 152 Posts
Failed 1,140 Times in 246 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Takumi I have driven the R35 as well and found that the car is too boring. Although the car hold immense speed, it just isn't involving to drive. I literally find that it doesn't take much driver's skill to drive it very fast on the track.
Basically means if I see one on the track and it starts beating everyone else, it is only because of the car. If the same driver move out to another car with no driver aid, that driver will probably get its ass handed to him. | yes Takumi, we all know your AE86 is faster then anything else.
|
| |
12-18-2008, 10:49 PM
|
#92 | Marcosexual Fan Club, CEO
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: US Bush-country
Posts: 7,741
Thanked 823 Times in 284 Posts
Failed 236 Times in 113 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 1983 Z28 I'm still trying to figure out what's wrong with my Defender/Elise arrangement? | They are both extreme garbage catering to drivers on two different ends of the spectrum. Nobody who wants to drive a Defender enjoys driving an Elise, I mean come on. Does a true sports car driver like a stupid-useless-vehicle (SUV)? Does an SUV driver like sports cars? No.
I like sports cars. I can barely tolerate SUVs. If I had an SUV in my garage, it would only be driven 5% of my total driving miles and my all purpose sports car (read 911) will be driven 95%. I much rather get a 911 and an Audi RS4 if I need something more practical.
__________________
Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.
|
| |
12-18-2008, 10:50 PM
|
#93 | Marcosexual Fan Club, CEO
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: US Bush-country
Posts: 7,741
Thanked 823 Times in 284 Posts
Failed 236 Times in 113 Posts
| Quote:
B) People are too pampered when they drive anyway. I drive my Land Rover every day, and an Elise is luxurious by comparison... and you know what? I don't miss things like a finely padded seat, a headrest, sound deadening, a radio, carpet, A/C, or a decent heater. And beyond all that, Defender interiors are fine; they've got all that stuff, and are plenty comfortable for daily driving, so who cares?
| Yeah, let's see you fit a baby seat into that thing.
__________________
Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.
|
| |
12-18-2008, 11:43 PM
|
#94 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bus Stop
Posts: 2,668
Thanked 37 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Neither is extreme garbage, and you know it. Lotus is, was, and probably always be considered the last word on handling, and Land Rover is, was, and definitely always will be the last word on off-road capable. And actually you can fit a baby seat quite easily. I wouldn't fit it to mine, since it's from 1973 and thus has absolutely no safety equipment, but there's plenty of Defenders with baby seats.
And plenty of people actually do own both an SUV and a sports car. Like me. 1973 Land Rover, 1995 Range Rover, 1974 Jaguar XJ-12, and a 1968 MG Midget. In fact, with the current crop of Range Rovers being so successful, I've met plenty of fellows with grade-A sports cars for fun, and Rovers for practicality.
As for the SUV's general notions of uselessness, I'd probably agree. The modern Cayenne/X3/X5/Q7/Explorer/Santa-Fe/LR3/Range Rover Sport set are useless, bloated sedans that have overgrown their practicality. But Land Rover Defenders and Series trucks cannot be considered alongside those vehicles. There's only a few hunderd of them in the country, and as such, they attract a different set of buyer. I have yet to see someone use a Defender poorly. They're built to go places nothing else will go, and pretty much all the local Defenders and Series trucks are use off-road extensively. When was the last time you were trapped behind a Land Rover Defender or Series vehicle?
__________________ "We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people." -Gen. Rick Hillier
Through the mud and the blood to the green field beyond. Faugh A'Ballaugh. |
| |
12-18-2008, 11:50 PM
|
#95 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,645
Thanked 1,357 Times in 508 Posts
Failed 229 Times in 105 Posts
|
^ you might also want to consider how that dude is getting rid of one ride he might not have been looking into having one more in return.
GTR is out to tell the world that you can go Porsche turbo fast while sitting 4 in good comfort, have a large boot and go snowboarding all in the same goddamned car. It's just boring......but it can do the above rather well.
Elise + Defender is exactly not that.
madz what about a Maserati GT with 6 speed? Aston Martin DB7 slightly used? and so forth? you can see where i'm going here it's bunch of rather posh sports cars that needs you to shift..... I think for someone stepping off a R35 these will suit their taste very well.
Or a 996TT? http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/ctd/926941913.html
this looks mighty alright at 78K.
__________________ ⇐ If I bothered replying, that's the face I made while I typed. - 2017 Alfa Romeo Giula Q4
- 1999 Nissan Stagea 260RS 1 of 748
- 1998 Nissan Laurel Medallion Club S drift boi
- 1991 Lexus LS400 mint boi
- 1989 Nissan S-Cargo cute boi
Last edited by hk20000; 12-18-2008 at 11:50 PM.
|
| |
12-18-2008, 11:51 PM
|
#96 | 14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 655
Thanked 469 Times in 109 Posts
Failed 306 Times in 50 Posts
|
wow nice r35, is this the only red one in town? Those wheels look expensive
|
| |
12-19-2008, 12:42 AM
|
#97 | Marcosexual Fan Club, CEO
Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: US Bush-country
Posts: 7,741
Thanked 823 Times in 284 Posts
Failed 236 Times in 113 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by 1983 Z28 Neither is extreme garbage, and you know it. Lotus is, was, and probably always be considered the last word on handling, and Land Rover is, was, and definitely always will be the last word on off-road capable. And actually you can fit a baby seat quite easily. I wouldn't fit it to mine, since it's from 1973 and thus has absolutely no safety equipment, but there's plenty of Defenders with baby seats.
And plenty of people actually do own both an SUV and a sports car. Like me. 1973 Land Rover, 1995 Range Rover, 1974 Jaguar XJ-12, and a 1968 MG Midget. In fact, with the current crop of Range Rovers being so successful, I've met plenty of fellows with grade-A sports cars for fun, and Rovers for practicality.
As for the SUV's general notions of uselessness, I'd probably agree. The modern Cayenne/X3/X5/Q7/Explorer/Santa-Fe/LR3/Range Rover Sport set are useless, bloated sedans that have overgrown their practicality. But Land Rover Defenders and Series trucks cannot be considered alongside those vehicles. There's only a few hunderd of them in the country, and as such, they attract a different set of buyer. I have yet to see someone use a Defender poorly. They're built to go places nothing else will go, and pretty much all the local Defenders and Series trucks are use off-road extensively. When was the last time you were trapped behind a Land Rover Defender or Series vehicle? | Point is both are extreme ends of the scale and averaging their driving characteristics does not give you the best of both worlds. There is no car that mixes driving pleasure of a sports car and daily drivability better than a Porsche 911.
__________________
Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.
|
| |
12-19-2008, 12:45 AM
|
#98 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bus Stop
Posts: 2,668
Thanked 37 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
This isn't about 911s. It's about a guy looking to replace with GTR with something more... interesting. If that's a 911, great. But averaging the sports car experience with practicality will always lead you to a compromise... and why compromise when you can have the best of both worlds?
EDIT: I'd also wager that the R8 mixes sports car ability with daily driver practicality as well as a 911. But niether will cope with inclement conditions
__________________ "We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people." -Gen. Rick Hillier
Through the mud and the blood to the green field beyond. Faugh A'Ballaugh.
Last edited by 1983 Z28; 12-19-2008 at 09:58 AM.
|
| |
12-19-2008, 12:47 AM
|
#99 | :: Sells McLarens, Not tofu :okay: ::
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: vancouver
Posts: 10,755
Thanked 11,826 Times in 3,334 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 89 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Marco911 Point is both are extreme ends of the scale and averaging their driving characteristics does not give you the best of both worlds. There is no car that mixes driving pleasure of a sports car and daily drivability better than a Porsche 911. | agreed.
honestly, you could go anywhere with it, live with it every day and be abe to drive it all year long.
look for a clean 996 twin turbo? well.. (even though its not as good as a 997 or a 993... )
__________________
13' Nissan DBA-R35 GT-R Black Ed - Black met. - "Sophia"
90' Honda EF Civic HB // 04' Honda Pilot Granite
- The Drinker of Many Many Coffees @ McLaren Vancouver
|
| |
12-19-2008, 07:57 AM
|
#100 | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 584
Thanked 194 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 164 Times in 42 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by madz I would love a ZR1. But MSRP is above $130K. Out of my price range. | Why would a ZR1 at $130K be out of your range but a car at $100K isn't? There's really no difference in price once you get to that point.
Or are you saying you can just afford $100K, but not $130K in which case I have some serious questions about how you manage your money.
I'm sure the ZR1 will give you a lot of "smiles" for that measly extra $30K. |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:35 AM. |