Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only. |
 | | 
12-18-2008, 01:09 PM
|
#26 | | private modder
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: North Shore
Posts: 6,895
Thanked 2,867 Times in 806 Posts
Failed 47 Times in 35 Posts
|
what section was written on your ticket?
| 
|  | |
12-18-2008, 01:22 PM
|
#27 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,194
Thanked 5,428 Times in 864 Posts
Failed 36 Times in 32 Posts
|
At the end of the day, how much time would it have taken you to clear the snow off the back window?
What sucks is following some turd who has snow on his roof, rear window, etcetc. which creates a shit whiteout driving experience for those behind him.
| |
| | |
12-18-2008, 01:24 PM
|
#28 | | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Eff-1  what section was written on your ticket? | read dude lol
| |
| | |
12-18-2008, 01:27 PM
|
#29 | | The RS Freebie guru
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: East Vancouver
Posts: 22,032
Thanked 2,491 Times in 860 Posts
Failed 137 Times in 67 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by DC5-S I called the office and spoke with a traffic cop and he said you have to have a 350 degree unobstructed view.. he also said vans and trucks have different privelages and that for cars you have to be able to see 350 degrees.. is this true? this guy might just be saying this to make me pay.. | WTF?
What, so is it also illegal if you have three people sitting in the back seat and their heads are partially blocking the rear window? 
Nobody likes the tuna here.
| |
| | |
12-18-2008, 01:35 PM
|
#30 | | Banned (BBM)
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 1,106 Times in 390 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by InvisibleSoul WTF?
What, so is it also illegal if you have three people sitting in the back seat and their heads are partially blocking the rear window?
Nobody likes the tuna here. | or wat if u are moving and have boxes piled up in ur mini van after removing the seats  | |
| | |
12-18-2008, 01:39 PM
|
#31 | | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
|
ya i know ive seen cars many times with piled up shit in the back seat im fucking disputing this bullshit ticket
| |
| | |
12-18-2008, 02:05 PM
|
#32 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 3,047
Thanked 1,705 Times in 595 Posts
Failed 50 Times in 22 Posts
|
that's bs, if you have working mirrors you can have no rear window, check the police forum and skidmark will tell you that.
and the traffic cop told you you need 350 degree view, he shouldnt be saying that unless it's actually written in the MVA as "350 degrees"
| 
| | |
12-18-2008, 03:17 PM
|
#33 | | RS Operative (G)
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: GYM
Posts: 12,643
Thanked 4,573 Times in 1,531 Posts
Failed 406 Times in 127 Posts
|
how much was the ticket, that is BS tho
__________________
╔╦╦╦═╦╗╔═╦═╦══╦═╗
║║║║╩╣╚╣═╣║║║║║╩╣
╚══╩═╩═╩═╩═╩╩╩╩═╝
| |
| | |
12-18-2008, 05:26 PM
|
#34 | | Retired Traffic Cop
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Nanoose Bay, BC
Posts: 9,025
Thanked 125 Times in 68 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
Just to make sure, instead of guessing, was it section 195 that you were ticketed for?
__________________
Have you ever met anyone that would admit to being less than a better than average driver ??
Learn more at DriveSmartBC | |
| | |
12-18-2008, 05:27 PM
|
#35 | | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
|
yes 195 (1) (a)
| |
| | |
12-18-2008, 06:02 PM
|
#36 | | The "You'd Know" Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Home
Posts: 20,931
Thanked 276 Times in 140 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
Moving this to Police forum.
__________________
08 CBR600RR
03 IS300
Ezekiel 25:17. The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you. | |
| | |
12-18-2008, 08:28 PM
|
#37 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bus Stop
Posts: 2,668
Thanked 37 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Well it does appear that you're ok; i took a pretty good look through the regs and MVA and couldn't find anything about the rear window being obscured.
Although, it definitely isn't as safe as simply wiping it off.
__________________
"We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people." -Gen. Rick Hillier
Through the mud and the blood to the green field beyond.
Faugh A'Ballaugh. | |
| | |
12-18-2008, 09:58 PM
|
#38 | | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
|
thanks for the help, anything about the rear view mirror either? i dont know where that cop got 350 degrees from i guess he was making stuff on the spot and thought I would be ignorant enough to fall for it. he was also talking about the blindspot but how can the blindspot be affected by the rear view.. i look through my rear passenger window for cars
Last edited by DC5-S; 12-18-2008 at 10:00 PM.
| |
| | |
12-18-2008, 10:08 PM
|
#39 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bus Stop
Posts: 2,668
Thanked 37 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
He was making that up. The law states that so long as you have side view mirrors mounted to both the left and right side of your automobile, you can obscure your rear window as much as you'd like.
__________________
"We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people." -Gen. Rick Hillier
Through the mud and the blood to the green field beyond.
Faugh A'Ballaugh. | |
| | |
12-18-2008, 10:37 PM
|
#40 | | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
|
i also remember him saying trucks and semis have different rules.. im like what about those white vans with doors on the back with no window he said they have the same rules lol
Last edited by DC5-S; 12-18-2008 at 10:38 PM.
| |
| | |
12-18-2008, 11:22 PM
|
#41 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bus Stop
Posts: 2,668
Thanked 37 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Trucks and vans have certain exemptions from the MVA regulations, but he cited you a MVA section that isn't from the regulations (MVA is the laws pertaining to how you drive, regulations pertain to what you drive).
You're good. Dispute.
__________________
"We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people." -Gen. Rick Hillier
Through the mud and the blood to the green field beyond.
Faugh A'Ballaugh. | |
| | |
12-19-2008, 12:28 AM
|
#42 | | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
|
how would the 195 (1) (a) even affect someone? it says "a person must not cause a vehicle to move on a highway if the control of the driver over the driving mechanism of the vehicle is obstructed" would that mean you would have to be driving with a steering wheel lock on the car or something? lol.. and why would he even write that section on that ticket it has nothing to do with visibility..
Last edited by DC5-S; 12-19-2008 at 12:28 AM.
| |
| | |
12-19-2008, 12:28 AM
|
#43 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bus Stop
Posts: 2,668
Thanked 37 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Yeah, pretty much.
__________________
"We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people." -Gen. Rick Hillier
Through the mud and the blood to the green field beyond.
Faugh A'Ballaugh. | |
| | |
12-19-2008, 06:25 AM
|
#44 | | RS Peace Officer
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 27 Posts
|
DC5-S he would have to be able to convince the JP that the snow on the back window did "obstruct" as stated specifically in that section. Sometimes reading the section from the "cheater' does not give you the correct section.
| |
| | |
12-19-2008, 10:14 AM
|
#45 | | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
|
i dont understand..
| |
| | |
12-19-2008, 10:17 AM
|
#46 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bus Stop
Posts: 2,668
Thanked 37 Times in 11 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Uh. Neither do I? What's this "cheater" you speak of, ZT? And who would have to convince the JP that the snow was obstructing the rear window?
195 (1) A person must not cause a vehicle to move on a highway if
(a) the control of the driver over the driving mechanism of the vehicle, or
(b) the view of the driver to the front or sides of the vehicle
is obstructed.
The rear window was obstructed, hence the section simply doesn't apply, and the kid doesn't deserve the ticket.
Seems pretty simple to me.
__________________
"We're not the public service of Canada, we're not just another department. We are the Canadian Forces, and our job is to be able to kill people." -Gen. Rick Hillier
Through the mud and the blood to the green field beyond.
Faugh A'Ballaugh.
Last edited by 1983 Z28; 12-19-2008 at 10:20 AM.
| |
| | |
12-19-2008, 12:21 PM
|
#47 | | Retired Traffic Cop
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Nanoose Bay, BC
Posts: 9,025
Thanked 125 Times in 68 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
Either there is more to the story that we are not hearing or the officer was genuinely mistaken in issuing the ticket. If the latter is the case, you should be able to have it cancelled by speaking to the officer's supervisor. Call the detachment listed on the ticket, ask for the supervisor and see what you can do.
__________________
Have you ever met anyone that would admit to being less than a better than average driver ??
Learn more at DriveSmartBC | |
| | |
12-19-2008, 12:48 PM
|
#48 | | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,608
Thanked 170 Times in 87 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
I followed that advice when I got the front tinted windows ticket. The officer was mistaken and I showed him the car during the day and he realized his error, but he still couldn't cancel the ticket. He said I'd have to dispute it but he'd plead no contest. He said he couldn't cancel the ticket. If only he knew he could do that.
| |
| | |
12-19-2008, 01:19 PM
|
#49 | | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
|
i dont wanna talk to that guy again lol its already been disputed.. should i print out the MVA section and take it with me to court? and tell the judge that it doesnt say anywhere that your rear view window has to be free off obstructions. and that the officer wrote down the wrong section 195 (1) (a) which has nothing to do with visibility.. and i dont think the officer was mistaken in issuing the ticket he told me i have to be able to see through the rear of the car which clearly he is wrong.. and there is nothing more to the story.
Last edited by DC5-S; 12-19-2008 at 01:51 PM.
| |
| | |
12-19-2008, 06:23 PM
|
#50 | | Retired Traffic Cop
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Nanoose Bay, BC
Posts: 9,025
Thanked 125 Times in 68 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
It's a simple form to fill out and submit if the white copy of the ticket has already been sent to ICBC. Once ICBC gets the form they cancel the ticket. Simple.
You can take a copy with you if you wish to, but it would be better to take 3, one for you, one for the JP and one for the officer is standard practice. The JP will have the Act on his desk and the officer should know what the section says, so you can get away in this case with just a copy for yourself.
__________________
Have you ever met anyone that would admit to being less than a better than average driver ??
Learn more at DriveSmartBC | |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:38 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
![Need advice on a ticket.. [Moved]](https://www.revscene.net/forums/iconimages/police-forum-143/need-advice-ticket-%5Bmoved%5D_ltr.gif)
