REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-31-2008, 12:59 AM   #1
I am Hook'd on RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 69
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Exclamation Leasing vs Purchasing Calculation HELP!

Hi All,

I'm looking to purchase or lease a 2009 Mazda 6 GT...

The price out of the door is $33,609.45

Option 1 - Financing
36 months - 0% - $782.04/month
$5000 down
36 months x $782.04 = $28,153.44


Option 2 - Leasing
36 months - 5.5% - $431.49/month
%5000 down
36 months x $431.49 = $15,533.64
Buy out @end of lease = $13,836.80

So say at the end of 3 yrs, I want to sell my Mazda 6 and can sell it for $15,000 ( I researched a 2005 Mazda 6 prices in craigslist)
Then, the total I paid for my 3 yrs of owning a Mazda 6 is $13,153.44 ($28,153.44 - $15,000)

Therefore the difference between leasing and purchasing is only $2000?

It seems to me that leasing is just the way to go? $2000 dollar in 3 yrs is nothing!

Anyone thinks Financing to own is better than leasing?
Advertisement
volcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 01:16 AM   #2
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
leasing is always better imo
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 01:24 AM   #3
I am Hook'd on RS
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 69
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane View Post
leasing is always better imo
Yes I would think so as well...

To think of it if you can also compare how much you can get back if you buy the car w/ Financing is $13,153.44 ($28,153.44 - $15,000) vs the buy out lease at the end of 3rd yr is $13,836.80

That's like only a $683.36 difference!
volcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 01:41 AM   #4
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
C5_Ryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Van
Posts: 638
Thanked 24 Times in 14 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 5 Posts
Leasing is always better short term. After 3 years you give the car back, instead of the headache of selling it back out.
C5_Ryder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 01:48 AM   #5
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 604
Posts: 1,049
Thanked 160 Times in 80 Posts
Failed 84 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by volcom View Post
To think of it if you can also compare how much you can get back if you buy the car w/ Financing is $13,153.44 ($28,153.44 - $15,000) vs the buy out lease at the end of 3rd yr is $13,836.80

That's like only a $683.36 difference!
Are you going to be sitting on $13k of cash to buy out the car at the end of lease? If not, throw in additional finance charges.

Leasing is generally the better ("cheaper") choice if one is planning on turning over their car every two or three years. Conversely, buying a car and holding it over a period of 5-6 years (I think - the break-even time depends on a number of factors) ends up being cheaper than leasing cars during the same period. You also have the equity in the car.

Last edited by Blinky; 12-31-2008 at 01:50 AM.
Blinky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 01:53 AM   #6
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
cococly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Van
Posts: 1,664
Thanked 413 Times in 101 Posts
Failed 95 Times in 37 Posts
Leasing is the better option.

It could sorta eliminate unexpected depreciation.
cococly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 02:15 AM   #7
nuggets mod
 
freakshow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: richmond
Posts: 7,065
Thanked 3,835 Times in 987 Posts
Failed 178 Times in 60 Posts
if you're going to change cars every 2-3 years, leasing is generally a better option for you.
__________________
I searched for truth, and all I found was You
freakshow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 09:11 AM   #8
Banned (ABWS)
 
JDM_CTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: land of JDM
Posts: 3,173
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 7 Times in 3 Posts
But as at the same time did you also factor in the TAEXES and FEES associated with buying out the lease at the end of your term.
By all means lease the car if you want to , but from what i see at work it is it is good if you're on ltd budget and want new cars every 3 years, but can you guarantee that even though your residual is $13,836 plaus applicable taxes and fees , will the ACTUAL CAR VALUE of that car be a POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE number after your term ends. easy to say "SURE IT WILL" but ask MAZDA what their "estimated" residual value is after a 36 month term based on 24,000km per year. if it ends up less than 55% of original value maybe not that worth it after all.
JUST MY $0.02
JDM_CTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 02:40 PM   #9
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
Anjew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 925
Thanked 237 Times in 102 Posts
Failed 84 Times in 31 Posts
leasing is also good also if you are self employed and use it for work sometimes. you can write off part of the payments.
Anjew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2008, 05:05 PM   #10
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 530
Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDM_CTR View Post
But as at the same time did you also factor in the TAEXES and FEES associated with buying out the lease at the end of your term.
By all means lease the car if you want to , but from what i see at work it is it is good if you're on ltd budget and want new cars every 3 years, but can you guarantee that even though your residual is $13,836 plaus applicable taxes and fees , will the ACTUAL CAR VALUE of that car be a POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE number after your term ends. easy to say "SURE IT WILL" but ask MAZDA what their "estimated" residual value is after a 36 month term based on 24,000km per year. if it ends up less than 55% of original value maybe not that worth it after all.
JUST MY $0.02
Yes there are taxes and fees when buying out the car at the end of lease. But you also need to keep in mind that you also pay less taxes at the beginning. So the math works out the same.

IF the car worth more than the residual value after the term then cool. YOU can buy the car and resell it to make some money.
IF the car worth less than the residual value then you can just leave the keys to Mazda and leave.

For leasing, you are paying for the depreciation value of the car at each month.
The math works out the about the same.
__________________
2006 G35C 6MT Blk/Blk
JackyJai is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net