REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-13-2009, 07:29 PM   #26
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: richmond
Posts: 920
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by !LittleDragon View Post
it only had 4 cylinders... lol
lol...You spew stuff outta your mouth that you don't even know anything about...Go and check the SVO mustang in google, if anyone cares...
Advertisement
kumbo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 07:51 PM   #27
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,552
Thanked 4,973 Times in 1,835 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kumbo1 View Post
lol...You spew stuff outta your mouth that you don't even know anything about...Go and check the SVO mustang in google, if anyone cares...
Um, it only had 4 cylinders was pretty much exactly the problem.

When people think Mustang they think V8 Muscle. Period.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions

Last edited by Great68; 01-13-2009 at 07:52 PM.
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 07:52 PM   #28
This title intentionally left blank MOD
 
Alatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Above Sea Level
Posts: 8,549
Thanked 484 Times in 211 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kumbo1 View Post
lol...You spew stuff outta your mouth that you don't even know anything about...Go and check the SVO mustang in google, if anyone cares...
Uh. No, he speaks correctly. The first and only mass-market production mustang that was turbocharged was back in the early 80s, and it was a turbo 4 cylinder.
__________________
Classifieds Head Moderator
Automotive Service Technician

I don't have an anger problem. I have an idiot problem.
Alatar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 10:20 PM   #29
"They call me Bowser...RawR!"
 
!LittleDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,226
Thanked 919 Times in 369 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 30 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kumbo1 View Post
lol...You spew stuff outta your mouth that you don't even know anything about...Go and check the SVO mustang in google, if anyone cares...
Lemme see.... who on earth would buy a 4cyl "muscle" car? Part of owning a muscle car is to be able to make fun of the 4bangers.. Average joe doesn't care how much power it'll make, it's got freakin 4 cylinders!
__________________
"Damn fine car Dodge... Ran over me wife with a Dodge!", Zeke
!LittleDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 11:02 PM   #30
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
heleu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rmd
Posts: 924
Thanked 435 Times in 194 Posts
Failed 16 Times in 13 Posts
A lot of manufacturers are starting to match 6 cylinder engines with turbos. I think the turbo lag we used to associate with 90's turbo four cylinders will be a thing of the past.

...and RE, 4cyl muscle car, the V6 mustang outsells the V8 mustang by a big margin if I recall correctly. A lot of people just want the image.
heleu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 11:56 PM   #31
"They call me Bowser...RawR!"
 
!LittleDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,226
Thanked 919 Times in 369 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 30 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by heleu View Post
...and RE, 4cyl muscle car, the V6 mustang outsells the V8 mustang by a big margin if I recall correctly. A lot of people just want the image.

Times are different now... Back then, you didn't have a lot of women buying the Mustang either.
__________________
"Damn fine car Dodge... Ran over me wife with a Dodge!", Zeke
!LittleDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 05:53 AM   #32
Witness protection
 
thumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: GVRD
Posts: 14,427
Thanked 5,343 Times in 2,222 Posts
Failed 111 Times in 57 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by !LittleDragon View Post
Lemme see.... who on earth would buy a 4cyl "muscle" car? Part of owning a muscle car is to be able to make fun of the 4bangers.. Average joe doesn't care how much power it'll make, it's got freakin 4 cylinders!
tough call... yes there was a 4cyl mustang, but the mustang was the only pony/muscle car to survive when both the camaro and firebird were both killed off.

wasn't at one point in history the dodge challenger became a little mitsubishi-based car?
thumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 11:21 AM   #33
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
LowTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Work
Posts: 2,851
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
^^we are talking about 20 years difference in time frame
__________________

Originally posted by Jocelyn
So, I guess a valentines day would include a blow job in the car with the PS2 hooked up and porn lined up.

Originally posted by Marco911
My C4S will ass rape a Z06 on a rainy day too.

Originally posted by KuSouL
even tho Timpo's an ass ~ he actually knows what he's talking about

Originally posted by maxx
where r jags assembled nowadays? back when they were made in GB, they were rock-solid, dependable and great cars.. now i hear the opposite.

Originally posted by maxx
lol.. Ford never even heard of Dakar not to mention get somewhere in it.
LowTEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 12:29 PM   #34
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
bossxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: pc
Posts: 7,554
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kumbo1 View Post
"We're able to decrease the size of the available engine - such as installing a V-6 versus a
V-8 - yet boost the power using turbocharging to deliver similar power and torque of that larger engine."
I dunno why but I laughed when I read this.
bossxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 11:53 AM   #35
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
heleu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Rmd
Posts: 924
Thanked 435 Times in 194 Posts
Failed 16 Times in 13 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by !LittleDragon View Post
Times are different now... Back then, you didn't have a lot of women buying the Mustang either.
I disagree. The mustang was meant to be the sports car for all people when it first came out. That's why you could buy a small 6 cylinder engine for those that just wanted the look and a huge big block V8 for those who wanted to take it to the dragstrip.

I think times are changing. BMW stopped turbocharging it's engines for a long period and now all of their top non-M models are turbo'd. I think a Turbo M car is just a matter of time.
heleu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 02:29 PM   #36
"They call me Bowser...RawR!"
 
!LittleDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,226
Thanked 919 Times in 369 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 30 Posts
The Mustang isn't a sports car, it never was. I had a '91 LX 5.0 as my first car but I'll let the other resident Mustang experts explain...

But back to the issue at hand... the turbo mustang didn't sell well and failed BECAUSE it was a 4banger. A simple show of hands will show you that. Everyone who thinks of a turbo4 when they hear Ford Mustang raise your hands. Everyone who thinks of a turbo4 when they hear American muscle, please raise your hands... Chances are, they never even knew they existed.

Sales of the Mustang other than the V8's didn't really pick up until the 4th gen, prior to that, the LX5.0 outsold all other Ford cars. What was different with the 4th gen was women started to find it appealing for them to drive but many of them opted for the V6 rather than the 8. Today, sales of the 6 may or may not be higher (I can't confirm this) than the 8 but it's still the 8 that people think associate with Mustang
__________________
"Damn fine car Dodge... Ran over me wife with a Dodge!", Zeke
!LittleDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 02:59 PM   #37
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,552
Thanked 4,973 Times in 1,835 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by !LittleDragon View Post

But back to the issue at hand... the turbo mustang didn't sell well and failed BECAUSE it was a 4banger.
The funny thing was that the SVO Mustang was faster, handled better (Factory Koni's!) and stopped better (4 wheel discs!) than the 5.0 at the time.

But well, the sales numbers spoke for themselves.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 03:12 PM   #38
racing & tech mod.
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,034
Thanked 507 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 22 Times in 12 Posts
The mustang WAS originally meant to be a sports car, like the corvette, but it quickly became far too heavy, with no real engineering R&D put into handling. Emphasis was always on aggressive looks and massive power - and thus the MUSCLE CAR was born.

I sell Mustangs, but I would never call them a sports car. They are Muscle cars, pure and simple, and that's nothing to be ashamed of. Hell, if I had the extra income, I'd rock one. The new 2005+ frame are awesome, and can be made to handle extremely well. (as per the Shelby KR's) I'd actually even prefer an FR500C to the Porsche race car that I'm currently building.

Last edited by Rich Sandor; 01-15-2009 at 03:13 PM.
Rich Sandor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 03:30 PM   #39
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,552
Thanked 4,973 Times in 1,835 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Sandor View Post
but it quickly became far too heavy, with no real engineering R&D put into handling.
Except for when a man named "Caroll Shelby" got a hold of them.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 06:25 PM   #40
"They call me Bowser...RawR!"
 
!LittleDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,226
Thanked 919 Times in 369 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 30 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Sandor View Post
Emphasis was always on aggressive looks and massive power - and thus the MUSCLE CAR was born.
I'm pretty sure the muscle car was around since the early 50's, long before the Mustang and that the Mustang brought on the pony car era
__________________
"Damn fine car Dodge... Ran over me wife with a Dodge!", Zeke
!LittleDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 09:47 PM   #41
racing & tech mod.
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,034
Thanked 507 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 22 Times in 12 Posts
Muscle cars in the 50's were colloquially called "Hot Rods", and in the 60's and 70's they were called "Supercars" The term "Muscle Car" didn't really enter mainstraim media until the mid to late 70's, when the classic muscle car production had already died off.

You're right the Mustang spawned the Pony car era, but when average Joe thinks of a "Muscle Car" it's a car based on the Pony appearance (Long hood, short trunk) but with way more horsepower than the original Ponies.
Rich Sandor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 10:29 PM   #42
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 584
Thanked 194 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 164 Times in 42 Posts
I almost bought an SVO when they came out. Ford crammed a lot of technology into the car and all the magazines raved about how great it drove.

The V8 Mustang was quicker than the SVO in a straight line, and sold for several thousand less. That's what killed the SVO - that it was more expensive and slower. Nobody really cared that it handled and braked extremely well and would hand the GT its ass on a track. The only thing people wanted was to have a fast car for those stop-light to stop-light races.

People call it a failure because of poor sales numbers, but that doesn't mean it was a lousy car. The SVO was a fantastic car that was basically too sophisticated for the general buying public.


That said, I think Ford is stupid if they don't use this engine in the Mustang. It's pretty sad when your competitors V6 (Camaro) outclasses your V8. Especially when you have a turbo V6 in your corner that trumps the Camaros. People will be wondering why they let such a great engine sit on the shelf.
ericthehalfbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 10:49 PM   #43
racing & tech mod.
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,034
Thanked 507 Times in 188 Posts
Failed 22 Times in 12 Posts
I don't think the engine will be sitting on the shelf. If anything, I don't think they will be able to produce enough of them to meet the demand for the models that they are currently slated for. Usually this is a problem of the supplier. I can already foresee a shortage or turbos or other subcomponents from suppliers. By contrast, there are plenty of the current 4+Litre V6 and V8 engines sitting on shelves.

As a Ford dealer, we have NOTHING on the engine other than what we read on autoblog. The biggest problem about it is customers expecting to be able to get a powerplant in any model car which may never happen. As far as I'm concerned, until it's in our system as an order, it's not available.
Rich Sandor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 10:53 PM   #44
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 152
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
good for ford.
but nothing TOOOO exciting.
wyattH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 03:26 AM   #45
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: vancouver
Posts: 184
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey Kumbo1, I am trying to message you but I am unable to, because your mailbox is full.

btw, thats looks like a powerful engine.
justdoit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net