| Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n |
 | | 
01-22-2009, 12:21 AM
|
#26 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Banned
Posts: 330
Thanked 14 Times in 6 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i much rather get the s2k, my opinions are a bit biased because i used to drive a miata so i would choose the convertible 4 banger.
| 
|  | |
01-22-2009, 12:34 AM
|
#27 | | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: vancouver
Posts: 841
Thanked 810 Times in 179 Posts
Failed 41 Times in 14 Posts
|
i find the 350z too heavy. at times, it feels underpowered. its not as agile as the s2k of course. thats a given. but its a quieter more civilized car.
the s2k is a lighter more communicatve car in my opinion. i would like to think of it as what a miata should be from day one. its well balanced. but, the s2k is sometimes too well balanced for my liking and becomes hard to drive well.
for a daily driver, they both arent very good. both 2 seaters with almost zero trunk space. parking is horrible with the 350z due to the small windows and high belt line. parking is equally bad with the s2k being that it has long front and low seating position. it gets worse when the top is up and when you happen to pick up an ap1 with no glass back with defog. both are quite loud on the highway. the s2k more so due to the high revs it needs. the 350z is quieter but i dont know about you but i hate how that v6 sounds. also, from memory, i think the 350z is more of a gas drinker.
from a reliability point of view. i've myself have owned neither but i've heard more horror stories about the 350z than the s2k. seems like transmission and engine failure issues plague the earlier cars. but then again, i've read about s2k guys blowing up their rear ends, subframes, axles and such. it seems that s2k are overall cheaper to maintain though i could be wrong.
as a toy, both aren't really that worthy of being an collector or purely a weekender like say a z06, elise or a 911. in my opinion, they are both fun cars at a good price for used but they arent special enough to get really attached to.
for me, honestly i would pick neither if buying new. as for buying used, a nice E36 M3 would be a much better choice. If i really had to choose between the two. I would pick the S2k but only if it came with a hard top, cage and proper roll bars as some clubs in the states dont allow convertibles to run track days anymore.
| |
| | |
01-22-2009, 01:11 AM
|
#28 | | Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
Join Date: May 2007 Location: burnaby
Posts: 247
Thanked 60 Times in 15 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Just go drive both and see which one you like.
| |
| | |
01-22-2009, 01:29 AM
|
#29 | | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
|
id rather have the new 350z as it is way faster then a s2000. s2000 is only good with a blower.
| |
| | |
01-22-2009, 01:53 AM
|
#30 | | RabidMod
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,371
Thanked 1,511 Times in 535 Posts
Failed 112 Times in 32 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by DC5-S  id rather have the new 350z as it is way faster then a s2000. s2000 is only good with a blower. | 350z with blower is faster.
350z win.
__________________
--- | 
| | |
01-22-2009, 03:19 AM
|
#31 | | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 803
Thanked 997 Times in 121 Posts
Failed 165 Times in 29 Posts
|
To the OP
Just buy whatever suits you better.
Don't jump on the ban wagon my friend.
| |
| | |
01-22-2009, 03:08 PM
|
#32 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
|
Here's a good comparison, S2000 vs 350Z. http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=wSPL6eepv-A | |
| | |
01-22-2009, 07:39 PM
|
#33 | | I don't get it
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: vancouver
Posts: 429
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I had an rsx, my bro had an s2k. My rsx-s was slower by far than the S2000...and I beat a G35 with the S2000.
| |
| | |
01-22-2009, 08:06 PM
|
#34 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,742
Thanked 179 Times in 76 Posts
Failed 189 Times in 70 Posts
|
somebody start an rsx-s vs civic si thread!
| |
| | |
01-22-2009, 08:21 PM
|
#35 | | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 530
Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 3 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolomite I had an rsx, my bro had an s2k. My rsx-s was slower by far than the S2000...and I beat a G35 with the S2000. | My friend with a 996 MK1 C2 w/ exhaust lost to a G35 on Knight Bridge.
My friend can't drive shit.
So is the G35 you beat.
G35 makes about 240whp and 1580kg (6.58kg/whp).
S2000 makes about 190whp and 1300kg(6.82kg/whp).
350Z makes about 250whp and 1450kg(5.8kg/whp).
There is no way a G35 lost to S2000 on straight.
Not to mention VQ35DE makes 100lb/ft torque more than S2000.
Straight line performance: 350Z>G35>S2000
__________________
2006 G35C 6MT Blk/Blk
Last edited by JackyJai; 01-22-2009 at 08:30 PM.
| |
| | |
01-22-2009, 08:56 PM
|
#36 | | I don't get it
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: vancouver
Posts: 429
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Well....I beat him....twice. So yea. And yea he was trying. The s2k had I/E but I cant see that making any difference.
| |
| | |
01-22-2009, 09:14 PM
|
#37 | | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 530
Thanked 9 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 3 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolomite Well....I beat him....twice. So yea. And yea he was trying. The s2k had I/E but I cant see that making any difference. | The only reason is he still can't drive shit even he tried.
The S2000 will achieve 0-60mph in 5.7 only if you drop the clutch at redline.
The torque of S200 is not a lot for its weight.
The VQ is a much more powerful engine.
__________________
2006 G35C 6MT Blk/Blk
Last edited by JackyJai; 01-22-2009 at 09:20 PM.
| |
| | |
01-23-2009, 03:03 AM
|
#38 | | RabidMod
Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,371
Thanked 1,511 Times in 535 Posts
Failed 112 Times in 32 Posts
|
seriously guys, grow up and take your racing off the streets.
__________________
--- | |
| | |
01-23-2009, 03:29 AM
|
#39 | | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 803
Thanked 997 Times in 121 Posts
Failed 165 Times in 29 Posts
|
they keep running the s2000 with the top down
| |
| | |
01-23-2009, 07:58 AM
|
#40 | | Banned (BBM)
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 1,106 Times in 390 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Timpo |
this is another video that shows s2k and 350z's 1/4 mile is very similar. 0.1 second difference??
those who mention that 350z has 100 more torque, 40-50whp more, even tho slightly heavier, with all those differences, than 350z should be a mile down the road if not a bus length. I dont see tat happenning
| |
| | |
01-23-2009, 12:03 PM
|
#41 | | I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,922
Thanked 304 Times in 155 Posts
Failed 116 Times in 29 Posts
|
The "not cross-shopped" statements are interesting. They're both rear wheel drive sports cars in roughly comparable price categories. Different? Yes.
If I was looking for a sports car right now then the driving experience and the entertainment it provides would be very high on my list of criteria. That is a major focus of both of these cars. And if I could afford one then I could afford the other. In that case they need to be compared in order to make an informed decision. At least according to criteria that are important to me.
In the end I suspect I would personally choose the Honda. I have a bias against Nissan and my perception of their quality.
| |
| | |
01-23-2009, 12:35 PM
|
#42 | | I subscribe to Revscene
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,940
Thanked 320 Times in 123 Posts
Failed 349 Times in 74 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by amit87 somebody start an rsx-s vs civic si thread! | there is no k-pro for the si, thus your si fails
| |
| | |
01-23-2009, 12:46 PM
|
#43 | | Guest | Quote:
Originally Posted by RabidRat seriously guys, grow up and take your racing off the streets. | Completely agree. Can't believe people are like "yah I totally beat him". Go out to the track and prove it, not on the street.
As for the two cars, I've driven a 350z and a S2000. Both had mild mods - intake, exhaust. Personally I think the 350Z is a better looking car, and the interior is very nice, EXCEPT, I found the driving / steering wheel position was pretty horrible. There also wasn't a huge amount of communication between driver/car. I drive a 1990 miata, so the S2000 should be right up my alley, but I was left somewhat unimpressed. Rear visibility is atrocious, interior is also nice as well, but nothing went wow to me when I drove it.
So I wouldn't buy either, but if I had to choose, it would be the 350Z, probably in convertible form (I drove the coupe).
AND not to be an idiot because you didn't ask, but check out the Chrysler Crossfire. You can get them for a steal, and they're actually nice cars.
| |
| | |
01-23-2009, 02:53 PM
|
#44 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: surrey
Posts: 2,526
Thanked 149 Times in 90 Posts
Failed 132 Times in 38 Posts
|
crossfire ? the market value will only keep going worst!!, plus it is made by chrysler.
| |
| | |
01-23-2009, 04:01 PM
|
#45 | | Guest | Quote:
Originally Posted by wasabisashimi crossfire ? the market value will only keep going worst!!, plus it is made by chrysler. | It's actually a rebadged Mercedes SLK.
| |
| | |
06-27-2009, 11:12 AM
|
#46 | | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: north vancouver
Posts: 199
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 32 Times in 6 Posts
|
who buys a s2000 and go drag.....its 2 different types of car.
| |
| | |
06-27-2009, 11:27 AM
|
#47 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: May 2007 Location: Toilet
Posts: 1,081
Thanked 354 Times in 63 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
you tell me.
[youtube]c49McBCqFNM[/youtube]
| |
| | |
06-27-2009, 11:27 AM
|
#48 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,095
Thanked 2,237 Times in 251 Posts
Failed 103 Times in 22 Posts
|
who brings up a 6month old post... its 2 old.
| |
| | |
06-27-2009, 11:58 AM
|
#49 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
|
exactly... right now 370 FTMFW!!!!
| |
| | |
06-27-2009, 02:44 PM
|
#50 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 5,541
Thanked 1,109 Times in 299 Posts
Failed 192 Times in 41 Posts
|
^I saw a black one the other day with black Volk Racing RE30s.....hella sexy!!!!
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
