| Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n |
 | | 
01-27-2009, 03:21 PM
|
#26 | | Witness protection
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: GVRD
Posts: 14,427
Thanked 5,343 Times in 2,222 Posts
Failed 111 Times in 57 Posts
|
i guess anything that was group A in WRC is a 2.0 turbo? for example, the 2.0 YBT engine in the ford escort cosworth?
| 
|  | |
01-27-2009, 04:03 PM
|
#27 | | My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Kelowna
Posts: 1,793
Thanked 961 Times in 244 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
3S-GTE gets my vote  | |
| | |
01-27-2009, 04:04 PM
|
#28 | | Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,323
Thanked 225 Times in 62 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 35 Posts
|
2.0TFSI
Audi/VW
| |
| | |
01-27-2009, 04:28 PM
|
#29 | | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,615
Thanked 5,072 Times in 1,873 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
|
I would hardly consider a motor that has a crankshaft that needs a leash (4G63) a good motor.
It's not good if it can't take the power/abuse/mileage.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4
A vehicle for all occasions
| |
| | |
01-27-2009, 05:19 PM
|
#30 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 920
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
^The later gen 4g had the crankwalk issue (hence the 6 bolt is better bit)
| |
| | |
01-27-2009, 05:51 PM
|
#31 | | straight from the fields of squamton
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Grande Prairie
Posts: 11,286
Thanked 576 Times in 201 Posts
Failed 305 Times in 63 Posts
|
late89- may92 had the good 6 bolt motors.
RB20DET was left off the list as well. I had a lot of fun with that motor.
Never driven an SR20DET (just sr20de fwd) but I hear they're fun.
I'm stuck between the RB20 and 4G63. both are great motors that make a lot of power with almost nothing invested.
I like the sound of a 6 more though, so Rb20det wins for me
__________________
2013 Mazdaspeed 3
| |
| | |
01-27-2009, 06:36 PM
|
#32 | | Resident Bullshitter
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,209
Thanked 298 Times in 152 Posts
Failed 1,140 Times in 246 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by godwin  Huh?
How can you realistically use only one turbo? Considering the EJ is a boxer4, ie 2 cylinder on each side. | all 4 headers goes into the turbo?? 
how the hell do you think subaru produce the EJ20 with a single turbo for the past 15 years?
| |
| | |
01-27-2009, 07:33 PM
|
#33 | | 2x Variable Nockenwellen Steuerung
Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: N49.2 W122.1
Posts: 6,176
Thanked 1,174 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 67 Times in 51 Posts
|
You have a penchant for all things competent don't you?
4-1 header works.. but is it the best solution thermodynamically? no.
Again I thought we are talking about the best solution. Quote:
Originally Posted by .Renn.Sport all 4 headers goes into the turbo??
how the hell do you think subaru produce the EJ20 with a single turbo for the past 15 years? | | |
| | |
01-27-2009, 08:00 PM
|
#34 | | I am Hook'd on RS
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Cloverdale
Posts: 61
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Berzerker What turbo does the SRT-4 run?
Berz out. | TD04H-15G
| |
| | |
01-27-2009, 09:47 PM
|
#35 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: North Shore
Posts: 2,279
Thanked 58 Times in 17 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 2 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Berzerker What turbo does the SRT-4 run?
Berz out. | I though it was a 16g? The SRT is a 2.4 liter though..
| |
| | |
01-27-2009, 09:51 PM
|
#36 | | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 530 Times in 136 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by .Renn.Sport Since when is F20C a 2000cc turbo engine?
20B can hardly be classified as a 2000cc, more like a 4L engine
VW's 2.0TFSI is probably one of the most refined 2L Turbo engine out there. | its still 2000cc though it makes the power equivalent to a 4L engine.
| |
| | |
01-27-2009, 09:59 PM
|
#37 | | Resident Bullshitter
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,209
Thanked 298 Times in 152 Posts
Failed 1,140 Times in 246 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by shenmecar its still 2000cc though it makes the power equivalent to a 4L engine. | you know it needs twice the amount of gas to complete a combustion cycle on a rotary right?
| |
| | |
01-27-2009, 10:07 PM
|
#38 | | NOOB, Not Quite a Regular!
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 40
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
| Quote:
Originally Posted by .Renn.Sport you know it needs twice the amount of gas to complete a combustion cycle on a rotary right? | who cares.fuel consumption isn't the issue here anyway.i wouldn't call a evo9/10 economical either.or a SRT-4.almost any 2.0 motor that is boosted economy will just tank.
| |
| | |
01-27-2009, 11:03 PM
|
#39 | | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Langvista
Posts: 7,936
Thanked 73 Times in 19 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by .Renn.Sport you know it needs twice the amount of gas to complete a combustion cycle on a rotary right? | That's because rotaries function very similarly to two stroke motors. When four stroke MX bikes first hit the scene, they had to group the four strokes with two strokes of roughly half the displacement to make things even. Rotaries and four stroke piston motors share a similar arrangement.
For the topic at hand, if we're talking straight out of the box motors, the Turbo Ecotec/ LNF is far and away the most advanced of the lot, with the VW being a very close second. I've had the pleasure of driving cars with both of those motors (A GTi, and the new Cobalt SS), and they are on a completely different level of refinement, power production, fuel consumption and predictability VS. all the others mentioned in the list from the first post.
Boxers are rough, thirsty pigs. The 4Gs are the same, and you can add to that a bunch of reliability issues that are well documented. Turbo rotaries are in the same boat too, with the worst consumption issues in the group. While rotary power production can be high, I personally don't like the fact you have to rev the bag off of them even for every day driving. Also, you need to really know how to look after a rotary motor, or they will give you constant grief.
Of the older motors, the SR and 3S are both nice, and the aftermarket support is in my mind what makes them good choices for 'project' motors - be they swaps, or just upgraded in their original engine bays. Give the LNf some time though, and I think the flag wavers will be right in calling it the "Small Block Chev" of four bangers.
As for which car are they best in? I'm honestly torn. I've had a ride in a GTi with the DSG, and I fell in love with it, but that may partly be the whizbang transmission. The Cobalt put the power to the road with less fanfare, and a more direct grunt though. I'd personally have to spend a lot more seat time in both to make a decision on the matter.
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
| | |
01-27-2009, 11:28 PM
|
#40 | | Resident Bullshitter
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,209
Thanked 298 Times in 152 Posts
Failed 1,140 Times in 246 Posts
|
the GM LNF might be a good engine... but too bad they are put into shitty cars, poor driving ergonomic, rubbery shift. VW is actually able to put the engine in good use, having it mated to perfect gearboxes, better chassis tuning.
what a waste....
| |
| | |
01-28-2009, 06:57 AM
|
#41 | | Witness protection
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: GVRD
Posts: 14,427
Thanked 5,343 Times in 2,222 Posts
Failed 111 Times in 57 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by godwin You have a penchant for all things competent don't you?
4-1 header works.. but is it the best solution thermodynamically? no.
Again I thought we are talking about the best solution. | isn't the stock ej20t exhaust header a 4-2-1 design? not sure about the twinscroll version however.
| |
| | |
01-28-2009, 08:00 AM
|
#42 | | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 584
Thanked 194 Times in 59 Posts
Failed 164 Times in 42 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by godwin Except fundamentally EA888 is very long on the tooth.. eg Iron block, VVT only on inlet, not to mention slightly off square.
Yes they sell a lot of them vs LNF, but it doesn't make them good, just competent. | I didn't know direct injection or Audi Valvelift had been around long enough to be considered "very long in the tooth".
You should be giving credit where it's due. An aluminum block is better than iron, but only slightly so. Cam timing on exhaust for a forced induction engine is also slightly better than hot having it.
But direct injection is a huge improvement over in-direct injection.
You seem to be placing an unusual weight on the small things as if you have a hate on for VW and are looking for even the tiniest reasons to knock their engine, which has been on Ward's list for I think 4 years now.
| |
| | |
01-28-2009, 08:05 AM
|
#43 | | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Langvista
Posts: 7,936
Thanked 73 Times in 19 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by .Renn.Sport the GM LNF might be a good engine... but too bad they are put into shitty cars, poor driving ergonomic, rubbery shift. VW is actually able to put the engine in good use, having it mated to perfect gearboxes, better chassis tuning.
what a waste.... | As much as I hate to cite lap times as an indicator of ability, the Cobalt SS is the fastest production front drive car around the 'Ring. It's also won a handful of awards from auto magazines. Last years SS won the T3 class in SCCA Runoffs, and that car has worse handling than the current model. The Solstice GXP was one and two in the T2 division of last years Runoffs as well. You can say what you want about dash materials etc., but it's hard to argue facts and results about the ability of these cars.
__________________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
| | |
01-28-2009, 08:32 AM
|
#44 | | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,645
Thanked 1,357 Times in 508 Posts
Failed 229 Times in 105 Posts
|
no one mentions the 4B11? What the fuck?
It'll be the next most versatile engine evarr since the 4G disappeared. It is ALREADY on FF FR 4WD chassis....chassises? alum block and MIVEC equipped
EVOX, Genesis Coupe, Caliber SS(? or R/T?) is using that engine right now. Just about as easy to tune as a 4G but a lot lighter from alum block.
__________________ ⇐ If I bothered replying, that's the face I made while I typed.
- 2017 Alfa Romeo Giula Q4
- 1999 Nissan Stagea 260RS 1 of 748
- 1998 Nissan Laurel Medallion Club S drift boi
- 1991 Lexus LS400 mint boi
- 1989 Nissan S-Cargo cute boi
| |
| | |
01-28-2009, 02:39 PM
|
#45 | | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: May 2001 Location: Work
Posts: 2,851
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
|
"Who need to walk their dogs when they can walk their cranks"
__________________
Originally posted by Jocelyn
So, I guess a valentines day would include a blow job in the car with the PS2 hooked up and porn lined up.
Originally posted by Marco911
My C4S will ass rape a Z06 on a rainy day too.
Originally posted by KuSouL
even tho Timpo's an ass ~ he actually knows what he's talking about
Originally posted by maxx
where r jags assembled nowadays? back when they were made in GB, they were rock-solid, dependable and great cars.. now i hear the opposite.
Originally posted by maxx
lol.. Ford never even heard of Dakar not to mention get somewhere in it.
| |
| | |
01-28-2009, 03:49 PM
|
#46 | | Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,615
Thanked 5,072 Times in 1,873 Posts
Failed 185 Times in 100 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by .Renn.Sport the GM LNF might be a good engine... but too bad they are put into shitty cars, poor driving ergonomic, rubbery shift. VW is actually able to put the engine in good use, having it mated to perfect gearboxes, better chassis tuning.
what a waste.... | Better chassis tuning? What?
I'd say if GM was able to make a Torsion beam rear suspension car handle better than a multi-link car like the GTI, that's pretty damn good chassis tuning.
You obviously have never driven one of GM's LNF cars. You don't really know what you're talking about.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4
A vehicle for all occasions
| |
| | |
01-29-2009, 04:16 AM
|
#47 | | Oh goodie, 5 posts already!
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: B.C.
Posts: 9
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The GM LNF is a good engine, and the Cobalt SS is a good platform for it to sit in. The 2009 has a new suspension, that handles better than my 2007 SS/SC with an aftermarket suspension, all 4 corners got Brembro brakes, and launch control, they really went all out improving this car (pisses me off that I bought a 2007).
The car puts out 260hp out of the box and the guys on the cobalt forum are seeing 280-290hp with a simple tune, no aftermarket parts at all. Not bad for $27,000.
That being said it has 1 fatal flaw, there are no aftermarket products for this car, the stock intake pipe has been flatened in the middle of it in order to sqeeze it in to the engine bay, it goes down to the size of a pack of smokes and greatly constricts the air flow.
The SC versions had the option from GM to up the hp, (Stage 1+Stage 2) with injectors and a new pulley and now Harrop has come out with the TVS 1320 which is a 1.3L version of the Eaton M62 SC that came on the car (with cooling mods about 100 bolt on hp)
GM has no plans to offer anything similar with the TC version and infact has slated that 2010 will be the last year for the car with the Volt to take its place. Its hard enough to get parts for the SC version that are out there but the TC doesn't stand a chance in the mods department. So its a great car and fast little engine but you better love it the way it is cuz you won't be able to change much
| |
| | |
01-29-2009, 10:26 AM
|
#48 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,389
Thanked 3,070 Times in 1,311 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 25 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Spun infact has slated that 2010 will be the last year for the car with the Volt to take its place. | Er, it's going to be replaced by the Cruze. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Cruze
)
Cuz the Volt is predicted to hit markets around $30k-35k USD, and that's way too expensive for an entry level vehicle. And there's already a Cruze model with pictures floating around the net that's replacing the Cobalt equivalent in Asia/Europe/ANZ. 
We can hope the LNF makes a come back in this car... it's not half-bad looking either. http://www.motorauthority.com/gm-to-...html#more-6811 | |
| | |
01-29-2009, 10:44 AM
|
#49 | | Oh goodie, 5 posts already!
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: B.C.
Posts: 9
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Your right sorry it was late and some reason I had Volt stuck in my head
either way it looks like a cheap nock off of the 1 series BMW
| |
| | |
01-29-2009, 11:20 AM
|
#50 | | Resident Bullshitter
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,209
Thanked 298 Times in 152 Posts
Failed 1,140 Times in 246 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Black SC2 As much as I hate to cite lap times as an indicator of ability, the Cobalt SS is the fastest production front drive car around the 'Ring. It's also won a handful of awards from auto magazines. Last years SS won the T3 class in SCCA Runoffs, and that car has worse handling than the current model. The Solstice GXP was one and two in the T2 division of last years Runoffs as well. You can say what you want about dash materials etc., but it's hard to argue facts and results about the ability of these cars. | faster car doesn't mean its a better car
you can put a 1000HP LS9 into a shit box and make it faster then a Veyron, in the end, its still only a fast shit box
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:04 AM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
