tail says corolla or chysler sebring

car looks sick

front and interior is sexy

the tailight is such a turn off. Corolla + solara combo

saw this in person @ SEMA...

VERY HOT... too bad its going to the crusher eventually... :(

The body looks nice boz it has Merc S/CLS class shape

It really is a good looking car minus the rear. I'm currently in the market for a new car and the CC is on top of my list of cars because it looks good, pretty good build quality, cheap lease payments and from what I’ve read it has great fuel economy.

thats gorgeous

cool coupe lol

that is really nice seen a couple cc in vancouver. I dont think the rear looks bad at all. theres alot worse out there..... 7 series

bumping an old thread with new pictures, lol

Passat CC Performance

http://www.vwvortex.com/artman/uploads/vw_800.jpg

http://www.vwvortex.com/artman/uploads/vw008.jpg

http://www.vwvortex.com/artman/uploads/vw001.jpg

http://www.vwvortex.com/artman/uploads/vw006.jpg

Looks pretty good, love the wheels.

looks pretty slick

The CC in general is a very tempting car at a starting price of 34k, which is the same price of a loaded GTI

Too bad its sluggish

Very nice! ^ I don't think these cars are meant to be driven like a track car, so it's sluggish for the softer comfortable feel.

the performance concept is from sema last november, not really new..
i believe it had apr stage 3

looks better/par than bmw's/mercs/lexus/infiniti/audi

quite surprising how sexy it is

The thing is, the CC looks so good in photos but in real life it doesn't stand out and doesn't look that good.

still selling in the euro market...

You need the oem kit to fill it out, then it looks good. I am telling my dad to look into one (3.6 4-motion), or the bmw 335.

agreed. however when you mash the acelerator of a base MB CLS - it wont dissapoint. Your wallet will be though.

Really!? I haven't driven a lot of cars, but I've driven a CLS550. It feels very sluggish and handles like a boat. When you accelerate, the whole car feels like it's lifting off! Maybe it's because I'm used to the Evo...

does anyone have fuel economy numbers for the 3.6L V6 model? this is the same drivetrain that is in the R32 (which we don't get), and the mileage numbers for that car are not that great compared to the 2.0T.

going back to the original post w/regards to the gold coast model...

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog....coast---17.jpg

it says on the spec sheet that the rear brakes are "stock"... those don't look stock to me :o

the R32 gets a 3.2L V6 engine. the Passat CC has a 3.6.

put a v8 with over 350hp and ill buy one

Here in Winnipeg, I've seen R32s..... I heard a few was around, i saw at least 2 blue ones....:confused:

And too bad the 2.0T doesn't have AWD and neither have DSG...
the car is alright, but I just don't like feeling ripped off since Euro models have a lot more toys... iirc, DSG, active cruise, auto park etc... I forgot, but there's quite a few things that we don't get...