REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-12-2009, 08:12 PM   #1
y'all better put some respeck on my name
 
Harvey Specter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,431
Thanked 9,515 Times in 2,455 Posts
Failed 393 Times in 159 Posts
Mexico blasts Forbes for putting drug lord on billionaires list

Quote:
MEXICO CITY – Mexico is decrying Forbes Magazine's decision to include the reputed leader of one of the country's most violent drug cartels on its list of billionaires.

Forbes ranks Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, with an estimated $1 billion fortune, at No. 701 — between a Swiss oil-trading tycoon and an American chemical heir.

Guzman, Mexico's most-wanted fugitive, is believed to head the Sinaloa cartel.

President Felipe Calderon said Thursday that "magazines are not only attacking and lying about the situation in Mexico but are also praising criminals."

Mexico's Attorney General Eduardo Medina Mora said Forbes is defending crime by "comparing the deplorable activity of a criminal wanted in Mexico and abroad with that of honest businessmen."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090313/...ug_billionaire
.
Advertisement
Harvey Specter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 08:13 PM   #2
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 3,303
Thanked 1,107 Times in 271 Posts
Failed 66 Times in 25 Posts
WAIT LOL?! Forbes allows criminals in their list?! LOL.
KingDeeCee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 08:17 PM   #3
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Alphamale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 9,441
Thanked 2,377 Times in 445 Posts
Failed 601 Times in 94 Posts
Although I don't know the full extent of it, didn't Microsoft break anti-trust laws?

And if they were convicted of such (and I think they were if memory serves me right), wouldn't Mr. Gates be a criminal himself? Then again, one can separate the corporation from CEO...or not. I have no idea. I'm going to make myself a tuna sandwich.
__________________
Feedback
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason00S2000 View Post
Invisible sky daddies commanding people to do shit is just so beyond retarded, I feel like punching myself in the balls until I shit my computer chair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chopstick View Post
4 years ago, I pulled up to burger king, and asked to get a teen burger. I realized after the 3rd time i said it, I was in the wrong fucking place.

(>___<)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky_High
[19-10, 22:51] how many post do I need before I can fail TOS'D posts.
Alphamale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 09:06 PM   #4
My homepage has been set to RS
 
ajax's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PoCo
Posts: 2,062
Thanked 551 Times in 141 Posts
Failed 84 Times in 48 Posts
shit he deserves to be on the list if he found a way to make a billion like that.
ajax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 10:04 PM   #5
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 174
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 2 Posts
Pablo Escobar at one point was the number one guy on the list before Bill Gates and all the others came along... the sick part is that these drug lords' wealth is liquid!
Skyliner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 11:05 PM   #6
My dinner reheated before my turbo spooled
 
StaxBundlez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,720
Thanked 2,116 Times in 382 Posts
Failed 877 Times in 94 Posts
haha drug money baby
__________________
Quote:
If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true; to be skeptical of those in authority, then we're up for grabs..
-Carl Sagan
StaxBundlez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 11:23 PM   #7
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: n zone
Posts: 2,660
Thanked 1,910 Times in 606 Posts
Failed 325 Times in 112 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyliner View Post
Pablo Escobar at one point was the number one guy on the list before Bill Gates and all the others came along... the sick part is that these drug lords' wealth is liquid!
he was on the list, just never #1
Sid Vicious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2009, 11:56 PM   #8
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,668
Thanked 10,388 Times in 3,914 Posts
Failed 1,390 Times in 625 Posts
drug-king pins and corrupt chinese officials could probably fill the top 100
StylinRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 12:52 AM   #9
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shaugnessy
Posts: 2,610
Thanked 481 Times in 168 Posts
Failed 730 Times in 91 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by StylinRed View Post
drug-king pins and corrupt chinese officials could probably fill the top 100
yeah wtf china has like thousands of billionaires.
BNR32_Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 02:41 AM   #10
The RS Freebie guru
 
InvisibleSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East Vancouver
Posts: 22,032
Thanked 2,491 Times in 860 Posts
Failed 137 Times in 67 Posts
The people that are complaining are stupid.

Being included in the list isn't praising them. It's just reporting a fact.

If they have that money, regardless of how they made it, they should be included as part of the list.

Unless they change the list to be "list of the wealthiest people who's money did not come from crime".
InvisibleSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 02:43 AM   #11
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Alphamale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 9,441
Thanked 2,377 Times in 445 Posts
Failed 601 Times in 94 Posts
^In which case, about 90% of the list would be voided.
__________________
Feedback
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason00S2000 View Post
Invisible sky daddies commanding people to do shit is just so beyond retarded, I feel like punching myself in the balls until I shit my computer chair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chopstick View Post
4 years ago, I pulled up to burger king, and asked to get a teen burger. I realized after the 3rd time i said it, I was in the wrong fucking place.

(>___<)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky_High
[19-10, 22:51] how many post do I need before I can fail TOS'D posts.
Alphamale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 04:22 AM   #12
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
Pablo gained world infamy as a Colombian drug lord and became so wealthy from the drug trade that in 1989 Forbes magazine listed him as the seventh richest man in the world.
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 06:38 AM   #13
SFICC-05*
 
chun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,135
Thanked 545 Times in 127 Posts
Failed 107 Times in 33 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by InvisibleSoul View Post
The people that are complaining are stupid.

Being included in the list isn't praising them. It's just reporting a fact.

If they have that money, regardless of how they made it, they should be included as part of the list.

Unless they change the list to be "list of the wealthiest people who's money did not come from crime".
Are you daft or just daft?

Forbes is a national BUSINESS magazine. Covering billionaires is not actually covering them for the fact of their money, but the BUSINESS in which they made their money. Would you feel alright if CNN started putting Hell's Angel's activities under "business news" on money.cnn.com? Or how about we start publishing the local weedman's latest deals on canada.com too? These people are raking in large amounts of money, yes, but it has no place in wholesome business publications.

Regardless of how they made it? OKAY there buddy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aman23
shit he deserves to be on the list if he found a way to make a billion like that.
Uh, no he doesn't.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyde View Post
nammer don't listen to me, they listen to money. do you know how cheap it is to have someone killed in vancouver? let alone a beat down

Last edited by chun; 03-13-2009 at 06:40 AM. Reason: just cuz
chun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 07:08 AM   #14
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bowen Island
Posts: 1,605
Thanked 525 Times in 148 Posts
Failed 313 Times in 50 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingDeeCee View Post
WAIT LOL?! Forbes allows criminals in their list?! LOL.
Yes. In the 1980s, Pablo Escobar headed up the Medellin Cartel in Colombia and was ranked 3rd richest man in the world.
achiam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 07:31 AM   #15
WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,650
Thanked 348 Times in 165 Posts
Failed 127 Times in 56 Posts
Mexico got more serious shit to worry about than Forbes listing some drug lord in their magazine. I mean fuck half of their people lived under poverty line with no clean water.
Carl Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 07:59 AM   #16
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
 
hotjoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Surrey
Posts: 12,759
Thanked 689 Times in 376 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 38 Posts
damn thats nuts
hotjoint is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 11:12 AM   #17
The RS Freebie guru
 
InvisibleSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East Vancouver
Posts: 22,032
Thanked 2,491 Times in 860 Posts
Failed 137 Times in 67 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by chun View Post
Are you daft or just daft?
Is there supposed to be more than one option there?

Quote:
Forbes is a national BUSINESS magazine. Covering billionaires is not actually covering them for the fact of their money, but the BUSINESS in which they made their money. Would you feel alright if CNN started putting Hell's Angel's activities under "business news" on money.cnn.com? Or how about we start publishing the local weedman's latest deals on canada.com too? These people are raking in large amounts of money, yes, but it has no place in wholesome business publications.

Regardless of how they made it? OKAY there buddy.
Is the list called "The world's wealthiest legitimate businessmen"? No? Then invalid argument.

It doesn't matter whether it's a business magazine or not.
InvisibleSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 12:08 PM   #18
I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
 
bossxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: pc
Posts: 7,554
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
But how can Forbes know of how much money a criminal is actually worth? I mean its not like they are reporting every year lol. An estimated 1 billion is ridiculous. It's like estimating how many fish are in a fucking lake. They have no idea of the depth of his operations. If anything he could be higher or lower on that list. I guess imo its just incredibly inaccurate which degrades the value of these articles.
bossxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 12:10 PM   #19
Hypa owned my ass at least once
 
Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Japan
Posts: 6,745
Thanked 1,314 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 124 Times in 79 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by InvisibleSoul View Post
Is the list called "The world's wealthiest legitimate businessmen"? No? Then invalid argument.

It doesn't matter whether it's a business magazine or not.
Yes the legitimacy of the business does matter.
Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 01:08 PM   #20
The RS Freebie guru
 
InvisibleSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East Vancouver
Posts: 22,032
Thanked 2,491 Times in 860 Posts
Failed 137 Times in 67 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noir View Post
Yes the legitimacy of the business does matter.
But if the list is simply "The world's wealthiest individuals", why should criminals be excluded?

And maybe some of his money might be from criminal proceeds, but maybe he then took that money and used it in legitimate businesses to make even more money... who knows... maybe only $100M was drug money, but $900M was from legitimate business... should he still be excluded from the list?
InvisibleSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 01:15 PM   #21
I am Hook'd on RS
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 52
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
- Bill Gates lost $18 billion (Can$22.3 billion) but regained his title as the world's richest man. Warren Buffett, last year's No. 1, saw his fortune decline $25 billion (Can$31.0 billion) as shares of Berkshire Hathaway (nyse: BRK-B) fell nearly 50 per cent in 12 months, but he still managed to slip just one spot to No. 2. Mexican telecom titan Carlos Slim Helú also lost $25 billion (Can$31.0 billion) and dropped one spot to No. 3.

So is there anywhere one can still make a fortune these days? The 38 newcomers offer a few clues. Among the more notable new billionaires are Mexican Joaquín Guzmán Loera, one of the biggest suppliers of cocaine to the U.S. -
wddian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 01:25 PM   #22
SFICC-05*
 
chun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,135
Thanked 545 Times in 127 Posts
Failed 107 Times in 33 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by InvisibleSoul View Post
Is there supposed to be more than one option there?
By asking, you've picked both.

Quote:
Originally Posted by InvisibleSoul View Post
Is the list called "The world's wealthiest legitimate businessmen"? No? Then invalid argument.

It doesn't matter whether it's a business magazine or not.
Yeah, the title isn't "politically correct" but it needn't be. Like I said, how would you feel if money.cnn.com covered Hell's Angel's activities as a legitimate business?

It doesn't matter whether it's a business magazine or not? LOL okay, I'd expect Canucks.com to have two homos spooning, on an article about how gay couples are just as "regular" as straight couples. Let's see how many people complain. Oh wait! Just because Canucks.com is a SPORTS website doesn't mean they have to publish SPORTS.

PS. It doesn't become an "invalid argument" just because your ignorant closed mind was capable of typing out 15 letters with a space in between.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyde View Post
nammer don't listen to me, they listen to money. do you know how cheap it is to have someone killed in vancouver? let alone a beat down
chun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 01:26 PM   #23
SFICC-05*
 
chun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,135
Thanked 545 Times in 127 Posts
Failed 107 Times in 33 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by InvisibleSoul View Post
But if the list is simply "The world's wealthiest individuals", why should criminals be excluded?

And maybe some of his money might be from criminal proceeds, but maybe he then took that money and used it in legitimate businesses to make even more money... who knows... maybe only $100M was drug money, but $900M was from legitimate business... should he still be excluded from the list?
BECAUSE it's not BUSINESS. Business = paying taxes, employees, playing your part in society.

And the second part of your post = mad fail attempt at trying to weasel some sort of possible and probable way that it COULD possibly maybe be interpreted as business.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyde View Post
nammer don't listen to me, they listen to money. do you know how cheap it is to have someone killed in vancouver? let alone a beat down
chun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 02:28 PM   #24
The RS Freebie guru
 
InvisibleSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East Vancouver
Posts: 22,032
Thanked 2,491 Times in 860 Posts
Failed 137 Times in 67 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by chun View Post
Yeah, the title isn't "politically correct" but it needn't be. Like I said, how would you feel if money.cnn.com covered Hell's Angel's activities as a legitimate business?

It doesn't matter whether it's a business magazine or not? LOL okay, I'd expect Canucks.com to have two homos spooning, on an article about how gay couples are just as "regular" as straight couples. Let's see how many people complain. Oh wait! Just because Canucks.com is a SPORTS website doesn't mean they have to publish SPORTS.

PS. It doesn't become an "invalid argument" just because your ignorant closed mind was capable of typing out 15 letters with a space in between.
Aggressive much? Are you always this insulting to everyone, or do you have a special agenda with me? I didn't know we had any beef.

The examples you provided aren't counter examples at all.

Forbes published a list of the world's billionaires.

It is not a list of the world's businessmen billionaires.

What part of that do you not understand?

The list is a factual document. If you're a billionaire, you get included in the list. If you're not a billionaire, you're not included in the list. It does not MATTER how the money was obtained for the sake of being included in the list.

What if someone on the list just inherited the a billion dollars? He was never a businessman himself. He never earned any of it. Shoud he also not be on the list?

You're the one who's ignorant and closed minded.
InvisibleSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2009, 02:39 PM   #25
Hypa owned my ass at least once
 
Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Japan
Posts: 6,745
Thanked 1,314 Times in 540 Posts
Failed 124 Times in 79 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by InvisibleSoul View Post
Forbes published a list of the world's billionaires.
But those billionaires earned the right of ownership of those billions. Drug Kingpins have not. If law enforcement was anywhere near adept, their wealth would be stripped.
Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net