Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n | | |
04-13-2009, 10:05 PM
|
#1 | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: ...
Posts: 20,300
Thanked 4,525 Times in 1,357 Posts
Failed 4,505 Times in 971 Posts
| Big cars are safer than small cars
Shocker: Small Cars Don't Protect as Well in Collisions
Date posted: 04-13-2009
ARLINGTON, Virginia — Turns out your parents were right after all: Big cars really do protect you better in a collision than small cars. Or so says the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, which tested pairs of large and small cars from three manufacturers — Daimler, Honda and Toyota.
The IIHS performed car-to-car crash tests between the 2009 Toyota Camry and Yaris, the 2009 Honda Accord and Fit and the 2009 Mercedes-Benz C300 and Smart Fortwo. While all vehicles performed relatively well in the institute's frontal offset barrier test, all three small cars received poor ratings in the crash tests with midsize cars.
"There are good reasons people buy minicars," said IIHS President Adrian Lund. "They're more affordable, and they use less gas. But the safety tradeoffs are clear from our new tests. Equally clear are the implications when it comes to fuel economy. If automakers downsize cars so their fleets use less fuel, occupant safety will be compromised."
As it does in the frontal barrier tests, the IIHS rated performance in the 40-mph car-to-car tests based on measured intrusion into the occupant compartment, as well as forces recorded on the driver dummy and movement of the dummy during the impact. According to the test results, the likelihood of injury goes up in the smaller vehicle.
"Though much safer than they were a few years ago, minicars as a group do a comparatively poor job of protecting people in crashes, simply because they're smaller and lighter," Lund said.
Sometimes the conventional wisdom turns out to be correct. — Paul Lienert, Correspondent
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety issued photos graphically depicting what happens when a Toyota Camry meets the smaller Yaris...
when a Honda Accord meets the more diminutive Fit...
and when a Mercedes-Benz C-Class gets up close and personal with the Smart Fortwo.
|
| |
04-13-2009, 10:21 PM
|
#2 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: BC
Posts: 423
Thanked 25 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| |
| |
04-13-2009, 10:23 PM
|
#3 | DOES HE LOOK LIKE A BITCH?
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,037
Thanked 2,572 Times in 690 Posts
Failed 578 Times in 161 Posts
|
I can't believe it.
Why didn't I think of this?
|
| |
04-13-2009, 10:25 PM
|
#4 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: East Atlanta 6
Posts: 2,439
Thanked 256 Times in 92 Posts
Failed 611 Times in 61 Posts
|
um....
|
| |
04-13-2009, 10:39 PM
|
#5 | RS Operative (G)
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: GYM
Posts: 12,641
Thanked 4,567 Times in 1,530 Posts
Failed 406 Times in 127 Posts
|
.....
__________________
╔╦╦╦═╦╗╔═╦═╦══╦═╗
║║║║╩╣╚╣═╣║║║║║╩╣
╚══╩═╩═╩═╩═╩╩╩╩═╝
|
| |
04-13-2009, 10:40 PM
|
#6 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: na
Posts: 656
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
legit tip.
|
| |
04-13-2009, 11:00 PM
|
#7 | The RS Anchorman
Join Date: May 2003 Location: Comics
Posts: 2,059
Thanked 49 Times in 22 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 8 Posts
|
Holy shit look @ the Yaris Sedan !
|
| |
04-13-2009, 11:01 PM
|
#8 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,629
Thanked 273 Times in 90 Posts
Failed 62 Times in 32 Posts
|
This should put to rest all those (no names mentioned) who insisted their Hondas were safer than my 1984 Oldsmobile back in tha day.
To be honest, that's the biggest problem with modern crash tests. They only show protection against stationary objects. In the city I'd imagine most collisions are with other vehicles.
|
| |
04-13-2009, 11:04 PM
|
#9 | Hypa owned my ass at least once
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,592
Thanked 1,491 Times in 341 Posts
Failed 218 Times in 69 Posts
|
roll cage it!!
|
| |
04-13-2009, 11:06 PM
|
#10 | Banned (ABWS)?
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 19,305
Thanked 4,054 Times in 1,731 Posts
Failed 434 Times in 211 Posts
|
BUT!!!!!
if the car is too big... they could flip while drifting. lol
|
| |
04-13-2009, 11:06 PM
|
#11 | regulator
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,738
Thanked 250 Times in 102 Posts
Failed 93 Times in 44 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by slammer111 This should put to rest all those (no names mentioned) who insisted their Hondas were safer than my 1984 Oldsmobile back in tha day.
To be honest, that's the biggest problem with modern crash tests. They only show protection against stationary objects. In the city I'd imagine most collisions are with other vehicles. | Unless you're talking 1984 Hondas, they probably were. Technology of a newer car can more than make up for lack of mass.
__________________ Quote: Originally posted by Mr.HappySilp ^^ I think u seen jeus..... Lol. u shouldn't be scare of jeus. | |
| |
04-13-2009, 11:14 PM
|
#12 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: BC
Posts: 423
Thanked 25 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by slammer111 This should put to rest all those (no names mentioned) who insisted their Hondas were safer than my 1984 Oldsmobile back in tha day.
To be honest, that's the biggest problem with modern crash tests. They only show protection against stationary objects. In the city I'd imagine most collisions are with other vehicles. | "According to the test results, the likelihood of injury goes up in the smaller vehicle."
I responded to this with a picture that said "No Shit Sherlock"
If some1 were to tell me "According to test results, the likelyhood of injury goes up in the older vehicle," I'd probably respond using the same picture...
|
| |
04-14-2009, 12:02 AM
|
#13 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: MacLeod
Posts: 7,298
Thanked 542 Times in 289 Posts
Failed 1,639 Times in 418 Posts
|
did they really need to perform these experiments to figure it out?
common sense...
|
| |
04-14-2009, 12:06 AM
|
#14 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: BC
Posts: 423
Thanked 25 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by orange7 did they really need to perform these experiments to figure it out?
common sense... | |
| |
04-14-2009, 01:26 AM
|
#15 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Richmond
Posts: 821
Thanked 796 Times in 185 Posts
Failed 55 Times in 12 Posts
|
Next study should be; which one is safer now, a car or a motorcycle. Im interested to know what the results of this study is.
|
| |
04-14-2009, 01:35 AM
|
#16 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Langley
Posts: 4,117
Thanked 3,400 Times in 1,289 Posts
Failed 92 Times in 70 Posts
|
Holy shit glad I don't drive a Yaris that thing got fucked up bad.
|
| |
04-14-2009, 02:21 AM
|
#17 | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: ♠
Posts: 4,847
Thanked 693 Times in 249 Posts
Failed 339 Times in 75 Posts
|
Yaris are gross, what was Toyota thinking?
|
| |
04-14-2009, 08:52 AM
|
#18 | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,044
Thanked 315 Times in 149 Posts
Failed 53 Times in 33 Posts
|
I"m sure we all know this already.
but the pictures are nice to look at, to see what sort of disparity there actually is.
__________________ 1996 Honda Accord 1995 Nissan 240sx 2004 Infiniti G35 2005 Honda Jazz BuySell Feedback Quote:
"It's called Sex Panther by Odeon. It's illegal in nine countries... Yep, it's made with bits of real panther, so you know it's good ... They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time it works, every time. "
| |
| |
04-14-2009, 09:00 AM
|
#19 | Media Officer / MOD
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 28,077
Thanked 5,752 Times in 1,725 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 63 Posts
|
actually the small cars here all have a 4-5 star frontal test but looking at the front of the yaris.... and how the window frame is bent like that. The fit survived a lot better
|
| |
04-14-2009, 12:54 PM
|
#20 | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,760
Thanked 375 Times in 181 Posts
Failed 159 Times in 63 Posts
|
k = mv^2. 'nuff said
__________________
Ignorance is bliss
How I wish I can remain ignorant, why do I know so much?
|
| |
04-14-2009, 12:59 PM
|
#21 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 186
Thanked 13 Times in 7 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
| Quote:
Originally Posted by q0192837465 k = mv^2. 'nuff said | You forgot the 1/2.
__________________ Victor Chow (Elder_MMHS) |
| |
04-14-2009, 01:09 PM
|
#22 | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,760
Thanked 375 Times in 181 Posts
Failed 159 Times in 63 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Elder_MMHS You forgot the 1/2. | u got me, havent done physics in a long time
__________________
Ignorance is bliss
How I wish I can remain ignorant, why do I know so much?
|
| |
04-14-2009, 01:18 PM
|
#23 | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: canada
Posts: 187
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Sure in a controlled crash like these, small cars may be inferior. However on the roads, their great maneuverability and small size might allow them to AVOID a collision in the first place. The Honda Fit has great handling and can out slalom most other cars in and above it's class.
|
| |
04-14-2009, 02:11 PM
|
#24 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 9,521
Thanked 1,289 Times in 409 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 100 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by time_traveller Sure in a controlled crash like these, small cars may be inferior. However on the roads, their great maneuverability and small size might allow them to AVOID a collision in the first place. The Honda Fit has great handling and can out slalom most other cars in and above it's class. | Hahahaha, that was a Timpo-esque reply if I have ever seen one. THEY ARE NOT TESTING THEIR CRASH AVOIDANCE. THEY ARE SEEING HOW THEY STAND UP TO BEING HIT BY A LARGER CAR.
facepalm.jpg
|
| |
04-14-2009, 02:27 PM
|
#25 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: surrey
Posts: 2,526
Thanked 149 Times in 90 Posts
Failed 132 Times in 38 Posts
|
whats so special at Volvos? they arnt that big in size
|
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:23 PM. |