| Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n |
 | 
04-22-2009, 11:25 PM
|
#1 | | The RS Anchorman
Join Date: May 2003 Location: Comics
Posts: 2,059
Thanked 49 Times in 22 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 8 Posts
| Audi dropping 3.2-liter V6 from 2010 A3, A4 and TT
Since the 2009 Audi A4's introduction last year, the number of sedans rolling off dealer lots equipped with the company's turbocharged 2.0-liter inline-four versus the 3.2-liter V6 has been nine-to-one. With almost 90% of all A4s equipped with the peppy, fuel-efficient and thoroughly entertaining four-pot, Audi has decided to cease offering the V6 on the A4 – along with the A3 and TT – for the 2010 model year.
"We're not backing away from the V6 strategy," Audi's U.S. Corporate Communications head, Bradley Stertz told Autoblog, "We're recalibrating our mix."
According to Stertz, Audi's rejiggered engine strategy has less to do with the slow-sales of the V6 and more to do with the brand's expanding lineup. With Audi's new supercharged V6 making its way to the States in the new S4, along with the introduction of the TT S and A3 TDI, the 3.2-liter's standing in the engine hierarchy was lessened. And with the 2.0-liter mill delivering the best bang-for-the-buck – not to mention placing Audi in the enviable position of being the only German luxury marque offering a four-cylinder in the U.S. – the automaker's new tactic should continue to pay-off on the sales front. http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/22/a...-a3-a4-and-tt/ | 
|  | |
04-23-2009, 06:57 PM
|
#2 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Rmd
Posts: 924
Thanked 435 Times in 194 Posts
Failed 16 Times in 13 Posts
|
I'm not too surprised. I rode in both the 20009 2.0T A4 and the 3.2 A4 and they felt equally quick. The 2.0T has more torque than the V6 I believe.
There's no reason to buy the V6 unless you want some sort of weird bragging right.
| |
| | |
04-23-2009, 06:59 PM
|
#3 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
|
yay that v6 sucks, sounds okay but still not worth it for the performance and fuel consumption increase over the 4
| |
| | |
04-23-2009, 07:02 PM
|
#4 | | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,645
Thanked 1,357 Times in 508 Posts
Failed 229 Times in 105 Posts
|
and the increased maintenance cost. Ask me how I know.
__________________ ⇐ If I bothered replying, that's the face I made while I typed.
- 2017 Alfa Romeo Giula Q4
- 1999 Nissan Stagea 260RS 1 of 748
- 1998 Nissan Laurel Medallion Club S drift boi
- 1991 Lexus LS400 mint boi
- 1989 Nissan S-Cargo cute boi
| |
| | |
04-23-2009, 09:42 PM
|
#5 | | Ready to be Man handled by RS!
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: vancouver
Posts: 76
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I would imagine that the 4 banger would have higher maintenance costs, considering it has turbo's, therefore more things in the engine that can fail.
| |
| | |
04-24-2009, 12:09 AM
|
#6 | | Revscene Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: .
Posts: 862
Thanked 3,421 Times in 393 Posts
Failed 526 Times in 123 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hk20000  and the increased maintenance cost. Ask me how I know. | how you know?
| |
| | |
04-24-2009, 01:25 AM
|
#7 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: MacLeod
Posts: 7,298
Thanked 542 Times in 289 Posts
Failed 1,639 Times in 418 Posts
|
ya.. it's kinda weird how the I4 has more torque than the v6..
when someone told me t hat, i thought he was just joking
| |
| | |
04-24-2009, 06:49 AM
|
#8 | | Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: here & there
Posts: 4,654
Thanked 298 Times in 131 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 5 Posts
|
Yeah but the V6 sounds soo good
Oh well 
__________________ Moderator Vancouver Automotive Chat | Vancouver Off-Topic
__________________ REVscene.net - Vancouver's #1 Automotive Forum and Classified's Site!
Interested in advertising with REVSCENE? Join our roster of Brian Jessel BMW, EBISU Robson, Blitz Gear, Soundworks, and dozens of the Lower Mainlands BUSIEST and most SUCCESSFUL small and medium businesses! Let us take you to the next level with our Incredibly affordable and effective packages Advertisement@revscene.net | |
| | |
04-24-2009, 11:47 AM
|
#9 | | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 703
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
|
If you want to have a little fun with the engine you can do a few simple mods that will give you 60-80 more hp with the 2.0T... the VR6 used is the same as the R32's engine i believe (don't quote me) but the upgrade path on that is bit more steep and really... chip the 2.0T and you have VR6 power... The extra money makes it not really worth it... if you wanted a serious power upgrade on the v6 you would have to turbo it... and that is 4-8 grand...
This is all from an enthusiasts perspective... but to say the least I understand it being dropped from the lineup... I am guessing VW will do the same thing ditching the VR6 in the R32 for something else (rumord to me a 2.0T)
| |
| | |
04-24-2009, 01:03 PM
|
#10 | | I answer every Emotion with an emoticon
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,760
Thanked 375 Times in 181 Posts
Failed 159 Times in 63 Posts
|
the didnt really make the V6 competitive anyways. They made their 4-turbo so good that it renders the V6 innecessary. I dun like the way Audi line-up their cars. The V6 is slightly worse than the 335 while the S4,S5 is slightly better than the 335. Why would ppl get a Audi V6 if they can get a I6-TT. Doesnt makes sense.
__________________
Ignorance is bliss
How I wish I can remain ignorant, why do I know so much?
| |
| | |
04-24-2009, 01:22 PM
|
#11 | | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Vancity
Posts: 467
Thanked 531 Times in 138 Posts
Failed 81 Times in 28 Posts
|
The 3.2 definitely sounds better. The only downside to Audi dropping the 3.2 is that now you won't be able to get the TT in manual, since the 2.0T engines, and the TT-S only come in Stronic. I hear they're dropping the manual transmission for the A5 too, which is lame.
| |
| | |
04-24-2009, 01:48 PM
|
#12 | | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 703
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
| Quote:
Originally Posted by wstce92 The 3.2 definitely sounds better. The only downside to Audi dropping the 3.2 is that now you won't be able to get the TT in manual, since the 2.0T engines, and the TT-S only come in Stronic. I hear they're dropping the manual transmission for the A5 too, which is lame. | S-Tronic is an amazing system and with the HPA transmission remap the system is made even better... (same as DSG)... I am holding just shy of 380 crank HP on my dsg and it drives like a dream and once my tune is updated I should be pushing 400+ whp (and once the upgraded clutchpacks are released the sky is the limit  )...
A4 the 3.2 is only available in Automatic (not s-tronic) but you can get the 2.0T in manual...
| |
| | |
04-24-2009, 10:47 PM
|
#13 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Rmd
Posts: 924
Thanked 435 Times in 194 Posts
Failed 16 Times in 13 Posts
|
I think the new turbos are (sadly) the way of the future. A smaller engine with a turbo can have the same power as the V6 with much better fuel economy.
...but there is something about the throttle response of a large V6.
| |
| | |
04-25-2009, 12:29 AM
|
#14 | | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,645
Thanked 1,357 Times in 508 Posts
Failed 229 Times in 105 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by dogeatcookie how you know? | I know because I am in a similar situation. V6 = 4 camshafts 4 variable cam thingy 32 valves and 32 valve lash adjusters.
if it isn't significantly faster than the I4 I say this is smart move.
__________________ ⇐ If I bothered replying, that's the face I made while I typed.
- 2017 Alfa Romeo Giula Q4
- 1999 Nissan Stagea 260RS 1 of 748
- 1998 Nissan Laurel Medallion Club S drift boi
- 1991 Lexus LS400 mint boi
- 1989 Nissan S-Cargo cute boi
| |
| | |
04-25-2009, 12:44 AM
|
#15 | | I subscribe to the Fight Club ONLY
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 7,091
Thanked 2,112 Times in 264 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 29 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hk20000 I know because I am in a similar situation. V6 = 4 camshafts 4 variable cam thingy 32 valves and 32 valve lash adjusters.
if it isn't significantly faster than the I4 I say this is smart move. |
32 valves with 6 cylinders?
how does that work ?  | |
| | |
04-25-2009, 01:16 AM
|
#16 | | Hypa owned my ass at least once
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,592
Thanked 1,491 Times in 341 Posts
Failed 218 Times in 69 Posts
|
RS4 4.2 V8 FTMFW!!!!!!!!! god that thing is fast
| |
| | |
04-25-2009, 10:31 AM
|
#17 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
|
could they stuff the TT-S engine in the next R32? (well it wouldn't be a 32 then? but w.e)
| |
| | |
04-25-2009, 03:18 PM
|
#18 | | RS controls my life!
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 703
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ilvtofu could they stuff the TT-S engine in the next R32? (well it wouldn't be a 32 then? but w.e) | that is what the rumor is... an .:R20... but of course vw has said nothing about this...
| |
| | |
04-26-2009, 01:40 AM
|
#19 | | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: richmond
Posts: 463
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Failed 4 Times in 1 Post
|
no r20...no scirroco..polo has a really slight chance on this side of the pond ( source from within VW canada).....anyways..the 3.2L is an obsolete engine compare to the new 3.6L in the touareg and passat, less funky stuff in it like variable intake runners, 400cc bigger, better and improved cam adjusting unit..no more smashing valves and pistons.
__________________
Honda: Hang On Not Done Accelerating
| |
| | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:28 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
