Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only. |
 | 
05-19-2009, 02:53 PM
|
#1 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2008 Location: B.C.
Posts: 2,039
Thanked 101 Times in 57 Posts
Failed 44 Times in 20 Posts
| Hasting street
Everyone understand that driving on Hasting requires extra precaution due to construction, high traffic, cycles and lots of perdestrain/jaywalkers.
1)Say you are driving at 40km/h and jaywalker ran into your car, who is at fault?
2)Ran into cyclist who disobey traffic lights or without signal of chaning lane, who is at fault?
3)Driving within speed limit, ran into jaywalker and caused third party brain damaged or perhaps death (<--im not sure if ever been case where people died in accident below 50km, im just assuming ) who is at fault?
| 
|  | |
05-19-2009, 03:04 PM
|
#2 | | Diagonally parked in a parallel universe
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,349
Thanked 56 Times in 32 Posts
Failed 49 Times in 16 Posts
|
I dunno but Hastings and Renfrew was a BITCH this morning they were fixing some sign by the PNE and blocked off all north bound of Hastings on Renfrew.
__________________
If you don't like me you can blow me. | |
| | |
05-19-2009, 03:28 PM
|
#3 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2008 Location: B.C.
Posts: 2,039
Thanked 101 Times in 57 Posts
Failed 44 Times in 20 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by VancityPimp  I dunno but Hastings and Renfrew was a BITCH this morning they were fixing some sign by the PNE and blocked off all north bound of Hastings on Renfrew. | lol, they were fixing up the cables for the bus.
| |
| | |
05-19-2009, 07:28 PM
|
#4 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,560
Thanked 22 Times in 13 Posts
Failed 14 Times in 7 Posts
|
i had a few of those happen. guy ran into my car and pretended i hit him. he dashed as i was coming to a stop for the light n made a big scene. i was choked cause i thought the homeless man would win n screw me over. cops across the street sirened over. so thought i was dead at this point. turns out the cops were on my side as the homeless dude was known for pulling stunts like this. cops even asked if there was damage to the car. not sure why, cause i doubt the homeless dude would pay for it lol
but the told me i could go and took the dude away.
__________________
~goodnight fat sig.
| |
| | |
05-19-2009, 08:09 PM
|
#5 | | Retired Traffic Cop
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Nanoose Bay, BC
Posts: 9,025
Thanked 125 Times in 68 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
When you say "who is at fault," do you mean who is financially liable or who is in breach of the traffic rules?
__________________
Have you ever met anyone that would admit to being less than a better than average driver ??
Learn more at DriveSmartBC | |
| | |
05-19-2009, 08:47 PM
|
#6 | | MiX iT Up!
Join Date: May 2006 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,138
Thanked 2,069 Times in 867 Posts
Failed 642 Times in 183 Posts
|
^assuming both. im super careful when i drive around that area for all those reasons. crackheads make great bf/gf's - cuz they are unpredictable 
__________________
Sometimes we tend to be in despair when the person we love leaves us, but the truth is, it's not our loss, but theirs, for they left the only person who couldn't give up on them.
Make the effort and take the risk..
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't." - Eleanor Roosevelt | |
| | |
05-20-2009, 12:47 AM
|
#7 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2008 Location: B.C.
Posts: 2,039
Thanked 101 Times in 57 Posts
Failed 44 Times in 20 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by skidmark When you say "who is at fault," do you mean who is financially liable or who is in breach of the traffic rules? | assuming both as well, this is a pretty serious question im asking, im curious how is the result going to turn out..
| |
| | |
06-09-2009, 12:18 PM
|
#8 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2008 Location: B.C.
Posts: 2,039
Thanked 101 Times in 57 Posts
Failed 44 Times in 20 Posts
|
No one has any answer to my question?
As I was driving to work this morning, I see this crack head ran into a car on the lane beside me while stoping at the red light.
It really bothers me when i see something like that happen.
| |
| | |
06-09-2009, 01:22 PM
|
#9 | | Retired Traffic Cop
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Nanoose Bay, BC
Posts: 9,025
Thanked 125 Times in 68 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
In all of your cases it comes down to how much you could have or should have been able to anticipate and avoid when it comes to civil liability. Since I have no training here, I can't answer any more than that.
As far as the MVA is concerned, without more specific circumstances, it appears that all 3 are meant to be the fault of others, but you are still required to exercise caution if you see a child or apparently confused person on the highway, which your jaywalker could be, so in some cases you could both be charged.
__________________
Have you ever met anyone that would admit to being less than a better than average driver ??
Learn more at DriveSmartBC | |
| | |
06-09-2009, 06:18 PM
|
#10 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 128
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by silk No one has any answer to my question?
As I was driving to work this morning, I see this crack head ran into a car on the lane beside me while stoping at the red light.
It really bothers me when i see something like that happen. | I wouldn't even care who was legally responsible, will it even matter?
I think the main problem is that regardless of whos fault it is, you are paying for damages one way or another. You always get shafted as the vehicle owner. Lets say even if ICBC somehow covered an accident with another vehicle, or some "damages" to your vehicle. You will pay for it when your policy is renewed. Whenever your car has damages and its your fault or another party is at fault, you always pay; now or later.
| |
| | |
06-10-2009, 08:05 PM
|
#11 | | I am Hook'd on RS
Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 63
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
gotta watch out for the hobos as well....some have bad tempers lol
| |
| | |
06-10-2009, 09:03 PM
|
#12 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by stutterr I think the main problem is that regardless of whos fault it is, you are paying for damages one way or another. You always get shafted as the vehicle owner. Lets say even if ICBC somehow covered an accident with another vehicle, or some "damages" to your vehicle. You will pay for it when your policy is renewed. Whenever your car has damages and its your fault or another party is at fault, you always pay; now or later. | That's completely untrue.
If collision damage is 100% the other party's fault, ICBC covers the repairs, and it DOES NOT affect your rates. That's the whole point of the "claim-rated scale" and the safe-driver discounts.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira Does anyone know how many to a signature? | ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?" | | |
| | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:29 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
