![]() |
PHIL 220A: Symbolic Logic I - SYMBOLIC LOGIC I Anyone ever take this course before? I used to hear how PHIL 120/220 were super easy courses, but apparently they have been reconstructed so that they are actually challenging?? |
pure garbage. easiest course ever...220 at least. I had friends taking 120, and acing it without studying much. I took the online 220 and i ended up with 84%. Just to warn you, because it's online, you're still required to do homework and study for it. If I studied, I think i could have easily gotten above 90%. But all that said, the class course tends to have a higher average. My class average for the online was pretty high but the normal class was even higher. I recommend having a friend with you too if you plan on doing the online. If one person gets it, it's very easy to explain to the others. Reading that online textbook was a real pain in the ass. Don't recommend online if you're HONESTLY not disciplined. Good luck! Forgot to add, I just took it last year. |
It really depends on your prof/instructor and I got some over-achieving masters student teaching. I took it as a summer course and it was NOT as easy as the guy above described. This, coming from a person who took CPSC 121. |
Took the online one..pretty easy..but yea burkholder is changing it up.. When I took it he limited the homework to doing it 2 times only..but i think the average dropped alot..so he made it 4 times the next term..so i dno it depends.. if you have even a sense of logic you'll be fine.. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net