| Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n |
 | | 
07-06-2009, 07:03 PM
|
#1 | | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: May 2004 Location: df
Posts: 484
Thanked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Failed 12 Times in 7 Posts
| Are Honda cars under powered?
http://www.honda.ca/HondaCA2006/Mode...2009/Specs?L=E
Take S2000 for example, it only has 237HP and 162Torque. Why is the car so pricey at 50 grand with such low specs? Same with the CSX, TSX, TL, etc their numbers in terms of performance are so low.
Why doesn't Honda put more punch into their cars?
| 
|  | |
07-06-2009, 07:20 PM
|
#2 | | OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,065
Thanked 180 Times in 96 Posts
Failed 23 Times in 10 Posts
|
"put more punch into their cars"
one reason why is to keep their cars good on gas, a big selling point for any Honda. what car are you comparing with Hondas? the higher end of Hondas seem to have good powerplants, like the Acura TL or RL. the Accord has a pretty beefy v6 available as well.
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 07:27 PM
|
#3 | | "They call me Bowser...RawR!"
Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,238
Thanked 937 Times in 375 Posts
Failed 60 Times in 31 Posts
|
Honda built their brand on fuel economy and reliability. HP goes up, those two go down.
__________________
"Damn fine car Dodge... Ran over me wife with a Dodge!", Zeke
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 07:30 PM
|
#4 | | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bakar
Posts: 1,175
Thanked 64 Times in 41 Posts
Failed 17 Times in 3 Posts
|
Honda does not create sport cars; they're fwd economical cars that are reliable. The problem is, when ppl throw an exhaust (actually, I shouldn't even say exhaust, Muffler or tip is more accurate) on their civic and mistake it for a dragster.
Your point of "underpowered" is also not that accurate. The TL has enough power in its class as does the CSX. You may be thinking that the CSX is $$ and overpriced, but it has adequate power for its perspective buyers. Honda knows this. Everyone Knows this. And they sell. Sometimes, ppl just want a civic with an Acura emblem.
Drive a TSX and S2k and you will find why they have sold well. You neglected the Accord and other vehicles which have more than enough power for a FWD vehicle without the issue of torque steer (yes I know about their SHAWD).
End of the day, Honda does not aim to win HP wars. They never have. The Civic Si back in the hey day, was the darling not because of its 127hp, but because it was nimble and fun to drive (how many j bodies back than did that?).
They do like to equip their cars with small brakes though. Anyone else remember when the EP3 came out with the small tires? That was quite comical.
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 07:34 PM
|
#5 | | The "You'd Know" Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Home
Posts: 20,931
Thanked 276 Times in 140 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
The S2000 and RSX-S used to have "more" horsepower when they cheated; then SAE hp rating came in...
__________________
08 CBR600RR
03 IS300
Ezekiel 25:17. The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you. | |
| | |
07-06-2009, 08:03 PM
|
#6 | | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: May 2004 Location: df
Posts: 484
Thanked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Failed 12 Times in 7 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by sas  Your point of "underpowered" is also not that accurate. The TL has enough power in its class as does the CSX. You may be thinking that the CSX is $$ and overpriced, but it has adequate power for its perspective buyers. Honda knows this. Everyone Knows this. And they sell. Sometimes, ppl just want a civic with an Acura emblem. | I got a mini cooper S convertible (172HP, 177ft-lbs) to drive around on the weekend and it's very responsive with the turbo charger. The 0-60mph is very close to the s2000 and gas mileage is pretty much the same as the s2000 or better.
Is just got me thinking why pay 50G for an s2000? I would expect more out of a car for 50G thus I would rather buy an BMW 335i convertible over the s2000 anytime.
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 08:07 PM
|
#7 | | The "You'd Know" Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Home
Posts: 20,931
Thanked 276 Times in 140 Posts
Failed 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
I don't mind paying more for a car that looks better (though subjective) and is RWD.
__________________
08 CBR600RR
03 IS300
Ezekiel 25:17. The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness. For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know I am the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you. | |
| | |
07-06-2009, 08:08 PM
|
#8 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: 604
Posts: 1,049
Thanked 160 Times in 80 Posts
Failed 84 Times in 14 Posts
|
The S2000 is overpriced at Canadian MSRP. Used however, its price starts to make more sense. BTW a 335 cabrio is going to run far north of $50k and is in a different class than a S2000 anyways.
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 08:17 PM
|
#9 | | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Bakar
Posts: 1,175
Thanked 64 Times in 41 Posts
Failed 17 Times in 3 Posts
| Quote: |
I got a mini cooper S convertible (172HP, 177ft-lbs) to drive around on the weekend and it's very responsive with the turbo charger. The 0-60mph is very close to the s2000 and gas mileage is pretty much the same as the s2000 or better.
| I understand your point, but you need to compare vehicles vs. their direct competition. As someone mentioned, the 335 is north of 50k. I would compare it to the Z4, SLK, Audi TT, Solstice, Mustang, Vette etc..
It stacks up pretty well, while def. not the fastest.
Honda's have never been cheap and you will never see them offering "employee price discounts" anytime soon.
You can pretty much argue that a fox body with 5k dropped into it will blow away.... well you know where I am going.
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 08:31 PM
|
#10 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,036
Thanked 486 Times in 117 Posts
Failed 59 Times in 18 Posts
|
Pretty good for value, me thinks.
Like when I bought my Si, all other competitors were priced more and equipped less.
__________________
2006 Civic Si Coupe
HFP / Gram Lights / Kumho / Buddy Club / Mugen
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 08:45 PM
|
#11 | | I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 20,406
Thanked 7,468 Times in 1,445 Posts
Failed 2,380 Times in 472 Posts
| | |
| | |
07-06-2009, 08:52 PM
|
#12 | | I *Fwap* *Fwap* *Fwap* to RS
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,599
Thanked 492 Times in 125 Posts
Failed 104 Times in 21 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by impactX The S2000 and RSX-S used to have "more" horsepower when they cheated; then SAE hp rating came in... | Yeah no kidding. I'd much rather have the beast, 240hp ap1 than the 237hp weak sauce ap2.
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 09:28 PM
|
#13 | | private modder
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: North Shore
Posts: 6,878
Thanked 2,838 Times in 802 Posts
Failed 47 Times in 35 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by d1 Yeah no kidding. I'd much rather have the beast, 240hp ap1 than the 237hp weak sauce ap2. | How does 3 hp turn a "weak sauce" into a beast?
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 09:33 PM
|
#14 | | Trollollolloing RS sine 2005
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Richmond
Posts: 7,093
Thanked 2,471 Times in 704 Posts
Failed 473 Times in 132 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Eff-1 How does 3 hp turn a "weak sauce" into a beast? | ap1 was consider more lively because it didnt have traction/stability control, and the rear end was more drift happy where as the ap2 was more "tame" and numbed down
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane I had some girl come into the busser station the other day trying to make out with every staff member and then pull down her pants and asked for someone to stick a dick in her (at least she shaved). | Quote:
Originally Posted by 1exotic Vtec doesn't kick in on Reverse. | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma its like.. oh yeah oh yeah.. ohhhh yeah... OOoooOohh... why's it suddenly feel a bit better... ohhhh yeahh... ohhh...oh..fuck... it probably ripped. | | |
| | |
07-06-2009, 09:42 PM
|
#15 | | private modder
Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: North Shore
Posts: 6,878
Thanked 2,838 Times in 802 Posts
Failed 47 Times in 35 Posts
|
AP2 only introduced the VSA/traction on 06 and up. 04-05 AP2 had none of that.
Yes suspension changes were made to the AP2, but I guess I'm not one who thinks that snap oversteer tendencies are a positive thing...
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 10:41 PM
|
#16 | | I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 576
Thanked 402 Times in 77 Posts
Failed 211 Times in 38 Posts
|
I havent driven a v6 honda product that was good on gas the TL was worse than my trans am.
__________________
2002 Pontiac Trans Am
1999 Camaro Z28
1995 Camaro SOLD
1995 Nissan 240sx SOLD
2009 Saturn Astra
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 10:48 PM
|
#17 | | Rs has made me the man i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: VANcity East
Posts: 3,443
Thanked 365 Times in 190 Posts
Failed 25 Times in 14 Posts
|
I always thought the RSX type S was quite powerful in its class.. 210HP for a NA car which isnt bad.
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 10:52 PM
|
#18 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
|
The 4 cylinders aren't good on power if u leave them stock, V6 is decent but uses loads more gas than any competitor V6 without giving much more power, I doubt it's much more reliable than toyota's too which is now being used in the evora 
And the handling of stock Honda's aren't that great either, for around 30k I'd take a GTI over an SI anyday, more torque, DSG, More solid, tons of other plusses including the engine,
Honda used to be famous for reliability but now not so much, because everyone's engine quality has significantly improved in the last 10 years, even mercedes, (not saying a mercedes is more reliable than a honda, never in a million years...)
Most importantly though, reliability is a subjective thing and so is fuel economy, Prius drivers may find that their toyota doesn't get as good reliability or fuel economy as claimed, but what we can determine is track times  and when it comes to those numbers none of the current stock honda lineup really has what it takes, when you take into consideration things like power:weight, and price.
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 11:13 PM
|
#19 | | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: 604
Posts: 1,049
Thanked 160 Times in 80 Posts
Failed 84 Times in 14 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ilvtofu The 4 cylinders aren't good on power if u leave them stock, V6 is decent but uses loads more gas than any competitor V6 without giving much more power , I doubt it's much more reliable than toyota 's too which is now being used in the evora And the handling of stock Honda 's aren't that great either , for around 30k I'd take a GTI over an SI anyday , more torque, DSG, More solid, tons of other plusses including the engine,
Honda used to be famous for reliability but now not so much, because everyone's engine quality has significantly improved in the last 10 years , even mercedes, (not saying a mercedes is more reliable than a honda, never in a million years...)
Most importantly though, reliability is a subjective thing and so is fuel economy, Prius drivers may find that their toyota doesn't get as good reliability or fuel economy as claimed, but what we can determine is track times and when it comes to those numbers none of the current stock honda lineup really has what it takes, when you take into consideration things like power:weight, and price. | Remember kids. Be cool-- stay in school.
(I haven't even highlighted a bunch erroneous stuff in the quote above).
| |
| | |
07-06-2009, 11:16 PM
|
#20 | | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: kelowna
Posts: 4,797
Thanked 488 Times in 168 Posts
Failed 52 Times in 23 Posts
|
simple, if you dont like the car, you arent its target market
a mini is a long long stretch off a true sports car like an s2000
and come talk to us about reliability when your mini hits 200k+
honda doesnt need big numbers to sell cars, its all about the soul of them
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar Ugliness and fatness are genetic disorders, much like baldness or necrophilia, and it's only your fault if you don't hate yourself enough to do something about it. | | |
| | |
07-06-2009, 11:25 PM
|
#21 | | RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: kelowna
Posts: 4,797
Thanked 488 Times in 168 Posts
Failed 52 Times in 23 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ilvtofu The 4 cylinders aren't good on power
And the handling of stock Honda's aren't that great either,
Honda used to be famous for reliability but now not so much,
, but what we can determine is track times and when it comes to those numbers none of the current stock honda lineup really has what it takes, when you take into consideration things like power:weight, and price. |
wat?
i read your post after the other guy made fun of your grammer, and man, you must be fucked
honda has an incredible track record with 4 cylinder motors, they were the first to break the 100hp per litre mark
they were the first to offer variable valve timing on a production car
Honda is a benchmark for reliability and quality of products
a stock civic si is faster around an autoX track than a gti, gti's are fat slow numb pigs, the honda just laques a bit of the tourqe that vw needs a turbo to make, a stock s2000 is still the car to have for AS class autocrossing and has been since 2000 when it came out.
what does price have to do with track times? the ridgeline won the baja 1000 last year in the stock category, integra type R's, s2000's, crx si and ef civic si's are all still winning trophees every year in the states at competition events, and the NSX was described in the early 90's as the car that made the exotics blush, as it would turn the same lap times as their current scrap with 1/3 of the horsepower
all in all, Honda is probably glad you arent out repping their cars, as you have no clue
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by RRxtar Ugliness and fatness are genetic disorders, much like baldness or necrophilia, and it's only your fault if you don't hate yourself enough to do something about it. | | |
| | |
07-06-2009, 11:34 PM
|
#22 | | Media Officer / MOD
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 28,077
Thanked 5,752 Times in 1,725 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 63 Posts
|
some honda's are powered just enough  | |
| | |
07-07-2009, 12:03 AM
|
#23 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: MacLeod
Posts: 7,298
Thanked 542 Times in 289 Posts
Failed 1,639 Times in 418 Posts
|
sport cars aren't all about hp, torque, and 0-60.
This thread reminds me of the thread where a guy thinks his v6 Camry is the best sport cars because it can outrun a rx-8 in 0-60, fuel economy, comfort, utilities, etc.
if you've never driven an s2k, you'll never understand. Then again, not everyone likes the s2k's ride feel.
| |
| | |
07-07-2009, 12:27 AM
|
#24 | | I STILL don't get it
Join Date: May 2004 Location: df
Posts: 484
Thanked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Failed 12 Times in 7 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by orange7 s
This thread reminds me of the thread where a guy thinks his v6 Camry is the best sport cars because it can outrun a rx-8 in 0-60, fuel economy, comfort, utilities, etc. | Sure he can outrun the rx-8 on a straight but when it comes to cornering, his camry's is going to wobble like a boat and go overboard lol.
| |
| | |
07-07-2009, 12:37 AM
|
#25 | | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 5,541
Thanked 1,109 Times in 299 Posts
Failed 192 Times in 41 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by orange7 sport cars aren't all about hp, torque, and 0-60.
This thread reminds me of the thread where a guy thinks his v6 Camry is the best sport cars because it can outrun a rx-8 in 0-60, fuel economy, comfort, utilities, etc.
if you've never driven an s2k, you'll never understand. Then again, not everyone likes the s2k's ride feel. | Fully agreed.
It's the "nature" of the car and the thrill you get from driving it that makes it sporty.
| |
| | | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:32 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
