Police Forum Police Head Mod: Skidmark
Questions & info about the Motor Vehicle Act. Mature discussion only. |
 | 
08-28-2009, 09:28 AM
|
#1 | | RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 933
Thanked 288 Times in 152 Posts
Failed 76 Times in 23 Posts
| Ticket for Smoked Tail lights?
Hey guys..
Anyone know the charges and fines you receive if you get pulled over for smoked tail lights?
Thanks
| 
|  | |
08-28-2009, 09:43 AM
|
#2 | | RS Peace Officer
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 27 Posts
|
Assuming nobody rear ends you in the process...probably a $109 ticket...and maybe not permitted to drive away.
| |
| | |
08-28-2009, 10:51 AM
|
#3 | | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 1,660
Thanked 367 Times in 128 Posts
Failed 154 Times in 36 Posts
|
Pay to play...
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Graeme S  More than half of the problem is stupidity, not malice. | | |
| | |
08-28-2009, 11:26 AM
|
#4 | | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: May 2008 Location: B.C.
Posts: 2,039
Thanked 101 Times in 57 Posts
Failed 44 Times in 20 Posts
|
smoked is outdated and ugly
| |
| | |
08-28-2009, 11:27 AM
|
#5 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
|
just about to get smoked tails...
| |
| | |
08-28-2009, 12:55 PM
|
#6 | | Retired Traffic Cop
Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Nanoose Bay, BC
Posts: 9,025
Thanked 125 Times in 68 Posts
Failed 3 Times in 2 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ilvtofu just about to get smoked tails... | If you do, you are what I call a "Pick me!" driver. Doing this around a traffic cop is like waving the proverbial red cape in front of the bull...
__________________
Have you ever met anyone that would admit to being less than a better than average driver ??
Learn more at DriveSmartBC | |
| | |
08-30-2009, 12:52 AM
|
#7 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
|
Can i just do a side marker pretty please?
| |
| | |
08-30-2009, 01:33 AM
|
#8 | | WOAH! i think Vtec just kicked in!
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: richmond
Posts: 1,660
Thanked 367 Times in 128 Posts
Failed 154 Times in 36 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by skidmark If you do, you are what I call a "Pick me!" driver. Doing this around a traffic cop is like waving the proverbial red cape in front of the bull... | IMO anything modification to exterior is "PICK ME" driver to the police.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Graeme S More than half of the problem is stupidity, not malice. | | |
| | |
08-30-2009, 08:59 PM
|
#9 | | What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: coquitlam
Posts: 188
Thanked 19 Times in 10 Posts
Failed 2 Times in 1 Post
|
I was wondering if anyone had anymore info on what happens if you get rear ended with smoked taillights??
I have heard that the driver that rear end's you can claim he didn't see your brake lights and the blaim can be shifted to you
any truth to this??
__________________
00 em1 - I/H/E, act hdss, koni coilover's, 17' konig helium's ... DD
97 ek - b16 swaped sleeper ... parted RIP
90 ef - I/E, rota slips, 140db stereo ... sold & missed
91 ef - sold
| |
| | |
08-31-2009, 06:25 AM
|
#10 | | RS Peace Officer
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 27 Posts
|
I have investigated 2 such crashes and YES...ICBC held the driver of the smoked tail lights responsible for the crash...they also assigned blame to the rider of a sportbike who barely survived being rearended on his bike with a fender elinminator and intergrated tail/brake/signal light setup.
| |
| | |
08-31-2009, 08:30 AM
|
#11 | | F**K YOUR HEAD
Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: vancouver
Posts: 8,718
Thanked 8,153 Times in 1,251 Posts
Failed 643 Times in 181 Posts
|
How about tinting around Like MKV R32 style on a regular MKV GTi?
The light area is exposed and remains untinted, I can't see any possible danger, would that be legal? http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...scaled_600.jpg
As you can see the two circle pods aren't tinted, but everything around is
| |
| | |
08-31-2009, 09:53 AM
|
#12 | | I bringith the lowerballerith
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: PR
Posts: 1,140
Thanked 253 Times in 131 Posts
Failed 6 Times in 1 Post
| Quote:
Originally Posted by ilvtofu How about tinting around Like MKV R32 style on a regular MKV GTi?
The light area is exposed and remains untinted, I can't see any possible danger, would that be legal? http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...scaled_600.jpg
As you can see the two circle pods aren't tinted, but everything around is | Not legal as all that surround is reflector and helps your vehicle be visible at night (and during the daytime with glare). The number of vehicles with dead tail lights that i've seen driving around the past few days off is huge. The reflectors are the only thing that let me know it was a car, not a motorcycle, from behind.
__________________
"Never give a match up halfway through. Never say that you do not feel up to it, that your condition is bad, and throw in the towel. Fight to the very end, always looking for your chance to break through." - Kazuzo Kudo
| |
| | |
08-31-2009, 01:17 PM
|
#13 | | RS Peace Officer
Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Vancouver Islan
Posts: 3,867
Thanked 1,636 Times in 683 Posts
Failed 64 Times in 27 Posts
|
Here is what you are dealing with..smoked aftermarket lights/reflectors are NOT compliant...as shown below.
General lighting requirements
4.02 (1) A vehicle on a highway must only be equipped with and use lamps, reflectors or other illuminating devices authorized by this Division or authorized in writing by the director.
(2) A vehicle on a highway must be equipped with lamps equivalent to those provided by the original manufacturer in accordance with the requirements that applied under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada), or a predecessor to that Act, at the time of vehicle manufacture.
(3) All lamps, lamp bulbs and reflectors required or permitted by this Division must comply with
(a) the approved standards established by the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (Canada) and the applicable SAE standards,
(b) the conditions of use described in this Division, and
(c) the requirements of Table 1 of the Schedule to this Division.
(4) The function of 2 or more lamps or reflectors may be combined if each function meets the following requirements:
(a) no turn signal lamp may be combined optically with a stop lamp unless the stop lamp is extinguished when the turn signal is flashing;
(b) a clearance lamp must not be combined optically with a tail-lamp or identification lamp.
(5) The director may exempt vehicles or classes of vehicles from the requirements of this section.
[en. B.C. Reg. 476/98, s. 2; am. B.C. Reg. 135/2003, s. 1.]
Mounting of lamps and reflectors
4.03 (1) If 2 lamps of the same type are required or permitted on a vehicle, the lamps must be mounted at the same height unless otherwise specified in this Division.
(2) If 2 lamps of the same type are required or permitted on the side, front or rear of a vehicle, the lamps must, unless otherwise specified in this Division, be mounted with one lamp at or near the extreme left and one lamp at or near the extreme right of the vehicle, so as to indicate the approximate width of the vehicle.
[en. B.C. Reg. 476/98, s. 2.]
General maintenance
4.04 (1) Lighting devices required by this Division must be maintained in good working order.
(2) Lamps and reflectors required by this Division
(a) must be securely mounted on the vehicle,
(b) must not have any cracked, broken, missing or incorrectly installed lenses, and a lamp must not have bent or broken rims that allow water to enter the lamp, and
(c) must not be shielded, covered or obscured by any part of the vehicle or load or by dirt or other material.
| |
| | |
08-31-2009, 02:07 PM
|
#14 | | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Deutschland
Posts: 2,402
Thanked 900 Times in 387 Posts
Failed 395 Times in 107 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by silk smoked is outdated and ugly | unless you drive an o8/09 STI... those babys are just crying for some tint.
true story. My old mk3 GTI had Hella DOT approved smoked tails when I bought it. i got hassled so much (also had my N at the time) that I swapped them for OEM
| |
| | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:57 PM.
|
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
