![]() |
best tuning option? 88 turbo cavalier let me start by saying I'm a noob to turbo builds and i don't know anything about tuning so my friend just "finished" his turbo z24 build he's using a custom burned chip for the stock ecu but It's probably not the best tune in the world seeing as how it is just a base tune (imo) and the fact that it was sent half way across the country without the tuner actually ever sitting in the car maybe im too skeptical..the car does indeed run though the car has a tendency to die after decelerating when coming to a light not 100% of the time but enough to make it a nuisance it also does something else i'll try my bast to describe it when you're driving the car and you give it gas it can tend to do nothing a lot like how my car feels when it's almost out of gas the car bucks and there is no response for a short while and it does this throughout the rev range even a tiny bit under WOT It doesn't run very smooth under deceleration either kind of bucks a bit according to the wideband it's not leaning out like crazy or something but it defnitely doesn't feel right to me (keep in mind i've never been in a custom turbo car before though) are these symptoms of a possibly bad tune or something else?? and what would the best solution be? try to find someone local who can reburn the chip to a more prescise tune? switch to a piggy back of some sort or go for something like megasquirt? I like the idea of megasquirt but have no idea how to tune the thing what's the learning curve like? is it possible to get a base map from someone else with a similar setup then get a local tuner to fine tune it? the setup: 1988 z24 cavalier 2.8v6 - pretty standard 50 trim turbo .63 ar? or whatever from kinetic - the manifold is basically the two stock logs connected in a y then going to the turbo - 38mm tial knockoff with a 6 lb spring although the gauge only ever reads a max of 4psi (there is a very tiny hole in the intercooler though where we can feel air escaping) - hks sqv blow off - medium sized intercooler - 2.5'' exhaust and intercooler piping - STOCK fuel pump - 28 lb injectors - custom burned chip - 2 bar map sensor - stock clutch that slips under WOT :haha: I think the eventual goal of the car is to get into the 250hp range on stock internals hopefully something like a low 14 high 13 car.. the thing only weighs about 2800 pounds with all the turbo goodies and the system the car makes around 125-130 hp stock? my butt dyno tells me it Might be in the 180-200 range now (not very accurate i know) another question i have is regarding plugs I've heard it's good for turbo cars to go to a "colder" plug at what point is this necessary? is it okay to run the stock plug for now since it's not making a huge amount of power? tell me If I'm leaving some critical information out here.. If I'm a moron that worries too much about my friend's car go ahead and tell me any input is appreciated |
It's very difficult to tell what could be wrong without seeing the car. It does sound like the tune could be off. First things first get rid of the stock spark plugs and get some cheap plain ngk plugs with a heat range of 6 or 7 and gap them to .030 (don't use platinums) It also sounds like their could be a problem with the 2bar map calibration or the tps adjustment on the throttle body. You say the car has a wideband, what are the air/fuel ratios during cruising at light load and what are they during full throttle? What boost is the car running? |
first and foremost,just scrap that POS and just start over with something other than a junkyard cavalier:D |
Quote:
under full throttle it goes down to 10 the car has a 6 pound spring in the wastegate but the gauge is reading 4 psi tops I'll get my friend (owner of the car) to chime in here |
Hi im the owner of that POS (blackedoutaudi) thanks for the post whore. Anywho, yea the car is bogging as johnrb said, it doesnt always go to 10 AFR under WOT but sometimes does.Anywho it seems that under deceleration it boggs kinda like the tranny is lugging but its not. even if the tun is bad could it be that the vacuum lines come lose or the plugs, can the plugs really casue this to happen.It gives me problems in lower rpms, but once i got on the highway, it would be fine, but once i started to decelerate, it starts bogging again, Any ideas |
Quote:
|
10:1 at WOT? :eek: As for the symptoms, it sounds like it could be a possible fuel issue, either not enough going through due to a clogged fuel filter, or too much is going through and it's blowing out the spark on the plugs... especially on one cylinder. It's been years since I worked on a Z24 (brother turbo'ed his '93 many years ago), so I forget what the vacuum system is like on 'em. |
Quote:
I thought excess fuel would just run through the exhaust so it's better to be a bit rich as opposed to lean maybe 10 is a little more than a bit though huh :confused: 93 eh? i kind of like those series two cavs with the slanted headlights a little more.. and to the audi guy It's not a POS but to each his own some people prefer to drive a car that's a little unique as opposed to a civic or something else a million other people drive |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As for the deceleration, I'm not sure what program/chip you're running but as Muskys SS said, it sounds like the decel fuel cut is incorrectly programed, especially if you're pushing much more fuel into the engine than it's designed to work with. |
what do you mean, could it be a bad TPS or too hot of plugs, the tune is decent, overs used the same thing but they told me to check those first. What do you guys think? |
It does sound like the accel and decel settings are both off. Well, either the settings are off, or as has been said it's possible the tps is either misadjusted, or broken, or noisy, etc. Generic tunes being horrendously rich under full load like this one is (unfortunately) extremely common. This is a function partially of the "tuner" taking a "one size fits all" approach, and partially do to him being inclined to make a "safe" tune. Unfortunately power drops like a stone as a result. While still not ideal, low-mid 11's is still plenty safe, easier for the plugs to ignite, and will make way more power. Why these guys set chips up to have afrs in the mid 10's or worse is beyond me... |
grenade. |
Okay so this is going to sound like a very noobie question but it doesn't hurt to ask.. Is it possible that a horrible tune would contribute to lowering the lifespan of a timing chain? (or am i just being crazy now because this tune sucks) I would think a chain should be designed well enough to be able to take the sudden jolts and whatnot but i guess the added power from the turbo doesnt help either.. anyways the chain snapped like last week i think? bent most of the valves.. it had an original 200k on it though |
In regards to the car dying after decelerating, does this car have an AFM? If so, I hope you are re-routing back into the intake stream as I see you have the HKS SSQV. If you vent to atmosphere, the AFM is going to tell the ECU to use "x" units of fuel to compensate for the "metered air." When it doesn't see this air, it'll stall. |
It is probably due to the uneven delivery of power, caused by the car constantly dying. I won't say it is directly caused by the tune. It sounds like the engine had underlying problems before you stick things on it. I hope you guys learn something from the process... good thing parts etc for the car are cheap. With everything, if you want things to last long, do proper engineering from ground up, ie blueprint, test and verify.. make sure everything is understood and running before you move on to the next step in the bolt on process. Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net