You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Vancouver Off-Topic / Current EventsThe off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.
Anyone that says this is over is an idiot. We seen a 3-0 deflate many times during these playoffs, what happened with Tampa and boston last night? Posted via RS Mobile
NBC dude said that the Ballard hit was a penalty. Kinda shows why he's no longer GM of the Florida Panthers and why he traded away Luongo. Dude can't watch hockey
NBC dude said that the Ballard hit was a penalty. Kinda shows why he's no longer GM of the Florida Panthers and why he traded away Luongo. Dude can't watch hockey
The way the calls were going today - I wouldn't be surprised if Ballard didn't get a "clipping" penalty... hehe.
__________________ Proud member of GRAPEGreat Revscene Action Photographers Enthusiasts
Hughson said it was, but I am still unsure if the give-away by Henrik Sedin to put the Sharks on 5-on-3 with Too Many Men was intentional, just because it would be absolutely brilliant on Henrik's part if it was planned.
If he (I believe it was Couture) let the puck pass to avoid the Too-Many-Men, the puck would've gone straight to Daniel Sedin on the far blue line for an odd-man-rush, but he didn't so he took the penalty.
F'n amazing, when you think about that split second decision and recognition of the Sharks having too many men, AND knowing his brother would be there to take the pass if the Shark player let it go, THEN having the balls to put it right to an opponents stick in the neutral zone... Just crazy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyxx
Sonick is a genius. I won't go into detail what's so great about his post. But it's damn good!
2010 Toyota Rav4 Limited V6 - Wifey's Daily Driver
2009 BMW 128i - Daily Driver
2007 Toyota Rav4 Sport V6 - Sold
1999 Mazda Miata - Sold
2003 Mazda Protege5 - Sold
1987 BMW 325is - Sold
1990 Mazda Miata - Sold
Hughson said it was, but I am still unsure if the give-away by Henrik Sedin to put the Sharks on 5-on-3 with Too Many Men was intentional, just because it would be absolutely brilliant on Henrik's part if it was planned.
If he (I believe it was Couture) let the puck pass to avoid the Too-Many-Men, the puck would've gone straight to Daniel Sedin on the far blue line for an odd-man-rush, but he didn't so he took the penalty.
F'n amazing, when you think about that split second decision and recognition of the Sharks having too many men, AND knowing his brother would be there to take the pass if the Shark player let it go, THEN having the balls to put it right to an opponents stick in the neutral zone... Just crazy.
are we giving the Sedins too much credit for this? lol. seems more like a lucky coincidence.
are we giving the Sedins too much credit for this? lol. seems more like a lucky coincidence.
That's why I am unsure, it's sooo coincidental, but at the same time if anybody were to do it, it would be Henrik. Hughson or Simpson (don't remember who) said it WAS intentional; but I am not so sure just because it was such a crazy play.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyxx
Sonick is a genius. I won't go into detail what's so great about his post. But it's damn good!
2010 Toyota Rav4 Limited V6 - Wifey's Daily Driver
2009 BMW 128i - Daily Driver
2007 Toyota Rav4 Sport V6 - Sold
1999 Mazda Miata - Sold
2003 Mazda Protege5 - Sold
1987 BMW 325is - Sold
1990 Mazda Miata - Sold