You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Vancouver Off-Topic / Current EventsThe off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.
Originally posted by v.b. can we stop, my pussy hurts... Originally posted by asian_XL fliptuner, I am gonna grab ur dick and pee in your face, then rub shit all over my face...:lol Originally posted by Fei-Ji haha i can taste the cum in my mouth Originally posted by FastAnna when I was 13 I wanted to be a video hoe so bad
Originally posted by v.b. can we stop, my pussy hurts... Originally posted by asian_XL fliptuner, I am gonna grab ur dick and pee in your face, then rub shit all over my face...:lol Originally posted by Fei-Ji haha i can taste the cum in my mouth Originally posted by FastAnna when I was 13 I wanted to be a video hoe so bad
Willing to sell a family member for a few minutes on RS
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Richmond
Posts: 13,420
Thanked 1,421 Times in 273 Posts
Failed 110 Times in 37 Posts
I dont see why evereyone is in a rush to deal bieksa.
do people not remember what happened to our D with injuries?
to be honest, i dont see a problem with us have 6 top 4 Dmen
yes, it puts us in a bind cap wise, but having bieksa playing bottom 2 minutes might make him a little but more effective. If his plays get better bump up to top 4 minutes
plus having a stacked D means luongo wont be working as hard to make saves
__________________
Acura Integra Type R 00-1004 - It's back 223whp 161ft tq 2.0L ITR
I dont see why evereyone is in a rush to deal bieksa.
do people not remember what happened to our D with injuries?
to be honest, i dont see a problem with us have 6 top 4 Dmen
yes, it puts us in a bind cap wise, but having bieksa playing bottom 2 minutes might make him a little but more effective. If his plays get better bump up to top 4 minutes
plus having a stacked D means luongo wont be working as hard to make saves
Trading Bieksa is a necessity, not an option. We have $2.6m cap space left to sign 4 RFAs including Raymond.. you think that can be done? No way.
I still think Gillis should have thrown the same deal he gave Maholtra in an offer sheet to Ladd. If Ladd accepted the Hawks would have matched it but then they would have been stuck with Ladd for at least a year since you can't trade a player for a year after you match an offer sheet. It would have been a great way to mess the Hawks up cap wise. If the Hawks didn't match we would have got Ladd for the same price as Maholtra and it would have only cost us a 2nd round pick next year.
ladd doesn't play center and doesn't take faceoffs.
and if we throw an offersheet at ladd, they're definitely throwing one back at raymond for 3.5m+ (supposedly weak draft next year), while we're trying to fit him for 2.5m.
ladd doesn't play center and doesn't take faceoffs.
and if we throw an offersheet at ladd, they're definitely throwing one back at raymond for 3.5m+ (supposedly weak draft next year), while we're trying to fit him for 2.5m.
...or the Hawks let us have him and we give up a draft pick.
And there's no way the Hawks would be putting out offer sheets...they don't have the money. We'd just let them have Raymond and they'd be fucked.
ladd doesn't play center and doesn't take faceoffs.
and if we throw an offersheet at ladd, they're definitely throwing one back at raymond for 3.5m+ (supposedly weak draft next year), while we're trying to fit him for 2.5m.
LOL, no they wouldn't. Two problems with your scenario, one Chicago doesn't have 3.5m to offer to Raymund and second they'd have to give us a 1st and a 3rd round pick to do that. I'd take Ladd over Maholtra anyday of the week. We have a 3rd line center as far as I'm concerend and his first name is Cody. I'd take Ladd at 2.5 for 3 years over a 30 year old Maholtra any day.
It's a mute point anyway since Ladd is no longer a Hawk and we've already given our money to Maholtra. I was just saying it would have been a great way to really fuck them over. It was a perfect storm since they were up against the cap and either would have had to give him a way for almost nothing or sign him and be stuck with him paying more then then they wanted to pay, lose lose for them and win win for us either way.
__________________
“The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place... and I don´t care how tough you are, it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently, if you let it. You, me or nobody, is gonna hit as hard as life. But ain't about how hard you hit... It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward... how much you can take, and keep moving forward. That´s how winning is done. Now, if you know what you worth, go out and get what you worth.” - Rocky Balboa
That would've been a slick move on Gillis' part if he pulled that off but I'm very happy with the signing of Malhotra. Since he said it himself he'd be fine playing either centre or wing, this gives Hodgson and Schroeder time to adjust to the NHL level without all that pressure. Instead of rushing our prospects, we let them grow and mature at their pace. It's the proper way to build an NHL franchise and I'm glad we have Mike Gillis as our GM.
Bieksa for Filatov would be highway robbery, I doubt Columbus' GM wants to lose his job. Adding Filatov to our prospect pool with Hodgson, Schroeder, Schnieder, Shirokov, etc would be surreal.
Kubina signs a 2 year deal worth $7.7 mil with the team he won a cup with
^^ I'm just glad he's working out and not sidelined due to injury.
Was listening to the Team1040, and someone mentioned how the Canucks now lead the league in number three defensemen...Hamhuis would be low on the depth chart on Chicago and was in Nashville as well. The Canucks don't have a true number 1 dman, but good depth I'd say.
__________________
"A chicken crossing the street is poultry in motion"
^^ I'm just glad he's working out and not sidelined due to injury.
Was listening to the Team1040, and someone mentioned how the Canucks now lead the league in number three defensemen...Hamhuis would be low on the depth chart on Chicago and was in Nashville as well. The Canucks don't have a true number 1 dman, but good depth I'd say.
Hamhuis isn't Duncan Keith...that guy is amazing...but he's as good as Seabrook I think and Brian Campbell is LOL.
Hamhuis is a #2 D-man in that he's not as amazing as Keith, Doughty, Mike Green, etc...we don't have a star but our defense is full of guys you'd actually want on your team...no pluggers apart from Aaron Rome...and he's not bad either. Aaron Rome would be a top 4 on a team like Columbus or Tampa.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
![b0unce. [?]'s Avatar](customavatars/avatar28217_23.gif){kind=avatar}
