REVscene Automotive Forum
Page 78 of 1648 « First 2868697071727374757677 78 798081828384858687881281785781078 Last »
Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   The Official 2010/2011 Canucks Thread (https://www.revscene.net/forums/617486-official-2010-2011-canucks-thread.html)

shawn79 07-20-2010 12:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange7 (Post 7035448)
okay.. I think most of you guys got confused of what I was just trying to say.

I was just trying to say how our production might decrease next year and we will see less action (didn't literally mean going back to boring hockey).

hopefully I am wrong on this one.

Both sedins will drop in pts to 85-90 pts.
If the sedins drop in pts, obviously burrows will drop in goals since they are in the same line.

there isn't the olympic next year, so I don't think samuelsson will explode.

Kesler is close to his limit (pt-per-game player), so I don't think his numbers will increase by a lot. Plus samuelsson will get fewer goals, hence raymond's improved goal production will break even this line in production compared to last year.

now I dunno about the third line yet, since I don't know who will be playing.

4th line isn't a scoring line. -> no point production.

From the history, ballard and hamhuis aren't really offensive defencemen. hence, not really more offensive than last year from our improved D.


so in conclusion, I don't think we will be 3rd in the league in scoring again.

But it was my bad to say we were going back to boring hockey.

I think we will end up being like 7th in the league for goals. IMO

hopefully I am wrong on this one.
engrish?
:facepalm:

Harvey Specter 07-20-2010 01:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch28 (Post 7034989)
You're such a fucking idiot.

Seriously.

Go die in a fire.

Please.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raygunpk (Post 7034994)
Waste of a good fire.


I LOL'd my OJ on my keyboard when I read this.

mqr03 07-20-2010 01:34 AM
If you think about it NHL pro's make the least out of the top 4 pro sports leagues (nhl, nfl, mlb, nba)

The list of highest contract payout goes like this
1.MLB
2.NBA
3.NFL
4.NHL

Only the Crosby's & Ovechkins get absolute maximum with some exceptions being dumb GM's handing out silly contracts like Garth Snow.
Nhl is also the least watched sport out of the 4 primarily due to the fact Americans prefer the nfl, mlb and nba more than nhl.

Contract for 17 years is just stupid. No player is gonna see the end of his contract because he'll either get injured, bought out or traded.

orange7 07-20-2010 01:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvxo (Post 7035300)
Damn, the Kovalchuk contract is a lot of years committed. I wonder if he'll even last that long playing.
pretty sure a buyout will be involved at some point near the end of his contract.

orange7 07-20-2010 01:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raygunpk (Post 7034994)
Waste of a good fire.
ouch.

orange7 07-20-2010 02:05 AM
Found this interesting topic in the canucks site.

all 4 are exceptional players! I would love all 4 of them on the team when they are all at their prime.

mb_ 07-20-2010 02:15 AM
I'm confident Danny and Hank will be at 200+ pts combined next season :)

SkinnyPupp 07-20-2010 03:55 AM
I think if you looked back at Nazzy and Bert in the early 2000's, most of their goals came from Bertuzzi pushing his defenseman away from the crease area. As soon as they cracked down on that, their production went way down, and continued to drop until Bert tried to kill someone and Naslund became a head case.

hotjoint 07-20-2010 07:03 AM
this upcoming season is going to be interesting

Gumby 07-20-2010 08:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp (Post 7035559)
I think if you looked back at Nazzy and Bert in the early 2000's, most of their goals came from Bertuzzi pushing his defenseman away from the crease area. As soon as they cracked down on that, their production went way down, and continued to drop until Bert tried to kill someone and Naslund became a head case.
Don't forget, Naslund had a bunch of sniper-type goals from the slot too, unless those were scored as a result of Bert shoving defensemen away... :)

SkinnyPupp 07-20-2010 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby (Post 7035674)
Don't forget, Naslund had a bunch of sniper-type goals from the slot too, unless those were scored as a result of Bert shoving defensemen away... :)
Yup, I'm sure it helped. And the ones that didn't go through were big juicy rebounds :thumbsup:

Expresso 07-20-2010 09:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gumby (Post 7035674)
Don't forget, Naslund had a bunch of sniper-type goals from the slot too, unless those were scored as a result of Bert shoving defensemen away... :)
Or from the face off circles too, thats the Naslund I remember. After the lock out, it was like he lost his touch and the concussion probably didn't make things better.

MR_BIGGS 07-20-2010 09:46 AM
LOL

trancehead 07-20-2010 10:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MR_BIGGS (Post 7035764)
HAHHHAHAHAHA:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

trancehead 07-20-2010 10:19 AM
Ive watched that Spezza laugh 100 times and its still funny! No wonder hes Ottawa's whipping boy LOL

trancehead 07-20-2010 10:20 AM
a little more Spezza:


NOW SPEZZA LAUGHING FOR 10 MINUTES. i bet you cant watch it for more than 30 seconds...

Greenstoner 07-20-2010 11:12 AM
^ sounds like a retard more than a nerd lol

raygunpk 07-20-2010 11:16 AM
Spezza's wife is pretty cute.

trip 07-20-2010 05:01 PM
had to get my hockey fix and this hyped me up and made it worse :(

murd0c 07-20-2010 05:07 PM
So I just heard on 1040 that theirs a rumor floating around that Bieska for the Habs #1 draft pick Jarred Tinordi, I for one think that would be fricken wicked to have someone that size and young for the Canucks.

Ch28 07-20-2010 05:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by murd0c (Post 7036271)
So I just heard on 1040 that theirs a rumor floating around that Bieska for the Habs #1 draft pick Jarred Tinordi, I for one think that would be fricken wicked to have someone that size and young for the Canucks.
I'd do cartwheels around the office if that were to happen. We need a big hard nosed and rugged defensive prospect like him.

raygunpk 07-20-2010 05:23 PM
Lol Bieksa would get eaten up by the Montreal media.

Harvey Specter 07-20-2010 05:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenstoner (Post 7035864)
^ sounds like a retard more than a nerd lol
LOL, exactly what I was thinking when I watched the videos.

Harvey Specter 07-20-2010 05:27 PM
I would give my left nut if the Canucks can pull off that deal and lol, yes Bieksa would be eaten up alive by the Montreal media. I bet he'll request a trade after one season if he plays like he's played for the Canucks for most of his career.

raygunpk 07-20-2010 05:32 PM
TSN: Kovalchuk contract rejected.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:16 AM.
Page 78 of 1648 « First 2868697071727374757677 78 798081828384858687881281785781078 Last »
Show 25 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net