Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/377a6/377a60741f25cad4aafb65b71b84e8119e061080" alt="Reply" |
07-14-2010, 07:57 PM
|
#1 | Ready to be Man handled by RS!
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 82
Thanked 16 Times in 5 Posts
Failed 0 Times in 0 Posts
| Ferrari 458 Challenge Revealed http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2...-revealed.html Quote:
After bringing you some of the first unofficial pics of Ferrari’s F430 Challenge successor, we now have the one-and-only first official photo of the new 458 Challenge race car.
According to Ferrari, the new 458 Challenge weighs significantly less than the production model, although specific numbers have not been given. In addition, this race car gets aluminum bushings, stiffer springs that lower the car by 30mm, 19-inch racing wheels and wider Pirelli racing slicks. Ferrari claims it’s capable of 1.6 Gs of lateral acceleration. Also included are a new generation of Brembo carbon ceramic brakes (called CCM2), that first debuted on the 599XX.
And for the first time on a Ferrari Challenge car, the Prancing Horse has decided to equip its gentleman racers with traction control. The F1-Trac system constantly monitors grip to deliver the most power possible, with a dry track and wet track setting. And because these are real Ferrari race cars, drivers can also opt for CT-OFF on the steering wheel-mounted manettino to completely shut off the traction control system.
Compared to the F430 Challenge car, Ferrari claims the 458 Challenge is two seconds a lap faster on its Fiorano test circuit, setting a new record time of 1:16.5.
The 458 Challenge will run alongside its 430 Challenge predecessor in the 2011 Series, while the latter is phased out. Ferrari also plans to expand its Ferrari Challenge series next year, adding a new series in the Asia-Pacific region.
| |
| |
07-14-2010, 08:03 PM
|
#2 | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 5,541
Thanked 1,109 Times in 299 Posts
Failed 192 Times in 41 Posts
| Quote:
Ferrari claims it’s capable of 1.6 Gs of lateral acceleration
| Holy shit! |
| |
07-14-2010, 08:05 PM
|
#3 | Banned (ABWS)
Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: vancity
Posts: 306
Thanked 74 Times in 22 Posts
Failed 1,244 Times in 130 Posts
|
not aggressive enough. rather have gallardo superlegga
|
| |
07-14-2010, 09:25 PM
|
#4 | Banned (BBM)
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
Failed 1,106 Times in 390 Posts
|
damn 1.6 G is insane
somehow i still like F430 SC better
|
| |
07-14-2010, 11:11 PM
|
#5 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 2,187
Thanked 1,815 Times in 341 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 29 Posts
|
^ me too
__________________ FEEDBACK 2018 Golf R MK7.5 (Daily) 2001 S2000 (Weekend Warrior) 1991 Merc 300 TE-24 AMG Estate - Sold 2005 STi - Sold 1987 AE86 GTS - Sold 1986 AE86 GTS - Sold |
| |
07-14-2010, 11:18 PM
|
#6 | I am on the internets
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,991
Thanked 184 Times in 80 Posts
Failed 129 Times in 31 Posts
|
how much faster and lighter will the next one be???
__________________
"As Sir Francis Bacon once said, 'There is no beauty which hath not some strangeness about its proportions'.
And he's right, who ever he is. I mean, look at Keira Knightley.
She's just an ironing board with a face. And she works." - JC on the Alfa 8C
|
| |
07-15-2010, 05:23 AM
|
#7 | HELP ME PLS!!!
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Burnaby
Posts: 5,541
Thanked 1,109 Times in 299 Posts
Failed 192 Times in 41 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by mqr03 not aggressive enough. rather have gallardo superlegga | 1.6 lateral Gs not aggressive enough for you? |
| |
07-15-2010, 06:17 AM
|
#8 | Media Officer / MOD
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 28,077
Thanked 5,752 Times in 1,725 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 63 Posts
|
The 458 has a more futuristic look comparing to the f360/430 that's why the f430 is so sexy it just looks "right"
But damn 1.6G.... That's amazing Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
07-15-2010, 07:14 AM
|
#9 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,370
Thanked 1,874 Times in 604 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 88 Posts
|
^ 1.6g is crazy impressive, but I am sure it has more to do with slick tires than anything else....
__________________
16 GT3 RS
11 R8 V10
17 Long beach blue M2
86 944 Turbo with 340rwhp Lindsay Racing kit
15 991 PTS GT3
18 VW Golf R
|
| |
07-15-2010, 07:29 AM
|
#10 | Witness protection
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: GVRD
Posts: 14,427
Thanked 5,343 Times in 2,222 Posts
Failed 111 Times in 57 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Z3guy ^ 1.6g is crazy impressive, but I am sure it has more to do with slick tires than anything else.... | going with what we know of F1 cars, would downforce be a factor as well? i don't see much in the way of aerodynamic aids body-wise, and i don't know what the underside of this thing looks like.
__________________ "The guy in the CR-V meanwhile, he'll give you a haughty glare. He's responsibly trying to lessen his impact, but there you go lumbering past him with your loud V8, flouting the new reality. You may as well go do some donuts in a strawberry patch and slalom through a litter of kittens." Dan Frio, Automotive Editor, Edmunds
|
| |
07-15-2010, 07:33 AM
|
#11 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,370
Thanked 1,874 Times in 604 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 88 Posts
|
^ the 458 is an amazing chassis....it has 2x the downforce of a F430 without any gaudy spoilers. Since G load tests are done at relatively low speed, I don't think downforce plays a significant role. Now high speed stability...that is a different ball game.
__________________
16 GT3 RS
11 R8 V10
17 Long beach blue M2
86 944 Turbo with 340rwhp Lindsay Racing kit
15 991 PTS GT3
18 VW Golf R
|
| |
07-15-2010, 07:36 AM
|
#12 | Media Officer / MOD
Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: vancouver
Posts: 28,077
Thanked 5,752 Times in 1,725 Posts
Failed 85 Times in 63 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Z3guy ^ 1.6g is crazy impressive, but I am sure it has more to do with slick tires than anything else.... | Actually the car's design played a big roll with the road holding. The front air dam has a "movable" spliter. Thus directly air to either the grill beside the lights creating downforce while traveling higher speeds. And at low speeds it directs the air underneath Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
07-15-2010, 07:39 AM
|
#13 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: May 2002 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,370
Thanked 1,874 Times in 604 Posts
Failed 217 Times in 88 Posts
|
^ agree, however since G#s are performed at below 100 km/hr, the aero does not play a role in the 1.6g number
__________________
16 GT3 RS
11 R8 V10
17 Long beach blue M2
86 944 Turbo with 340rwhp Lindsay Racing kit
15 991 PTS GT3
18 VW Golf R
|
| |
07-16-2010, 01:04 AM
|
#14 | RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,858
Thanked 2,420 Times in 669 Posts
Failed 530 Times in 136 Posts
|
is lateral sideways or is that longitudinal?
__________________ 2014 Honda Civic Si |
| | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/377a6/377a60741f25cad4aafb65b71b84e8119e061080" alt="Reply" |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:15 AM. |