REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Vancouver LifeStyles (VLS) > Photography Lab

Photography Lab THIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE!
A place to display digital masterpieces, enhance photography skills, photoshop, and share photo tips with one another...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-22-2010, 10:52 PM   #1
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Do we have a need for Full Frame?

Just read this interesting article:

http://www.digitalrev.com/en/do-we-s...s-6677-article

Any thoughts? Is FF worth the price difference with these new cameras coming out with high quality APS-C sensors? (like the 7D)?
Advertisement

Last edited by LiquidTurbo; 09-22-2010 at 11:00 PM.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2010, 11:18 PM   #2
My homepage has been set to RS
 
77civic1200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: burnaby
Posts: 2,284
Thanked 1,275 Times in 303 Posts
Failed 9 Times in 9 Posts
If only for the improvement in DOF, yes


That and I can barely stand the viewfinder in my crop bodies, FF has spoiled me!
__________________
flickr
77civic1200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2010, 11:51 PM   #3
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
You can't really see it with APS-C vs. FF sensors in a small print or on the web, but tonality is also improved with the larger sensor. Of course, the FF medium format backs are on another level.

FF sensors also have less noise, generally speaking. The 7D is never noiseless, whereas the 5DmkII is smooth up to 200 ISO. The problem with the 5DmkII is you cannot get rid of the noise banding when you try and bring out the shadows. The 7D has a much more uniform noise structure.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2010, 11:53 PM   #4
I am grateful grapefruit
 
gars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,094
Thanked 831 Times in 392 Posts
Failed 83 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senna4ever View Post
FF sensors also have less noise, generally speaking.
It's just the A900 that's the exception right? hehehe
gars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 12:19 AM   #5
I WANT MY 10 YEARS BACK FROM RS.net!
 
Soundy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Abbotstan
Posts: 20,721
Thanked 12,136 Times in 3,361 Posts
Failed 1,848 Times in 413 Posts
Is a 4x6 better than a 35mm frame?

Bigger is always better, from a purely quality perspective. The tradeoffs are in cost, size, weight, etc.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira View Post
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta View Post
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
Soundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 12:33 AM   #6
VLS Moderator
 
Senna4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,351
Thanked 2,591 Times in 832 Posts
Failed 61 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gars View Post
It's just the A900 that's the exception right? hehehe
That's why I put the 'generally speaking' part.

Well, yes and no. Up to 400 ISO, the A900 has stellar image quality, then the other FF cameras kill it. But if you compare the noise of a medium format back, the 35mm FF cameras absolutely destroy them. Even though 645 medium format backs are are a bit more than twice that of 35mm FF sensors, the pixel density is roughly the same as a 5DmkII. Those are only usable up to about 200 ISO, then they just fall into a black hole of noise. The Phase One P45+ & P65+ have a special high ISO setting, but they reduce the MP by quite a lot. The MF backs are optimized for maximum sharpness, as they are made for studio use, more so than everyday street shooting.
__________________
2007 Volvo V50
Taken by ex: 2005 Toyota Prius.
R.I.P. 1997 Lexus ES300.
R.I.P. 1989 Acura Legend Coupe LS.
Senna4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net