REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   Accident without winter tires could hike premiums (https://www.revscene.net/forums/630727-accident-without-winter-tires-could-hike-premiums.html)

PK-EK 11-19-2010 04:41 PM

Accident without winter tires could hike premiums
 
Quote:

VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) - ICBC has a reminder, and a warning, if you plan on driving in the snow this season. If you do crash while trying to negotiate slushy or snowy streets, your car better have the right gear.

If it turns out you're more than 25 per cent to blame for an accident on wintery roads, you can expect to pay the price with your insurance premiums. Mark Jan Vrem with ICBC says, "If you are in a collision, and the subsequent investigation determines that the lack of winter tires was one of the factors, it's a possibility that it could affect your liability."


That's something it seems few are aware of on Vancouver streets. A woman tells us, "I did not know that, I wasn't aware of it. But luckily, my husband is on the ball and I have snow tires."

Another person says, "I'll think more before I go driving down the hill... But I see people driving past me; I drive no faster than I can slide."

ICBC says driving without the right winter tires may not be the smartest move, but ultimately it won't affect your ability to make a claim, and shouldn't void your insurance.

http://www.news1130.com/news/local/a...-hike-premiums

What's next?
mandatory snow tires like Quebec?

1exotic 11-19-2010 04:43 PM

repost.
http://www.revscene.net/forums/winte...628369p12.html

PK-EK 11-19-2010 04:44 PM

:facepalm:
FML

jing 11-19-2010 04:50 PM

If you get into an at fault accident your premiums are going to rise regardless
Posted via RS Mobile

Roach 11-19-2010 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jing (Post 7193954)
If you get into an at fault accident your premiums are going to rise regardless
Posted via RS Mobile

Bingo. Any accident where you are deemed over 25% fault means your premiums will increase.

Kev

Hondaracer 11-19-2010 06:18 PM

what about in a truck with all-terrain radials?

if your going through snow with A/T radials and get into an accident who's to say you werent in 4X4 and had an obvious traction advantage VS even a 2 wheel drive with snowy's?

asian_XL 11-19-2010 06:39 PM

170 car accidents in the past 2 days in Calgary.
I'd be pissed if I were the insurers

MindBomber 11-19-2010 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by asian_XL (Post 7194109)
170 car accidents in the past 2 days in Calgary.
I'd be pissed if I were the insurers

I think I'm going to add collision for a couple months..

cococly 11-19-2010 08:36 PM

so Accidents with Snow tires = No insurance premiums?

What is the purpose of this article? To sell more Winter tires?

Nightwalker 11-19-2010 08:54 PM

I thought this was common knowledge.

jeffwilliams17 11-19-2010 09:00 PM

For sure when you're 25% or more at fault your premiums will go up.. But with winter tires you might have a better shot at avoiding an accident in the first place.
Posted via RS Mobile

Soundy 11-19-2010 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cococly (Post 7194265)
so Accidents with Snow tires = No insurance premiums?

What is the purpose of this article? To sell more Winter tires?

You always pay premiums - that's how insurance works.

When you're found at fault in an accident, your premiums go up (unless you repay whatever ICBC had to pay out on the claim).

What they're saying is that if you have an accident, and it's because your car is properly outfitted for the conditions, that you could be assigned a larger portion of the blame... and THAT could affect your premiums.

ICBC has no interest in "selling winter tires". They DO have an interest in reducing accidents, because fewer accidents cost them less money.

TRDood 11-19-2010 10:21 PM

I don't get the point. The same results happen if you hit a pole with or without snow tires. It will still have premium increases.

I appreciate the reminder, but not the misleading/useless article.
Posted via RS Mobile

FerrariEnzo 11-20-2010 03:17 AM

if your not at fault, this would not apply...

moomooCow 11-20-2010 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PK-EK (Post 7193941)
If it turns out you're more than 25 per cent to blame for an accident on wintery roads, you can expect to pay the price with your insurance premiums.

Quote:

Originally Posted by FerrariEnzo (Post 7194759)
if your not at fault, this would not apply...


:thumbsup:

underscore 11-20-2010 06:01 PM

Evenyone should put on winters, the traction levels of summer tires drops as it gets colder, and watching the Vancouver news from Kelowna is funny as hell when it snows because it looks like NOONE puts on winters or knows how to drive.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hondaracer (Post 7194067)
what about in a truck with all-terrain radials?

if your going through snow with A/T radials and get into an accident who's to say you werent in 4X4 and had an obvious traction advantage VS even a 2 wheel drive with snowy's?

4WD doesn't brke any better than 2WD. just sayin'

asian_XL 11-21-2010 02:35 AM

:facepalm: please don't drive on the road when it is snowing, u guys are moron.
Posted via RS Mobile

racerman88 11-21-2010 10:01 AM

they may deem it that your car is not properly equipped for the weather. Like if you choose to drive in pouring rain and you have bald tires, hydroplane and hit something or someone.
Essentially, it is a preventable accident.

Inaii 11-21-2010 10:03 AM

What if you don't have winter tires, but you are deemed not at fault, will ICBC still screw you over? (fyi my car has winter tires, I'm just curious :))

TOPEC 11-21-2010 10:15 AM

another scenario, what if u are waitting at a stop light, and someone read ends u, and pushes u into the car infront of u? i can see icbc trying to put some blame on u saying BS like if u had winter tires u wouldnt have been pushed as easily.

Inaii 11-21-2010 10:21 AM

Actually that one is all year round. If someone rear-ends you and you're pushed into the car in front of you, ICBC deems you at fault because you were obviously too close to the person.

dinamix 11-21-2010 10:37 AM

what if i sprayed this on my tires after the accident


http://tyre-grip.com/images/new_can/new_with_shoe.jpg

FN-2199 11-21-2010 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinamix (Post 7196254)
what if i sprayed this on my tires after the accident


http://tyre-grip.com/images/new_can/new_with_shoe.jpg

Posted via RS Mobile

Obviously, you'll haul the other driver over to distinctly lie that you sprayed your tires with that "sticky shit". Then you'll be 100% at fault and will say, "Fuck. I should have put it on before" :troll:

geeknerd 11-21-2010 09:41 PM

:facepalm:or maybe u can just carry it in ur trunk and say it was already sprayed on -.-

TOPEC 11-21-2010 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inaii (Post 7196243)
Actually that one is all year round. If someone rear-ends you and you're pushed into the car in front of you, ICBC deems you at fault because you were obviously too close to the person.

actually i think its who ever does the rear ending is fully at fault. so if theres a 4some rear ending going on, the 4th/last person would be paying for the other 3 cars.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net