REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2016, 06:51 PM   #1276
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Corn Fields
Posts: 914
Thanked 792 Times in 242 Posts
Failed 275 Times in 82 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by godwin View Post
I don't think US or Australia have mothballed any of their Super Hornets. The Marines had to pull some of their old Hornets.. so the US fighter gap is real.

Boeing has to get authorization from Congress to export to Canada. Also Canada traditionally want their own configurations..

F35 is too compromised for Canada's size.. single engine especially a high performance and rather temperamental one is bad news for Arctic patrol.

However politically Canada has to dance some tricky dance to get around the F35 offset.. hence they are insisting it is an "interim" solution.
There is no such thing as "Arctic patrol". It is incredibly expensive to fly up north for extended periods of time, that is why you only see one or two excerises a year.

The F135 engine is exceeding 90% reliability which is well beyond 2020 targets. This is the most advanced jet engine ever built that is designed for every scenario. There is no such thing as 100% reliability and flying jets has its own risks regardless of number of engines. The US, Norway and Denmark all will be flying their F35s in Arctic environments. We are nothing special when it comes to risks.
Advertisement
belka is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-16-2017, 02:45 PM   #1277
Witness protection
 
thumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: GVRD
Posts: 14,427
Thanked 5,343 Times in 2,222 Posts
Failed 111 Times in 57 Posts

__________________
"The guy in the CR-V meanwhile, he'll give you a haughty glare. He's responsibly trying to lessen his impact, but there you go lumbering past him with your loud V8, flouting the new reality. You may as well go do some donuts in a strawberry patch and slalom through a litter of kittens." Dan Frio, Automotive Editor, Edmunds
thumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2017, 12:12 AM   #1278
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Home*
Posts: 513
Thanked 387 Times in 128 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 14 Posts
red flag? but that doesnt look like nevada in background
Rallydrv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2017, 10:04 AM   #1279
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
roastpuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,267
Thanked 2,930 Times in 1,249 Posts
Failed 45 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rallydrv View Post
red flag? but that doesnt look like nevada in background
Eielson AFB, in Alaska.

U.S. Air Force, Indian Air Force join forces during RED FLAG-Alaska > Eielson Air Force Base > Article Display
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeanutButter View Post
Damn, not only is yours veiny AF, yours is thick AF too. Yours is twice as thick as mine.. That looks like a 2" or maybe even 3"?
roastpuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2017, 03:36 PM   #1280
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Home*
Posts: 513
Thanked 387 Times in 128 Posts
Failed 21 Times in 14 Posts
Rallydrv is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 08-15-2017, 12:11 PM   #1281
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Corn Fields
Posts: 914
Thanked 792 Times in 242 Posts
Failed 275 Times in 82 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by roastpuff View Post
Eielson AFB, in Alaska.
What a shit hole.
belka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2017, 09:37 AM   #1282
Witness protection
 
thumper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: GVRD
Posts: 14,427
Thanked 5,343 Times in 2,222 Posts
Failed 111 Times in 57 Posts
is this still a thing for us? article was from beginning of last month:

Canada mulls buying used Boeing fighter jets from Australia

https://ca.reuters.com/article/domes...CN1BH2H2-OCADN

Quote:
OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada, embroiled in a dispute with Boeing Co over the planned purchase of 18 new Super Hornet fighters, could buy older jets from Australia instead, the defense ministry said on Wednesday.

The Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau suspended talks with Boeing over a possible acquisition after the U.S. firm launched a trade challenge against Canadian planemaker Bombardier Inc.

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan says Canada needs the 18 jets as a stopgap measure until it can run a competition to replace its CF-18 fighters. The CF-18 is Canada’s version of the F-18, a design that is 40 years old.

“In light of Australia recently notifying all allies about their intent to dispose of their F-18 fleet, Canada visited them to inquire about the state of their equipment and spare parts,” Sajjan’s office said in a statement.

“It is too early to provide detailed information about other options,” it added.

Boeing declined to comment. The Australian High Commission (embassy) did not reply to a request for comment.

Sajjan spokeswoman Jordan Owens said Canada had not visited other nations to assess their planes.

Trudeau on Tuesday slammed Boeing’s “unfair and aggressive” challenge against Bombardier, which the U.S. firm alleges is dumping passenger planes in the American market.

Boeing’s Canadian network of aerospace suppliers on Tuesday urged Trudeau to buy the Super Hornets, noting the firm supported more than 17,000 jobs in Canada.

“Our partnership is deep and enduring, but it needs your engagement,” said a letter from 10 firms, a copy of which was seen by Reuters.

Signatories included CAE Inc, Heroux Devtek Inc and Honeywell International Inc. as well as the Canadian arms of General Electric Co and Raytheon Co.

CAE, which has close ties to Bombardier, later noted the letter had not mentioned the Boeing dispute.

Asked for a reaction to the letter, a source familiar with government thinking said the Canadian aerospace sector supported many jobs in the United States.

Australia bought 24 Super Hornets as an interim fleet until it could take delivery of F-35 planes from Lockheed Martin Corp.

Canada’s former Conservative government said in 2010 it would buy 65 F-35s but later scrapped the decision, triggering years of delays and reviews.

Ahead of the 2015 election that brought him to power, Trudeau campaigned against buying the F-35 on the grounds it was too expensive. Officials now say the plane would be eligible to participate in the competition.
[UPDATE] looks like it might happen:

Canada makes first moves toward Australian fighter jet purchase
https://globalnews.ca/news/3796464/c...edium=Facebook
__________________
"The guy in the CR-V meanwhile, he'll give you a haughty glare. He's responsibly trying to lessen his impact, but there you go lumbering past him with your loud V8, flouting the new reality. You may as well go do some donuts in a strawberry patch and slalom through a litter of kittens." Dan Frio, Automotive Editor, Edmunds

Last edited by thumper; 10-11-2017 at 09:26 AM.
thumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2018, 08:51 AM   #1283
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Corn Fields
Posts: 914
Thanked 792 Times in 242 Posts
Failed 275 Times in 82 Posts
Meanwhile in the real world, the F35 makes its first combat appearance used by a real combat capable Air Force. Pretty sure our idiot leader said this thing doesn't work not too long ago. While we are still flying our clapped out F-18s, the F35 will be flying real-world missions and our politicians will be hitting a "reset" on a competition.

The F-35 just made its combat debut

Quote:
Lockheed Martin’s F-35 has seen combat for the first time.

The Israel Defense Forces announced on its Twitter account that the Israeli version of the aircraft, using its “Adir” moniker was used in operational missions.

“The Adir planes are already operational and flying in operational missions,” the tweet said, quoting Israel Air Force head Maj. Gen. Amikam Norkin. “We are the first in the world to use the F-35 in operational activity.”

The Israeli Air Force used the F-35 in two recent strikes in the Middle East, Norkin said, according to the news outlet Haaretz.
https://www.defensenews.com/breaking...-combat-debut/
belka is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 12-02-2021, 08:04 AM   #1284
GO FLAMES GO
 
Tegra_Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 4,609
Thanked 2,210 Times in 701 Posts
Failed 807 Times in 194 Posts
a little bump for the rejection of the f-18 SH.

So it is between the gripen -e and f35.......

More advanced fighter vs cost effective fighter.... I really hope Trudeau goes with the f35 despite costs
__________________
2013 Toyota Tundra CrewMax TRD Offroad *CURRENT*
2005 Nissan Xterra SE *SOLD*
1991 Toyota Hilux Surf SSR-X Widebody *SOLD*
2001 Acura Integra Type-R *SOLD*
Club-Integra.net OG
Your Friendly Neighborhood Firefighter
Tegra_Devil is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net